VP Dhankhar nominates ophthalmologist ML Raja for Dr S Radhakrishnan Chair
The Chair was initiated after the first vice president, Dr S Radhakrishnan, who later became the president. It was initiated by the Rajya Sabha in the year 2009 with the objective of promoting research on different aspects of Parliamentary democracy in India.
Announcing Raja's nomination at an event at Vice-President's Enclave , Dhankhar stated, 'Let me welcome in particular today, whose presence I have solicited, and that is Dr S Radhakrishnan Chair, Dr ML Raja.'
The Chair was made functional during Dhankhar's tenure.
'This Chair was initiated after one of the distinguished sons of Bharat, the first vice president who became president, Dr S Radhakrishnan, a philosopher who was also known for his academic commitment as a teacher. The Chair was initiated for the first time in the year 2009. Technically, Dr. ML Raja is the third recipient. De facto second. The Chair was made functional during my tenure when Jawahar Kaul, a distinguished journalist from the state of Jammu and Kashmir, deeply committed to nationalism, got the honour to get the chair, and Dr. Raja from the deep south, the state of Tamil Nadu, was the second one to get it...
'About the Chair, let me tell you, in 1962, September 5 was declared as Teacher's Day. It happens to be the birthday of Dr S. Radhakrishnan; that underscores that you may have any position, President or Vice-President. You may be a philosopher. You may be a great author but social recognition has come by virtue of his being a teacher, Teacher's Day. Always bear that in mind. Respect your parents as much as you respect your teachers either way,' the VP added.
Dr Raja brings exceptional multidisciplinary expertise as an ophthalmologist, epigraphist, archaeologist, and historian. Currently serving as Director of AVINASH (Academy on Vibrant National Arts and Scientific Heritage) and RICH (Research Institute of Chronology and History), he holds qualifications spanning medicine (M.B., B.S., D.O.), archaeology and epigraphy (D.I.A.E.), and history (M.A.).
His scholarly contributions include 13 published books covering subjects from ancient Indian astronomy to historical chronology, including notable works like 'Aryabhatta's Date: an Analytical Study' and 'Astronomical Evidence of the Date of the Mahabharata War', the release stated.
Dr Raja has received significant recognition, including recent awards from the Governor of Tamil Nadu, for his contributions to Tamil literary works and research on Kamba Ramayanam. His involvement with the IKS Division of AICTE, where he has served as mentor and expert evaluator, has been particularly noteworthy.
His current research focuses on determining the accurate chronology of Indian history, including the dating of historical figures like Adi Shankara and Chandragupta Maurya and analysing astronomical texts. His expertise in Tamil, Sanskrit, Telugu, and English enables a comprehensive study of diverse historical sources. (ANI)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
13 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Ceremonial heads: on Governors
The Supreme Court of India's strong censure of Tamil Nadu Governor R.N. Ravi in April seems to have done little to slow down the collision course that many Governors have been on with the respective State governments. Not only did the Court rule against the Governor casting a de-facto veto on 10 Bills relating to universities passed by the State legislature but it also specified timelines for the Governor's response to Bills. Importantly, it declared infructuous any Presidential intervention based on the Governor's recommendation. Last week, Mr. Ravi had referred the Kalaignar University Bill to the President instead of giving it his assent. In Kerala, Governor Rajendra Vishwanath Arlekar has kicked off yet another controversy after directing State-run universities to observe a 'Partition horrors day' on August 14, drawing criticism about possible ideological and communal motives. His predecessor, Arif Mohammed Khan, had also locked horns with the government, sitting on and practically vetoing Bills especially relating to universities. The Court's line has been de-facto challenged by the President, but through a reference. State-owned universities have become the key battlegrounds in the Governor-State government conflicts. They are among the few institutions over which the Governor has a direct say. As scholars point out, the office of the Governor was a colonial mechanism of control over provinces that may be ruled by Indian parties. That the universities had British Governors as their ceremonial heads, or rather Chancellors, was to bring colonial prestige and ensure their autonomy and importance. India's early national-level leaders retained the Governor as a central appointee to guard against separatist tendencies. It appears that legislation in many States retained the role of Governors as Chancellors of State-run universities to give them the same colonial veneer and aura. Even a Tamil Nadu Bill that had sought to minimise the Governor's role in Vice-Chancellor appointments did not seek to remove the Governor as Chancellor of the university. In Kerala and Tamil Nadu, the Governors are central proxies with a hostile political and ideological agenda. Meanwhile, draft UGC regulations seek to divest State governments of their role in the selection of the Vice-Chancellor, vesting all powers in the Chancellor. But the thrust of the National Education Policy 2020 has been towards greater autonomy for educational institutions. Universities are expected to raise funds and be accountable for spending. A university head's role is expected to be not just academic and administrative but also that of a business manager, cheerleader and fundraiser. It may make sense to have professionals become the ceremonial as well as executive heads of universities, replacing Governors.
The Hindu
13 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Science and nation-building
Since Independence, India has drawn on science and technology as key pillars of the nation-building process. The vision of its first leaders, but especially Jawaharlal Nehru, was to foster a rational temper among the populace, empowering citizens not only to adopt technological advancements but also to imbue everyday life and national development with evidence-based reasoning and inquiry. The Constitution encodes the development of 'scientific temper, humanism, and the spirit of inquiry and reform' as a fundamental duty of every Indian. Immediately after Independence, India made significant investments in scientific institutions, research laboratories, and educational establishments, leading to the founding of the IITs, the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, and the Indian Space Research Organisation, among others. The planned economy, the Green Revolution, and liberalisation all banked on scientific solutions and deployed expert knowledge across agriculture, infrastructure, and industry. The ecosystem for research and innovation that resulted is today exemplified by achievements in spaceflight, pharmaceuticals, digital technologies, and renewable energy. Innovations in the form of household appliances, electronic goods, and telecom and Internet connectivity have also diffused into daily life. Despite these advances, however, there continues to be a tension between technological adoption and the prevalence of irrational attitudes at multiple levels of Indian society. While Indians readily embrace new technologies, scientific temper remains confined to a few pockets. Superstitions, pseudoscience, and magical thinking persist in mainstream culture, sometimes melding with religious practices and customs to the detriment of rationality. While Prime Minister Narendran Modi himself has claimed that the Hindu god Ganesha's form proved ancient expertise in plastic surgery, Ministers have promoted the idea that cow urine can cure cancer. Former Education Minister Satya Pal Singh once threatened to remove Darwin's theory of evolution from textbooks, saying no Indian text supports 'monkeys turning into humans'. At the Indian Science Congress, some scientists have advocated renaming gravitational waves as 'Modi waves'. Mass superstitions have often triggered widespread panic, such as rumours that witches were cutting off women's braids, eliciting violent community reactions. Belief in the 'miraculous: healing powers of individuals are widespread in spite of multiple 'godmen' like Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh and Asaram Bapu having been exposed as fraudsters. While social media continues to amplify the spread of pseudoscience and conspiracy theories related to health and history, policy discourse sometimes relies more on political expedience or parochial interests than on scientific advice. Attitudes towards climate change, pollution, and environmental degradation are often apathetic despite clear scientific warnings. While India's elite scientific institutions are globally competitive, the quality of science education at school and college levels is inconsistent. The gap between rote-based learning and genuine scientific inquiry and problem-solving scepticism endures. The ability to reason critically and challenge dogma has not been cultivated widely, leaving segments of the populace susceptible to misinformation. The media's role has also been mixed. While there are commendable public science communication efforts and popularisation initiatives, there is a greater amplification of pseudoscience and anti-intellectualism. High-profile personalities sometimes even misuse platforms to spread unscientific claims, which go unchallenged due to deference to authority or lack of public understanding. Legal and regulatory mechanisms to curb pseudoscience, fraudulent miracle cures, and exploitative practices remain inadequate or inconsistently applied. In a society where tradition, religion, and modernity rub shoulders, scientific temper is not an attack on faith or tradition but the ability to question and test ideas irrespective of source. Many Indians hold rational views in aspects of life directly shaped by science yet default to tradition or non-scientific authority in other spheres. Merely adopting a technology is not synonymous with adopting scientific temper. Rationality encompasses a broader outlook, including evidence-based reasoning and the courage to question received wisdom. So while India has made considerable scientific and technological progress, it has not done so as a people moved by the constitutional spirit. Bridging the gap between technological advances and internalised scientific temper demands both institutional action and collective cultural transformation. To this end, India must revamp science education to emphasise critical thinking over rote learning and strengthen science communication and public outreach to make scientific knowledge accessible and engaging. Vital areas like healthcare, climate action, and social justice must be guided by evidence-based policymaking. The government should also promote interdisciplinary approaches in academia that blend Humanities and sciences to nurture empathy.
The Hindu
13 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Federal balance is a key indicator of a thriving democracy
In a true federal system, States should not have to protest, litigate, or plead for their rightful share of revenues. Such a situation affects not only the development of the State, but also the unity of India India attained its political Independence in 1947. But this was not achieved ordinarily; it was the culmination of a tumultuous, three-century-long struggle for freedom. From those who took up arms against the repressive British Rule to those who chose the path of non-violent resistance and laid down their lives, countless martyrs walked this soil. The nation's Independence was not gifted. It was earned through blood, sweat, breath, will, and sacrifice. This historic struggle was not confined to any one region, community, or linguistic group. From Kanniyakumari to the Himalayas, people across all States, irrespective of language, religion, ethnicity, or culture, rallied behind the idea of an Independent India. It was truly a nationwide movement. The political freedom it secured was envisioned by our leaders to be collective, an India that belongs to everyone. It was this spirit that led to the formulation of one of our most enduring ideals: 'Unity in Diversity'. Despite our differences of race, language, state, and faith, our leaders fostered the vision of a shared national identity. Foreign powers doubted this unity, predicting that a newly liberated India would fragment within years. But we have defied such expectations for over 75 years, because of our unshakable commitment to unity in diversity. India is home to many nationalities. To ensure harmony among them, our States were reorganised along linguistic lines. The Constitution of India defines the country as a 'Union of States', a deliberate and foundational expression. The Planning Commission was established to ensure equitable development across all regions, with Five-Year Plans laid out for national progress. Linguistic diversity is a defining feature of India. Jawaharlal Nehru, our first Prime Minister, assured the nation that Hindi would not be imposed as long as non-Hindi speaking people wanted it. Whenever the Union government's decisions seemed to favour Hindi at the cost of other languages, the backlash was strong, and many such decisions were withdrawn. It is a matter of record that the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly, under Chief Minister Perarignar Anna, passed a resolution affirming Tamil and English as sufficient for official use, a position accepted by the Union government. India is equally home to people of many faiths, and yet, we are a secular state. The Indian Constitution affirms secularism not just in principle, but in the very Preamble that frames our Republic. Together, these ideals have transformed India's political Independence into a collective freedom, one that belongs to all. Yet, there is a section which fails to understand the full import of what we seek when we articulate emancipatory ideas such as cooperative federalism, State autonomy, social justice, religious harmony, and linguistic rights. We have been consistent in our position that for India to function as a true federal union, its States must be empowered with real autonomy. We have given enough empirical evidence for sufficient devolution of power. That is why visionary leaders who championed State autonomy asserted that aside from subjects such as Defence, External Affairs, and Currency, all other rights and responsibilities must rest with the States. Even the carefully structured division of powers in our Constitution, the Union List, the State List, and the Concurrent List, has been gradually eroded. Matters in the Concurrent List have been subsumed into the Union List. State List subjects are being steadily encroached upon. Even the Union's obligations towards the States under the Union List are increasingly unmet. This is the grave crisis that several Indian States have been forced to face since the BJP came to power in 2014. When our party came to power for the first time, one of the major initiatives was forming a high-level committee to frame the desirable and enduring relationship between States and the Union by forming the Rajamannar Committee. The committee recommendations became a Legislative resolution in 1974. Despite being a pioneer advocating the spirit of cooperative federalism, it was penalised for its performance because of the lopsided distribution of power. Since we assumed office in 2021, Tamil Nadu's development has been reaching remarkable heights. For the financial year 2024-25, the State's economy recorded an impressive growth rate of 11.19%, a double-digit figure achieved for the first time in 14 years. Tamil Nadu is now the fastest-growing large economy in India, a distinction no other major State can currently claim. This growth has been achieved amidst numerous challenges. It represents the highest economic growth rate in the country. But the Union is penalising the State for its exceptional performance. In recent years, Tamil Nadu has seen exponential growth in exports, particularly in electronics, with exports increasing ninefold over four years. According to EPFO data, the number of registered employees in the State has grown by nearly one crore in the past five years. Based on this trajectory, we have set ourselves an ambitious but achievable target: to transform Tamil Nadu into a five-trillion-dollar economy by 2047. But we do not believe in isolated development. Tamil Nadu's growth is a critical pillar of India's overall progress. I have said this, unequivocally and on record, in the presence of the Hon'ble Prime Minister of India: 'Tamil Nadu's performance will be a significant contributor to India's aspiration of becoming a 30-trillion-dollar economy by 2047.' Why then is there such hesitation within the Union government to recognise and embrace Tamil Nadu's progress as part of India's success story? The current Prime Minister served as the Chief Minister of Gujarat for 12 years. He often spoke passionately about State rights. Why then there is a change in the tone and tenor of the Prime Minister when it comes to the crucial question of State powers? In 2015, then Finance Minister Arun Jaitley announced an AIIMS for Tamil Nadu. The Prime Minister laid its foundation stone in Madurai before the 2019 election. Six years on, the building remains unconstructed. Should we not question such neglect? Tamil Nadu has been denied nearly ₹2,200 crore in funds under the Samagra Shiksha Abhiyan (SSA) for 2024-25 on the grounds that it did not sign an MoU relating to the entirely separate 'PM SHRI' scheme. They are two entirely different schemes. Why should the School Development Scheme be linked to the State's language policy? The result is that disadvantaged children, including those protected under the Right to Education Act, are deprived of crucial educational support. Is it wrong if people perceive this as a fascist spirit? The Union government routinely announces Centrally sponsored schemes but fails to allocate its share of the funding. The Tamil Nadu government is forced to not only contribute its own share but also compensate for the Union's default. The rising share of State contributions in schemes jointly implemented by the Union and State governments continues to strain the finances of States such as Tamil Nadu. Is this not a clear manifestation of an authoritarian mindset that believes, 'No one can question us'? The 15th Finance Commission recommended that 41% of the Union's tax revenue be devolved to the States. But over the past four years, only 33.16% has been shared. This amounts to a betrayal of the States. We continue to insist that a fair allocation would see this figure raised to 50%. In a true federal system, States should not have to protest, litigate, or plead for their rightful share of revenues. Such a situation affects not only the development of the State, but also the unity of India. Governors in many States, including Tamil Nadu, have become obstacles to development, acting as roadblocks rather than facilitators. Despite clear and repeated judgments from the Hon'ble Supreme Court, these gubernatorial overreaches continue. Every time we pass a Bill and send it to the Governor for assent, we are left with no choice but to move the Supreme Court as well. This repeated compulsion is not just an insult to legislative authority — it is a betrayal of the Constitution and of democracy itself. Hence, to secure the just rights for States, we have constituted the High-Level Committee on Union-State Relations under the chairmanship of former Supreme Court judges like Justice Kurian Joseph. Hope at least the recommendation of this committee becomes a national norm and bring about changes in the present dominance-dependancy equation between the Union and the States, replacing it with a true federal spirit where the inalienable rights of the States are not trampled upon. M.K. Stalin is the Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu
