BMW M5 - long-term review - Report No:4 2025
'It's not very often bikes get in the way of cars across here,' says Peter Hickman. Well, no, but then we are doing 160mph and seeing as the biker had his knee down a couple of corners back, I don't think he's a slouch. 'I don't think this lad knows where he's going,' continues Hicky, 'normally I'd be doing about 190-ish through here.'
We're on a public road. You know which one – the infamous Mountain section of the Isle of Man TT course. I hope you know who Hickman is too, a 14-time TT winner and the fastest man to ever lap the legendary 37.7-mile course. His record stands at 16mins 36.115secs, at an average speed of 136.358mph.
Advertisement - Page continues below
But not tonight, because he's driving my M5 Touring around. It's one of the most fascinating drives of my life. Hicky knows every drain cover, bump, hedgerow gap and kerbstone. The following day he'll get more intimate with the road surface at Kerrowmoar than he intended, resulting in a few broken bones before race week has even got underway after he 'got off the bike at 140mph'. As you do. Still, by the standards of TT accidents, he has a small one.
The majority of my lap with him happens at two speeds: the one he's driving, and the one he's talking about. Because as we potter round behind Kias and vans, never exceeding the speed limit, he's talking a different language. One that involves 80-metre jumps, lining lamp posts up with bathroom windows, kissing hedgerows, checking gauges at 190mph and sentences like this: 'We're coming up to a place called Black Dub, we're going to short shift through third and fourth, keep the bike as calm as possible, about 145-150mph, jump over the top of here, both wheels off the floor, land, pull to the right hand side, back one gear into the left, it's off-camber with a jump in it, it's horrible."
It's practice week and you can already see black lines painted where the bikes are wheelspinning. 'My back wheel does about a mile more than the front over the course of a lap with wheelspin and the front wheel popping off the ground," he says. "On the big bikes we are literally at full throttle for 50 per cent of the lap, on the little bikes it's more like 75 per cent.'
The smaller twins and triples do 160mph, but his BMW M1000RR SuperStock and Superbike have over 250-260bhp at the wheel ('more like 300bhp at the crank') and hit 200mph at several points around the lap. The bikes have a minimum weight of 168kg. Even with rider and fuel you're well beyond a 1:1 power to weight ratio. Hicky's a strapping 6ft 2in. 'Round here, it helps to be big so you can boss the bike, throw it from side to side."
Advertisement - Page continues below
BMW supplies cars for the TT – X5s for the medics, M3s and M5s as course cars, S1000 bikes for the travelling marshalls. The previous night I'd had a lap with chief official driver James Mylchreest. He's the fourth generation of his family to perform that role. The TT's that kind of event. World famous, but run locally. Reopening the course after an evening practice session we'd been doing 80mph through villages. It felt ridiculous. The bikes are through at well over twice that speed.
The Mountain section is one-way during the TT festival. Hicky is a calm, laid back driver, the M5 settles in his hands. It's an upgrade from his first trip here, learning the course in a 1.0-litre Fiesta. 'I did a lot of homework, played PlayStation games, watched onboard laps, but I did seven trips in my first year, 2014, coming over in the months before the races for two days at a time, and doing a minimum of five laps a day. So at least 70 hours of driving round and round in a Fiesta. Just driving round with the music on. I wanted it to feel like the drive to work. My theory was the more I drove round and round the TT course the more I'd know it without having to think about trying to learn it.'
That seems to have paid off. We stop at the Bungalow section to get a shot of him leaning on the car, and the cloud closes in. When we set back off – after he's patiently posed for selfies with gobsmacked fans who can't believe who's just pulled up – visibility is down to maybe 30 metres. Hicky's commentary doesn't miss a beat, as turn-in points, mid-corner bumps and cambers are mentioned before they emerge from the grey gloom.
I can't believe the love the M5 Touring gets on the island – and that's before I tell people the shade is called Isle of Man green. I assumed bikers would only have eyes for bikes, but every time we stop the compliments flow. Way better looking as a Touring, way more useful too. It's the perfect tool for a ride with Hickey – I sit high enough that I can see what he's talking about, the big seats support and envelop, and tightening the suspension up a notch removes most of the heave and jounce.
The V8 delivers background thunder and, it turns out, enough power and speed for this beefy great super-estate to keep a fast bike honest. Hadn't expected that. More to do with the driver than the car though.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
Martin Lewis reveals who is due for car finance compensation - and how much they'll get
Martin Lewis says motorists who were mis-sold car finance are likely to receive "hundreds, not thousands of pounds" - with regulators launching a consultation on a new compensation scheme. The founder of believes it is "very likely" that about 40% of Britons who entered personal contact purchase or hire purchase agreements between 2007 and 2021 will be eligible for payouts. "Discretionary commission arrangements" saw brokers and dealers charge higher levels of interest so they could receive more commission, without telling consumers. Speaking to Sky News Radio's Faye Rowlands, Lewis said: "Very rarely will it be thousands of pounds unless you have more than one car finance deal. "So up to about a maximum of £950 per car finance deal where you are due compensation." Lewis explained that consumers who believe they may have been affected should check whether they had a discretionary commission arrangement by writing to their car finance company. However, the personal finance guru warned against using a claims firm. "They're hardly going to do anything for you and you might get the money paid to you automatically anyway, in which case you're giving them 30% for nothing," he added. 1:13 Yesterday, the Financial Conduct Authority said its review of the past use of motor finance "has shown that many firms were not complying with the law or our disclosure rules that were in force when they sold loans to consumers". The FCA's statement added that those affected "should be appropriately compensated in an orderly, consistent and efficient way". Lewis told Sky News that the consultation will launch in October - and will take six weeks. "We expect payouts to come in 2026, assuming this will happen and it's very likely to happen," he said. "As for exactly how will work, it hasn't decided yet. Firms will have to contact people, although there is an issue about them having destroyed some of the data for older claims." He believes claims will either be paid automatically - or affected consumers will need to opt in and apply to get compensation back. What motorists should do next The FCA says you may be affected if you bought a car under a finance scheme, including hire purchase agreements, before 28 January 2021. Anyone who has already complained does not need to do anything. The authority added: "Consumers concerned that they were not told about commission, and who think they may have paid too much for the finance, should complain now". Its website advises drivers to complain to their finance provider first. If you're unhappy with the response, you can then contact the Financial Ombudsman. Any compensation scheme will be easy to participate in, without drivers needing to use a claims management company or law firm. The FCA has warned motorists that doing so could end up costing you 30% of any compensation in fees. The FCA estimates the cost of any scheme - including compensation and administrative costs - to be no lower than £9bn. But in a video on X, Lewis said that millions of people are likely to be due a share of up to £18bn.
Times
2 hours ago
- Times
Rip up the benefits system and start again
As a fan of Jeremy Clarkson's writing I asked ChatGPT to compose, 'in the style of Jeremy Clarkson', some thoughts on a monstrosity reported often enough in this newspaper: the state-funded Motability scheme. AI's Clarkson impersonation began. 'Disabled? Have a BMW on me.' Sharp and amusing; but not what I want to say. You cannot (I maintain) get to grips with where state assistance has ended up without getting to grips with where it started. My column takes the Motability scheme as an illustration of this wider argument. Let me set out how we got to a situation in which one fifth of all new car sales in Britain are Motability cars, and disabled claimants whose conditions range from acne to neurodiversity may indeed get all or part of the cost of a new car that is replaceable every three years. Outrageous? Well, I think so. But we got here by a series of 'if — then' judgments, each of which has seemed fair and rational at the time. Read on, and tell me which was a misstep … • Just 900 people on top-level benefits joined work coach scheme in June We start just after the end of the Second World War, from which many servicemen returned disabled. The Labour government hit upon what became known as the Invacar (older readers may remember those weird little one-person, pale blue three-wheelers) for those war-wounded who could neither walk easily nor afford a conventional private car. Fair enough, don't you think? Invacar production continued for decades as governments of both parties introduced disability benefits for those who struggled to get about; and whether a disability stemmed from war service or some other cause seemed irrelevant. A system of disability benefits evolved which entitled all seriously mobility-impaired claimants access to an Invacar. Fair enough, don't you think? But the Invacar was dangerously unstable, underpowered and could take no passengers. What if a disabled mum wanted to take her toddler with her? The mobility allowance that was introduced in 1976 started at £5 per week (more than £40 at today's prices) and has crept up to the present rate for 'enhanced' impairment to mobility: £77.05. Naturally, many claimants entitled to these regular extra benefits have wanted to use the money to get a proper car. Fair enough, don't you think? • Artist misled NHS about disability when seeking £3m payout So the government arranged for a company to be set up. Motability Operations Ltd deploys claimants' benefits to lease cars for them. Using economies of scale and financed by the individual's benefits, it gets a better deal with a simpler process than a claimant could manage individually. It oils the wheels and costs the taxpayer nothing. If the whole Motability scheme were abolished tomorrow, there would be no saving for the taxpayer. The mobility-impaired would still get the same benefits, but if they wanted a car they would have to make their own arrangements, probably on worse terms than the company can get them. Fair enough, don't you think? So here we are today. The company operates the largest fleet in Europe, spending almost £3 billion of taxpayers' money last year on car leases, insurance and breakdown cover. TikTok influencers boast about how you can get a new car virtually free; online critics mock a scheme to benefit 'bed-wetting boy-racers'; the benefit is available for acquiring even BMWs and Ford Mustangs; complaints abound about Motability cars' use for purposes beyond transporting the disabled; and The Times reports that the 'scheme now has vast eligibility, allowing people with anxiety, dyslexia, severe acne and Munchausen syndrome to claim. Hundreds of thousands of people receive the enhanced mobility award on Pip (personal independence payment) for mental health conditions, learning difficulties and skin conditions to get around.' Few across the whole political spectrum would fail to be disturbed. We on the right speak of 'the bloated state'. We talk about trimming, snipping, pruning, reforming, cutting back. But how? Reduce the benefits? That hits even the most appallingly impaired claimants. Stop the misuse of Motability cars for purposes unrelated to disability? How? Fitting vehicles with transponders would be impossible. Oblige owners to have the Motability logo painted in large letters on the side of their cars? Invite neighbours to squeal, or make DWP swoops? Cries of 'shaming' or 'Stalinist' would fill the air. So how about removing mental problems as a qualifying disability? But the most common, from autism to anxiety to depression may in severe cases be genuinely confining without a car. • Pensions sector seeks Gen Z talent amid recruitment challenges I've zeroed in on Motability only as a parable for the expanding reach and ballooning cost of benefits right across our welfare state. I read, for instance, that the Welsh government is introducing a prepaid subsidy card for those whose food intolerances add to their food costs. Things are spinning out of control. Indignant at manifest abuse, we call for a 'crackdown on scroungers'. We argue that the welfare state should 'sharpen its focus' so that it can 'address genuine need' and exclude 'the undeserving'. Yes, the undeserving predictably muscle in, and whenever the government gives there will be scroungers among those who take. But the core problem is not the undeserving but the deserving. The weight of their numbers and the burden of meeting their entitlements is in danger of toppling the whole economy supporting them. Kemi Badenoch was right to say last month that it's 'not about cutting bits of the state' or 'top slicing' spending. 'It's about looking at what the state does; why it does it.' I take my triple-locked state pension and concessionary travel pass, though I could easily manage without. But even as every such snipping around the edges dies in the Commons voting lobbies or falls victim to second thoughts at No 10, we still shrink from the alternative: abandoning the pruning shears and pulling things up by the roots. The scandal is that there is no scandal. Though cheating, gaming the system and over-claiming do exist, they're not the root of the problem. The root is that the state has taken on responsibilities it should not bear. Governments have tried to level the ups and downs with which time and fate may curse or bless any human being, but we cannot level that landscape; and even if we could, we wouldn't like the result. We cannot entitle everyone to compensation for their difficulties. Entitlement has crept, step by understandable step, too far. Hearts must harden. But I'm convinced that our fellow citizens are not yet ready for this. Your choice and mine, therefore, is between joining the bandwagon as it careers towards the abyss or adding our voices to a small chorus doomed to be drowned out until after the crash.
The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
Motor finance victims urged to complain as compensation could hit £18bn
Millions of drivers could be owed a share of up to £18bn after the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) announced it will consult on an industry-wide compensation scheme. Motorists could receive a pay-out after it emerged many motor finance firms were not complying with rules or the law by not providing customers with relevant information about commission paid by lenders to the car dealers who sold the loans, the FCA said. The authority estimates that most individuals will probably receive less than £950 in compensation. The final total cost of any compensation scheme is estimated to be between £9 billion and £18 billion, the FCA added. Consumer champion Martin Lewis said in a video posted to X that millions of people are likely to be due a share of up to £18 billion. He told Sky News the consultation is 'likely to mean 40% of people who got a car finance deal between 2007 and 2021 will be due some form of redress, likely to be hundreds not thousands of pounds'. The consultation will be launched by early October. If the compensation scheme goes ahead, the first payments should be made in 2026. It comes after Friday's ruling by the Supreme Court on cases in which the FCA had intervened. While some motor finance customers will not get compensation because in many cases commission payments were legal, the court ruled that in certain circumstances the failure to properly disclose commission arrangements could be unfair and therefore unlawful, the FCA added. People who have already complained do not need to do anything, the FCA said. Consumers who are concerned that they were not told about commission and think they may have paid too much to their motor finance lender have been urged to complain now. Consumers do not need to use a claims management company or law firm and doing so could cost them around 30% of any compensation paid, it added. To make an initial complaint, the FCA says people should get in touch with their lender or broker, then the provider should send an acknowledgement within eight weeks. Under the FCA's current rules, it will not have to send a final response until after December 4 2025. But as the FCA is consulting on a compensation scheme, the deadline may be extended. If customers are unhappy with their provider's response, they can then complain to the Financial Ombudsman Service, the FCA added. The authority will propose rules on how lenders should 'consistently, efficiently and fairly' decide whether someone is owed compensation and how much. It will monitor if firms are following the rules and act if they are not. Nikhil Rathi, chief executive of the FCA, said: 'It is clear that some firms have broken the law and our rules. It's fair for their customers to be compensated. 'We also want to ensure that the market, relied on by millions each year, can continue to work well and consumers can get a fair deal. 'Our aim is a compensation scheme that's fair and easy to participate in, so there's no need to use a claims management company or law firm. If you do, it will cost you a significant chunk of any money you get. 'It will take time to establish a scheme but we hope to start getting people any money they are owed next year.'
