Tehran's allies keep distance from Iran-Israel conflict
In the aftermath of US airstrikes on its nuclear sites during the night of Saturday, June 21 to Sunday, June 22, Iran appeared very much alone to retaliate. Most of Tehran's allies showed great caution towards Donald Trump's surprise initiative, seeming eager to keep a war with an uncertain outcome at a distance.
Just hours after 14 US GBU-57 bombs hit the nuclear sites at Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan, China "strongly condemned" the attack, which aimed to decisively support the offensive Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu launched 10 days earlier. "China calls on the parties to the conflict, Israel in particular, to reach a ceasefire as soon as possible," the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement released on June 22. At the same time, Narendra Modi, prime minister of Iran's trading partner India, called for "an immediate de-escalation" in talks with Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian.
However, the US entry into the war had all the potential to be viewed as yet another affront by the West against the somewhat nebulous entity of emerging or non-aligned nations known as the Global South. The US and Israeli attack on Iran was, after all, a violation of international law. "Legally, it's an aggression," said Antoine Madelin, advocacy director at the International Federation for Human Rights. Furthermore, it comes in addition to the war crimes committed during Israel's operations in Gaza over the past 21 months.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LeMonde
35 minutes ago
- LeMonde
For Gulf monarchies, Israel has replaced Iran as Middle East's main destabilizing force
The United States's entry into war against Iran is a worst-case scenario for the Gulf monarchies. The support they have shown for Iran since June 13, condemning Israel's attack on this "friendly nation," may no longer be enough. They have been placed on high alert in anticipation of potential reprisals from Tehran, which has threatened to attack US bases on their territory and to close the Strait of Hormuz, a crucial commercial route in the Persian Gulf. On Sunday, June 22, the Gulf monarchies jointly called for de-escalation and a political end to the crisis. Israel's hawkish charge ahead, tempted by the prospect of regime change in Iran, has fueled their fear of a slide toward uncontrollable, widespread war in the Middle East. Until the moment of the US strikes on late Saturday night into Sunday, Gulf leaders tried to persuade President Donald Trump to abandon the military option and give diplomacy a chance. "De-escalation is extremely important. We still believe there is a path back to negotiations," pleaded Anwar Gargash, diplomatic adviser to Emirati President Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, before journalists, including from Le Monde, on Friday. "Riyadh supports neither escalation nor regime change," stressed Ali Shihabi, a Saudi political analyst. "A diplomatic solution seems very difficult to find at the moment, but not impossible."
LeMonde
an hour ago
- LeMonde
Macron says the US strikes on Iran lack legal basis
French President Emmanuel Macron on Monday, June 23, said US strikes on Iran were not legal, but that France supported the objective of keeping Tehran from developing nuclear arms. "While we can consider there being legitimacy in neutralizing nuclear structures in Iran given the objectives we share... There is no legality in these strikes," Macron told reporters during a visit to Norway. "We have consistently believed from the beginning that this can only be achieved through diplomatic and technical means," the French president said, speaking alongside Norwegian Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Store. Store echoed the sentiment. "International law has some clear principles on the use of force. It can be granted by the Security Council or it can be in pure self defense," he said, noting that this meant the strikes were "outside the realm of international law." The French president also voiced his opposition to any intention of a regime change in Iran through military means. "Every time we've made this choice, whatever the legitimacy of the initial approach ... we made a mistake," he said, adding that such actions had not led to increased stability in the past. Macron added that Israeli strikes on Iran's Evin prison had nothing to do with Israel's "stated objectives" of destroying the nuclear program and had endangered civilians. Macron also warned of the economic impact on the global economy in the event of Iran closing the Strait of Hormuz. "The consequences for the global economy, especially China and many others, would be massive, and I think it would prompt a lot of reactions," the president said.
France 24
an hour ago
- France 24
Bluff and last-minute orders: Trump's path to Iran decision
The next evening he left the White House for a fundraising dinner at his New Jersey golf resort, and much of the world seemed to believe that there was still space for diplomacy. In reality, Trump was already on the verge of making his mind up. A few hours after his arrival at Trump National Golf Club Bedminster on Friday night, the first B-2 stealth bombers took off from a US airbase. The next day, while the bombers were still in the air, Trump made the call on attacking three Iranian nuclear facilities, in the first direct US military strike on Iran since the 1979 Islamic Revolution. "The president gave the final order to the Secretary of Defense on Saturday," a senior White House official told AFP on condition of anonymity. "In the week leading up to the strike, the president was continuing to pursue diplomacy, mainly through Special Envoy (Steve) Witkoff's efforts, while the Pentagon was simultaneously preparing the operation," added the official. 'Misdirection' Trump's "two weeks" gambit appeared to be part of a broader campaign of what Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth called "misdirection," which included several B-2s flying in the opposite direction as a decoy. Trump, the tycoon who prides himself as an expert on the "art of the deal," had ladled on the strategic ambiguity all week. First he flew home early from the G7 summit for talks with his national security team. Then he unleashed a barrage of bellicose social media posts against Iran's supreme leader. On Wednesday he said that "I may do it, I may not" when asked about striking Iran. Finally, Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt read out a statement from Trump in the White House briefing room on Thursday, saying there was a "substantial" chance of talks and that he would decide "whether or not to go within the next two weeks." It played into a frequent criticism of Trump for setting two-week deadlines on everything from Ukraine to health care and then ignoring them. But behind the scenes, Trump was increasingly determined, US officials said. Trump had opposed Israel attacking Iran right up until it did so on June 13 -- but afterwards he openly admired Israel's success and was talking daily to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Israel's achievement of air superiority over Iran presented Trump with a unique opportunity to hit the nuclear program that he had railed against since his first term. Trump was "briefed daily on the Israelis' efforts and the operation itself as he decided whether to move forward," the senior White House official said. The US commander-in-chief held daily meetings with his National Security Council in the White House's basement Situation Room as he pondered his options. And to head off opposition in his "Make America Great Again" movement to another Middle Eastern "forever war", he reportedly met his influential former aide Steve Bannon. 'Highly classified' In public, Trump and the White House took pains to keep things under wraps. The normally talkative Trump said nothing to reporters as he returned to the White House on Saturday night, just one minute after his scheduled 6 pm arrival. The timing was precise for a reason. The first B-2 bomber dropped its bombs just 40 minutes later, at 6:40 pm US time, or 2:10 am Sunday Iranian time. The last submarine-fired Tomahawk missiles struck at 7:05 pm. Trump announced the "very successful" strikes in a Truth Social post at 7:50 pm. The White House then released pictures of a pensive looking Trump in the Situation Room, wearing his red "Make America Great Again" baseball cap. "This was a highly classified mission with very few people in Washington knowing the timing or nature of this plan," US Joint Chiefs Chairman Dan Caine said on Sunday. But the tough decisions are far from over for Trump, who was meeting his top team again on Monday in the Oval Office. How will he respond to Iran's retaliation on Monday? If the US strikes did not completely destroy Iran's nuclear sites as he claimed, will he launch more? Above all, will Trump go further than striking Iran's nuclear plants? "If the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change???" Trump wrote on Truth Social on Sunday.
