logo
Philippine Ex-Leader Duterte Seeks Release From ICC Detention

Philippine Ex-Leader Duterte Seeks Release From ICC Detention

Bloomberga day ago

Former Philippine president Rodrigo Duterte has requested the International Criminal Court in The Hague for his interim release, three months after he was arrested for alleged crimes against humanity under his controversial war on drugs.
Duterte, 80, is not a flight risk and a certain government has agreed to take him in during the interim release, according to a June 12 request made by his counsel Nicholas Kaufman. Portions of the document, including the name of the country that agreed to host Duterte, were redacted.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Plane That Crashed Yesterday Was the Same One a Dead Boeing Whistleblower Warned About
The Plane That Crashed Yesterday Was the Same One a Dead Boeing Whistleblower Warned About

Gizmodo

time6 hours ago

  • Gizmodo

The Plane That Crashed Yesterday Was the Same One a Dead Boeing Whistleblower Warned About

Critics of Boeing have long expressed criticisms of the 787 Dreamliner and the company's standards. Last year, a former quality manager at Boeing warned that the factory that made the 787 Dreamliner—one of the company's newer models of airplane—was plagued by shoddy work practices and poor oversight. John Barnett, who had worked for the airplane manufacturer for many years before becoming one of its most outspoken critics, said that Boeing was building the planes with 'sub-standard' parts and that its mandate of speed and efficiency was endangering lives. Barnett, who refused to fly on the Dreamliner, was also involved in a legal dispute with the company at the time that he died of an apparent suicide. Yesterday, the plane that Barnett had warned regulators about crashed in Ahmedabad, India, killing all but one of the passengers. The worst aviation disaster in recent memory, the crash has spurred fresh scrutiny of its controversy-plagued manufacturer. While it will take months to understand what actually caused the crash, if the source of the disaster ends up being a vulnerability in the plane's technical design, it won't be particularly surprising. Barnett, whose death sparked conspiracy theories due to his involvement in the legal case against his former employer, was one of a long list of critics who have long expressed concern about the company's manufacturing practices. The 787 was launched in 2011, with one of the advertised benefits being that Boeing could manufacture the aircraft more cheaply than its previous models. However, from the get-go, the plane was ridiculed for having an overly complicated assembly process. One critic, writing in 2013, noted that the plane was put together through a convoluted network of contractors, some of whom offered limited transparency. Another aviation commentator said that it was as if Boeing had said 'F*ck it. Let's throw out everything we've ever known or used in airplane production and use this new, unproven method.' Critics noted that the company had outsourced too many parts to too many different contractors and that there was a risk that all of those components might not properly fit together when the craft was finally assembled. Upon launch, the plane was almost immediately plagued by technical problems. In 2013, a series of battery-related fires in aircraft cabins caused the FAA to ground all of the 787s in the U.S. until the safety issues could be resolved. In 2015, the U.S. air safety authority discovered a software bug in the plane's generator-control units that could hypothetically lead to a 'loss of control' by the plane's pilots. The plane also suffered from fuel leaks and other issues. In 2019, the New York Times reported for the first time on the South Carolina plant where the Dreamliner was manufactured, noting that it was alleged to be 'plagued by shoddy production and weak oversight that have threatened to compromise safety.' Barnett—who, by that time, had already left the company—was quoted heavily in the article, saying that he hadn't 'seen a plane [come] out of Charleston yet that I'd put my name on saying it's safe and airworthy.' After Barnett's death, another whistleblower who had formerly served as an engineer at Boeing, Sam Salehpour, claimed that deficiencies in the way the 787 was assembled could cause the aircraft to 'break apart' in midair. Salehpour went on to testify about the issues in front of Congress, accusing his former company of being involved in a 'criminal cover-up.' He also implied something could 'happen' to him as a result of his outspoken criticism. Around the same time, other Boeing whistleblowers emerged from the woodwork to offer similar critiques of the airplane manufacturer, another of whom died. That spring, Boeing also admitted to falsifying documents about the 787, communicating to the FAA that it 'may not have completed required inspections to confirm adequate bonding and grounding where the wings join the fuselage' and that other misconduct may have occurred at the company. Boeing did not return a request for comment.

The U.S. Can Rise to the Chinese Challenge
The U.S. Can Rise to the Chinese Challenge

Wall Street Journal

time6 hours ago

  • Wall Street Journal

The U.S. Can Rise to the Chinese Challenge

The only way to rise to the Chinese challenge in the epic contest now under way is to heed the words of China's great warrior philosopher, Sun Tzu: 'The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting.' Because we were able to avoid a mutually catastrophic military conflict with the Soviet Union, we won the Cold War through the skillful use of nonmilitary advantages. These included economic power, technological superiority, diplomacy, strategic communications behind the Iron Curtain and around the world, development and humanitarian assistance, security assistance, alliances and ideology. We were lucky that the Soviet Union, while a military superpower, was weak in every other way, economically and technologically most of all. After the 1950s, its ideology had little appeal around the world.

Israel's Iran attack succeeded. But what's the endgame?
Israel's Iran attack succeeded. But what's the endgame?

Washington Post

time7 hours ago

  • Washington Post

Israel's Iran attack succeeded. But what's the endgame?

By most early indications, Israel's attack on Iran's nuclear program and its military leadership was a stunning success. Significant portions of Iran's nuclear infrastructure have been damaged if not destroyed. The top commanders of the Iranian military and its Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps have been eliminated. Scientists behind the nuclear program were killed. And, so far, Iran's retaliation has been less severe than what one might have expected.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store