Israeli strike on Tehran jail 'irresponsible': French prisoner's sister
Iran's judiciary said Israeli strikes left sections of the facility damaged and Israel's defence minister confirmed the army was targeting it.
Cecile Kohler has been held along with her partner Jacques Paris in Evin since May 2022 on espionage charges their families reject.
Overall, Iran is believed to hold around 20 European nationals in what some Western governments describe as a strategy of hostage-taking aimed at extracting concessions from the West.
Most are held in Evin, a large, heavily fortified complex notorious among activists for rights abuses.
It is located in a northern district of the Iranian capital.
"This strike is completely irresponsible. Cecile, Jacques and all the prisoners are in mortal danger," Noemie Kohler told AFP.
"This is really the worst thing that could have happened," she added.
"We have no news, we don't know if they are still alive, we're panicking," Noemie Kohler said.
She urged the French authorities to "condemn these extremely dangerous strikes" and secure the release of the French prisoners.
She also expressed concern about the risk of "chaos" and "riots".
Noemie Kohler has tirelessly campaigned to secure the release of her sister and her sister's partner Jacques Paris.
Chirinne Ardakani, a lawyer for the Kohler family, denounced the strikes as "illegal".
"The risk of riots, general confusion and reprisals by the security forces against the insurgent prisoners raises fears of bloodshed," she told AFP.
"Both sides are playing with people's lives."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LeMonde
an hour ago
- LeMonde
Tehran's allies keep distance from Iran-Israel conflict
In the aftermath of US airstrikes on its nuclear sites during the night of Saturday, June 21 to Sunday, June 22, Iran appeared very much alone to retaliate. Most of Tehran's allies showed great caution towards Donald Trump's surprise initiative, seeming eager to keep a war with an uncertain outcome at a distance. Just hours after 14 US GBU-57 bombs hit the nuclear sites at Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan, China "strongly condemned" the attack, which aimed to decisively support the offensive Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu launched 10 days earlier. "China calls on the parties to the conflict, Israel in particular, to reach a ceasefire as soon as possible," the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement released on June 22. At the same time, Narendra Modi, prime minister of Iran's trading partner India, called for "an immediate de-escalation" in talks with Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian. However, the US entry into the war had all the potential to be viewed as yet another affront by the West against the somewhat nebulous entity of emerging or non-aligned nations known as the Global South. The US and Israeli attack on Iran was, after all, a violation of international law. "Legally, it's an aggression," said Antoine Madelin, advocacy director at the International Federation for Human Rights. Furthermore, it comes in addition to the war crimes committed during Israel's operations in Gaza over the past 21 months.
France 24
an hour ago
- France 24
NATO to take 'quantum leap' with 5% summit pledge: Rutte
The 32 members of the alliance will pledge to boost defence expenditure to five percent of gross domestic product, a key demand of President Donald Trump, who has long grumbled that the US pays too much for NATO. NATO's members have thrashed out a compromise deal to dedicate at least 3.5 percent of GDP to core military needs by 2035, and 1.5 percent to broader security-related items like cybersecurity and infrastructure. "The defence investment plan that allies will agree in The Hague introduces a new baseline, five percent of GDP to be invested in defence," Rutte told reporters at a pre-summit news conference. "This is a quantum leap that is ambitious, historic and fundamental to securing our future." The focus at the summit in the Hague will be on keeping Trump happy after his return to power sparked fears he could blow a hole in the seven-decade-old alliance. In the run-up to the meeting, Spain had sparked fears of undermining a carefully choreographed unity by refusing to commit to the headline figure of five percent. But Rutte stressed that Spain had not been granted an "opt-out" from the pledge. "NATO does not have as an alliance opt-outs, side deals, etcetera, because we all have to chip in," Rutte said. The NATO chief said that the increase in spending would see the alliance boost its air defences five-fold and add thousands more tanks and armoured vehicles to its arsenals. "Our focus is ensuring that we have all we need to deter and defend against any threat," he said. "Of course, the most significant and direct threat facing this alliance remains the Russian Federation." Iranian 'stranglehold' Rutte insisted that the summit would also send a strong signal of support to Ukraine -- despite Trump upending the West's stance towards Russia's war on Kyiv. Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky will attend a state dinner with the Dutch king but he has largely been sidelined from the summit's main event. Rutte said that Europe was stepping up already to fill the gap left by Washington pulling back from supporting Ukraine. He said that Europe and Canada had already pledged 35 billion euros ($40 billion) to help arm Kyiv so far this year. Dismissing the idea that the fresh conflict between Israel and Iran could deflect attention from the summit, Rutte stressed that Tehran should not be permitted to possess a nuclear weapon. He said his "greatest fear" was that Iran would secure access to a nuclear bomb, giving it a "stranglehold" over Israel, the region, and the wider world. Over the weekend, Trump said that US warplanes had used "bunker buster" bombs that had "obliterated" Iran's nuclear capabilities. Other officials said it was too soon to assess the true impact on Iran's nuclear programme, which Israel and some Western states consider an existential threat. Pressed over the legality of Washington's strikes against Iran, the NATO chief replied: "I would not agree that this is against international law, what the US did." © 2025 AFP
Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
What would happen if the Strait of Hormuz is closed?
As oil prices are climbing after the attacks on Iran by Israel and then the US, investors are closely watching the fate of a narrow sea passage in the Middle East. The Strait of Hormuz is vital for gas and oil exporters in the Gulf region, as this is the only route by sea to export large volumes of oil and gas produced among the oil-rich countries in the region. This narrow passage is located between Oman and Iran, connecting the Persian Gulf with the Gulf of Oman and the Arabian Sea. It is about 167 km long, and at its narrowest point, 39 km wide. According to the Joint Maritime Information Centre, June 2024 averaged 114 vessels transiting the strait daily and so far traffic in June 2025 is consistent with this. On 21 June, for instance, there were 122 vessels passing through the strait. The passage is deep enough and wide enough to handle the world's largest crude oil tankers, and it is one of the world's most important oil chokepoints (narrow channels along widely used global sea routes that are critical to global energy security). How important is the Strait of Hormuz for global trade? The health of the world economy depends on the flow of oil from this region. Oil tankers on average carry through the strait 20 million barrels per day (b/d), or the equivalent of about 20% of global petroleum liquids consumption, according to the US Energy Information Administration analysis. 'A potential Iranian blockade of the Strait of Hormuz would send shockwaves through the global economy," Professor Guido Cozzi, Chair of Macroeconomics at the University of St. Gallen, said to Euronews. He added that any disruption to the oil flow in this narrow waterway would drive up energy prices, fuel inflation, and strain supply chains. Continental Europe and China are losing the most, both heavily reliant on imported energy and lacking domestic buffers. "They would face rising costs, slower growth, and heightened inflation without any upside," Cozzi said. Meanwhile, the US and the UK would see their exports become more competitive, as they are sourcing the majority of their energy from elsewhere. And if the strait would be closed, pushing prices up globally, that would benefit Western producers more than it would harm them, according to the professor. Natural gas supplies are also at risk Besides oil, global natural gas supply could also be seriously impacted, as Qatar, one of the world's biggest natural gas exporters uses the narrow seaway to export about 77 million metric tons of liquefied natural gas (LNG) a year. This is one-fifth of the global LNG supply. Alternative supply routes for Middle Eastern oil and gas are limited, with pipeline capacity insufficient to offset potential maritime disruptions through the Persian Gulf and Red Sea,' S&P said in an analysis. 'Any Iranian closure of the Strait of Hormuz would affect not only its own exports but also those of Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Kuwait and Qatar, potentially removing over 17 million b/d of crude oil from global markets,' added the analysis, saying that Saudi Arabia and the UAE have pipelines that can circumvent the strait. Analysts expect oil prices to skyrocket and surpass $100 a barrel if Iran decides to close the passage. Though insurance for the oil tankers passing through the strait increased and the situation is quite tense, according to the Joint Maritime Information Centre, there are no indications of threats to commercial shipping. Would Iran close the Strait even if it affects its own trade? After US attacks on three Iranian nuclear sites, on 22 June, the Parliament in Tehran voted to close down the strait. A step that has never been taken. The decision is pending approval by the Islamic Republic's Supreme National Security Council. Iran threatened several times in the past that it would cut this artery of oil in the past but it never followed through with the threat. US Vice-President JD Vance called the move 'suicidal' for Iran's economy on Sunday at a press conference. Creating a major disruption in the strait would be extremely difficult due to various economic, political and military forces present in the region today, said the Robert Strauss Center for International Security and Law in an analysis. Experts agree that Iran itself has a lot to lose and very little to gain as it would cut its own oil exports to major trade partners such as China. Besides losing a key source of revenue, Iran would also anger its oil-producing neighbours whose support they may not be able to afford to risk. If Iran decides to close the passageway, another question is, for how long? The duration could be key, as global stockpiles are currently sufficient. The nations in need have at least 5.8 billion barrels of crude and fuel stockpiled between them, according to Bloomberg. This shows a healthy buffer, compared to the annual 7.3 billion barrels a year, passing through the strait. According to Barclays, other possible scenarios include Iran trying to target the Strait of Hormuz using missile attacks, making ships and insurance firms hesitant to use Hormuz. They could also consider mining the strait, which would hit traffic to a greater extent. There are also less aggressive ways to further disturb commercial shipping through Hormuz. For instance, the widespread jamming of GPS signals could make it harder to navigate safely in certain conditions.
