EPF accumulates Gamuda shares, cuts position in KPJ Healthcare
Muhammed Ahmad Hamdan
KUALA LUMPUR: The Employees Provident Fund (EPF) has been snapping up shares in Gamuda Bhd, lifting its stake in the property and infrastructure giant by more than four percentage points since the start of the year.
EPF now holds an 11.91 per cent stake or 686.64 million shares in Gamuda, up from 7.51 per cent or 427.37 million shares on Jan 2. This represents a net accumulation of 259.27 million shares over the past four months.
Gamuda's stock last changed hands at RM3.99, 15.11 per cent or 71 sen lower than RM4.70 at the start of the year. It's market capitalisation stood at RM20.01 billion.
Year-to-date, the stock has traded between a low of RM3.59 and a high of RM5.20, compared to its 52-week range of RM2.60 to RM5.38.
The counter has received five 'strong buy', 12 'buy' and two 'hold' calls, with a consensus target price of RM5.27, according to Bursa Marketplace.
The 12-month target price implies an upside potential of 32.15 per cent from the current price of RM3.99.
Gamuda, which pays semiannual dividends, declared a first interim payout of five sen per share on Jan 23, together with a dividend reinvestment plan at RM3.81 per share.
For the second quarter ended Jan 31, 2025, the group posted a 17 per cent year-on-year jump in revenue to RM3.90 billion, while net profit climbed five per cent to RM218.85 million.
Cumulatively, for the first half of its financial year, revenue surged 31 per cent to RM8.04 billion, with net profit rising five per cent to RM424.24 million compared to the same period a year ago.
RHB Investment Bank Bhd, which has a 'buy' call on Gamuda, said the group boasts strong prospects from upcoming infrastructure projects.
It cited Gamuda's secured role in the Penang Light Rail Transit project and its potential participation in water infrastructure projects, including the Sungai Perak–Bukit Merah Dam and Sungai Rasau Water Supply Scheme Stage 2.
It said Gamuda is also a key partner in the Upper Padas Hydroelectric Dam project in Sabah and is among the contenders for major contracts under the Mass Rapid Transit 3 project.
Meanwhile, EPF has also been increasing its holdings in several other blue-chip companies, including Tenaga Nasional Bhd (TNB), MISC Bhd, Sunway Bhd, and Sime Darby Property Bhd.
Year-to-date, the fund has raised its stake in TNB by 2.23 percentage points to 20.46 per cent, representing a net accumulation of 132.89 million shares.
TNB last traded at RM13.56, giving it a market capitalisation of RM79.05 billion, down 8.07 per cent or RM6.94 billion from RM85.99 billion when it was trading at RM14.76 on Jan 2.
EPF also accumulated 46.90 million shares in MISC to raise its stake to 13.69 per cent, 59.63 million shares in Sunway to 8.65 per cent and 66.95 million shares in Sime Darby Property to 8.51 per cent.
On the flip side, EPF has trimmed its stakes in several companies, notably KPJ Healthcare Bhd, where it sold 107.09 million shares, reducing its stake to 9.7 per cent from 12.16 per cent.
KPJ last traded at RM2.72, 15.74 per cent higher than its Jan 2 price of RM2.35, giving the healthcare group a market capitalisation of RM12.31 billion.
The fund also cut its holdings in Axiata Group Bhd by 75.63 million shares to 17.55 per cent, in AMMB Holdings Bhd by 23.90 million shares to 12.70 per cent, and in Sunway Real Estate Investment Trust by 7.07 million units to 15.95 per cent.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
7 hours ago
- The Star
Is there a 'right' retirement age?
Here we go again. Yet another round of viewpoints regarding increasing the retirement age. This came after Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Law and Institutional Reform) Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said suggested that the government consider raising the retirement age to 65. It was her personal opinion but it opened the flood gates of debate from the public on whether this was a good or bad idea. My view on this? Neither good nor bad, but unavoidable, inevitable. The number of countries opting to raise their retirement age is growing. In the majority of countries in Europe, the retirement age is 65 and above, with Denmark and Norway leading at 67. What about Asia? Singapore is following suit. It plans to raise the statutory retirement age from 63 to 65 and the re-employment age from 68 to 70 in 2026. For Japan, it's 65. For Korea, India, Vietnam, Cambodia and Thailand, it's 60 but it will likely be raised in the coming years. China is also joining the lineup. For decades since 1950, the retirement age in China has remained at 50. It recently raised retirement age for the first time from 50 to 55 for women in blue-collar jobs, and from 55 to 58 for those in white-collar jobs. For men it will be increased from 60 to 63. Two sides of the coin The main argument against increasing the retirement age is that it deprives young job seekers of employment. While this may be true to a certain extent, it's primarily technology and mechanisation, not older workers, that is taking away jobs. Let's not forget AI. It is already replacing workers in white-collar jobs. All this has nothing to do with the retirement age. Based on DOSM figures, the unemployment rate stands at 3.1% for May 2025. The government is committed to ensuring unemployment is kept low. It does this by taking on the role as employer of last resort. Malaysia has the largest civil service in the world in terms of ratio of civil service workforce to population: Over 1.6 million-strong to serve its 34.1 million population. The government will not be able to continue paying pension to an ever-growing number of pensioners. Currently there are an estimated 930,000 pensioners from the civil service, judges, former servicemen and senators. The government is finding it a huge challenge to keep up with pension payments despite raising the retirement age from 55 to 60 in 2013. Hence the moveaway from pensions to EPF contributions. The family structure has changed so drastically that parents can no longer expect their adult children to support them in their old age. Family size has shrunk, and with the grown children moving out to work or settle elsewhere, retired couples are often left to fend for themselves. It's a good idea to sit down at the family table and have a heart-to-heart discussion about the future scenario for the family 20 years down the road. What would it look like? Here's a very likely scenario: The adult children are now in their late 30s. Their parents are retirees in their early 60s, and their grandparents are in their early 80s. The adult children have to see their teenage children through further education, and still have to support their retired parents as well as their elderly grandparents. Three-four generation families are becoming common. The longer life expectancy is both a boon and a bane. What this means is that the adult children have to support their parents as well as grandparents. Multiply that by two. They mustn't leave out parents-in-laws and grandparents-in-law. In total, the couple has to support eight older persons on top of supporting their own children! To top it, they have fewer siblings to share the cost of caring for the elderly family members. This is already happening in many families now. It's not a future reality. Our fertility rate is declining, as in most countries. Young people are delaying marriage. When they do, they delay starting a family. When they are finally ready to have children, they want only one or two. The result – fewer siblings to share the heavy financial responsibility of supporting six to eight elderly family members. Faced with such a reality, perhaps those in the 30s and 40s will not protest against increasing the retirement age. Their parents will be able to work longer and be self-supporting. With their salary, they will be able to contribute financially towards supporting the family members, both young and old. Thanks to better education and awareness of staying active and healthy, a growing number of those in their 60s, (and even 70s) are still hale and hearty. They are capable of working another five years or more. Give them the option to do so. Some may want to retire, let them. Some may need to continue working as their adult children are unable to support them, or they may need to help their adult children who are unable to find a job, or keep up with their financial commitments. Stop gap solution This is a temporary stop gap solution. No one wants to work indefinitely. Who doesn't want to enjoy freedom from work, to have time to pursue their personal interests and not be at the beck and call of their boss. What it comes down to is that family life and work life as we know it have changed drastically. This has impacted every aspect of our existence. We have to adjust, adapt and accept. This is one way of looking at progress. Or survival. Quite similar to how we now look at the digital world. Adapt or be left behind while the rest of the world marches on. This is the message to both young and old alike. And to countries too. Governments simply can't afford pension payouts when the older population keeps growing due to longer life expectancy and the younger population keeps shrinking due to lower fertility rate. Demographic changes have a huge impact on the economy, indeed on all aspects of life, and also on the family support system. China abandoned their 1979 one-child policy in 2015 when they realised the adverse implications it had on support for the growing older population. Whether we want to or not, whether we like it or not, the retirement age will continue to be raised. We don't have to work till we drop dead, but at least allow older workers to continue working for as long as the retirement age allows them to. They will know best whether they are physically and mentally fit enough to continue working. Employers also have the option to offer early retirement or not hire workers who do not satisfy the health requirements for the job. Let's not forget the social benefits of working longer. There are retirees who miss the social connections at work. When they stop working, life can become lonely. They miss their former colleagues. They miss the daily chat, the company outings and social functions. Isolation and loneliness can affect the mental health and wellbeing of older people. If these retirees were your parents, wouldn't you want them to continue working a few years longer and to remain independent longer? For young people who oppose raising the retirement age, be thankful that your working parents are self-supporting, and not a financial burden to you. Regardless of whether the retirement age is 60, 65 or 70, everyone reaches that age one day. Everyone has parents and grandparents. Think of them when you think of whether to support the proposal to raise the retirement age. We need to look at the issue both objectively and subjectively, from the government's point of view, from the employers' stand and also from the perspective of both the young and the old. Perhaps then we can have a clearer picture of whether raising the retirement age is a 'good or bad' idea. We know what the answer is. Lily Fu is a gerontologist who advocates for seniors. She is founder of SeniorsAloud, an online platform for seniors to connect and enjoy social activities for ageing well.
New Straits Times
12 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Sime Darby Property sets new wage benchmark
KUALA LUMPUR: Sime Darby Property Bhd's move to raise the minimum living wage for its B40 employees by 80 per cent, from RM1,500 to RM2,700 per month in 2024, could set a new benchmark for the private sector, economists say. Economist Dr Geoffrey Williams described the initiative as a positive step, even if it falls short of the RM3,100 monthly living wage recommended by Bank Negara Malaysia and government-linked investment companies (GLICs). On May 1, Khazanah Nasional Bhd, Permodalan Nasional Bhd (PNB), the Employees Provident Fund (EPF), Kumpulan Wang Persaraan (KWAP), Lembaga Tabung Angkatan Tentera and Lembaga Tabung Haji announced the full implementation of a living wage policy for all their permanent Malaysian employees. The policy is part of the Finance Ministry's GEAR-uP initiative, which aims to align GLIC efforts to boost growth in key sectors. "The six GLICs have committed to the RM3,100 living wage in line with the Belanjawanku and Bank Negara estimates. So the RM2,700 is a little below that but still a good threshold," Williams told Business Times. Williams added that the decision reflects the ability of large companies, particularly government-linked companies and GLICs, to increase base pay for lower-income workers. "This is a good move that will clearly help their lower-paid staff. However, they should disclose how many people will benefit," he said. As of February 1, 2025, the national minimum wage in Malaysia stands at RM1,700 for all employees in businesses with five or more staff, as well as those under the MASCO (Malaysia SME and Small to Medium Enterprises) sector. Employers with fewer than five workers have until August 1, 2025, to comply. Putra Business School economic analyst Prof Dr Ahmed Razman Abdul Latiff praised the move by Sime Darby Property, noting that the RM2,700 wage is close to the national median income level. Razman said this has wider implications than just simply providing better financial support, as higher wages mean the workers will have a higher contribution to their Employees Provident Fund (EPF) account, which subsequently will help them to have a higher quality of life after retirement. "This decision should be emulated by other large corporations, especially for those hiring many workers who live in urban areas. "It will also reduce the salary inequality between top bosses and their workers, where the gap is currently increasing," he told the Business Times. Meanwhile, Bank Muamalat Malaysia Bhd chief economist Dr Mohd Afzanizam Abdul Rashid said the decision could set a new benchmark and attract talent in a competitive labour market. Citing the trend in the labour markets, Afzanizam said the own-account workers (OAW) have been growing quite persistently at 2.9 per cent per annum between 2019 and 2024 to 3.1 million. "With youth increasingly turning to gig work and self-employment, substantial wage increases can help address labour shortages, though benefits like flexible hours and career development are also key," he said. Afzanizam added that while RM2,700 is a good start, the adequacy of income depends on location and family size. Citing EPF's Belanjawanku guide, he noted that a single person in the Klang Valley typically needs RM2,800 monthly, while a family with one child may need over RM6,400. "Hence, we need to understand that salaries should reflect the skillset and qualification but at the same time, real income, which will consider the cost of living, also matters. This may require different policies and approaches in order to ensure that the cost of living will remain manageable," he said. Meanwhile, Sime Darby Property chairman Datuk Rizal Rickman Ramli said the wage adjustment took into account the increased cost of living and aimed to provide better financial support for lower-income employees. "This initiative highlights our commitment to financial stability and the well-being of our workforce, particularly those most impacted by rising living costs," he said in the group's integrated annual report 2024. As of March 28, Sime Darby Property's major shareholders included PNB's unit Amanah Saham Bumiputera with a 36.73 per cent stake, EPF with 11.08 per cent, KWAP with 6.25 per cent and PNB with 5.23 per cent.
Free Malaysia Today
21 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Viral tariff schedule is fake, says TNB
TNB has clarified that it did not issue a widely circulated electricity tariff schedule that bears its logo and claims a tariff hike. (TNB pic) PETALING JAYA : Tenaga Nasional Bhd (TNB) has dismissed a widely circulated electricity tariff schedule on WhatsApp as fake, urging the public not to fall for any misinformation. In a statement today, TNB clarified that the schedule, which bears the TNB logo and claims of a tariff hike, is fake and was not issued by the company. 'The false schedule misleadingly suggests a tariff increase that features the TNB logo,' it said. 'The circulation of such false information is creating unnecessary confusion among customers.' TNB stressed that as of today, no official announcement has been made regarding any changes to electricity tariffs affecting consumers. The company also reminded the public to be responsible with the content they share online. 'We strongly advise the public to avoid sharing unverified information,' it said. For accurate and updated information, TNB urged consumers to refer only to official government and TNB platforms for any updates on electricity tariffs. Last December, TNB proposed a new tariff schedule with a base tariff of 45.62 sen per kilowatt-hour for Peninsular Malaysia under Regulatory Period 4 (RP4), for implementation from July 1, 2025. The base tariff under RP3 had been set at 39.95 sen/kWh between 2022 and 2024. Deputy prime minister Fadillah Yusof then said no decision had been made on the new tariff as the government was still finalising the matter. Fadillah is also the energy transition and water transformation minister.
