When jobs ads open for Geelong's biggest hotel revealed
The 200-room Crowne Plaza Geelong is a key component of the Nyaal Banyul Geelong Convention and Event Centre which is under construction on the waterfront.
Industry veteran John Dickson has been appointed Crowne Plaza Geelong's general manager and has hit the ground running ahead of an expected opening early next year.
Mr Dickson said a date hasn't been set to welcome the first paying guests, but revealed the hotel would open before the convention centre, once the pre-opening team had been recruited and the hotel put through its paces.
'We'll get the hotel handed over to us from the builder towards the end of the year and we'll start co-ordinating the installation of furniture and fittings and equipment and all the operating supplies that we need to present the hotel to a standard so we'll be ready to open,' Mr Dickson said.
'This sounds easy but I can tell you it goes into detail from picking knives and forks for the restaurant and the bed linen and towelling for the rooms and everything in between.
'In January, we'll put the staff through for a trial stay under normal hotel conditions and we'll test everything to make sure that everything works exactly as it should.'
Head of sales and marketing Karen Jackson is Mr Dickson's first appointment, while recruiting has opened for human resources and finance manager.
'Over the course of the next three to four months, the management team will come on board, and then towards the end of the year we've got some assistants and supervisors to come on board, and then we'll also recruit in December for all of the front of house people,' he said.
'We're going to be around 90-plus people for the pre-opening period, and then we'll be in the new year, we'll train them up in January.'
Among the people to be recruited will be a sommelier, who will oversee the wine selection that will heavily feature Geelong, Bellarine Peninsula and Surf Coast producers, and mixologists for the hotel's 10-floor Sky Bar.
'The Sky Bar will be a unique aspect of the hotel. That'll be a 90-seat cocktail bar on the 10th floor of the hotel, overlooking Corio Bay.'
The up-market bar and lounge will have its own kitchen and be available for before and after dinner and for functions.
'That will be a great asset for the hotel and for our guests, but also for locals to. It obviously will have amazing views.'
An all-day Italian trattoria on level one will include a 100-seat restaurant and a 60-seat bar, with a wood-fired pizza oven.
The $120m hotel is fully funded by Plenary Group and will be operated by IHG Hotels & Resorts under the Crowne Plaza brand.
retail, commercial and mixed-use spaces.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
34 minutes ago
- ABC News
Off the productivity round table: What won't be discussed this week
Problem and productivity. It's a pairing that has become inseparable in recent times, given our productivity growth is the lowest in half a century. It'll also be a major point of discussion at the Economic Reform Roundtable that kicked off in Canberra this week. For a while, it appeared the entire forum would be devoted to the topic with our best and brightest assembled to nut out a way to address it. But solutions generally can only be found if we truly understand the root cause of the problem. And that's where things go horribly wrong when it comes to any discussion around labour productivity. A seemingly simple concept — the amount of product produced over a given period of time by the same amount of labour — understanding what drives it can be complex and prone to misinterpretation. And that's before you consider the difficulties in even measuring labour productivity, particularly in an economy such as ours where the vast bulk of workers, instead of churning out easily countable widgets, are providing services to other people. Professor Roy Green from the University of Technology points to Australian manufacturing's demise — which now accounts for just 6 per cent of our GDP — as a major contributor to our productivity conundrum. There is, he says, "an almost exact correlation between the decline of manufacturing, the decline of business expenditure on research and development and the decline of productivity growth, now at its lowest level in almost 60 years". And then there are factors that are totally off the agenda. For such a pointy headed topic, finding answers often involve traversing areas that are socially, culturally and politically explosive. In many cases, economists — fearing a community backlash — refuse to even mention some of the more obvious topics that have a legitimate bearing on productivity. That involves two other P-words: population and property. Many business leaders and most politicians confuse productivity with profitability. There's a common misconception that, if only we could keep wages in check, our labour productivity problems could fix themselves. True, there's a link between wages and how much we produce but, even then, it's not completely understood. If lower wages were the key to better productivity, company executives should have penalties imposed for underperformance rather than bonuses for turning up. Reserve Bank governor Michele Bullock lamented last week's decision to downgrade its labour productivity forecasts for the nation, a move that sent headline writers into a frenzy. Rising productivity, she said, lifts living standards as it provides the scope for workers to earn higher wages without putting pressure on inflation. But there's a catch. Businesses need to invest in new technology to help workers lift productivity. And they'll only do that if wages are rising, so they can reduce costs and boost profit. So, what comes first? Do higher wages lead to better productivity? Or does better productivity lead to higher wages? Just between us, no-one really knows. Luckly for the RBA governor, she declared it well and truly outside her remit. "All the Reserve Bank can do is make sure we have low and stable inflation, and if we have full employment, both of those things are very stable environments for businesses to think about how they might improve productivity, how they might produce more for the same amount of labour and capital input," she said. Once upon a time, there was no such thing as an automated carwash. You either did it yourself or paid people to do it by hand. When the first auto washing machine opened in Australia in 1968, it sparked what should have been a trend to lay waste to the old style, expensive hand washing. Cheaper and quicker, with minimal labour input, it's a perfect example of a productivity improvement. But in the past 20 years, there's been a resurgence in car hand washing operations. You'll find them everywhere, in shopping centre car parks and on highway corners. Why? Perhaps hand washing delivers a superior finish. But the biggest factor may well be that hand washing comes at a competitive price because labour costs are no longer prohibitive. Regardless of the reason, it's a negative for our productivity numbers. Sydney University academic Salvatore Babones penned an interesting piece in the Australian Financial Review this week, sheeting home the blame for our tardy performance in labour productivity to our surging population growth. Most new arrivals, he points out, are not highly skilled, nor are they permanent. "Massive influxes of low-skilled workers are obvious drivers of trends in labour productivity," he wrote. "But they're not even mentioned in recent Reserve Bank of Australia and Productivity Commission reports." Only around half the 1 million students — who make up about 10 per cent of the workforce — in Australia attend a university. The rest are in courses primarily designed to deliver a working visa. The huge influx has artificially kept GDP numbers elevated. But it's been at the expense of productivity. In those proportions, they act as a cheap source of labour which, when combined with a rigid wage setting system, maintains a lid on wages growth, and dampens the incentive for businesses to invest. "If you flood the labour market with low-skilled immigrants, real wages (adjusted for inflation) will fall, and productivity will decline as labour is used less efficiently," he wrote. "It's that simple." As Babones points out, Australia may look down on other countries that exploit cheap, imported labour. But we do the same, under the guise of education visas. As they hunker down in working groups in the national capital this week, the dominant topic for conversation will be tax. There'll be furious debate about cutting the corporate tax rate and increasing the GST. But there is no guarantee either of those measures will lead to increased business investment or improve productivity. That's because businesses that earn bigger profits don't automatically invest the windfall gains. Most of the time they hand it back to shareholders, or at least a large slab of it. Our productivity may be among the worst in the developed world and our business investment woeful. But there is one area where Australians exceed on the investment front. Our obsession with real estate has resulted in a deluge of cash directed into housing. It's why our real estate is so horrifyingly expensive. According to the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority, as a nation we are in hock to the tune of $2.3 trillion on property mortgages. And that's expected to rise as interest rates ease. More than 2.26 million Australians own an investment property, largely because of favourable tax policies that deliberately direct investment into real estate. It may be a radical idea but altering some of those tax policies, such as negative gearing and the capital gains tax discount, might have two beneficial impacts. It may lead to more affordable housing in the future. And it might result in resources being better allocated to more productive means. Just don't mention it in Canberra this week.
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Productivity summit begins with a warning on NDIS spending
Treasurer Jim Chalmers says this week's productivity round table will be about writing "the next chapter of economic reform" as he calls on business leaders, union chiefs and advocates attending the summit to provide "concrete ideas" that help the Albanese government turbocharge the economy. Opening the three-day event in Canberra, Mr Chalmers will urge participants to focus on three objectives: making the economy more productive to lift living standards, measures to sandbag Australia's economy and repairing the budget. "Global uncertainty surrounds us, big economic challenges confront us, and our ambitions must meet this moment," he is expected to say. "Our progress in the near term … gives us the time and space to attend to the bigger, more persistent structural issues." The treasurer will point to pressures in energy, demography, technology and geopolitics, warning that Australia must act despite global instability. "We are realistic about the impact of all of this but optimistic too," he will say. The National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) is set to loom large over the summit, with Thursday's session on budget sustainability and tax reform expected to examine its rapidly escalating cost. That conversation will come a day after Health Minister Mark Butler is expected to make a significant policy announcement on Wednesday aimed at tightening elements of the disability insurance scheme amid reports that 16 per cent of six-year-old boys are now recipients. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese on Monday flagged the need for reform, citing concerns about its growth trajectory. "We need to make sure the system's sustainable," he told Sky News. He added that reforms passed last year to rein in NDIS spending growth to 8 per cent was an "interim target", with that growth rate still well outpacing broader GDP growth. With annual costs projected to surpass $64 billion by 2029, the NDIS is on track to become the third most expensive item in the budget, behind only health and aged pensions. The Coalition has signalled it is open to further savings, with Shadow Treasurer Ted O'Brien saying in July the scheme must be made sustainable. The NDIS, as well as defence, debt costs, health and aged care will be among the structural issues up for discussion. In an interview with the ABC, Mr Chalmers framed the productivity discussions as an effort to "work out what additional steps we need to take to make our economy more productive so that we lift living standards over time". He told the ABC his case has been strengthened by the Reserve Bank's downgrade of growth forecasts from 1 per cent to 0.7 per cent last week. "The contribution from the Reserve Bank was confronting but nonetheless welcome because it helps people understand what we're up against," he said. RBA Governor Michele Bullock will address the summit on Tuesday morning. Another looming challenge is how to replace the billions of dollars raised each year from fuel excise as Australians switch from petrol to electric vehicles. A road-user charge is under active consideration, but both the model and timing are yet to be finalised. Government sources told the ABC a likely approach is a tapered model, beginning first with heavy vehicles before being extended more broadly. The aim would be to balance fairness for early adopters with the long-term need to protect the revenue base that funds roads and infrastructure. Mr Chalmers confirmed the issue is on the agenda, but stressed the government is not rushing. "The tax base is going to change dramatically over time … We're in no rush to make changes here. We want to work through the issues in a considered, consultative, methodical way," he said. He added that discussions with state and territory governments have been ongoing since before the election, given their shared reliance on road funding. "We haven't settled a model, we haven't set a time frame. This work will take a lot of time to get right. But a government will address this challenge and we've said we're prepared to grapple with it with our colleagues and that's what we're doing."
News.com.au
8 hours ago
- News.com.au
Australia has ‘big problems' as AI revolution creeps in
Nationals MP Barnaby Joyce has warned millions of Aussies could lose their jobs, drawing parallels between AI's growing presence in Australian workplaces and working from home. Joyce criticised a new proposal from the Australian Services Union (ASU), which calls for employers to be required to give employees six months' notice before mandating a return to the office. The union also proposes that work-from-home requests should be presumed approved unless an employer validly objects, with any changes to arrangements also subject to the same six-month notice. The union also argues that employers must genuinely attempt to reach an agreement with the employee, respond within 14 days to work-from-home requests, and if refusing, set out the business grounds for doing so. But Joyce says that's all 'absurd'. 'What you're doing there is encouraging people not to employ people. You can't just say you're going to work from home today or you won't have a job,' he said on Channel 7's Sunrise. Host Natalie Barr pushed back, informing the politician that many people can and do work from home successfully. But Joyce says employees should be 'doing everything in their power' to ensure their position remains viable as AI creeps into the workplace. 'I think you got to be careful. It's not a myth, AI is coming. What you're doing is encouraging people to say 'OK, stay home for the whole week because you don't have a job anymore'. AI is coming into clerical work and remove jobs left, right, and centre,' he rebutted. 'I'd be doing everything in your power to try and keep your jobs because if people can prove they don't need to come to the office, then the office can prove they can be replaced by AI. Be really careful in not being enthusiastic about not going to the office and getting to work.' When asked on exactly how Australia could safeguard jobs, Joyce took a defeatist tone. 'I don't know whether you can, that's the problem,' he said. 'What you have to do is broaden the base of the economy, so there are alternate jobs to go to. But in our genius, we have decided to go to net zero and intermittent power, so we don't have an industrial base to absorb those jobs and that is one of the big problems we've got.' Barr then questioned minister for Social Services Tanya Plibersek about claims that AI could generate a net increase in jobs. 'I think there will be different types of jobs. A lot of the repetitive work will be done by AI in the future and what we need to do is make sure there are good jobs available for Australians in new and emerging industries as well,' she said. 'We've got real capacity to develop some of those AI tools right here. 'The big data centres we're going to need to run some of these programs can be based right here and they can be powered by renewable energy. We have the cheapest form of energy available to us here in Australia. Solar, wind, we know it's the cheapest form of new energy.' Barr then pointed out that AI cannot readily replicate skilled trades and asked if Australians should learn trades instead. 'You are dead right,' Joyce responded. They should because I can assure to my accountancy days, electricians overwhelmingly earn more money than people who have graduated with arts degrees. Doctors can go and make good money, no doubt about that. But AI won't be able to turn itself into a plumber or itself into an electrician or a chippy, so trades are a place where you can sustain a good level of employment. But if you are just in clerical work ... that's what its genius does, (it) replaces people but it doesn't have hands and it doesn't have feet.' Jobs and Skills Australia forecasts that routine clerical roles (receptionists, general and accounting clerks) are most vulnerable to automation, while most occupations (79 per cent) face low automation exposure and high augmentation potential. AI is already being used in place of customer service and administration roles, with real-life examples already emerging in Sydney, such as the sacking of medical receptionists after their employer found AI systems could complete their job. The Social Policy Group estimates up to one-third of the Australian workforce could face temporary unemployment by 2030 at current AI adoption levels. Meanwhile, some CEOs are warning the public that those who don't get in line will fall behind, with Airwallex CEO Jack Zhang warning that employees must use AI daily, or risk losing their jobs. A recent report into the Australian government's AI ecosystem shows rapid growth in AI businesses, research output, and AI-based hiring, particularly across Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, and Perth. But sentiments are mixed on the revolutionary and potentially dangerous technology. A recent Ipsos survey showed that while 40 per cent of workers believe AI makes jobs easier, roughly the same proportion (39 per cent ) worry about security. Academic analysis reveals that AI is increasing demand for complementary human skills, including digital literacy, teamwork, and resilience, but is quickly diminishing roles tied to repetitive skills. Net demand for human skills is rising, especially where AI augments rather than replaces.
