Antarctica's hidden threat: Melting ice could spark hundreds of explosive volcanoes
climate change
and increased volcanic activity, warning that the rapid melting of
glaciers
and ice caps, especially in regions like West Antarctica, could trigger hundreds of explosive
volcanic eruptions
worldwide. The research, based on geological data from Chile's Andes Mountains, demonstrates how retreating ice removes pressure on underground magma chambers, making eruptions more likely and more violent. Scientists believe this mechanism, already observed in Iceland, could apply across several glaciated regions of the world. The biggest concern lies beneath Antarctica's thick ice, where at least 100 volcanoes remain buried. As global temperatures rise, this hidden volcanic threat could become a dangerous feedback loop that further accelerates climate change.
From ice to fire: The chain reaction beneath our feet
According to the
study
presented at the Goldschmidt Geochemistry Conference in Prague, glaciers suppress volcanic activity by exerting immense pressure on magma chambers beneath Earth's surface. As the ice melts due to global heating, this pressure lifts, allowing gases in magma to expand and erupt explosively. Researchers found that after the last Ice Age, regions like Chile experienced a surge in volcanism, offering a chilling preview of what could happen as modern glaciers disappear.
Case study from Chile's Andes
Lead researcher
Pablo Moreno-Yaeger
and his team studied Mocho-Choshuenco, a volcano in Chile, using radioisotope dating of volcanic rocks. Their findings show that thick ice cover between 26,000 and 18,000 years ago suppressed eruptions. Once the ice melted around 13,000 years ago, the volcano erupted more frequently and more violently. The magma became more viscous due to prolonged underground buildup, increasing the explosiveness when finally released.
The growing risk in Antarctica
The
West Antarctic Ice Sheet
, already under threat from rising temperatures, covers at least 100 known volcanoes. Scientists warn that the loss of this ice could unleash significant volcanic activity in the region. While eruptions can temporarily cool the planet by releasing sunlight-blocking particles, sustained volcanic activity would inject carbon dioxide and methane into the atmosphere, intensifying global warming.
Global implications beyond Antarctica
Though much of the focus is on Antarctica, other glaciated regions such as North America, New Zealand, and Russia could also be at risk. The findings urge scientists and policymakers to monitor glacial regions more closely and prepare for possible climate volcano feedback loops. More research is now considered 'critically important' to understand how warming temperatures may interact with Earth's geologic systems.
A call for urgent study
Despite the potentially massive impact, volcanism remains under-studied in climate change models. Researchers say it's vital to factor in geological responses like eruptions into our understanding of climate risks. As more glaciers retreat and expose ancient volcanoes, the Earth's response may not be slow or quiet, but loud, explosive, and globally disruptive.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
23-07-2025
- Time of India
Study reveals how 5,000-year-old Stonehenge's giant blocks were moved using human hands and primitive tools
A new scientific study has added weight to a long-held belief that the builders of Stonehenge, the iconic 5,000-year-old monument in southern England, transported its massive stones using only human effort and rudimentary tools. By analyzing a mysterious fragment known as the Newall Boulder, archaeologists have dismissed the theory that glaciers carried these stones to the Salisbury Plain during the Ice Age. Instead, they found geochemical and microscopic evidence linking the rocks directly to quarries in the Preseli Hills of Wales, over 200 kilometers away. This supports the argument that Neolithic people, with no access to wheels or metal tools, managed this incredible feat through ingenuity, endurance, and primitive but effective technology. Stonehenge clues hidden in the Newall Boulder The centerpiece of the new findings is a stone fragment unearthed at Stonehenge in 1924 and largely forgotten until recently. Called the Newall Boulder, this bullet-shaped piece was reanalyzed using advanced chemical and microscopic techniques. Researchers found that it shares identical mineral features with rhyolite rock found at Craig Rhos-y-felin in Wales. This connection effectively rules out glacial origin and aligns with the theory that the stone was manually extracted and transported by people. For decades, one camp of archaeologists believed the bluestones arrived at Stonehenge via glaciers during the Ice Age. Proponents like Dr. Brian John cited glacial abrasion marks as evidence. However, the latest study argues that these surface characteristics could easily be the result of weathering. More importantly, there's no supporting evidence of glaciation on Salisbury Plain — no other glacial erratics or deposits have ever been found in the area. This significantly undermines the ice transport theory. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like No annual fees for life UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo Theories behind why Stonehenge's giant stones were arranged in a circle The circular layout of Stonehenge has puzzled historians and archaeologists for centuries, giving rise to a number of compelling theories. One of the most widely supported ideas is that the monument functioned as an ancient astronomical observatory . Researchers have noted how certain stones align with the rising and setting sun during the summer and winter solstices. This suggests that Stonehenge may have served as a prehistoric calendar, helping early societies track the changing seasons for agricultural or ceremonial purposes. Another leading theory focuses on Stonehenge's role as a sacred or spiritual site. The circular shape, often associated with unity, eternity, and the heavens, may have had symbolic significance to Neolithic communities. Some experts believe the site was used for rituals, burials, or ancestral worship, with the arrangement of the stones reflecting a cosmic order or serving as a portal between the earthly and the divine. While no single theory has been universally proven, the alignment, symmetry, and sheer scale of Stonehenge continue to point toward its importance as a center of cultural and spiritual life in ancient Britain. Human ingenuity and Neolithic engineering The idea that Neolithic people manually moved stones weighing 2 to 3 tonnes across 200 kilometers may sound implausible, but archaeologists say it's entirely feasible. Evidence from other ancient cultures shows that large stones have been transported over great distances using wooden sledges, ropes, rollers, and teamwork. The larger 'sarsen' stones at Stonehenge, some weighing up to 40 tonnes, were also moved into place, further proving that Neolithic communities had the capability to orchestrate such a massive undertaking. Stonehenge remains one of the world's most iconic and enigmatic monuments. Understanding how its stones were transported gives us deeper insight into the lives, beliefs, and capabilities of Neolithic people. The latest findings strengthen the argument that the monument wasn't the result of natural forces, but a powerful testament to human will and innovation — a message carved in stone across millennia.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
11-07-2025
- Business Standard
Jurassic Park for real? Biotech firm to revive New Zealand's giant bird
Towering over three metres tall, the South Island giant moa was a true titan of the bird world — the tallest bird ever to walk the Earth. For millennia, this flightless herbivore roamed the lush forests of New Zealand, browsing on trees and shrubs with unmatched dominance. But its reign came to an abrupt end 600 years ago with the arrival of humans who hunted it to extinction. The legendary moa now lives on only through Māori oral traditions and scattered remnants: ancient bones, traces of mummified flesh, and the occasional feather — haunting clues to a lost giant. Now, centuries after its disappearance, the giant bird is set to be the latest resurrection target for Colossal Biosciences — a Texas-based biotech company known for its audacious attempts to revive extinct creatures. On Tuesday, the company announced plans to "bring back" the moa within the next ten years, calling the project part of its growing mission to restore lost biodiversity. 'We're bringing back avian dinosaurs,' the company declared. The South Island giant moa (Dinornis robustus) was the largest of nine known moa species, capable of reaching up to 12 feet (3.6 metres) in height. While all moas vanished within a few hundred years of human settlement in New Zealand, Colossal says it hopes to reverse that loss using advanced genetic engineering — in partnership with local Indigenous communities. Can genetic engineering truly bring back lost species? Colossal's plans are ambitious, but they're also raising serious scientific concerns. The company has already faced scrutiny for claiming earlier this year that it had brought back the dire wolf — an Ice Age predator believed to have gone extinct over 10,000 years ago. But after the reveal, many experts pushed back, calling it misleading. The recreated animals, they argued, were simply grey wolves with minor gene edits — not true dire wolves. Even Beth Shapiro, Colossal's chief scientist, later admitted the animals were 'gray wolves with 20 edits' and clarified in an interview with New Scientist that 'it's not possible to bring something back that is identical to a species that used to be alive.' Despite this, the company has doubled down on its original claims, insisting it had indeed "resurrected" the dire wolf. Similar questions now surround the moa project — and others in Colossal's pipeline, including plans to bring back the woolly mammoth, the dodo, and the thylacine (also known as the Tasmanian tiger). Critics argue that, while the science may be impressive, the outcomes are far from true de-extinction. 'There is no existing genetic technology capable of truly bringing a lost species back to life — especially one that's been absent from its ecosystem and evolutionary journey for centuries,' said Philip Seddon, a zoology professor at the University of Otago, in a statement to the New Zealand Science Media Centre (NZSMC). 'No matter the scientific precision, the outcome will never be a real moa. It cannot be. The moa was a singular marvel, shaped by thousands of years of natural evolution — a legacy that simply can't be replicated in a lab.' How Colossal plans to recreate the moa According to Colossal, the process to 'revive' the moa involves extracting DNA from preserved remains of all nine moa species and comparing it with the genetic codes of living birds. Speaking to Time magazine, Shapiro said scientists aim to identify key genetic traits unique to the moa and then engineer those into the genome of the emu or tinamou — two of the moa's closest living relatives. The result would be a modified bird, bred to resemble the extinct giant as closely as possible. But experts caution this will be, at best, a proxy — not a perfect clone. Dr Tori Herridge, an evolutionary biologist at the University of Sheffield, who turned down an offer to join Colossal's advisory board, is among those raising ethical and scientific red flags. 'Is de-extinction possible? No, it's not,' she told The Guardian. 'What we might eventually create are genetically modified organisms that mimic some traits of extinct species, based on what we think they looked like. But using the term 'de-extinction' skips over the hard questions. We're not bringing back the mammoth, the moa or the dodo — we're creating something new to engineer ecological change.'
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
11-07-2025
- Business Standard
De-extinction firm to bring back avian dinosaurs within next 10 years
Towering over three metres tall, the South Island giant moa was a true titan of the bird world — the tallest bird ever to walk the Earth. For millennia, this flightless herbivore roamed the lush forests of New Zealand, browsing on trees and shrubs with unmatched dominance. But its reign came to an abrupt end 600 years ago with the arrival of humans who hunted it to extinction. The legendary moa now lives on only through Māori oral traditions and scattered remnants: ancient bones, traces of mummified flesh, and the occasional feather — haunting clues to a lost giant. Now, centuries after its disappearance, the giant bird is set to be the latest resurrection target for Colossal Biosciences — a Texas-based biotech company known for its audacious attempts to revive extinct creatures. On Tuesday, the company announced plans to "bring back" the moa within the next ten years, calling the project part of its growing mission to restore lost biodiversity. 'We're bringing back avian dinosaurs,' the company declared. The South Island giant moa (Dinornis robustus) was the largest of nine known moa species, capable of reaching up to 12 feet (3.6 metres) in height. While all moas vanished within a few hundred years of human settlement in New Zealand, Colossal says it hopes to reverse that loss using advanced genetic engineering — in partnership with local Indigenous communities. Can genetic engineering truly bring back lost species? Colossal's plans are ambitious, but they're also raising serious scientific concerns. The company has already faced scrutiny for claiming earlier this year that it had brought back the dire wolf — an Ice Age predator believed to have gone extinct over 10,000 years ago. But after the reveal, many experts pushed back, calling it misleading. The recreated animals, they argued, were simply grey wolves with minor gene edits — not true dire wolves. Even Beth Shapiro, Colossal's chief scientist, later admitted the animals were 'gray wolves with 20 edits' and clarified in an interview with New Scientist that 'it's not possible to bring something back that is identical to a species that used to be alive.' Despite this, the company has doubled down on its original claims, insisting it had indeed "resurrected" the dire wolf. Similar questions now surround the moa project — and others in Colossal's pipeline, including plans to bring back the woolly mammoth, the dodo, and the thylacine (also known as the Tasmanian tiger). Critics argue that, while the science may be impressive, the outcomes are far from true de-extinction. 'There is no existing genetic technology capable of truly bringing a lost species back to life — especially one that's been absent from its ecosystem and evolutionary journey for centuries,' said Philip Seddon, a zoology professor at the University of Otago, in a statement to the New Zealand Science Media Centre (NZSMC). 'No matter the scientific precision, the outcome will never be a real moa. It cannot be. The moa was a singular marvel, shaped by thousands of years of natural evolution — a legacy that simply can't be replicated in a lab.' How Colossal plans to recreate the moa According to Colossal, the process to 'revive' the moa involves extracting DNA from preserved remains of all nine moa species and comparing it with the genetic codes of living birds. Speaking to Time magazine, Shapiro said scientists aim to identify key genetic traits unique to the moa and then engineer those into the genome of the emu or tinamou — two of the moa's closest living relatives. The result would be a modified bird, bred to resemble the extinct giant as closely as possible. But experts caution this will be, at best, a proxy — not a perfect clone. Dr Tori Herridge, an evolutionary biologist at the University of Sheffield, who turned down an offer to join Colossal's advisory board, is among those raising ethical and scientific red flags. 'Is de-extinction possible? No, it's not,' she told The Guardian. 'What we might eventually create are genetically modified organisms that mimic some traits of extinct species, based on what we think they looked like. But using the term 'de-extinction' skips over the hard questions. We're not bringing back the mammoth, the moa or the dodo — we're creating something new to engineer ecological change.'
