logo
Public urged to back ban on destructive fishing in protected areas

Public urged to back ban on destructive fishing in protected areas

Yahoo23-07-2025
Bans on destructive fishing across marine protected areas would help restore 'healthy seas' around England, conservationists have said as the Government considers the move.
The Wildlife Trusts are calling on members of the public to lend their voice to support for moves to ban 'bottom trawling' – in which fishing gear is dragged across the seabed destroying habitats and scooping up a wide array of species – in protected areas of English seas.
A consultation is being run by the Marine Management Organisation until September 1, which includes bans on bottom trawling in 41 offshore marine protected areas (MPAs) that have been designated thanks to the importance of their seabeds, in moves to better protect 30,000 square kilometres of sea.
The call from The Wildlife Trusts to support the bans comes as polling for the charities reveals that eight out of 10 people agree that marine wildlife should be treated with the same care as species on land.
The survey of more than 2,000 people by Savanta also revealed that many people did not realise bottom trawling could still take place in many protected areas – with more than a third (36%) believing an MPA designation meant all wildlife and seabeds are protected from damaging activities.
Daniele Clifford, marine conservation officer for The Wildlife Trusts, said the UK's seas were full of 'incredible marine life', with habitats from cold-water corals to sandbanks, muds and chalk reefs supporting species from fish to whales, and storing huge amounts of carbon.
But much of that marine life is threatened, facing pressures such as destructive fishing practices.
Putting in marine protected areas was a 'tried and tested' method to help nature's recovery, but while many had been designated in British waters, they were not doing well because they were still being affected by pressures such as bottom trawling, she said.
The fishing method can destroy the habitat on the seabed, and the nets 'literally sweep up everything in their path', Ms Clifford said, creating a huge amount of bycatch, besides the one or two species targeted, which is then thrown back.
'If land-based nature reserves were being bulldozed, there would be an outcry.
'And yet bottom trawling has been going on for many years in these MPAs. It's about time proper management was implemented,' she said.
'We know that when you reduce pressures on marine life, it helps support their recovery. It's possible to recover our seas, we just need to remove those pressures.'
Unlike on land where active management may be required to help habitats and species recover, seas are more able to bounce back on their own if those pressures are removed, Ms Clifford said.
'You allow nature to do its thing and recover naturally.
'The benefit of this measure is our seas will recover – and we know people want healthy seas,' she said, adding restoring wildlife in MPAs had benefits for wider ocean health and fish stocks.
Where bans have already been implemented in inshore MPAs, Ms Clifford said there were 'astonishingly' signs of recovery quite quickly, pointing to cold-water corals starting to recover within two to three years of restrictions in Lyme Bay, on the south coast, along with increases in scallops and lobsters.
And off the coast of Sussex, largely vanished kelp beds are being helped to recover in a major marine rewilding project thanks to restrictions on bottom trawling introduced in 2021.
The kelp was hit by stormy conditions in the 1980s and bottom trawling, leaving only 4% of the habitat remaining, affecting both an array of wildlife using it for shelter and food, and society which benefits from its role in reducing storm impacts and supporting fish stocks.
The habitat's restoration is 'a long process,' according to George Short, kelp recovery co-ordinator for Sussex Wildlife Trust, one of the partners in the Sussex Kelp Recovery Project.
'One of the key things about our work is letting nature lead in its own recovery.
'It's been impacted for decades, it's not an overnight recovery,' she said.
But nearly five years into the project, monitoring shows mussel beds – which form the hard bed on the seabed that kelp grows on – are starting to recover, as are the black sea bream once targeted by the trawling, she said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Record A-level results but concerns raised about ‘entrenched' regional divides
Record A-level results but concerns raised about ‘entrenched' regional divides

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Record A-level results but concerns raised about ‘entrenched' regional divides

A-level grades have exposed stark divides in results between regions, prompting fears about 'entrenched' inequalities across England. While the overall proportion of entries awarded top grades rose again this year – remaining above pre-pandemic highs – a breakdown shows attainment gaps are widening across some areas of the country. North-east England saw just 22.9% of entries awarded an A or A* grade this year, a record 9.2 percentage points behind London (32.1%), and the only region to see a lower figure than in the pre-pandemic year of 2019. The Education Secretary called the 'entrenched divide' in outcomes and the lack of progress for white working-class children 'concerning'. Education experts suggested that differences in A-level results, which are having an impact on university access, are a symptom of poverty and problems outside the school gates, which mean children's life chances are being determined 'more by their postcode than their potential'. Overall, 28.3% of UK entries were awarded an A or A* grade, up by 0.5 percentage points on last year, when 27.8% achieved the top grades. This was higher than in 2019, the last year that summer exams were taken before the pandemic, when 25.4% of entries were awarded A or A* grades. It is the highest proportion of entries scoring top grades outside the pandemic-affected years of 2020-22, according to the figures from the Joint Council for Qualifications (JCQ) for England, Wales and Northern Ireland. Boys outperformed girls in terms of top A-level grades for the first time in seven years. As results were published, separate Ucas figures showed the number of applicants accepted on to UK degree courses has risen to a record high. The higher education admissions service said 82% of UK 18-year-old applicants awaiting a decision on results day secured their first choice. But Ucas data showed regional disparities remain in university access, with the gap between north-east England and London at the highest on record. Overall, 24.9% of 18-year-olds from north-east England secured a university place on results day, compared with 43.4% of 18-year-olds from London. The gap is now 18.5 percentage points, up from 17.3 percentage points last year and 11.9 percentage points in 2019. At A-level, the A*-A gap between the highest performing region, London, and the lowest, north-east England, is now at its widest since the current system of grading was introduced, according to figures from England's exams regulator Ofqual. Some 32.1% of entries in the capital were awarded A or A* this year, the highest for any region in England and up from 31.3% in 2024. North-east England had the lowest regional percentage this year at 22.9%, down from 23.9% in 2024. It means the gap between these two regions now stands at 9.2 percentage points, up from 7.4 points last year and the largest since the present system of grading began in 2010, according to analysis by the PA news agency. North-east England is one of just two regions to see a year-on-year drop in entries receiving top grades, the other is West Midlands (down from 24.8% to 24.2%). Bridget Phillipson said: 'Every single young person collecting their results today should have the opportunity to pursue their dreams, whether that starts with further study, university, an apprenticeship or the world of work, but too often, opportunities depend on background rather than talent. 'The entrenched divide in outcomes seen over the last few years and the lack of progress for children from white working-class backgrounds is particularly concerning.' On A-level results day, Ms Phillipson said Government education reforms will ensure that all young people are 'truly ready for life and work'. Lee Elliot Major, professor of social mobility at the University of Exeter, said: 'In too many parts of the country, children are arriving at school hungry, anxious and facing the grinding effects of poverty outside the school gates— poor housing, insecure work, a lack of local services. 'Inside the school gates, overstretched schools struggle to meet rising needs. 'Until we tackle these inequities both inside and outside the classroom, we will continue to see children's life chances determined more by their postcode than their potential.' He added: 'These results expose an education system of entrenched regional divides. 'It is a stark reminder that where you grow up still shapes your life chances.' Mr Elliot Major called for a 'region-first approach' to tackling divides that invests in schools and colleges outside London, addresses poverty in places where it 'hits most', and attracts and retains teachers in 'struggling areas'. Chris Zarraga, director of Schools North East, said: 'North East students have done brilliantly again this year, but the structural gap between our region and London has grown yet again. This is not about school quality. 'Every August, our students prove their talent and determination. But we cannot keep pretending the North East–London gap is about standards. It is about deep-rooted structural inequalities that no government has seriously addressed. 'Without urgent, sustained action to tackle them, the gap will keep widening and it will not be because our students or teachers are any less capable.' Paul Whiteman, general secretary of school leaders' union NAHT, said the widening gap needs closer investigation. He said: 'This regional disparity has grown over the past decade, and the reasons need to be properly understood if they are to be tackled. 'This could range from differences in the impact of Covid and the cost-of-living crisis, to specific areas of poverty and varying investment into education, health, social care and other support services and infrastructure in the London and the South compared to the North.' Mr Whiteman added that similar data needed to be collected for vocational technical qualifications (VTQs) 'to build a complete picture of the situation'. JCQ's figures for England, Wales and Northern Ireland show overall pass rate – the proportion of entries graded A* to E – has also risen to 97.5% this year, which is up on last year (97.2%) and the pre-pandemic year of 2019 (97.6%). Sir Ian Bauckham, chief regulator of Ofqual, told the PA news agency that the standard of work required to achieve grades has 'held constant' since 2023. He said any changes were because a 'smaller, smarter cohort' of students had sat their A-level exams this year compared to previous years. The Covid-19 pandemic led to an increase in top grades in 2020 and 2021, with results based on teacher assessments instead of exams. This cohort of school and college leavers received their GCSE results in 2023, the first year that grading was returned to pre-pandemic levels in England. In Wales and Northern Ireland, exam regulators returned to pre-pandemic grading in 2024, a year later than in England. More than 250,000 Level 3 VTQ results have also been awarded to UK students by the JCQ this year. In England, 11,909 students received their T-level results in the fourth year that the qualification has been awarded, and 91.4% achieved at least a pass. Scotland has a different qualification system and students received their results on Tuesday last week.

Florida woman snags $10,000 and 60 invasive snakes in record-breaking 2025 Python Challenge
Florida woman snags $10,000 and 60 invasive snakes in record-breaking 2025 Python Challenge

CBS News

time26 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Florida woman snags $10,000 and 60 invasive snakes in record-breaking 2025 Python Challenge

When it was all said and done Wednesday, a woman emerged as the top snake slayer of the 2025 Florida Python Challenge. The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) announced Taylor Stanberry removed 60 invasive Burmese pythons and claimed the $10,000 Ultimate Grand Prize. Record haul for conservation effort The FWC announced that 934 participants from 30 states and Canada removed a record 294 pythons during the 10-day competition. This year marked the first time Everglades National Park was included among the eight official competition locations. Florida authorities said the competition plays a crucial role in preserving Florida's natural biodiversity and gives residents an active role in environmental protection. A family passion Stanberry, a Naples, Florida resident, alongside her husband, Rhett, runs a Facebook page dedicated to snakes and hunting. The couple also has a YouTube and Instagram page. Python Challenge aims to raise awareness The Florida Python Challenge, now a yearly event, includes public education. "The python, animal that can get 20 feet long and weigh 200 pounds, is destroying the natural food chain. Under the leadership of the FWC, we started the Python Challenge," Ron Bergeron, South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) governing board member, said. The goal is twofold: reduce the impact of the invasive species and raise public awareness about the threat these animals pose to native wildlife in the Greater Everglades ecosystem, state officials said. "The Python Challenge is not just catching pythons. That's a part of it. It's educating the public so that when you're in the Everglades, all of the groups that recreate in the Everglades learn how to remove a python safely year-round," Bergeron said.

OPINION - If you think A Level results are unfair, I've got some news for you
OPINION - If you think A Level results are unfair, I've got some news for you

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

OPINION - If you think A Level results are unfair, I've got some news for you

If teenagers haven't already absorbed that life is unfair, they'll register it by the time they're 18 and find that everyone around them thinks that their entire future hangs on three little letters, or maybe four, these being the grades they got at A-level or its equivalent today. You may well live for eight decades but for those who got their results at 10am – unless they made it to school earlier – it's the six or so hours they took sitting their exams which determine what follows between now and death. That's how it feels. It was fine, chez McDonagh. There were whoops this morning from my daughter's bedroom, which frightened the cat, once she found she's got the grades to get into the Courtauld. But she's tiptoeing round her friends, some of whom fell short of the results they wanted. It's all the more awkward, since it turns out that there are record numbers of A grades this year: 28 per cent of students got an A or starred A, which looks remarkably like grade inflation. There are in fact marked gender and regional disparities when it comes to A levels. Many more girls – 440,000 - than boys – 380,000 - took A-levels than male students. The boys were concentrated in subjects such as maths, physics and economics in which they did slightly better than girls, but it's striking, that disparity in numbers. As for the regional imbalance, it's even more marked, and London is on the right side of the divide. Some 32 per cent of entries here got a starred A or A; a little under 23 per cent in the north east of England did so. I hate to say this, but London doesn't have a premium on native intelligence over Sunderland I hate to say this, but London doesn't have a premium on native intelligence over Sunderland; there's something else at work, and it's probably the enhanced pupil premium that the capital was so good at demanding and getting in previous years, though the number of private schools may also have something to do with it. Private schools are genius at producing top grades. And there are tricks to getting them: A levels are to a dispiriting extent nowadays a matter of jumping through hoops, in giving examiners the chance to tick boxes (it's not a figure of speech) when they see candidate using the formulas and language that they are looking for. In the humanities, and I've been through this twice now, you aren't marked on your engagement with the subject or your knowledge of it, so much as your ability to make the requisite number of points in the required fashion. And if you don't, you're toast. Notwithstanding the inflated A grades, there are lots of young people out there who are feeling like failures because they didn't measure up to a narrow standard of performance in a narrow range of subjects. You want to bring them together for a collective pep talk to say that, actually, once you're at work, no one cares what you did or where you went. No one has ever asked for proof of my university qualifications, ever and certainly not A levels. What matters is whether you're good at your job, a decent worker, a pleasant colleague. People may ask where you went to university by way of conversation, but there's quite a bit of kudos in not having a degree, the currency now being so widely spread. This year, about 38 per cent of 18 year olds will go to university. It carries zero bragging rights. My father left school in Ireland at 14 and went straight to work in a pottery. It's possible to flourish outside higher education. And yet one of my daughter's friends is trying to find a way to tell her parents that actually, she doesn't want to go to university; she wants to join the armed services. I mean, which is cooler, having a daughter who's an RAF pilot or a girl who, after three years of media studies, still isn't quite sure where she's going, only she's going to be taking an awful lot of student debt with her? The more important aspect of A levels is that it's the culmination of about 15 years of education, in my children's case, courtesy of the state. And it's those 15 years which matter, not the exams that mark their ending. That schooling takes up most of a young life, in the course of which an individual is formed by school, teachers, friends, the state and that intangible thing, the wider culture. In other words, A levels may be the culmination of a lifetime's schooling but they're not the measure of it. They're a narrow assessment of a narrow range of subjects, useful chiefly as an entry to higher education, which isn't for everyone. Other aspects of the years at school matter more. If you've done well, congratulations. But if you didn't, it needn't matter. The adventure of life isn't defined by the letters A to C. Melanie McDonagh is a columnist for The London Standard

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store