logo
How many times is too many times to flake on someone?

How many times is too many times to flake on someone?

Yahoo6 hours ago

We've all been there: You've made plans with a friend and been looking forward to the get-together all day. Maybe you turned down other invitations to keep this commitment or you're just excited to spend time with someone you like. You're standing in front of your closet deciding what to wear when suddenly your phone dings: 'Hey. I've had the longest day and I feel like I just need to be in my pajamas,' a text message from your friend reads. 'Let's try again soon!'
Oof. You've just been flaked on and it hurts.
'It feels like rejection and nobody wants to feel that,' said Danielle Jackson, a friendship coach in Tampa, Fla., and author of the book 'Fighting for our Friendships: The Science and Art of Conflict and Connection in Women's Relationships." 'You wonder if the person is invested in you or respects your time. And you may feel you are not going to put yourself in that situation again.'
Read more: Can straight married men and women be friends? I went on a quest to find out
It's totally understandable to feel angry, hurt or embarrassed when someone flakes on you, and you might want to write that person out of your life entirely. But not all flaking is the same. I talked to some friends about flaking, asking them how many times is too many times for someone to cancel a plan, and found that, as with everything in life, context matters.
One friend shared that when it comes to one of her best friends from childhood, there is no limit to the number of times they cancel on each other. 'Every time we make a plan I know there's only a 50% chance it will actually happen,' she said. 'But I've known her for 30 years. We will be friends forever.'
Molly, who, like me, is in her late 40s and is the busiest person I know, said the older she gets, the less upset she feels when people cancel on her, even when it means derailing her carefully arranged schedule.
'I've come to realize that when somebody flakes, it's usually not about me,' she said. 'People can't keep plans for so many different reasons — they probably just have some [stuff] going on.'
My friend Carol offered a similarly nuanced take.
'It depends on the background of the friendship and if they earned the right to flake,' she said. 'And that's tenure and showing up for the big things.'
I respect these friends' patience and understanding, but personally, I agree with my friend Laura's perspective.
"My time feels very valuable to me, and I'm very discerning about how much of it I give and who I give it to," she told me. "Generally speaking it's hard for me with my personality to get really close with unreliable people."
Stephanie took an even more hard-line stance: "I tend to feel like grit and effort are admirable traits and I feel a little allergic to self-indulgence in general," she said. "So if someone is a self-care queen, we're not going to be a good match."
Figuring out how you feel about flaking — whether you're thinking about flaking or if you're the person being flaked on — is hardly trivial. A growing number of studies over the past two decades have demonstrated that healthy friendships play an important role in both well-being and longevity. They have shown that people with close friends are more satisfied with their lives and less likely to suffer from depression. They are also less likely to die from all causes including heart problems and a range of chronic diseases. If making and maintaining close friends are a pathway to health and happiness, then it's useful to understand how canceling on people and being canceled on by others impacts these relationships.
Researchers have also noted that at the same time that Americans, and particularly young Americans, are experiencing high amounts of loneliness, the ease with which people cancel plans to tend to their own well-being appears to be growing. TikTok is filled with Gen Z guidance on setting boundaries and the internet has no shortage of memes touting the joy of canceling plans.
Read more: How to help a friend after a breakup? Your first instinct is wrong
But while there may be a real personal cost to keeping a dinner date with a friend when you're tired, overwhelmed or emotionally spent, there can be serious costs to breaking that commitment as well.
'Yes, you can always change your mind when you make a plan, but you may not like what happens as a result,' said Mia Schachter, an intimacy coordinator and consent educator. 'If it's important to you that your friends think you're reliable and a person of your word, then even if you don't have the energy right now, you may need to push yourself beyond your capacity for the greater good of something you ultimately believe is important.'
It's also true that no matter how dedicated we are to our friendships, there are times when we have to cancel plans. When that's the case, friendship researchers say there are ways to cancel that are less likely to damage the relationship.
In a survey of 1,192 people, Michigan State University Professor Bill Chopik and his students asked respondents to share how upset they feel when someone cancels on them and which cancellations are the least hurtful and annoying. In a 2023 paper, they shared the following takeaways: If you have to cancel plans with someone but want to preserve the friendship, don't cancel at the last minute, don't lie about it and make sure you have a good reason for canceling.
And for those times when we are canceled on ourselves, experts say we might offer our friends grace, especially if they apologize and try to repair the situation.
As Jackson, the friendship coach, explained, if someone cancels on you and says, 'I'm the worst, this is a weird week, but does next Thursday at 6 work?' this person is acknowledging they probably put you out and disappointed you, and also demonstrating that they really do want to see you another time.
"That's a completely different tone than 'Life happens,'' she said.
Sign up for The Wild newsletter to get weekly insider tips on the best of our beaches, trails, parks, deserts, forests and mountains.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Blake Lively's request to protect Taylor Swift texts in Justin Baldoni legal battle shut down by judge
Blake Lively's request to protect Taylor Swift texts in Justin Baldoni legal battle shut down by judge

Fox News

time24 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Blake Lively's request to protect Taylor Swift texts in Justin Baldoni legal battle shut down by judge

Taylor Swift continues to be dragged into the legal drama ensuing between Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni. Days after Lively requested a protective order against Baldoni's request to access Lively and Swift's private text messages, Judge Lewis Liman denied the motion on June 18. "A motion or request may be, and in this case often has been, both a legitimate litigation tactic and an attempt to maneuver in the broader court of public opinion," Judge Liman wrote. "Given that Lively has represented that Swift had knowledge of complaints or discussions about the working environment on the film, among other issues, the requests for messages with Swift regarding the film ('It Ends With Us') and this action are reasonably tailored to discover information that would prove or disprove Lively's harassment and retaliation claims," he added. In a statement to Fox News Digital, a representative for Lively said they will continue to fight against Baldoni's "relentless efforts" to exploit "Swift's popularity." "The Court outright denied the Wayfarer Parties' motion to compel documents from Ms. Lively, who has produced far more documents in this case than the Wayfarer Parties combined. Further, the Court's protective order ruling rests on the Wayfarer Parties' admission that they received nothing from Taylor Swift, which is exactly the opposite of what their 'insider' claimed two weeks ago," the representative stated. "As for the rest, Justin Baldoni and the Wayfarer parties demanded access to Taylor Swift's private communications—despite having already subpoenaed and then withdrawn that subpoena. Baldoni's desire to drag Taylor Swift into this has been constant dating back to August 2024, when the crisis PR firm led by Melissa Nathan included her in their 'Scenario Planning' document (Lively Amended Complaint, Exhibit D), referred to her as a bully, and called for a strategy to influence the 'TS fanbase' (Lively Amended Complaint, ¶214(b))," the representative continued. "We will continue to call out Baldoni's relentless efforts to exploit Ms Swift's popularity, which from day one has been nothing more than a distraction from the serious sexual harassment and retaliation accusations he and the Wayfarer parties are facing." Representatives for Baldoni and Swift did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital's request for comment. Swift was subpoenaed as a witness in the Lively-Baldoni dispute, but Baldoni's team has withdrawn the request, Fox News Digital confirmed in May. A source with direct knowledge of the case told Fox News Digital at the time, "When information is voluntarily received, there is no need for subpoenas." After Swift was subpoenaed May 10, a spokesperson for the pop star denied her involvement in the 2024 film "It Ends With Us" aside from the licensing of her song "My Tears Ricochet," which was featured in the movie's trailer and used in one scene. "Taylor Swift never set foot on the set of this movie. She was not involved in any casting or creative decisions. She did not score the film. She never saw an edit or made any notes on the film. She did not even see 'It Ends With Us' until weeks after its public release and was traveling around the globe during 2023 and 2024 headlining the biggest tour in history," Swift's representative told Fox News Digital at the time. WATCH: WHAT IS GOING ON BETWEEN BLAKE LIVELY AND JUSTIN BALDONI? "The connection Taylor had to this film was permitting the use of one song, 'My Tears Ricochet,'" the spokesperson added. "Given that her involvement was licensing a song for the film, which 19 other artists also did, this document subpoena is designed to use Taylor Swift's name to draw public interest by creating tabloid clickbait instead of focusing on the facts of the case." Baldoni and Lively's legal fight is scheduled to go to trial before a New York court in March 2026. Fox News Digital's Janelle Ash and Lauryn Overhultz contributed to this post.

Google Photos' upcoming Remix feature could launch with a video upgrade (APK teardown)
Google Photos' upcoming Remix feature could launch with a video upgrade (APK teardown)

Android Authority

time25 minutes ago

  • Android Authority

Google Photos' upcoming Remix feature could launch with a video upgrade (APK teardown)

Edgar Cervantes / Android Authority TL;DR Google Photos' upcoming Remix feature, internally codenamed 'Bluejay,' will likely support video editing. When it launches, the feature will use generative AI to transform videos into various styles, with options potentially including 'I'm feeling lucky,' 'Subtle movements,' and 'Go wild.' Creating AI photos and videos is all the rage these days, but many people are using AI to remix their existing photos and videos. For instance, the Studio Ghibli trend went viral recently, and people had a lot of fun reimaging themselves in the popular art style. We've previously spotted Google Photos working to incorporate this generative AI use case with the upcoming Remix feature. While the feature is yet to launch, we've now spotted clues indicating it will work for both photos and videos. Authority Insights story on Android Authority. Discover You're reading anstory on Android Authority. Discover Authority Insights for more exclusive reports, app teardowns, leaks, and in-depth tech coverage you won't find anywhere else. An APK teardown helps predict features that may arrive on a service in the future based on work-in-progress code. However, it is possible that such predicted features may not make it to a public release. Google Photos v7.34 includes code that indicates that the upcoming Remix feature could also support video edits. Code Copy Text Remix Bluejay Video I'm Feeling Lucky. Suble Movements. Go Wild. Here, 'bluejay' is the working codename for the Remix feature, and in the second string, it is used as a placeholder for the marketing name 'Remix' (which is still a work-in-progress name and may or may not be the final marketing name). While the Remix feature for photos could offer styles like claymation and anime, there would be different style suggestions provided for the Remix video feature. We could spot these three style suggestions: Random style: I am feeling lucky Subtle style: Subtle Movements Wild style: Go Wild As is the theme with the Remix feature, the Remix video feature will also likely use generative AI to transform your video into these different styles. Google has yet to announce the Remix feature, and it's still very much a work in progress. We don't know if and when it will roll out to users. We'll keep you updated when we learn more. Got a tip? Talk to us! Email our staff at Email our staff at news@ . You can stay anonymous or get credit for the info, it's your choice.

Justin Baldoni Scores Small Legal Win After Strong Message To Blake Lively
Justin Baldoni Scores Small Legal Win After Strong Message To Blake Lively

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Justin Baldoni Scores Small Legal Win After Strong Message To Blake Lively

Justin Baldoni's strong message to Blake Lively seems to be already yielding fruit in court. The director received a favorable ruling in his ongoing court case involving his "It Ends With Us" co-star. He can now review private conversations between Taylor Swift and Lively about the case. Justin Baldoni and Blake Lively's bitter legal dispute has reportedly had personal consequences, particularly for the friendship between Taylor Swift and the actress. Baldoni has now advanced further in the hot legal pursuit between himself and co-star Lively. Now, the director can review the conversations between the two friends to see what was said and what was not. The essence of this ruling is to help the court and Baldoni prove the validity of Lively's claims of harassment or otherwise- due to her closeness to the performer, a personal conversation may not be unusual. U.S. District Judge Lewis Liman added that only relevant information to the case must be examined should Baldoni go through these private text messages. While Lively's legal team pulled all the strings to absolve Swift from this new ruling, their pleas were disregarded. Per Page Six, the movie star had earlier pleaded with the court to protect her interaction with Swift last Friday, noting that they are not crucial to the case. It all started when Lively accused Baldoni of sexually harassing her and proceeded to coordinate a smear campaign targeted at diminishing her career. Swift was then introduced to the mix when the director name-dropped her in his now-dismissed $400 million counter lawsuit. The singer even bagged a subpoena in May to testify as a witness in an upcoming trial for the case next year, but the request was subsequently dropped. According to Baldoni, Lively leveraged her husband, Ryan Reynolds, and her friend Swift's social currency to control things on the set of "It Ends With Us." He added that he was also invited as a guest to Lively and Reynold's home, where one of their "famous" close friends was present. There, the issue of rewriting movie scripts and readjusting the story was raised. Baldoni's attorney continued that Lively bragged about her husband and her billionaire friend during a conversation, referring to them as her "dragon." Bryan Freedman continued that Lively's statement was a subtle threat to his client, making him aware of his unsafe professional environment. Last week, The Blast shared that Baldoni suffered a crushing defeat in court on another lawsuit he dragged a news outlet to court for. On June 9, a federal judge threw out Baldoni's $250 million libel suit against The New York Times. The director also got his $400 million countersuit against Lively, her husband, and her publicist Leslie Sloane dismissed. This double defeat prompted a significant reaction from Lively. The actress' legal team tagged the ruling as a total victory and absolute vindication for their client. In her words on Instagram, she described Baldoni's suit as defeated. Despite the pronouncement, the judge states that the two major claims cited in Baldoni's countersuit, namely, breach of implied covenant and tortious interference, can be amended later this month. For that reason, Lively and her team have also been advised to slow down on the early celebration by an attorney who is not involved with the case. The lawyer told PEOPLE: "The decision is undoubtedly a blow to Baldoni. But the case is far from over. One thing I've learned many times over as a litigator is not to celebrate too early." Baldoni's loss in court did not surprise his legal team. According to them, it was more of a move for them to bring public awareness to the ongoing case, which they have achieved despite the dismissal. Freedman then took a jab at Lively and her legal team for their reaction to the ruling. "Lively and her team's predictable declaration of victory is false. Lively's allegations are no truer today than they were yesterday, and with the facts on our side, we march forward with the same confidence that we had when Ms. Lively and her cohorts initiated this battle," Freed notes." The lawyer continued that he, along with his team, was battle-ready for Lively's next line of action, including a deposition, which he would personally handle. As soon as the director files his amendments for claims that were dismissed, his lawyers expect his co-star to react by filing another motion to dismiss. In his ruling, the federal judge declared that neither Sloane nor the Times acted with intent to defame Baldoni. He added that the news agency also has no existing motive to agree with Lively's narrative or promote it. Lively looked radiant for her first appearance on the heels of Baldoni's loss in court. She took her victory lap at the Chanel Tribeca Festival Artists Dinner in New York City. The "Gossip Girl" actress looked ethereal in a white crochet outfit paired with her signature Christian Louboutin heels and Chanel accessories. She strutted her stuff on the carpet, serving killer angles to the teeming photographers. The actress was reportedly elated to get the $400 million lawsuit off her back for good and even cried with relief after hearing the verdict. What does June 23 have in store for Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni?

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store