
‘Significant gap' between Australian companies' climate commitments and how they actually invest, analysts find
A report from climate consultancy group Pollination included analysis of the public climate disclosures of 12 major Australian companies, looking especially at their decisions on how and where to spend capital.
'What we've found is a significant gap between ambition and action,' said Richard Proudlove, the director of corporate engagement at the Investor Group on Climate Change, which commissioned the research. IGCC's members manage some $35tn of assets globally.
Proudlove said the report was the first 'deep dive' on whether Australian companies 'are actually backing their net zero commitments with real investment'.
The companies analysed were AGL, BHP, BlueScope Steel, Dyno Nobel, Orica, Qantas, Origin, Rio Tinto, Santos, South32, Woodside and Woolworths.
All those companies have been targeted for engagement by investors as part of a project called Climate Action 100+.
But the report does not single out individual companies, or name which companies had performed better than others.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
Researchers at Pollination assessed companies against eight criteria related to capital investment, and found only one 'achieved high alignment' in more than half the criteria.
For example, one criteria asked whether a company was moving capital away from fossil fuels. A company with no policy to phase out the use of oil, gas and coal and no meaningful cuts in investments would have 'low alignment'.
A company with public commitments on fossil fuels, and that had cut fossil fuel spending and quantified the financial implications of those decisions, was in 'high alignment'.
Only three out of eight applicable companies on that question were in 'high alignment', with three assessed as being in 'low alignment'.
The report, called Financing Australia's Corporate Climate Transition, also describes a framework and set of guiding principles for companies on how they source, manage and spend capital.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
Zoe Whitton, the managing director at Pollination Group, said: 'Companies are announcing capital expenditure numbers, but our analysis shows these disclosures don't provide enough detail for investors to assess whether the capital is sufficient or appropriately targeted to achieve their stated decarbonisation goals.'
The Australian government is expected to announce its 2035 emissions reduction target by September, and is also working on detailed plans to reduce emissions across six different industry sectors.
Whitton said: 'Without clear policy frameworks like sectoral pathways, companies lack the guidance they need for effective capital allocation, and investors can't properly evaluate their transition strategies.'
Proudlove said the level of ambition articulated in the government's plans and in the target would influence the capital investment decisions of many Australian companies.
'We're in a year where the Australian government needs to ratchet up its [climate goals] with a 2035 target. It's important that's an ambitious target.
'The detail in those [industry sector] plans and the ambition of the climate targets is an essential signal for investors and companies to commit.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
.jpeg%3Ftrim%3D0%2C0%2C0%2C0%26width%3D1200%26height%3D800%26crop%3D1200%3A800&w=3840&q=100)

The Independent
39 minutes ago
- The Independent
More American citizens are trying to migrate to these Caribbean islands this year. Here's how to join them
Americans are racing to take advantage of Caribbean nations offering citizenship by investment schemes, programs that grant citizenship to oversees investors willing to put six-figure investments into their new home countries. "Up to 70% of all buyers right now are wanting citizenship, and the vast majority are from the US," Nadia Dyson, a realtor in Antigua, told the BBC. "We don't talk politics with them, but the unstable political landscape [in the US] is definitely a time last year, it was all lifestyle buyers and a few CBI. Now they're all saying 'I want a house with citizenship'. We've never sold so many before." Lawyers in the U.S. faced a similar deluge of calls about the programs during the 2024 election of Donald Trump, according to the American Bar Association. 'In general, it comes in uncertain times,' Betina Schlossberg, an attorney at Schlossberg Legal, told a 2024 ABA report. 'We never thought of people just running away from the United States. All of a sudden, people feel uneasy, and they want to be ready.' The investment consultancy Henley & Partners has clocked a similar tend, noting the majority of applications for such programs came from U.S. citizens over the last year, part of a general surge in interest that saw applications to these schemes increase 12 percent overall. A variety of Caribbean nations offer such programs, including Antigua and Barbuda, Dominica, Grenada, St. Kitts and Nevis, and St. Lucia. Dominica's program has the lowest door to investment of the group, at $200,000, while St. Kitts and Nevis has the highest barrier, at $250,000. Many of the programs also confer wider visa benefits. Investors in Antigua and Barbuda, Grenada, and St. Lucia get travel access to Europe's Schengen Area. The programs have attracted a measure of controversy on the islands themselves, as well as from the governments of the U.S. and Europe, who have expressed concern the investments could be used to avoid taxes or shield financial crimes. Nonetheless, their defenders point to success stories like Dominica's initiative raising more than $1 billion, or Antigua's program helping the country avoid bankruptcy. Similarly situated European nations — ones with equally desirable locations, with economies heavily dependent on tourism — also offer ' golden passport' schemes, including Italy, Greece, and Portugal, each with investment floors of about a quarter of a million dollars.


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
ANDREW NEIL: The Industrial Revolution hit working class jobs but the rise of AI will decimate middle-class employment
I have a friend in storage. Not the most glamorous business, to be sure, but lucrative. It's made him rich and his business is still expanding as he creates new storage facilities for companies and individuals across the country. It's a well-run business but in the past year he's discovered how artificial intelligence, or AI, can make his companies even more productive and profitable.


The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Going to waste: two years after REDcycle's collapse, Australia's soft plastics are hitting the environment hard
Two years on from REDcycle's collapse, 94% of Australia's soft plastics are still headed for landfill. Collection has restarted at supermarkets, and 42 warehouses of plastics have been cleared, but experts say the packaging industry must take responsibility for the mess. By July, supermarkets had mostly cleared the stockpiles, which by November 2022 reached 11,000 tonnes of soft plastics at 44 sites across the country, hoards accumulated as collections outstripped available recycling capacity and export restrictions increased the amount of plastic waste in Australia. The remainder – 3,500 tonnes at two sites, in Victoria and in South Australia – is due to be processed in the first half of 2026, according to the supermarket members of the Soft Plastics Taskforce. But as more than 100 new collection points have been rolled out since June in selected Woolworths, Coles and Aldi stores across New South Wales and Victoria, taskforce members have been careful not to collect more than can be processed. 'The biggest challenge still remains that there is simply not enough soft plastic recycling capacity in Australia to support full, nationwide collections,' a spokesperson for the taskforce told the Guardian. Soft plastic is defined by its ability to be scrunched into a ball, unlike 'rigid' plastics, which are moulded to hold their shape. Even at the peak of its operations in 2022, REDcycle was collecting about 7,500 tonnes – less than 2% of the 538,000 tonnes of plastic bags, food wrappers, bubble wrap and other 'flexible' plastic waste produced in Australia each year. 'We still have a real problem in that we consume too much [soft plastics], we discard too much and we don't buy back anywhere near enough,' says Gayle Sloan, the chief executive of the Waste Management and Resource Recovery Association of Australia. While recyclers are increasing their capacity to process the material, Sloan says other problems remain: the vast quantities produced, design packaging that is too complex to recover and the lack of demand from packaging companies and other consumers for Australian-made recycled plastic. She says the onus should be on plastic manufacturers to invest in facilities to take back their own material. 'We've got to stop putting it on consumers to solve the problem.' Despite national packaging targets set by governments in 2018 for 70% of plastic packaging to be recycled by 2025, only about 6% of used and discarded soft plastics were being baled, sorted, shredded, washed, melted – or chemically processed – and turned into new products, according to data published in December by Soft Plastics Stewardship Australia. The rest has headed to landfill. Consumer plastics collected by households, while the most visible, are only one part of the story. Soft plastics are embedded in so many aspects of modern life, says David Hodge, the managing director of recycling company Plastic Forests. The material is widely used, for example, in sectors such as agriculture for storing grain and preventing weeds, and in transport for wrapping pallets. Consumer materials, particularly those used for foods – frozen produce bags, cereal liners or bread bags – are 'tremendously hard to recycle, some of them impossible', he says. They are often 'super technical', comprising different types of plastic, and contaminated by inks used for advertising, or food residues. While there is value for recyclers in processing plastics, such as PET (or polyethylene terephthalate) in drink bottles collected in container deposit schemes, Hodge says 'the economics is broken in soft plastics' because the energy, labor and transport required to collect, process and recycle them costs more than importing new materials. The lack of incentives or mandates for products made from recycled content – such as fence posts and garden edging, electrical cable cover and plastic sheeting – mean they often struggled to compete with non-recycled products. 'There has to be support for the purchase of products. That will create the pull through,' Hodge says. 'Bunnings needs to be given a federal government mandate to support Australian made recycled products,' he says as an example. Jennifer Macklin, a researcher at Monash University's Sustainable Development Institute, says the solutions to the soft plastics problem are similar to other material and waste challenges. They include designing plastic packaging so it can be more easily recycled (while retaining its function, such as keeping food fresh), developing recycling infrastructure capable of turning large volumes of soft plastic waste into a usable material and – crucially – reinforcing demand for the recovered material. 'That's the big chicken and egg that we have with recycling,' Macklin says. 'We're quite good at collecting and reprocessing but not very good at buying it to turn it into new things.' Consumers have a role to play, she says, but as a general principle producers and importers of plastics should be responsible for the material's entire lifecycle. In late 2024, the federal government consulted on options for reforming plastic packaging. According to its summary, 80% of stakeholders supported regulation, and 65% supported an extended responsibility scheme that would make plastics producers responsible for the entire product lifecycle. The government is now 'working with industry and state and territory governments to deliver fit-for-purpose packaging regulations as part of Australia's transition to a circular economy', a departmental spokesperson said. Sloan says voluntary approaches have failed. 'We need to have clear design standards and they need to be enforceable, and we actually need those who make this to be held accountable and invest in facilities to take it back,' she says. 'We've got to stop putting products out on the market that have no home and can't be recovered.'