London AI firm says Getty copyright case poses ‘overt threat' to industry
Getty's case against Stability AI for copyright and trademark infringement relating to its vast photography archives reached the high court in London on Monday.
Stability allows users to generate images using text prompts, and its directors include James Cameron, the Oscar-winning film director of Avatar and Titanic. But Getty called the people who were training the AI system 'a bunch of tech geeks' and claimed they were indifferent to the problems their innovation might create.
Stability countered by alleging that Getty was using 'fanciful' legal routes and spending approximately £10m to fight a technology it feared was 'an existential threat' to its business.
They added: 'The problem is when AI companies such as Stability want to use those works without payment.'
In submissions to the court on Monday Getty claimed Stability had trained its image generation model on databases that contained child sexual abuse material.
Stability is fighting the overall Getty claim and its lawyer said the allegations relating to child sexual abuse material were 'repugnant'.
A spokesperson for Stability AI said it was committed to preventing misuse of its technology, 'particularly in the creation and dissemination of harmful content, including CSAM [child sexual abuse material]'. It said it had robust safeguards 'to enhance our safety standards to protect against bad actors'.
Sign up to TechScape
A weekly dive in to how technology is shaping our lives
after newsletter promotion
The case comes amid a wider campaign from artists, writers and musicians, including Elton John and Dua Lipa, to protect their copyright from alleged theft by generative AI companies, which then use it to allow their customers to create new pictures, music or text.
The UK parliament is locked in a similar dispute after the government proposed that copyright holders would have to opt out of their material being used to train algorithms and produce AI-generated content, otherwise it would be free to use by tech companies.
The trial, which is scheduled to run for several weeks, will focus in part on the use of images by celebrated photographers, including photos of the former Liverpool football coach Jürgen Klopp taken by the award-winning British sports photographer Andrew Livesey; a picture of the Chicago Cubs baseball team by Gregory Shamus, an American sports photographer; a photo of the actor and musician Donald Glover by Alberto Rodriguez; and photos of the actor Eric Dane and film director Christopher Nolan by Andreas Rentz.
Seventy-eight thousand pages of evidence have been disclosed in the case and AI experts are being called to give evidence from the University of California, Berkeley and the University of Freiberg in Germany.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
25 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Katherine Ryan: Battleaxe review – comedy's ice queen melts into audience agony aunt
How would you like a ruthless cynic as an agony aunt? That's the question thrown up by this touring show from Katherine Ryan, which pairs 45 minutes of caustic standup with a second 45 of counselling to the crowd. You might protest that that adds up to less than an hour of new material in Battleaxe, plus a second act that's more improvised therapy session meets audience Q&A. But at least those three-quarters of an hour find Ryan on imperious form, dispensing tart put-downs of men in general and some men in particular. The Guardian's journalism is independent. We will earn a commission if you buy something through an affiliate link. Learn more. This ice queen of comedy pose is one Ryan wears lightly now, after a few years where it sometimes felt restrictive and for show. Then came her 2022 show Missus, which diluted (or enriched) the persona to address the Canadian's then-recent out-of-the-blue marriage. Battleaxe is a retrenchment after that more expansive offering, with Ryan back in her high-status comfort zone, eye-rolling at her children's foibles, breaching PC protocols for LOLs, and wrinkling her nose at the weaker sex. 'If dildos could bleed a radiator, men would be obsolete.' There's a fine routine on the contrasting ways male and female bodies husband their reproductive material, and many a weary remark at the expense of 'im indoors. See this masterpiece of double-edgery: 'I love my current husband so much so far.' The Ryan we meet post-interval sits a little at odds to this act one badass, as she responds to problems volunteered by the crowd with even-handedness in place of cynical certainty. Fair enough: such is (in her own words) her duty of care, as she ministers to a man whose Lego habit his new wife refuses to tolerate, and a couple at odds about the appeal (or otherwise) of having a third child. But, in this touring show of two halves, the laughs in this crowdsourced comedy are milder than the short, sharp hit of concentrated Katherine that goes before. Touring until 28 June
The Independent
26 minutes ago
- The Independent
Warning over 10% price hike trick when paying by card abroad this summer
Holidaymakers could see costs rise by 10 per cent this summer as 'dynamic currency conversion' (DCC) provides traders with tempting opportunities to profit from people paying with plastic. DCC, also known as 'cardholder preferred currency', has been around for many years. Hotels, restaurants and shops with significant numbers of tourists often provide the option to pay at a fixed conversion rate. The appeal to the traveller is that they will know instantly how much they have spent in sterling. But they are certain to lose out on the transaction. The practice looks harmless: simply an additional choice. When you ask to pay with plastic or a card stored on a mobile phone abroad, the terminal will often display two figures: the bill in euros (EUR) or other local currency, and a figure in pounds (GBP). Some holidaymakers may fondly assume that the sterling amount is the equivalent to the local currency at current exchange rates. In fact, the cost in pounds includes a margin of up to 10 per cent. This is pocketed by the bank, which passes some of the cash back to the merchant. Anyone who avails of dynamic currency conversion is voluntarily accepting a price increase that could add £1 to every £10 spent – a fast way to lose a slice of hard-earned cash. Many holidaymakers know, when asked abroad if they would like to pay a sterling amount rather than the local currency, always to say 'No'. When offering dynamic currency conversion, merchants are supposed to follow strict guidelines: But during the course of a journey through Europe this month, it has become clear that some traders are not playing fair. Once local currency has been selected, that should be the end of it. But some card machines are programmed to come up with another screen, typically reading: 'Do you accept that if you choose not to take advantage of the guaranteed exchange rate, you will be subject to whatever rate the card company uses?' Below it, there is a box marked 'Accept' and another, 'Reject'. Customers who are paying attention will select 'Accept' because they understand that their bank will just use the appropriate prevailing rate – and that it will be better than the DCC deal. But if 'Accept' is selected, it turns out to be applied to a different question, ie 'Do you accept the DCC rate of exchange?' The correct, counter-intuitive answer is 'Reject'. Some proprietors may not even let customers get this far. After a satisfying lunch of dumplings and tea at a restaurant on the Royal Route leading south from the Old Town of Warsaw, the waiter simply selected 'GBP' on the machine, adding 10 per cent to the cost of the meal. When challenged about this scam, he claimed the machine was faulty and that nothing could be done. For holidaymakers withdrawing cash abroad, ATMs generally offer dynamic currency conversion. It should also be declined. The profitability to the bank becomes clear by noting the GBP sum, selecting local currency and afterwards checking the account online to see the actual sum debited by the bank.
The Independent
26 minutes ago
- The Independent
Rachel Reeves warned against ‘unacceptable' London snub in spending review
London Mayor Sadiq Khan is urging Rachel Reeves to increase funding for London in the upcoming spending review, particularly for transport projects and the Metropolitan Police. Sources close to Khan warn it would be "unacceptable" if London doesn't receive the necessary funds, accusing Reeves of potentially pursuing an "anti-London agenda" similar to previous Conservative governments. City Hall is concerned London may not receive any of the £113 billion unlocked for infrastructure spending, with key priorities including extending the Docklands Light Railway and the Bakerloo underground line. Reeves has indicated a focus on prioritising spending outside of London and the South East, allocating over £15 billion to mayoral authorities in other regions. The spending review is expected to allocate a significant boost to the NHS, with other departments, including the Home Office, facing budget squeezes.
