RTÉ presents new documentary on the origin stories of three abandoned babies in 1960s Ireland
This new documentary airing on RTÉ One and RTÉ Player uncovers details about the babies' parents, where they came from, and why they were given up. Fifty years later, as adults, they discover their connection to each other and embark on an emotional journey to uncover their identities. David McBride, born in 1962, was left in a car in a Belfast driveway. John Dowling, born in 1965, was found in a Drogheda phone box. Helen Ward, born in 1968, was discovered in a Dundalk phone box. Each was adopted and raised in different parts of Ireland.
In 2020, David and Helen discovered they were brother and sister through DNA technology and were reunited on the ITV series Long Lost Family. To their shock and joy, they subsequently found John, a third full sibling. They believe there is a fourth sibling out there and are hoping this documentary will encourage that person to get in touch.
United in their desire to uncover more of the truth about their family and the circumstances surrounding their parents' decision to abandon them, the documentary follows the siblings as they uncover untold stories that reflect the Ireland of the past. Their mother was a young Catholic woman from the Republic of Ireland who, in the 1940s, began a affair with a married Protestant man from Northern Ireland, who was 17 years her senior and had 14 children of his own. This affair endured for decades and, in that time, David, John, and Helen were born – and given up.
Speaking about the documentary, Helen Ward said: 'This documentary has opened up the lines of communication about our biological parents, with people willing to share their stories. I hope the documentary fosters understanding and empathy, especially about what it's like to have to question your roots. I hope it encourages people to be open and receptive to helping others with similar experiences. The longing for connection with family is valid and deeply human.'
With both biological parents now deceased, the siblings confront painful truths about their parents' complex relationship and the impact of this abandonment on their own lives. They face a challenging journey in their quest for answers, but with the support of newly discovered half-siblings and family friends (including snooker legend Ken Doherty), they remain determined to unearth the buried secrets of their family's past, in the hope that it will bring them closer together.
The Phone Box Babies airs on RTÉ One and RTÉ Player on Wednesday 2 July at 9:35pm
-Ends-
Date: 26 June 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTÉ News
4 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Lawyer: 'Extraordinary' if DNA test links Bailey to death
The solicitor who represented the late Ian Bailey, the chief suspect in the killing of French woman Sophie Toscan du Plantier, has said he would find it "extraordinary" if a new DNA test linked him to the murder scene. Frank Buttimer was speaking after it emerged that a garda cold case team is awaiting a report on whether the new advanced method of DNA collection has yielded results. The method, called M-VAC, has helped solve decades-old cold cases in the United States. Ms du Plantier's body was found on the laneway leading to her isolated holiday home near Schull in Co Cork on the morning of 26 December 1996. A post-mortem examination revealed she had been bludgeoned to death with a rock and a concrete block. Nobody has been charged in Ireland in connection with her murder. The rock and block as well as Ms du Plantier's dressing gown, leggings, vest and boots have been analysed by new technology, according to The Irish Times. Mr Buttimer represented Mr Bailey for over 20 years. Mr Bailey was the chief suspect in the murder of the French woman before his death last year. Commenting on the attempts to use new DNA techniques to advance the case, Mr Buttimer said that "before he was even obliged to do so" that Mr Bailey had voluntarily provided DNA to establish his innocence. Speaking on RTÉ's This Week programme, he said: "Where it to be extraordinarily now 28 years or whatever it is later that there was some alleged link or connection being proposed then I would have regarded that as being something extraordinary. "Second of all, somewhat worrying, bearing in mind the passage of time and, of course, thirdly, Mr Bailey is deceased and is not around to defend his name." Investigators are hoping that any DNA evidence obtained will enable Forensic Science Ireland to make comparisons with DNA samples obtained from some 10 people identified as suspects during the initial garda investigation, including Mr Bailey. Mr Buttimer said that if the DNA points towards the involvement of another suspect, then this is something that should be kept in mind by the French courts. Mr Bailey was convicted of Ms du Plantier's murder by a court in France in 2019 in a case that he did not attend. "Insofar as Ian Bailey is concerned, we have this thing in Irish law called the presumption of innocence," he said, adding "Ian Bailey is presumed innocent by the State of Ireland". Mr Buttimer said Mr Bailey was "never prosecuted, except for a completely spurious case that was taken against him in France, where he was found guilty - but that was a predictable event". "Where it to be the case that DNA points the finger in some other quarter, perhaps the French who were so vigorous in their pursuit of them, might take time to reflect upon that and what had happened badly during his life," he said. He added that Mr Bailey had been "pursued for over 27 or 28 years from the time of that dreadful crime to the time of his death", adding "it destroyed his life". The new DNA testing, from the US, has helped solve decade old cases, including the 1995 case of Crystal Lynn in Utah. She was 17 years old when she was killed with granite rocks and her death remained a cold case for 18 years. After the traditional methods of swabbing failed to deliver answers, M-VAC was applied to the bloodied rock. It got 42 times more than needed to generate a full profile, and subsequently led to the arrest and prosecution of a suspect in the case. Mr Buttimer said he was not familiar with M-VAC DNA testing method, adding it is important to remember that while DNA testing can assist a cold case, it has to be properly tested in court. "I do not think that it has been tested in the Irish courts," he said. "It seems to have had some success in the United States," he added. Regarding Mr Bailey, he said: "The one thing that would be of concern to me is that he is not around to defend himself. "I would have to say that DNA evidence in certain circumstances has also been challenged. "So, it is not the be all and end all of criminal investigation and forensic assessment." Mr Buttimer added such evidence can "be challenged, but absolutely every avenue should be pursued of any inquiry to get to the truth of this appalling crime", When asked if Mr Bailey's DNA is found, should that information be made public, Mr Buttimer said: "I am sure that in certain quarters there would be a rush to provide such information because in my belief, and certainly you know in my experience, within certain sections of the police, there is still this ongoing belief that there is a link or connection between Mr Bailey and the crime, which he has denied throughout his life". "Ian Bailey was identified as the suspect even while he was in Bandon police station in February 1997, there was a rush at that point in trying to expose him," he said. "There's always been a rush to put Mr Bailey's name out there as being connected with this offence," he added. In a statement to RTÉ's This Week programme, gardaí said the investigation into the murder of Ms du Plantier remains active and ongoing. It added that An Garda Síochána makes operational decisions on the release of information on a case-by-case basis.
Irish Daily Mirror
4 hours ago
- Irish Daily Mirror
Bogus RTE worker loses claim for six years of retrospective and holiday pay
A former bogus self-employed worker at RTÉ has lost his claim to retrospective pay and holiday entitlements from the broadcaster as a result of the misclassification of his employment status for over six years. The Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) ruled that it did not have the jurisdiction to hear complaints made by RTÉ employee, Joseph Kelly, in relation to his former employment status because they had been submitted outside the statutory timeframe. Mr Kelly claimed he was originally required by RTÉ to register as a contractor with Revenue when he started working with the national broadcaster in September 2012. He claimed he lost out on entitlements to annual leave, sick leave, public holidays and incremental salary increases as a consequence of having to become self-employed. Represented by a lay advisor, Martin McMahon, Mr Kelly sought to have his loss of earnings for a period of just over six years corrected and the necessary adjustments to his current salary scale. Eight separate claims, which were lodged with the WRC on October 9, 2024, were brought under the Organisation of Working Time Act 1997 and the Terms of Employment (Information) Act 1994. However, solicitor for RTÉ, Séamus Given of Arthur Cox LLP, submitted that the cognisable period given the six-month statutory limitation of the legislation governing claims to the WRC was from April 10, 2024. Mr Given argued that Mr Kelly had been properly paid and given all his public holiday and annual leave entitlements over the relevant period. He also claimed that the WRC had no jurisdiction to hear or extend the time limit for submitting a complaint beyond a 12-month period. The WRC heard that Mr Kelly was hired as an independent contractor in September 2012 and paid €200 per day as a media content coordinator before being made an employee of RTÉ on November 12, 2018. He currently works as a news coordinator placed on point 12 of a 14-point salary scale which ranges from €37,567 to €59,862. Mr McMahon pointed out that the matter of bogus self-employment among workers at RTÉ was the subject of a review by an independent law firm as well as a review by the Department of Social Protection. He told the WRC that Mr Kelly was unaware of these reviews, which resulted in RTÉ having to make a payment of approximately €30,000 to the Department of Social Protection to regularise his PRSI contributions. Mr McMahon said it had also led to Mr Kelly losing out on any entitlements to pay for working Sundays and public holidays as well as annual and sick leave and any other entitlement that permanent employees had. He claimed Mr Kelly was continuing to lose out due to the consequences of his initial employment misclassification. Mr McMahon said the complainant had made numerous efforts to resolve these matters without success. He argued that Mr Kelly was seeking to have his entitlements rectified and regularised so that he did not suffer any loss for the error which RTÉ accepted it had made. In his ruling, Mr Harraghy noted that Mr Kelly had provided extensive documentation in relation to the context and background of his claim and his attempts to seek a resolution with his employer. Lansdowne House, the offices of the Workplace Relations Commission in Ballsbridge, Dublin (Image: Colin Keegan, Collins Agency, Dublin) The WRC adjudicator said it was clear that Mr Kelly and Mr McMahon had committed a considerable amount of time and research on the issue. He observed that all the issues that were the subject of his complaints related to the period covering his employment status up to November 2018, when he was not afforded any of the rights that an employee would have accrued. However, Mr Harraghy said his role was to apply the law to the facts but he could only consider complaints submitted within the statutory timeframe provided for by the relevant legislation. He observed that WRC adjudication officers were not empowered to modify timeframes or accept complaints which fell outside timeframes outlined by law. For that reason, Mr Harraghy said he had no jurisdiction to consider the complaints made by Mr Kelly. During a two-day hearing which took place in December 2024 and June 2025, RTÉ was accused of engaging in 'sharp practice' and attempting to 'run down the clock' on a commitment to compensate those who had lost money as a result of bogus self-employment. Mr Kelly said that when he joined the station in 2012, the HR section told him he had to become a sole trader, which also meant he was not allowed to apply for internal jobs at RTÉ. A senior HR manager at RTÉ, Angela McEvoy, said the station had accepted a decision by the Department of Social Protection in relation to Mr Kelly's PRSI insurability. However, Ms McEvoy rejected the suggestion by Mr McMahon that RTÉ had got Mr Kelly to misrepresent himself to Revenue. Mr McMahon told the WRC that it was 'not acceptable' for RTÉ to promise to follow the recommendations of an expert report in relation to bogus self-employed workers and now claim Mr Kelly's case was 'out of time'. Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest news from the Irish Mirror direct to your inbox: Sign up here. The Irish Mirror's Crime Writers Michael O'Toole and Paul Healy are writing a new weekly newsletter called Crime Ireland. Click here to sign up and get it delivered to your inbox every week
Irish Examiner
5 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Former 'bogus self-employed' RTÉ worker loses claim to retrospective pay at WRC
A former 'bogus self-employed' worker at RTÉ has lost his claim to retrospective pay and holiday entitlements as a result of the misclassification of his employment status for over six years. The WRC ruled that it did not have the jurisdiction to hear complaints made by RTÉ employee, Joseph Kelly, in relation to his former employment status because they had been submitted outside the statutory timeframe. Mr Kelly claimed he was originally required by RTÉ to register as a contractor with Revenue when he began working with the broadcaster in September 2012. He claimed he lost out on entitlements to annual leave, sick leave, public holidays, and incremental salary increases as a result of having to become self-employed. Represented by a lay advisor, Martin McMahon, Mr Kelly sought to have his loss of earnings for a period of over six years corrected and the necessary adjustments to his current salary scale. Eight separate claims, which were lodged with the WRC on October 9, 2024, were brought under the Organisation of Working Time Act 1997 and the Terms of Employment (Information) Act 1994. However, solicitor for RTÉ, Séamus Given of Arthur Cox LLP, submitted that the cognisable period given the six-month statutory limitation of the legislation governing claims to the WRC was from April 10, 2024. Mr Given argued that Mr Kelly had been properly paid and given all his public holiday and annual leave entitlements over the relevant period. He also claimed that the WRC had no jurisdiction to hear or extend the time limit for submitting a complaint beyond a 12-month period. The WRC heard that Mr Kelly was hired as an independent contractor in September 2012 and paid €200 per day as a media content coordinator before being made an employee of RTÉ on November 12, 2018. He currently works as a news co-ordinator placed on point 12 of a 14-point salary scale which ranges from €37,567 to €59,862. Mr McMahon pointed out that bogus self-employment among workers at RTÉ was the subject of a review by an independent law firm as well as the Department of Social Protection. He told the WRC Mr Kelly was unaware of these reviews which resulted in RTÉ having to make a payment of approximately €30,000 to the department to regularise his PRSI contributions. Mr McMahon said it also led to Mr Kelly losing out on any entitlements to pay for working Sundays and public holidays as well as annual and sick leave and any other entitlement that permanent employees had. Mr McMahon claimed Mr Kelly was continuing to lose out due to the consequences of his initial employment misclassification and had made numerous efforts to resolve these matters without success. He argued that Mr Kelly was seeking to have his entitlements rectified and regularised so that he did not suffer any loss for the error which RTÉ accepted it had made. In his ruling, WRC adjudicator John Harraghy noted that Mr Kelly had provided extensive documentation in relation to the context and background of his claim and his attempts to seek a resolution with his employer. The WRC adjudicator said it was clear that Mr Kelly and Mr McMahon had committed a considerable amount of time and research on the issue. He observed that all the issues that were the subject of his complaints related to the period covering his employment status up to November 2018 when he was not afforded any of the rights that an employee would have accrued. However, he said his role was to apply the law to the facts but he could only consider complaints submitted within the statutory timeframe provided for by the relevant legislation. He said WRC adjudication officers were not empowered to modify timeframes or accept complaints which fell outside timeframes outlined by law. For that reason, Mr Harraghy said he had no jurisdiction to consider the complaints made by Mr Kelly. During a two-day hearing which took place in December 2024 and June 2025, RTÉ was accused of engaging in 'sharp practice' and attempting to 'run down the clock' on a commitment to compensate those who had lost money as a result of bogus self-employment. Mr Kelly said that when he joined the station in 2012 that the HR section told him he had to become a sole trader which also meant he was not allowed to apply for internal jobs at RTÉ. A senior HR manager at RTÉ, Angela McEvoy, said the station had accepted a decision by the Department of Social Protection in relation to Mr Kelly's PRSI insurability. However, Ms McEvoy rejected the suggestion by Mr McMahon that RTÉ had got Mr Kelly to misrepresent himself to Revenue. Mr McMahon told the WRC that it was 'not acceptable' for RTÉ to promise to follow the recommendations of an expert report in relation to bogus self-employed workers and now claim Mr Kelly's case was 'out of time.'
