logo
MTM Health Celebrates 30 Years of Improving Health Outcomes Nationwide

MTM Health Celebrates 30 Years of Improving Health Outcomes Nationwide

LAKE SAINT LOUIS, MO / ACCESS Newswire / June 3, 2025 / MTM Health, the nation's largest privately-held non-emergency medical transportation (NEMT) broker, is proudly celebrating its 30th anniversary. Since its founding in 1995, MTM Health has been committed to ensuring access to care by eliminating barriers to healthcare and social services - and improving health outcomes, one ride at a time.
What began as a two-person operation in a one-room office has grown into a national leader in health access solutions. Founded in 1995 by Peg and Lynn Griswold, who recognized the challenges health plans faced in coordinating transportation for their members, MTM Health pioneered the brokered NEMT model. Their vision: leverage existing transportation networks instead of purchasing or owning vehicles - a model that remains central to the company's operations today.
Fast forward 30 years, MTM Health now operates in all 50 states, Washington, D.C., and Puerto Rico, employing more than 6,000 team members and coordinating over 35 million trips annually for more than 25 million people.
'As we reflect on three decades of service, I'm overwhelmed with pride in what we've built-not just a company, but a mission-driven organization that has transformed how people access healthcare,' said Alaina Macia, the 20-year President and CEO of MTM Health and daughter of the company's founders. 'We've grown from a small family operation into a national powerhouse, but what hasn't changed is our heart. We remain a privately held company committed to the communities we serve, and that legacy will continue with future generations.'
To mark the milestone, the company recently rebranded from Medical Transportation Management (MTM) to simply MTM Health - signaling the organization's expanded focus beyond transportation. In addition to core NEMT services, the company delivers a wide range of solutions including:
MTM Health is also leading the charge in NEMT technology and innovation with its MTM Link scheduling platform, rideshare-enabled VeyoRide model, and AI-driven analytics that enhance care delivery and operational efficiency.
As the company enters its next chapter, MTM Health remains dedicated to its mission of innovation, equity, and empowering healthier communities.
'Looking ahead, we are more energized than ever to continue breaking down barriers and creating connections that matter,' added Macia. 'The future of healthcare is evolving - and MTM Health will be at the forefront, one ride, one connection, and one outcome at a time.'
About MTM Health
MTM Health is a trusted leader in innovative healthcare solutions, empowering communities since 1995. Specializing in services like non-emergency medical transportation, HCBS therapies, and mobile integrated health, we partner with state and county governments, managed care organizations, health systems, and programs that serve disabled, underserved, and elderly populations. Through cutting-edge technology and a client-focused approach, our services enhance health outcomes, foster independence, and decrease healthcare costs. MTM Health provides 35 million+ trips annually, helping 20.5 million individuals nationwide access their communities.
Contact InformationAshley Wright Senior Manager, Marketing
SOURCE: MTM, Inc.
press release
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

High Yield and Low Stress: 2 Dividend ETFs That Are Built for Passive Income
High Yield and Low Stress: 2 Dividend ETFs That Are Built for Passive Income

Yahoo

time12 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

High Yield and Low Stress: 2 Dividend ETFs That Are Built for Passive Income

Key Points Statistical evidence supports the idea that these two ETFs can simultaneously grow capital and generate income. Maximum monthly drawdowns are less than the benchmark's performance, and so is the risk as defined by standard deviation. These ETFs do relatively best when benchmark indexes are highly volatile but still make money in bull markets. 10 stocks we like better than JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF › The JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF (NYSEMKT: JEPI) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (NASDAQ: JEPQ) have garnered significant investor attention, in part due to their trailing-12-month dividend yields of 8.2% and 11.2%, respectively. Moreover, they offer monthly income, making them a favorite among passive income investors. As such, it would be interesting to share some modeling of their performance to see if they do offer investors a way to a relatively low-volatility strategy that practically guarantees a monthly income. (Keep in mind dividends can always be cut.) Introducing two JPMorgan ETFs The first thing to understand about these two exchange-traded funds is that they are not tailored to invest in dividend stocks. Instead, they both follow the same strategy of investing up to 80% of net assets in equities (stocks), with the only difference being that the Equity Premium ETF focuses on S&P 500 stocks while the Nasdaq Equity Premium ETF focuses on stocks in the Nasdaq-100. As noted above, the stocks are not explicitly selected for their dividend yield, an essential point because high-yield equity-focused ETFs often involve concentrating holdings in sectors with high yields. The remaining net assets, up to 20%, are invested in equity-linked notes (ELNs) that follow a strategy of selling call options on the indexes that the two ETFs benchmark -- S&P 500 and Nasdaq-100, respectively. A call option is the right to buy shares of the index at a specified price (the strike price) and is bought by bullish investors. The seller of the call options (in this case the ETF) receives a premium from the buyer. However, if the index increases significantly, the option is exercised, and the ELN typically incurs a loss. Conversely, when the index experiences a small gain, stays flat, or loses value, the option isn't exercised. The idea is that an anticipated net profit in premiums collected from the ELNs, combined with some dividend income from stock holdings, will generate sufficient income for distributions to be paid to shareholders under any condition, particularly in the event of a substantial increase in the index. And note that the upside is limited (gains less than the market), but the downside is also restricted. This table lays out how the portions of the ETFs will perform based on how the underlying index performs in a month. Monthly Index Performance Strong Gain Moderate Gain Moderate Loss Strong Loss Equities (At least 80% of the ETF assets) Strong Gain Gain Loss Strong Loss ELNs (Up to 20% of the ETF's assets) Loss Profit Profit Profit Overall Gain, but less than the market Gain, but less than the market Slight profit/slight loss Loss, but less than the market Author's analysis. What the ETFs need to do to demonstrate they work Before I throw charts at you, it's worth noting that the proof of the strategy working includes: The ETF should have a lower volatility than the index (measured here by the standard deviation of monthly returns). The ETFs should have relatively low maximum monthly drawdowns because passive investors usually do not want to lose a significant amount in any one month. The strategy should demonstrate a high coefficient of determination, or R^2, indicating that the independent variable (in this case, the benchmark index) is primarily responsible for determining the outcome. Performance consistent with the outcomes outlined in the table above. That said, here are the charts comparing the monthly index performance to the ETF's performance. Both sets of data include reinvestment of dividends. First, here's the JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF. And now the JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF. A few conclusions can be drawn from the data, along with some additional calculations. The monthly standard deviation of the S&P 500 over the period is 4.7%, compared to 3.1% for JEPI, indicating lower volatility returns. The monthly standard deviation of the Nasdaq-100 over the period is 5.7%, compared to 4.2% for JEPQ, indicating lower volatility returns. Both ETFs exhibit high R^2 values, indicating a consistency of outcome from the strategy. The three most significant monthly drawdowns for JEPI are -6.4%, -4.2%, and -4.1%. The three most significant monthly drawdowns for JEPQ are -8.7%, -6.8%, and -6.6%. In general, the strategy is effective, generating a collection of positive returns when the indices report moderate gains and losses. The downside is limited compared to the index when the market declines significantly, and the upside is limited when the indexes perform well. What it means to passive investors Both indices have performed very well over the periods, with an average monthly gain of 1.5% on the S&P 500 and 1.8% on the Nasdaq; therefore, the ETFs have understandably underperformed. However, there's no guarantee that these conditions will continue, and these ETFs have demonstrated lower volatility returns while maintaining substantial dividends for those seeking monthly income. As such, they are excellent options for those seeking to generate passive income across a range of market conditions. Should you invest $1,000 in JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF right now? Before you buy stock in JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $663,630!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,115,695!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,071% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 185% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 13, 2025 JPMorgan Chase is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. Lee Samaha has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends JPMorgan Chase. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. High Yield and Low Stress: 2 Dividend ETFs That Are Built for Passive Income was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Investors react to US-Russia summit reaching no deal
Investors react to US-Russia summit reaching no deal

Yahoo

time12 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Investors react to US-Russia summit reaching no deal

NEW YORK (Reuters) -U.S. President Donald Trump said on Friday that he and Russian President Vladimir Putin did not reach an agreement to resolve Moscow's war in Ukraine after a nearly three-hour summit in Alaska, though he characterized the meeting as "very productive." "There were many, many points that we agreed on," Trump said at a joint press conference with Putin. "I would say a couple of big ones that we haven't quite got there, but we've made some headway. So there's no deal until there's a deal." COMMENTS: CAROL SCHLEIF, CHIEF MARKET STRATEGIST, BMO PRIVATE WEALTH, MINNEAPOLIS: "The only news was absolutely no news out of it. Not sure there will be any market impactful portions - geopolitical issues in general do not tend to preoccupy market attention for very long if at all." "Markets are at new highs despite this conflict going on for three years. Markets care more about consumers, inflation and commentary from Wyoming next week." MICHAEL ASHLEY SCHULMAN, CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER, RUNNING POINT, EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA "At this point, it has been three years into the war, so it really shouldn't have much effect. I think markets will take it as status quo, but I think there's only upside from here." ERIC TEAL, CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER, COMERICA, CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA: "The fact that there were no economic sanctions is a positive and markets should breathe a sigh of relief, but it doesn't appear as though a deal is in hand." "If anything, we see opportunity in the energy sector, as oil prices are at pretty low levels here and the prospect of sanctions on oil did not bear out. There could be a relief rally and that would be an opportunity to invest in energy as we head into higher seasonal demands and economic growth beginning to re-accelerate." "Gold and precious metals are likely to sell off because of being an asset class good for safety. Given concerns about inflation, they are a good buying point as well if any weakness." EUGENE EPSTEIN, HEAD OF TRADING AND STRUCTURED PRODUCTS, NORTH AMERICA, MONEYCORP, NEW JERSEY: "I don't think anybody expected it to be particularly specific or substantive. It's essentially a first step towards potentially something more. They both kind of said everything diplomatically. But it's more about the significance of the meeting as a whole, as opposed to the content of what they're saying." "Again, I don't think anybody really expected them to suddenly within a couple of hours come up with a very specific set of plans or any kind of blueprint to something. It basically was just showing their willingness to have continued talks to arrive at a conclusion that is beneficial for all parties. And I think this is just the first steps, and many more to come." TOM DI GALOMA, MANAGING DIRECTOR OF RATES AND TRADING AT MISCHLER FINANCIAL IN PARK CITY, UTAH "Basically, President Trump needs to go back to the European Union and relay what Putin has said. And then he's got to negotiate with Zelenskiy. For the most part, I think they've laid the groundwork for a deal. And my feeling is that it will probably get done, but there's probably a couple more steps. I'm thinking one of those steps will be Trump, Putin and Zelinski all meeting in the next month." "They will probably reach a deal in 30 days. I was kind of surprised that they didn't take any questions. So there's a little bit of disappointment in that, but until a deal is done, you can't really take any questions." "Overall, the markets will like it marginally because I think they've made some progress. But I don't think we will be up 400 points in Dow futures on Sunday night." JAMIE COX, MANAGING PARTNER, HARRIS FINANCIAL GROUP, RICHMOND, VIRGINIA: "Without Ukraine at the table, there was little chance for a peace accord. That Putin attended at all was significant, but he can't be seen ending the conflict while on American soil meeting with Trump." Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Rocket Companies Announces Early Tender Results of Cash Tender Offers and Consent Solicitations for Any and All of Nationstar Mortgage Holdings Inc.'s 5.125% Senior Notes Due 2030 and 5.750% Senior Notes Due 2031 and Receipt of Requisite Consents
Rocket Companies Announces Early Tender Results of Cash Tender Offers and Consent Solicitations for Any and All of Nationstar Mortgage Holdings Inc.'s 5.125% Senior Notes Due 2030 and 5.750% Senior Notes Due 2031 and Receipt of Requisite Consents

Yahoo

time12 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Rocket Companies Announces Early Tender Results of Cash Tender Offers and Consent Solicitations for Any and All of Nationstar Mortgage Holdings Inc.'s 5.125% Senior Notes Due 2030 and 5.750% Senior Notes Due 2031 and Receipt of Requisite Consents

DETROIT, Aug. 15, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Rocket Companies, Inc. (NYSE: RKT) (the "Company" or "Rocket Companies"), the Detroit-based fintech platform including mortgage, real estate, title and personal finance businesses, announced the early tender results as of 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on August 15, 2025 (the "Early Tender Deadline"), of the previously announced tender offers and consent solicitations (collectively, the "Tender Offers and Consent Solicitations") for the outstanding (i) 5.125% Senior Notes due 2030 (the "2030 Notes") and (ii) 5.750% Senior Notes due 2031 (the "2031 Notes" and, together with the 2030 Notes, the "Notes") of Nationstar Mortgage Holdings Inc. ("Nationstar"), a subsidiary of Mr. Cooper Group Inc. ("Mr. Cooper"). The Tender Offers and Consent Solicitations are being conducted in connection with the Company's pending acquisition of Mr. Cooper (the "Mr. Cooper Acquisition"). The below table presents, according to information provided to the Company by D.F. King & Co., Inc., the Depositary and Information Agent for the Tender Offers and Consent Solicitations, the aggregate principal amount of Notes validly tendered and not validly withdrawn at or prior to the Early Tender Deadline (the "Early Tender Notes"), and the percent of the aggregate principal amount of Notes outstanding constituting Early Tender Notes. CUSIP/ISIN* Title of Notes Aggregate PrincipalAmount Outstanding Aggregate Principal Amountof Early Tender Notes Percent of Outstanding Principal AmountTendered Tender OfferConsideration(1)(2) Early TenderPayment(1)(3) Total TenderOfferConsideration(1)(2) Registered Notes:CUSIP: 63861CAD1/ U6377NAC2ISIN: US63861CAD11/ USU6377NAC21 5.125% Senior Notes due 2030 US$650,000,000 $574,125,000 88.33 % $962.50 $50.00 $1,012.50 Registered Notes:CUSIP: 63861CAE9/ U6377NAD0ISIN: US63861CAE93/ USU6377NAD04 5.750% Senior Notes due 2031 US$600,000,000 $534,765,000 89.13 % $962.50 $50.00 $1,012.50 (1) Per $1,000 principal amount of Early Tender Notes accepted for purchase. (2) Does not include accrued and unpaid interest from the last date on which interest has been paid to, but excluding, the Settlement Date (as defined below) that will be paid on the Notes accepted for purchase. (3) Included in the Total Tender Offer Consideration for Early Tender Notes accepted for purchase. * CUSIPs are provided for the convenience of Holders. No representation is made as to the correctness or accuracy of such numbers. Because the Company received consents in respect of a majority of the aggregate principal amount of such series of Notes then outstanding (excluding Notes owned by Nationstar, or by any person directly or indirectly controlling or controlled by or under direct or indirect common control with Nationstar) (the "Requisite Consents"), Nationstar executed and delivered a supplemental indenture to each Indenture (each, a "Supplemental Indenture"), (i) eliminating the requirement to make a "Change of Control" offer for the related Notes following the consummation of the Company's acquisition of Mr. Cooper and future transactions, (ii) eliminating substantially all of the restrictive covenants in the applicable Indenture and the Notes, (iii) eliminating certain conditions to legal defeasance or covenant defeasance in the applicable Indenture and the Notes and (iv) eliminating all events of default other than events of default relating to the failure to pay principal of and interest on the Notes (collectively, the "Proposed Amendments"). Each Supplemental Indenture became effective upon execution, but provides that the applicable Proposed Amendments will not become operative until the Company accepts for purchase the Notes satisfying the Requisite Consents in the Tender Offers and Consent Solicitations. The Tender Offers and Consent Solicitations will expire at 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on September 2, 2025, unless extended or earlier terminated by the Company (the "Expiration Date"). The "Settlement Date" is expected to be on or before the second day following the Expiration Date. The Company anticipates extending the Expiration Date until such time that the Mr. Cooper Acquisition may be consummated substantially concurrently with the Settlement Date. Any Notes validly tendered and related Consents validly delivered after the Early Tender Deadline (including during any extension of the Expiration Date) may not be withdrawn, except as required by law. No tenders submitted after the Expiration Date will be valid. Subject to the terms and conditions of the Tender Offers and Consent Solicitations, holders of the Early Tender Notes will receive the Total Tender Offer Consideration set forth in the table above, which includes the Early Tender Payment set forth in the table above. Holders of Notes tendering their Notes after the Early Tender Deadline and on or prior to the Expiration Date will only be eligible to receive the Tender Offer Consideration set forth in the table above, which is the Total Tender Offer Consideration less the Early Tender Payment. In addition, holders of all Notes validly tendered and accepted for purchase pursuant to the Tender Offers and Consent Solicitations will receive accrued and unpaid interest on such Notes from the last interest payment date with respect to such Notes to, but excluding, the Settlement Date. The terms and conditions of the Tender Offers and Consent Solicitations are described in an Offer to Purchase and Consent Solicitation Statement, dated August 4, 2025 (the "Offer to Purchase and Consent Solicitation Statement"). The consummation of the Tender Offers and Consent Solicitations for the Notes of any series are subject to, and conditioned upon, the satisfaction or waiver of certain conditions described in the Offer to Purchase and Consent Solicitation Statement, including, among other things, the substantially concurrent consummation of the acquisition of Mr. Cooper on terms and conditions set forth in the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of March 31, 2025 (as it may be amended from time to time, the "Merger Agreement"), by and among the Company, Maverick Merger Sub, Inc., Maverick Merger Sub 2, LLC, and Mr. Cooper. This press release does not constitute an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, any security. No offer, solicitation, or sale will be made in any jurisdiction in which such an offer, solicitation, or sale would be unlawful. J.P. Morgan Securities LLC is the dealer manager and solicitation agent (the "Dealer Manager") for the Tender Offers and Consent Solicitations. D.F. King & Co., Inc. has been retained to serve as both the depositary and the information agent (the "Depositary and Information Agent") for the Tender Offers and Consent Solicitations. Questions regarding the Tender Offers and Consent Solicitations should be directed to the Dealer Manager at (866) 834-4666 (Toll-Free) or (212) 834-7489 (Telephone). Requests for copies of the Offer to Purchase and Consent Solicitation Statement and other related materials should be directed to D.F. King & Co., Inc. at RKT@ (email), (800) 549-6864 (U.S. Toll-Free) or (212) 390-0450 (Banks and Brokers). None of Rocket Companies, its board of directors, Mr. Cooper and each of Mr. Cooper's direct and indirect domestic, wholly owned subsidiaries that are issuers or guarantors under the Notes, Nationstar, Rocket Mortgage, LLC ("Rocket Mortgage"), each of Rocket Mortgage's direct and indirect domestic, wholly owned subsidiaries that are issuers or guarantors under Rocket Mortgage's existing senior notes and Redfin Corporation, the Dealer Manager, the Depositary and Information Agent, the Trustee under each Indenture, or any of their affiliates, makes any recommendation as to whether holders of the Notes should tender any Notes in response to the Tender Offers and Consent Solicitations. The Tender Offers and Consent Solicitations are made only by the Offer to Purchase and Consent Solicitation Statement. The Tender Offers and Consent Solicitations are not being made to holders of Notes in any jurisdiction in which the making or acceptance thereof would not be in compliance with the securities, blue sky or other laws of such jurisdiction. In any jurisdiction in which the Tender Offers and Consent Solicitations are required to be made by a licensed broker or dealer, the Tender Offers and Consent Solicitations will be deemed to be made on behalf of the Company by the Dealer Manager or one or more registered brokers or dealers that are licensed under the laws of such jurisdiction. Forward-Looking Statements This press release contains statements herein regarding the proposed transaction between Rocket Companies and Mr. Cooper. Future financial and operating results; benefits and synergies of the transaction; future opportunities for the combined company; the conversion of equity interests contemplated by the Merger Agreement; the issuance of common stock of Rocket Companies contemplated by the Merger Agreement; the expected timing of the closing of the proposed transaction; the ability of the parties to complete the proposed transaction considering the various closing conditions and any other statements about future expectations that constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. All statements in this communication, other than statements of historical fact, are forward-looking statements that may be identified by the use of words "anticipate," "believe," "could," "estimate," "expect," "intend," "may," "plan," "potential," "predict," "project," "should," "target," "will," "would" and, in each case, their negative or other various or comparable terminology. Such forward-looking statements are based upon current beliefs, expectations and discussions related to the proposed transaction and are subject to significant risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results expressed in such statements. Risks and uncertainties include, among other things, (i) the risk that the proposed transaction may not be completed in a timely basis or at all, which may adversely affect Rocket Companies' and Mr. Cooper's businesses and the price of their respective securities; (ii) the potential failure to receive, on a timely basis or otherwise, the required approvals of the proposed transaction, including stockholder approval by Mr. Cooper's stockholders, and the potential failure to satisfy the other conditions to the consummation of the proposed transaction; (iii) the effect of the announcement, pendency or completion of the proposed transaction on each of Rocket Companies' or Mr. Cooper's ability to attract, motivate, retain and hire key personnel and maintain relationships with others with whom Rocket Companies or Mr. Cooper does business, or on Rocket Companies' or Mr. Cooper's operating results and business generally; (iv) that the proposed transaction may divert management's attention from each of Rocket Companies' and Mr. Cooper's ongoing business operations; (v) the risk of any legal proceedings related to the proposed transaction or otherwise, including the risk of stockholder litigation in connection with the proposed transaction, or the impact of the proposed transaction thereupon, including resulting expense or delay; (vi) that Rocket Companies or Mr. Cooper may be adversely affected by other economic, business and/or competitive factors; (vii) the occurrence of any event, change or other circumstance that could give rise to the termination of the Merger Agreement, including in circumstances which would require payment of a termination fee; (viii) the risk that restrictions during the pendency of the proposed transaction may impact Rocket Companies' or Mr. Cooper's ability to pursue certain business opportunities or strategic transactions; (ix) the anticipated tax treatment of the proposed transaction may not be obtained, risks associated with third party contracts containing consent and/or other provisions that may be triggered by the proposed transaction; (x) the risk that the anticipated benefits and synergies of the proposed transaction may not be fully realized or may take longer to realize than expected; (xi) the impact of legislative, regulatory, economic, competitive and technological changes; (xii) risks relating to the value of Rocket Companies securities to be issued in the proposed transaction; (xiii) the risk that integration of the Rocket Companies and Mr. Cooper businesses post-closing may not occur as anticipated or the combined company may not be able to achieve the anticipated synergies expected from the proposed transaction, and the costs associated with such integration; and (xiv) the effect of the announcement, pendency or completion of the proposed transaction on the market price of the common stock of each of Rocket Companies and Mr. Cooper. These risks, as well as other risks related to the proposed transaction, are more fully described in a registration statement on Form S-4/A (the "Registration Statement") filed by Rocket Companies with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on July 25, 2025 in connection with the proposed transaction. While the list of factors presented here and the list of factors presented in the Registration Statement are considered representative, no such list should be considered to be a complete statement of all potential risks and uncertainties. Additional factors that may affect future results are contained in each company's filings with the SEC, including each company's most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K and Form 10-K/A, as it may be updated from time to time by quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K, all of which are available at the SEC's website The information set forth herein speaks only as of the date hereof, and any intention or obligation to update any forward-looking statements as a result of developments occurring after the date hereof is hereby disclaimed. View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE Rocket Companies, Inc. Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store