
Beware texts asking for personal details
KLANG: Any short messaging service (SMS) content that includes hyperlinks, callback numbers or requests for personal information is likely to be from scammers rather than legitimate sources.
According to a source involved in network security, the Malaysian Communication and Multimedia Commission (MCMC) issued a statement last year regarding this matter.
He noted that the MCMC had announced that, as of September 2024, the sending of hyperlinks, callback numbers and requests for personal information via SMS would be prohibited.
This directive had been communicated to all telecommunication companies, he added.
However, the source, who wished to remain anonymous, noted that the MCMC faced several additional challenges, especially regarding Internet messaging services such as Google's Rich Communication Services (RCS) and Apple's iMessage.
Both of these services are integrated within the SMS application. Consequently, if there is a message icon displayed on the phone, it allows users to receive RCS and iMessage as well.
'I believe both Google and Apple have not 'ingested' the rules issued by the MCMC,' he said.
He said the MCMC seems determined to enforce the prohibition ruling on both platforms, given that many had become victims of scams after receiving bogus messages, including those allegedly from the government.
In addition to these, there were other conduits that facilitated scams, including fake base stations, commonly referred to as rogue base stations or Stingrays.
'Phones try to connect to the strongest signals available, and hence, if there is a fake base station with a strong signal, phones will try connecting to it.
'Once connected to the fake base station, scammers operating these bogus transmission stations can send out SMSes that contain hyperlinks and other banned content.
'They can also craft the messages into whatever they want them to be,'' he explained.
The expert noted that the MCMC is collaborating with telecommunications companies to combat these issues as part of their efforts to eliminate scamming platforms.
To make matters worse, conmen were also spoofing the numbers of telecommunications account holders and using them to perpetrate scams by generating what is referred to as 'boomerang traffic'.
'International calls come in and connect to the telcos here through local numbers.
'To curb this, a repository must be created to ensure that when calls from local numbers come from overseas, the caller is indeed overseas and the calls are not coming from spoofed local numbers,' he added.
He explained that when mobile phone users travel overseas, their numbers must go into the repository, as they would be expected to call home from wherever they are.
'But if the account holders are in Malaysia and not overseas, and if calls are being made from their numbers but originating from overseas, the repository should reject those calls,' he said, noting that he is aware the MCMC is also pushing for this aspect.
He said the onus must also be on members of the public to be cautious and immediately delete SMSes that come with hyperlinks seeking personal information as well as with callback numbers.
'They are from scammers and not from any legitimate source,' he added.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
AI agent adoption rates are at 50% in tech companies. Is this the future of work?
Agent AI is, for the moment, one of the most advanced forms of the new technology, in which agents informed by AI can carry out more complex tasks than the large language model chatbot tools. — Pixabay Artificial intelligence use in the workplace keeps growing, and it's no surprise the tech sector is a leader in harnessing those tools. But a new report from the accounting and consulting giant EY makes clear just how quickly the industry has gotten onboard the AI train. The firm quizzed senior executives and found incredibly positive sentiment toward AI and its promise for helping companies grow, with nary a hint of the kind of doubts found in other recent reports. You may think it's obvious that tech firms think they'll benefit from AI – after all, Google has said it will spend US$100bil (RM425.60bil) on next-gen tech, and certainly expects to reap the benefits of that investment. Microsoft, Meta, OpenAI, and others have revealed similar plans. But the point is, it's not just the big names with big investments that feel this way. And in our technology-centric world, tech firms blaze a trail that other industries then follow. EY's Technology Pulse Poll surveyed over 500 senior technology company leaders – and reported that nearly half of them said they were already fully deployed or were in the process of adopting agent AI tech into their company. Agent AI is, for the moment, one of the most advanced forms of the new technology, in which 'agents' informed by AI can carry out more complex tasks than the large language model chatbot tools popularised by OpenAI's ChatGPT application. Big service providers like Salesforce, Google, and numerous other firms are now in the early phases of rolling out what OpenAI's CEO Sam Altman has heralded as the next generation of AI tools. The executives EY spoke to are putting their money where their mouths are. A whopping 92% expect to actually increase the amount they spend on AI over the next year – a 10% point rise from 2024. This effectively means nearly every tech executive in the survey plans to spend more on AI in the near future, a clear sign that whatever experimental phase agent AI was in is over, and the tech has been widely accepted despite bumps in its development. We're far beyond snake oil territory with that kind of leadership buy-in. Ken Englund, technology sector growth leader at EY, confirmed in an email interview with Inc. that he believes this AI funding is 'coming from the reprioritisation of existing programs and some operational efficiencies at technology organisations.' Essentially, last year leaders spent a little on AI as part of 'pilots and proof of concepts,' Englund thinks. This year, the spending is the real thing. The spending increase may be driven by these leaders' general enthusiasm for AI, which has attracted billions in investment capital and is already reshaping the landscape with the massive data centers needed to power it. EY found 81% were optimistic about the tech's potential to help their company reach its goals in the next year. And nearly six in 10 survey respondents said they believed their organisation was ahead of competitors in AI investment. EY notes that this may signal a 'clear shift' toward prioritising AI in long-term business planning. Again, this level of executive buy-in is beyond mere 'keeping up with the Joneses' investment levels, which would try to ensure their company isn't left behind the leading edge of the newest technology craze. The positive sentiment from tech executives certainly runs counter to recent research –including data from tech giant Lenovo, which suggested the one thing keeping companies from maximising the potential benefits from AI tech deployments was hesitancy from company leadership. Fully 55% of IT leaders surveyed by Lenovo said a 'lack of vision' on digital workplace transformation is on their lists of the top three obstacles preventing access to greater AI benefits. It's understandable from a C-suite perspective – this transformation is essentially a total reimagining of many workplace norms, which the experts say is needed if AI is to really bring a return on investments. Englund also partly addressed this issue, noting that 'The prevailing mindset among executives is that agentic AI will be a positive-sum scenario in which productivity will drive net-new growth,' he said. 'Certainly, they expect efficiencies in existing work processes,' adding that 'agentic AI will likely create entirely new workflows in an enterprise.' This may even include replacing, reskilling, or repositioning the leadership team itself, of course. Lastly, reskilling and upskilling of workers has been something other reports suggest will be necessary as AI hits the workplace. EY's data shows tech leaders are conscious of this issue. Seventy percent of those surveyed were 'focusing on upskilling,' while 68% were 'hiring AI-skilled talent.' More positively, only 9% were planning on layoffs in the next six months, implying, perhaps, that AI isn't outright replacing many workers yet. Why should you care about this? For one main reason: If tech leaders are leading the AI charge, other companies in other sectors will follow in their wake once the benefits of AI tech are proven. EY's report contains such a positive vibe about AI that it stands out against other more dystopian AI reporting, and counters data showing about half of US workers worry they'll lose their job to AI. – Inc./Tribune News Service

Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
Don't kneecap us: Google opposes Chrome break-up in antitrust fight
NEW YORK, May 31 — Google yesterday urged a US judge to reject the notion of making it spin off its Chrome browser to weaken its dominance in online search. Rival attorneys made their final arguments before US District Court Judge Amit Mehta, who is considering imposing 'remedies' after a landmark decision last year that Google maintained an illegal monopoly in search. US government attorneys have called on Mehta to order Google to divest itself of Chrome browser, contending that artificial intelligence is poised to ramp up the tech giant's dominance as the go-to window into the internet. They also want Google barred from agreements with partners such as Apple and Samsung to distribute its search tools, which was the focus of the suit against the Silicon Valley internet giant. Three weeks of testimony ended early in May, with Friday devoted to rival sides parsing points of law and making their arguments before Mehta in a courtroom in Washington. John Schmidtlein, an attorney for Google, told Mehta that there was no evidence presented showing people would have opted for a different search engine without the exclusivity deals in place. Schmidtlein noted that Verizon installed Chrome on smartphones even though the US telecom titan owned Yahoo! search engine and was not bound by a contract with Google. Of the 100 or so witnesses heard at trial, not one said 'if I had more flexibility, I would have installed Bing' search engine from Microsoft, the Google attorney told the judge. 'More flexibility' Department of Justice (DoJ) attorney David Dahlquist countered that Apple, which was paid billions of dollars to make Chrome the default browser on iPhones, 'repeatedly asked for more flexibility' but was denied by Google. Google contends that the United States has gone way beyond the scope of the suit by recommending a spinoff of Chrome, and holding open the option to force a sale of its Android mobile operating system. 'Forcing the sale of Chrome or banning default agreements wouldn't foster competition,' said Cato Institute senior fellow in technology policy Jennifer Huddleston. 'It would hobble innovation, hurt smaller players, and leave users with worse products.' Google attorney Schmidtlein noted that more than 80 percent of Chrome users are outside the United States, meaning divestiture would have global ramifications. 'Any divested Chrome would be a shadow of the current Chrome,' he contended. 'And once we are in that world, I don't see how you can say anybody is better off.' The potential of Chrome being weakened or spun off comes as rivals such as Microsoft, ChatGPT and Perplexity put generative artificial intelligence (AI) to work fetching information from the internet in response to user queries. The online search antitrust suit was filed against Google some five years ago, before ChatGPT made its debut, triggering AI fervor. Google is among the tech companies investing heavily to be a leader in AI, and is weaving the technology into search and other online offerings. Kneecap Google? Testimony at trial included Apple vice president of services Eddy Cue revealing that Google's search traffic on Apple devices declined in April for the first time in over two decades. Cue testified that Google was losing ground to AI alternatives like ChatGPT and Perplexity. Mehta pressed rival attorneys regarding the potential for Google to share data as proposed by the DoJ in its recommended remedies. 'We're not looking to kneecap Google,' DoJ attorney Adam Severt told the judge. 'But, we are looking to make sure someone can compete with Google.' Schmidtlein contended that data Google is being asked to share contains more than just information about people's online searches, saying it would be tantamount to handing over the fruit of investments made over the course of decades. 'There are countless algorithms that Google engineers have invented that have nothing to do with click and query data,' Schmidtlein said. 'Their remedy says we want to be on par with all of your ingenuity, and, respectfully your honor, that is not proportional to the conduct of this case.' — AFP


The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Microsoft wants to radically change the way you surf the web
Microsoft sees artificial intelligence transforming the Internet as fundamentally as mobile phones have over the past two decades. But the technology's limitations could curb Microsoft's grand vision. Generative AI – which creates content based on a user's request – burst into the zeitgeist in late 2022 when Microsoft-backed OpenAI launched ChatGPT, a conversational chatbot that could take a simple request and generate anything from a limerick to a college essay. Less than three years later, Microsoft has a plan to move beyond ChatGPT and its copycats by creating the foundation for a new version of the internet. Microsoft and its tech peers say the technology is moving fast. The industry is pouring billions into AI infrastructure and companies are restructuring corporate workforces to create agile teams for a shifting landscape. A week before Microsoft announced its ambitions for a new AI ecosystem, the company laid off more than 6,000 people in an effort to flatten management layers. Microsoft calls it the "open agentic web," with users sending AI-powered "agents" out into the void to do their bidding. Casual consumers primarily interact with AI now through a Google search – one that repeatedly drums up false answers – or a ChatGPT-esque chatbot that generates a conversation. In Microsoft's eyes, chatbots are old news. Microsoft's vision is a digital world in which autonomous agents interact with each other throughout the Internet. For example, a user who wants to schedule a vacation will delegate an agent to venture through the muck and find flights, hotels and an itinerary that fit their budget, work that users currently have to do themselves. At the company's developer-focused Build conference in Seattle last week, CEO Satya Nadella explained the framework Microsoft wants to provide as it tries to remake the web. He used more technical examples of the agents, demonstrating them fixing bugs in computer code, creating PowerPoint presentations and sorting expense reports. All of the demonstrations were done toward the top of what Microsoft calls the AI stack. Other companies, and Microsoft, are building agents and AI models to interact with the data below them. Toward the bottom of the stack is an infrastructure that Microsoft supports. One aspect of it is establishing a protocol, the set of rules computers follow to talk with one another. Microsoft favors one called Model Context Protocol. Kevin Scott, the company's chief technology officer, likens it to HTTP in the Internet, a standard that everyone can use to build out the web. The new protocol allows AI agents to go from website to website, collecting data and interacting with other agents. "It's filling an incredibly important niche," Scott said during a keynote address on May 19. Of course, Microsoft isn't alone in looking for the next big thing in AI. OpenAI spurred a wave of competing products from companies like Google, Meta and Elon Musk's xAI. The tech giants' looking beyond chatbots and angling to change the web from click-based to agent-based is creating a new competition. Chirag Shah, a professor of information science at the University of Washington, said this could be a problem. The World Wide Web Consortium, a neutral party, has maintained standards for the internet's development since 1994. Microsoft can dictate the standards it wants for an agentic web but nobody has to accept them, Shah said. "I don't see this as changing the web," he said. "I see this as one set of ideas that already has competition." Shah has worked for Microsoft in the past but does not currently. Since the idea behind the agentic web is an ecosystem of errand runners zooming around autonomously, its success is predicated on pulling accurate information and doing things correctly. Since ChatGPT launched in 2022, chatbots and other AI-infused tech have struggled with accuracy. Last month, social media users discovered a quirk with Google's AI Overview. If a user added the word "meaning" to a nonsensical idiom, Google's AI would confidentially spit out a fictitious origin for the phrase. In the week leading up to Build, xAI's Grok chatbot started promoting conspiracy theories about white genocide in South Africa on Musk's social media platform, X. The replies from Grok were under posts wholly unrelated to the conspiracy theories. XAI said it was due to an unauthorised modification. On May 20, a day after Nadella and Scott announced their agentic web ambitions to a crowd of hundreds, 404 Media reported that the Chicago Sun-Times had used AI to create a book recommendation article. The problem? The list featured nonexistent books from authors and completely made-up quotes. Humans make mistakes on the Internet as well. They're duped by misinformation, they fall for phishing scams and they read clickbait. But they understand the consequences of those mistakes, Shah said. Chatbots and agents don't. If an agent makes a mistake, will it know before it interacts with another and compounds it? "It's the equivalent to giving someone US$100 (RM425) and telling them to go shop for you," Shah said. "And that's low risk, but think about health care, legal issues and making financial decisions. "There are great consequences to making mistakes there." A new language AI adoption is another obstacle Microsoft faces. The company boasts that developers are pumping more agents into the ecosystem. It also said several websites like the live events platform Eventbrite and e-commerce company Shopify adopted a new software language project called NLWeb that allows a more fluid AI experience. NLWeb, like HTML was for the Internet, is Microsoft's plan to revamp the way the web works. It's exciting technology for those in the tech industry. Shah said it's what developers have been hoping for, creating a natural language for casual Internet users to search websites. But just like self-driving cars, while the technology is improving, there's a limit to widespread use. Autonomous vehicles are tested and deployed in limited markets. Microsoft hopes for the world to adopt the agentic web, but the future of it could be quite limited. "We're not ready, all of us, to give up our agency to these systems," Shah said. "It's not radically replacing the web as we know it." – The Seattle Times/Tribune News Service