What is Territorial Army? Centre empowers Army chief to mobilise reserve force amid India-Pakistan tensions
As tensions flare up between India and Pakistan, the central government has given the green light to the Chief of the Army Staff to call on the Territorial Army (TA) — a reserve force that supports the regular Indian Army during emergencies.
Amid rising security concerns, the government has decided to strengthen military presence across the country by deploying 14 of the 32 existing Territorial Army battalions in key military zones, according to a Ministry of Defence notification issued on May 6.
Follow India Pakistan live updates
These include the Southern, Eastern, Western, Central, Northern, and South Western Commands, as well as the Andaman and Nicobar Command and the Army Training Command (ARTRAC).
The Territorial Army is a volunteer force that acts as a second line of defence after the regular Indian Army. Unlike full-time soldiers, TA members are civilians who take time out of their regular jobs to train and serve the country in times of need.
This force is meant for people already employed in civil professions — doctors, engineers, business owners, and more — who are ready to put on the uniform when called upon. They undergo military training periodically and are ready to support national defence during wars, natural disasters, or other emergencies.
The Territorial Army operates part-time, and volunteers are required to undergo two months of training each year.
Also read: India envoy's reply to Pakistan's claim of downing Indian jets: 'If it satisfies…'
Depending on the situation, officers may also be called for extended military service as need be. When called up for training or active duty, they receive the same pay, allowances, and privileges as regular Army officers.
Promotions up to lieutenant colonel are given based on service duration and set criteria, while promotions to colonel and brigadier are based on selection.
Also read: 'Didn't intercept Indian drones because...': Pakistan defence minister's bizarre explanation
As per the official website, the Territorial Army currently has around 50,000 personnel across 65 units, including both departmental units (like those from Railways, ONGC, and Indian Oil) and Non-Departmental units (Infantry Battalions, Ecological Task Forces, and Engineering units).
While the force took a formal shape in 1920, when the Indian Territorial Force was set up, it has a long history, starting in 1857 during India's First War of Independence.
After India became independent, the Territorial Army Act was passed in 1948. The force was officially launched a year later, in 1949, by C. Rajagopalachari, the first Indian governor-general.
Since its formation, the TA has been involved in key military operations, including the 1962, 1965, and 1971 wars, Operation Pawan in Sri Lanka, and anti-insurgency duties in Punjab, Jammu and Kashmir, and the Northeast. TA units have also played a crucial role in helping during natural disasters such as earthquakes and cyclones.
October 9 is observed every year as Territorial Army Day.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
36 minutes ago
- Time of India
Kash Patel on Joe Rogan: FBI director reveals how India is helping America fight fentanyl crisis; take on China-backed trafficking network
FBI Director Kash Patel has claimed that the United States is working closely with Indian law enforcement agencies to dismantle what he describes as a China-backed global fentanyl trafficking network. Speaking on The Joe Rogan Experience podcast, Patel alleged that while India is not a consumer of fentanyl, it has become an increasingly critical transit point for chemical precursors manufactured in China and passed on to Mexican drug cartels. 'They're going to places like India, and I'm also doing operations in India,' Patel said. 'They're having the Mexican cartels now make this fentanyl down in Mexico still.' Patel claimed that Chinese companies were 'getting cute' by routing fentanyl precursors through third countries, including India, to evade direct enforcement and scrutiny. 'No fentanyl deaths in India' According to Patel, one of the clearest signs of a targeted campaign lies in where fentanyl deaths are and aren't occurring. He said the drug is devastating the United States but has not created comparable crises in countries like India, Australia, or Canada. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Secure Your Child's Future with Strong English Fluency Planet Spark Learn More Undo 'You don't hear fentanyl deaths in India. You don't really hear fentanyl deaths in England, Australia, New Zealand, or Five Eyes partners in Canada,' he said. Patel suggested that the absence of deaths in those regions indicated that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) was selectively deploying the fentanyl supply chain toward the United States for strategic purposes. 'The CCP have used it as a directed approach because we are their adversary,' Patel claimed. 'Why don't we go and take out generations of young men and women who might grow up to serve in the United States military, or become a cop, or become a teacher?' Read: How Kash Patel broke every Indian-American stereotype Direct engagement with India Patel said that he had personally reached out to Indian officials and that joint operations between the FBI and Indian law enforcement were now underway. 'I literally just got off the phone with the Indian government,' he said. 'I said, I need your help. This stuff's coming into your country and then they're moving it from your country because India is not consuming fentanyl.' He stated that the FBI is working on the ground in India with 'the heads of their government law enforcement authorities' to identify and shut down Indian companies involved in importing or redistributing Chinese fentanyl precursors. 'We're going to find these companies that buy it and we're going to shut them down,' Patel said. Patel also laid out a strategy that includes international legal action. 'We're going to sanction them. We're going to arrest them where we can. We're going to indict them in America if we can. We're going to indict them in India if we can.' Patel's India Connection Patel's interest in Indian cooperation is not merely geopolitical — it's personal. Born to Gujarati immigrant parents who fled East Africa, Patel grew up in a working-class immigrant household and has frequently spoken about the influence of his heritage on his national security outlook. His rise from federal public defender to Trump-era White House official and now FBI Director has often been cast by conservative media as a story of Indian-American exceptionalism — one that defies traditional liberal narratives of the diaspora. His critics, however, argue that he has used his identity to shield controversial moves inside the intelligence establishment. Claims of CCP strategy and Canadian rerouting Patel said that the fentanyl trafficking network has adapted in response to stricter enforcement at the US-Mexico border. According to him, cartels are now using Canada as a northern entry point for distribution. 'They're flying it into Vancouver,' Patel said. 'They're taking the precursors up to Canada, manufacturing it up there, and doing their global distribution routes from up there because we were being so effective down south.' He further alleged that China's economic interest in the trade is minimal and that the real motive is geopolitical sabotage. 'They're not making a ton of money off it,' Patel said. 'So it's really just for that purpose.' A broader appeal to Five Eyes allies Patel stated that fentanyl precursors have been detected in Five Eyes countries — the US, UK, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand — even though the drug itself has not yet been widely deployed in those regions. 'The fentanyl itself isn't being deployed into your country, but it's there being manufactured,' he said. 'The CCP just hasn't directed it at you yet, and they know that.' He said he has asked allied governments to help dismantle those production networks before they become operational threats. A global drug crisis — or a targeted assault? According to Patel, over 74,000 Americans died of synthetic opioid overdoses in 2023 alone, and the fentanyl epidemic should be viewed not only as a public health emergency but as a 'tier one national security threat.' Patel argued that India's cooperation is critical in confronting what he repeatedly characterised as a CCP-directed campaign to destabilise American society. 'India is not the problem,' he said. 'But if we don't get ahead of it, it could become one.' While none of Patel's claims have yet been independently confirmed by Indian or Chinese officials, his remarks suggest a new phase of international cooperation on drug enforcement — one that places India at the centre of a growing geopolitical storm. Note: Kash Patel's statements about India Timestamp ~00:06:00 — India as a fentanyl transit point Timestamp ~00:06:30 — No fentanyl deaths in India Timestamp ~00:12:22 — Direct outreach to Indian government Timestamp ~00:12:32 — FBI-India law enforcement collaboration Timestamp ~00:12:43 — Indictments in India Joe Rogan Experience #2334 - Kash Patel
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
37 minutes ago
- First Post
Canada's new citizenship framework to benefit Indian diaspora, proposed law removes first-gen limit
The Canadian government has introduced Bill C-3 to address longstanding citizenship issues, targeting the 2009 'First-Generation Limit' (FGL), which denied or revoked citizenship for many born outside Canada read more While the Donald Trump administration of the US may have tightened immigration policies, posing significant challenges for Indian nationals seeking US green cards and citizenship, the Canadian government may offer them a major respite very soon. Notably, an executive order signed by Trump on January 20 aims to end birthright citizenship for children born in the US to parents on temporary visas, such as H-1B and F-1. In contrast, the Canadian government has introduced Bill C-3 on Thursday (June 5) to address longstanding citizenship issues. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD This 'Citizenship Bill' targets the 2009 'First-Generation Limit' (FGL), which denied or revoked citizenship for many born outside Canada or with foreign-born children. The new bill seeks to correct these injustices. Bill C-3 proposes automatically reinstating Canadian citizenship for those affected by the FGL and similar outdated rules. This change could benefit thousands, especially within immigrant communities, including Indian-origin residents and skilled foreign workers with ties to Canada. Beyond addressing past issues, the bill sets a new standard allowing Canadian parents born abroad to pass on their citizenship to their children, even if born abroad, provided the parent demonstrates a 'substantial connection' to Canada. This connection is defined as at least 1,095 cumulative days (three years) of physical presence in Canada before the child's birth or adoption. If enacted, the bill would enable Canadian citizens by descent to regain lost citizenship and extend it to their children born or adopted abroad beyond the first generation, provided the parent meets the physical presence requirement. The bill is currently under legislative review and must pass three readings and receive royal assent to become law. The Ontario Superior Court of Justice has mandated that the federal government revise the existing legislation by November 20. Moreover, failure to comply may result in the court striking down or narrowing the contested FGL provisions. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
42 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Technology must aid, not replace, human mind in judicial decision: CJI
Technology must complement, not replace, the human mind in judicial decision-making, Chief Justice of India BR Gavai has said while emphasising that the value of discretion, empathy and judicial interpretation is irreplaceable. In his keynote address on "Role of Technology in the Indian Legal System" at the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) of the University of London, the CJI said while the judiciary welcomes innovations like automated cause lists, digital kiosks and virtual assistants, it must ensure that human oversight, ethical guidelines and robust training are integral to their implementation. "The value of discretion, empathy and judicial interpretation is irreplaceable," Justice Gavai said and pointed out that the Indian judiciary is well-positioned to develop homegrown ethical frameworks tailored to the country's constitutional and societal realities. "We possess the technological expertise, the judicial foresight and the democratic mandate to build systems that reflect our values of equality, dignity and justice," he said. "In fact, in the very first week after assuming office as the chief justice of India, I initiated a discussion with the Centre for Research and Planning of the Supreme Court to prepare a comprehensive note on the ethical use of artificial intelligence and emerging technologies in the judiciary. "Technology must complement, not replace, the human mind in judicial decision-making," the CJI said, adding, "The emphasis must always be on using technology to enhance trust and transparency -- never to replace the human conscience at the heart of justice." He said though the judiciary has started to embrace technology, with the emergence of artificial-intelligence (AI) tools in judicial processes -- from case management to legal research, document translation and even predictive analytics -- there must be caution. "Around the world, debates are ongoing about the ethical use of AI in legal systems. Concerns include algorithmic bias, misinformation, data manipulation and breaches of confidentiality. For instance, sensitive information, such as the identity of a victim of crime, must never be disclosed due to AI error or the absence of clear protocols. Additionally, a few recent cases have shown that AI tools can generate fabricated citations or biased suggestions if not properly regulated and monitored," the CJI underscored. He added that technology, if anchored in constitutionalism and empathy, can transform access to justice from an abstract ideal into a lived and shared reality. "As we continue our journey toward modernising the Indian legal system, our approach must remain deeply rooted in constitutional values. The integration of technology must be people-centric, inclusive and guided by ethical clarity. Our ultimate goal should be to make justice accessible to every citizen, regardless of language, geography, income or digital literacy," he said. Concluding his address, Justice Gavai said, "I firmly believe that access to justice is not solely the responsibility of the judiciary. It is a shared national commitment. Law schools, civil society, legal-aid institutions and governments must work in unison to develop and promote technological models that are accessible, transparent and inclusive." Meanwhile, at a joint event of the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) and Trilegal organised on the occasion of London International Disputes Week, CJI Gavai said in recent decades, the justice-delivery mechanism, once confined within the boundaries of courtrooms, has witnessed a significant shift towards modes of alternative dispute resolution, with arbitration emerging as a prominent pillar of that transformation. The CJI was speaking on the topic of "Navigating the evolving landscape: The impact of the 7th edition of the SIAC Rules on India-Related Arbitrations". "At the cusp of this evolution lies the recognition that justice, particularly in complex commercial disputes, need not be adversarial or bureaucratic. Rather, it must be confidential, expert-driven and above all, tailored to the needs of those who seek it. Arbitration, in this context, is a substantive recalibration of how we understand and deliver justice," he said. Justice Gavai pointed out that over the last 10-15 years, India has made a multi-pronged effort towards its aspiration of building a favourable and sought-after place for arbitration. "While legislative reforms have significantly strengthened India's arbitration framework, the judiciary has also played a proactive role in fostering a more arbitration-friendly environment. Various progressive judgments by the Supreme Court of India over the last few years stand testament to this. Nonetheless, the enormity of India as a country has ensured that certain on-ground challenges continue," he said. "The Indian judiciary has and will continue to recognise and respect the autonomy of the arbitral process, ensuring that the courts step in only when demanded by the needs of justice," he added. The CJI said, "In conclusion, I am happy to note that the 7th edition of the SIAC Rules is a forward-looking endeavour, aimed at enhancing efficiency while balancing fairness. For India, whose commercial players are increasingly global in outlook and operation, these rules offer both an opportunity and a challenge -- the opportunity to align with international best practices and the challenge to elevate our own standards while balancing them with India's practical realities.
