How an Election Starting Today Impacts Your Power Bills
As summer returns and customers crank up their air conditioners to cope with the punishing heat, a little-known elected body that regulates energy prices in the state of Georgia is gearing up for a pivotal election.
The body, known as the Georgia Public Service Commission, or PSC, has the power to determine what Atlanta power bills are in the coming years and is deliberating putting a freeze on rate hikes for three-years.
In recent years, inflation-weary electricity rate payers in Georgia have struggled to pay rising monthly energy bills that, in extreme cases, match or exceed what some pay for their monthly rent or mortgage.
There is disagreement about whether electricity rate increases are warranted, with critics saying they are unfair and too onerous, and supporters saying they are necessary to bolster the state's booming economy.
Read More: Why Electricity Rates in Georgia Rose $516 Per Year on Average
Even so, the election is a big deal for Black voters because it is the PSC's first election since a federal judge ruled, in 2022, that its election system dilutes Black power. An appeals court overturned that decision, but this election will still impact how much many Black folks pay for electricity.
Here's what you need to know about energy prices, the commission and the special election.
Georgians have some of the highest utility bills in the nation, and the bills of Black Georgians, who are less likely to live in energy efficient homes, are often higher than most, according to Brionté McCorkle, executive director of Georgia Conservation Voters, an environmental justice group that educates and mobilizes voters on sustainability issues that affect their everyday lives.
'We also spend more of our income on power bills than other races,' McCorkle said. '[The PSC] will decide how much people will pay for power and whether that energy comes from safe, affordable, and clean energy sources.'
PSC commissioners have faced criticism for approving six Georgia Power rate hikes over the past two years. As a result, the average Georgia Power residential customer is paying $43 more per month, or $516 more per year, on their electric bill than they were two years ago.
But this month, Georgia Power — the state's largest electricity provider — agreed to forgo raising its base electricity rates for the next three years, with limited exceptions. The PSC is expected to vote on the rate hike freeze on July 1.
Georgia Power said its agreement not to raise rates for three years 'reflects broad consensus' and 'is the result of hard work and collaboration.'
'Even critics must agree this is great news for our customers,' company spokesman John Kraft said in an emailed statement. 'This stipulated agreement is simply the latest example of how our regulated market structure benefits Georgia families and businesses.'
Next year, Georgia Power is expected to request that the PSC let it begin recouping major storm-related losses from customers over the next few years. The company agreed to make its request between Feb. 1 and July 1 of next year.
Activists have been pressing for Black voters to have a greater say in the election of commissioners, given the importance of the PSC to the bottom line of Black households.
In 2020, McCorkle, Black Voters Matter activist Wanda Mosley, and former Atlanta NAACP President Richard Rose filed a lawsuit in a federal district court alleging that Georgia's at-large PSC election system unfairly diluted the power of Black voters, in violation of the 1965 Voting Rights Act.
Under the at-large system, each PSC commissioner represented one district, but the district did not elect its own commissioner. Each commissioner was elected in a statewide race.
The court determined that the power of Black voters — who are overrepresented in some PSC districts like District 3, which includes metro Atlanta — was diluted by white voters, who are the majority of the population in Georgia.
The August 2022 ruling led to the establishment of a special election in 2025. A federal appellate court overturned the lower court's decision in November 2023. The appellate court judges argued state lawmakers weren't motivated by race when they determined PSC elections should be statewide office races.
'Georgia chose this electoral format to protect critical policy interests and there is no evidence, or allegation, that race was a motivating factor in this decision,' the judges wrote in their ruling.
A total of eight candidates are competing in two separate PSC district races this year.
Each race will start with two primaries — one for Democrats and one for Republicans. Early voting in all four primaries starts today and ends on June 13. In-person voting takes place on June 17. Any runoffs would take place on July 15. The general election is Nov. 4.
The two commissioners who are vying for reelection are District 2 incumbent Timothy Echols, who represents most of eastern Georgia, and District 3 incumbent Fitz Johnson, whose region includes most of metro Atlanta. Both are Republicans, as are the three other current commissioners.
Capital B has interviewed all eight PSC candidates and will share their responses in future stories.
In the Republican primary, Johnson is running unopposed.
In the Democratic primary, there are four contenders — former EPA Regional Administrator Daniel Blackman, clean energy nonprofit leader Peter Hubbard, technologies consultant Robert L. Jones, and former Atlanta City Council member Keisha Sean Waites — are competing to challenge Johnson in November.
In the Republican primary, Echols is facing off against Harlem, Georgia, mechanical contractor Lee Muns.
Alicia M. Johnson, a Savannah-based health care administrator, is running unopposed in the Democratic primary.
The post How an Election Starting Today Impacts Your Power Bills appeared first on Capital B News - Atlanta.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Aurora City Council will not hold in-person meetings until Kilyn Lewis lawsuit concludes
DENVER (KDVR) — Aurora Mayor Mike Coffman announced Tuesday that the city's council meetings will be held virtually to prevent disruptions while a lawsuit filed on behalf of a man shot and killed by police works its way through the court system. The message was echoed on the council's webpage. The webpage includes instructions for how members of the public can view the meetings or provide public comment on agenda items. However, all public comment listening sessions have been canceled until further notice. Family of man killed by Aurora police last May files suit against city, officer who fired deadly shot The measure was voted on during the June 9 council meeting, with seven in favor, three against, and two members in debate. In May, the council addressed a resolution that would change how it accepts public comment. 'As of right now, criminally, Michael Dieck did not murder Kilyn Lewis,' said councilwoman Danielle Jurinsky. 'It's in the court's hands now, and I would like to suspend this to be virtual until we have an official ruling from the court as to whether or not the city is liable in any way, shape or form for the death of Kilyn Lewis. Because if we are not in fact liable in any way, shape or form for the death of Kilyn Lewis, there is nothing left to discuss, and there's no reason for you to come back.' Jurinsky added that if the ruling takes years to reach, then she's on board with having virtual meetings until the ruling. Family and friends of Kilyn Lewis have held protests during several Aurora City Council meetings. The group has been seeking justice after the 37-year-old was shot and killed by an Aurora police officer in May 2024. In October, the district attorney ruled that an officer who shot Lewis would not face charges. In late May, Lewis' family filed a lawsuit seeking accountability from the Aurora Police Department in their loved one's death. It discusses excessive force, wrongful death and violations of the family's constitutional rights. 'This lawsuit is not just about a dollar amount. It's about truth. It's about making sure that the life of a Black man like Kilyn Lewis is not so easily discarded,' said MiDian Shofner, CEO of the Epitome of Black Excellence and Partnership and lead advocate for the family, in the May 28 announcement of the case filing. 'No amount of money can bring him back, but since America has made money the metric for justice, the family is rightfully pursuing every legal remedy available.' Coffman wrote on Facebook that he believes the group is simply looking for a check, and then they will 'go away.' Deadly shooting of Kilyn Lewis leads to new Aurora police SWAT policies: Report 'Until then, they will continue to disrupt our meetings. They have no choice but to continue disrupting our meetings because their lawsuit is meritless. This is why we have no choice but to stop all in-person council meetings, and go virtual, until their lawsuit has been concluded,' Coffman wrote. He noted that an Arapahoe County Grand Jury was also asked to review the case and declined to pursue charges against the officer. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Ditched by Trump's EEOC, job applicant advances bias lawsuit against Sheetz
This story was originally published on HR Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily HR Dive newsletter. A Black job applicant who alleged that gas station chain Sheetz disproportionately screened out Black, Native American, Alaskan Native and multiracial applicants moved to continue his case June 5 after the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission abandoned it. EEOC filed a class-action lawsuit in April 2024 alleging that Sheetz maintained a longstanding practice of screening all job applicants for past criminal convictions and rejected those with such records. This practice violated Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, EEOC said in a press release, because it had a disparate impact on applicants of certain racial backgrounds. However, the agency moved to have the case dismissed last week because it determined that the disparate-impact claims would conflict with President Donald Trump's April 23 executive order directing agencies to cease enforcement of such claims. EEOC asked the court to defer dismissal of its claims by 60 days to allow the commission to notify class members so that they could obtain private representation. The legality of Trump's executive order on disparate-impact claims proved contentious, with one of EEOC's own administrative judges calling the order 'highly illegal.' But the June 5 filing in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania is one of the first examples in which the order has been put into practice. Trump said the end of disparate-impact liability enforcement was necessary because it inhibited businesses from hiring applicants on the basis of merit and skill. He also said that disparate-impact liability is unconstitutional and 'threatens the commitment to merit and equality of opportunity that forms the foundation of the American Dream.' The push to end disparate-impact liability is one of the goals stated by the conservative Heritage Foundation in its 'Project 2025' presidential transition document. The organization wrote that the concept should be thrown out because under disparate-impact theory, 'discriminatory motive or intent is irrelevant; the outcome is what matters. But all workplaces have disparities.' That logic has been met with resistance by former Democratic officials of the U.S. Department of Labor and EEOC, who said in May that disparate-impact liability is explicitly outlawed under Title VII and has been upheld by U.S. Supreme Court precedent. The former officials cautioned employers that they should avoid following Trump's executive order so they do not violate federal laws. 'Disparate impact liability is a necessary element of advancing equal opportunity for all, consistent with America's national commitment to equal justice,' the officials wrote. In a press release, plaintiff-side firm Outten & Golden, which is partly representing the job applicant in the Sheetz case, said EEOC had spent nearly a decade investigating the claims at issue and had found a basis to allege evidence of systemic discrimination. 'Our client has a right to be judged on his qualifications, and not to be denied a livelihood by policies that exclude people with stale convictions that are unrelated to the job,' said Ben Geffen, senior attorney at the Public Interest Law Center and a co-representative for the plaintiff, said in the press release. 'When the government steps back, we step in. We will not allow political interference to wipe out hard-won legal protections.' A similar dynamic played out following EEOC's abandonment of several lawsuits it filed on behalf of transgender workers alleging discrimination following an executive order from Trump. Advocacy groups have since filed to intervene on behalf of plaintiffs in those cases. Recommended Reading Shell Oil did not discriminate in hiring decision, 5th Cir. says
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Noem takes aim at Tim Walz for letting his 'city burn' in 2020 as she justifies Trump's LA riot response
Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem took a shot at Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz for how he handled the 2020 riots in his state, claiming that the Trump administration wouldn't let history repeat itself in Los Angeles amid immigration protests. Noem, who previously served as governor of South Dakota, defended the Trump administration's decision to deploy thousands of National Guard troops and hundreds of Marines to address the protests in Los Angeles, using Minnesota as an example of what happens when a "bad governor" is in charge. "I was a governor of a neighboring state to Tim Walz and watched him let his city burn," Noem told reporters Tuesday. "And the president and I have talked about this in the past, and he was not going to let that happen to another city and to another community where a bad governor made a bad decision." Ice Sweeps Through La Businesses As Local Democrats Cry Foul Over Trump Administration's Enforcement Actions Walz was first elected governor of Minnesota in 2019, leading the state as protests broke out after the death of Black man George Floyd at the hands of a White police officer in 2020. While Walz has said he takes the blame for a delayed response activating the National Guard in his state, he has also said he is proud of how Minnesota reacted. "I'm proud of Minnesota's response. I'm proud of Minnesota's first responders who were out there, from firefighters to police to the National Guard to citizens that were out there," Walz said in a 2022 gubernatorial debate. Read On The Fox News App Walz's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Fox News Digital. Federal Officials Slam Democrats For 'Dangerous' Rhetoric As Ice Agents Face Violent Mobs In La, Nyc Meanwhile, the Trump administration is dispatching a total of 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines to Los Angeles after protests broke out Friday stemming from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement arrests in the city. President Donald Trump has gone head-to-head with California's governor, Democrat Gavin Newsom, over the activation of the troops. While Trump has argued the National Guard troops are necessary to prevent destruction in Los Angeles, Newsom said most of the troops "are sitting, unused, in federal buildings without orders." Ice Official Puts Politicians On Blast, Demanding They 'Stop Putting My People In Danger' Additionally, Newsom argued that the move violates state sovereignty because state governors typically oversee National Guard troops. However, Trump invoked a law to place the troops under federal command to bypass Newsom. "This isn't about public safety," Newsom said in a post on X on Monday. "It's about stroking a dangerous President's ego." The Associated Press contributed to this report. Original article source: Noem takes aim at Tim Walz for letting his 'city burn' in 2020 as she justifies Trump's LA riot response