Alabama Senate committee approves bill requiring emergency buttons in public schools
An Alabama Senate committee unanimously approved a bill on Wednesday that would require school boards to install an 'emergency button' in order to enhance response times to school emergencies.
HB 234, sponsored by Rep. Alan Baker, R-Brewton, passed the House of Representatives 58-30 in March. The legislation would require public school employees who are around students to be equipped with an emergency button. It also mandates regular training for employees with the technology.
'We've heard the expressions like every second counts time equals lives. These are expressions that are often heard in crisis and emergency incidents,' Baker said. 'With this mobile rapid response technology in place, if this bill passes, then teachers, administrators, office, staff, custodians, lunchroom workers, maintenance and other education employees become the eyes and ears, internally and externally across the school campus to activate an alert that immediately notifies school officials and law enforcement of the exact location for the most rapid response to the incident.'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
An amendment that would extend the implementation time of the technology on the condition of additional funding specifically for school public safety starting in 2030 was adopted unanimously by the Senate Education Policy Committee.
'That actually sort of extends it possibly even beyond that, if there is not annual dedicated funding for school safety,' Baker said.
Baker said the technology would improve response times with first responders receiving the exact location of the emergency. Baker said on the House floor in March that an emergency is not limited to a shooting threat, but could also be used for a medical emergency.
Most of the concerns toward the bill in the House revolved around whether schools had the resources to install and maintain the technology.
Sen. Larry Stutts, R-Tuscumbia, said he is concerned about the legislation not addressing the root of the issue of safety in schools. He said there is a lack of discipline in the home that leads to safety issues at schools.
'We continually address these issues of school safety, and I'm 100% for that, but my concern is that we never seem to really address the reasons that we have these issues,' Stutts said.
The bill will now be considered by the full Senate.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
14 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Texas Republicans set to resume push for redrawn US House maps
Advertisement The Texas House was scheduled to try convening a quorum again Monday. Abbott put redistricting on the agenda at the urging of President Donald Trump, who wants to shore up Republicans' narrow U.S. House majority to avoid losing control of the chamber, and with it, prospects for Trump's conservative agenda in the later part of his term. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up It is unusual for redistricting to take place in the middle of the decade and typically occurs once at the beginning of each decade to coincide with the census. Many states, including Texas, give legislators the power to draw maps. California is among those that empower independent commissions with the task. The nation's two most populous states have been at the forefront of the resulting battle, which has reached into multiple courtrooms and statehouses controlled by both parties. Advertisement On a national level, the partisan makeup of existing district lines puts Democrats within three seats of a majority. Of the 435 total House seats, only several dozen districts are competitive. So even slight changes in a few states could affect which party wins control. Texas' maps would aim to give the GOP five more winnable seats there. California Democrats, who hold supermajorities in both chambers — enough to act without any Republican votes — on Friday unveiled a proposal that could give Democrats there an additional five U.S. House seats. But any changes would first need the approval of state lawmakers and voters. Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom has said that his state will hold a Nov. 4 special referendum on the redrawn districts.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The 'Pelosi Act' is a step closer to law — but some politicians say it goes too far. Here's the risk to you
A U.S. Senate committee has voted to advance a bill aimed at banning federal lawmakers, presidents and vice presidents from trading individual stocks. The move comes after years of outrage over potential conflicts of interest on Capitol Hill, where some members of Congress appear to have made timely trades ahead of market-moving events. Don't miss Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan 'works every single time' to kill debt, get rich in America — and that 'anyone' can do it But while supporters call it a long-overdue accountability measure, the bill is already facing pushback, including from the White House. Here's what exactly is in the PELOSI Act — renamed to the HONEST Act — and why it's controversial. Plus, how stock trading among politicians could be impacting your 401(k) without you realizing it. What's in the act, and why is it making headlines now? Originally named as a dig against Democrat Rep. Nancy Pelosi for her husband's heavy stock trading, Republican Sen. Josh Hawley's proposed PELOSI (Preventing Elected Leaders from Owning Securities and Investments) Act would ban trading for officials previously mentioned, along with their spouses and dependents. While there is no evidence that Pelosi had insider information that influenced her husband's trading, Hawley has stood fast that it's too risky for any congressional member to be involved in stocks. 'We have an opportunity here today to do something that the public has wanted us to do for decades, and that is to ban members of Congress from profiting on information that, frankly, only members of Congress have,' Hawley said during a Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee hearing on July 30. Notably, Pelosi herself has thrown her support behind the act. 'We must have strong transparency, robust accountability and tough enforcement for financial conduct in office because the American people deserve confidence that their elected leaders are serving the public interest — not their personal portfolios,' she said in a statement. 'If legislation is advanced to help restore trust in government and ensure that those in power are held to the highest ethical standards, then I am proud to support it — no matter what they decide to name it.' Read more: Nervous about the stock market? Gain potential quarterly income through this $1B private real estate fund — even if you're not a millionaire. After intense scrutiny from fellow members of Congress, Hawley and Michigan Democrat Gary Peters altered the bill to change the contentious name to the HONEST (Halting Ownership and Non-Ethical Stock Transactions) Act and allow President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance to maintain their holdings during the current administration but prohibit future trading. All future administrations would be subject to enforcement. The bipartisan bill was advanced by the committee, but not after criticism from Hawley's fellow Republicans, who claim the bill was unnecessarily strict, since the STOCK (Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge) Act already prohibits lawmakers and their spouses and dependents from trading on material, nonpublic information. The STOCK Act also requires transparency and public disclosure on many transactions. 'I don't know when in this country it became a negative to make money,' Republican Sen. Rick Scott said at the hearing. 'How many of you don't want to make money? Anybody want to be poor?' Trump later offered his own scathing rebuke, calling Hawley a 'pawn' and a 'second-tier' senator in a post on Truth Social. He also complained that Hawley had sided with Democrats to block a review of stock trading by Pelosi and her family. The dangers of congressional insider trading Insider trading can pose serious risks to the security of average American investors, especially if elected leaders use privileged knowledge to enrich themselves. If lawmakers gain insider information before trading, the fear is they might use it to not only influence policy, but that decisions will influence the market. For instance, a lawmaker who knows a coal restriction bill is about to pass might suddenly sell his shares in energy companies. This puts the everyday individual investor at a disadvantage, potentially leading to poorer stock decisions or unexpected losses. Your retirement account may be especially vulnerable to insider trading moves. Suppose your account is part of a large pension fund. In that case, you may be invested in industry-based stocks, which may be highly sensitive to insider trading if they're subject to new laws affecting entire market sectors. The same goes for 401(k)s or IRAs that use mutual funds or exchange-traded funds that invest in large market sectors influenced by legislation related to health care, technology, utilities or energy. Insider trading scandals can cause portfolio volatility, which is why it's important to implement a lasting solution to prevent long-term underperformance. What to read next Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now Here are 5 simple ways to grow rich with real estate if you don't want to play landlord. And you can even start with as little as $10 Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? Stay in the know. Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise sent straight to your inbox every week for free. This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Democrat Sherrod Brown says he will try to return to US Senate in 2026
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Democrat Sherrod Brown of Ohio said on Monday he would try to return to the U.S. Senate seat in next year's midterm elections, a development that could bolster his party's chances of winning back control of the chamber. Brown, 72, said U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs and health-care cuts prompted him to return to politics. "I didn't plan to run for office again. But when I see what's going on, I know I can do something about it for Ohio," Brown said in a video posted to social media. Brown served for 18 years in the Senate before he lost 50.1%-46.5% to Republican Bernie Moreno last November. He built a reputation as a champion for blue-collar workers in Ohio, an industrial state that has lost jobs to globalization. The state, once a political battleground, has trended increasingly Republican over the past decade. Brown will likely face Republican Senator John Husted, who was appointed in January to temporarily fill the seat vacated by JD Vance when he became vice president. Husted previously served as Ohio's lieutenant governor. The winner of the November 2026 special election would serve the remainder of Vance's Senate term, ending in January 2029. Analysts say it will be difficult for Democrats to pick up the four seats they will need to win back control of the Senate, which now has a 53-47 Republican majority. The nonpartisan Cook Political Report said Brown, the only Democrat to win statewide office in the past two decades, will make the race competitive and moved its rating from "likely Republican" to "lean Republican."
