Musk-Trump, from fast friends to breaking up: A timeline
President Trump and tech billionaire Elon Musk's alliance formed with swift and intense speed less than a year ago. It devolved just as quickly this week.
Their relationship abruptly imploded in a matter of days, as a simmering feud boiled over and spilled out in public between the world's richest man and the world's most powerful leader.
Just last week, Trump presented a ceremonial key to Musk at the White House. But on Thursday, the two were trading personal insults and threatening to hurt each other's business and political prospects.
Here's a look at the relationship's history, from the friendship phase to the nasty breakup.
Up until last year, Musk had largely stayed out of the political spotlight.
And there were times when he seemed skeptical of Trump.
In a 2015 interview with Vanity Fair, he said he got involved as 'little as possible' but thought Trump getting the 2016 presidential nomination 'wouldn't be good.'
Musk, like many Silicon Valley leaders at the time, took issue with some of Trump's policies, but his criticism was less public.
Trump did not hold back in his criticism of Musk in 2022, calling the tech billionaire a 'bulls‑‑‑ artist' for supporting the former president's opponents in 2016 and 2020.
Musk had flirted with Trump during the presidential race, but he went full MAGA after the attempt on Trump's life at a rally in Butler, Pa.
Musk's politics had gradually shifted to the right for years during the former Biden administration, which notably snubbed Tesla during the 2021 electric vehicle summit. The tech mogul took issue with the Biden White House over its diversity, equity and inclusion efforts and its handling of immigration and the southern border.His shift in politics culminated with his endorsement of Trump in July last year after Trump survived the assassination attempt in Butler and was formally nominated by the GOP the following week.
Once in the Trump fold, Musk quickly brought the Silicon Valley 'move fast and break things' approach to the campaign trail.
As the 2024 election inched closer, Musk and Trump's alliance was deepening.
Musk increased his rally appearances with Trump, while ramping up his political discourse on his social media platform X. Musk used his online platform as a vehicle to attack former Vice President Kamala Harris and other Democratic leaders and prop up Trump's presidential bid.
Musk, whose net worth is north of $385 billion, said in March last year that he would not donate to either Biden or Trump during the 2024 presidential election.
But months later, the billionaire entrepreneur became the biggest donor in the 2024 White House race, spending more than $290 million to propel Trump back to the Oval Office and boost Republicans in congressional races, according to Federal Election Commission (FEC) filings.
The majority of Musk's contributions went to America PAC, a super PAC that backed Trump's presidential bid. The outside group, which was filed with the FEC in May last year, spent money on direct mail, digital advertising, canvassing and get-out-the-vote efforts.
He also contributed to other outside groups during the election, including the RBG PAC, which worked on moderating Trump's stance on abortion.
By election night, it became clear Musk was moving closer to Trump's inner circle.
He joined the president at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida as they awaited election results and even joined the Trump family for a picture with his son 'Little X.'
Shortly after winning the 2024 presidential election, Trump selected Musk and ex-GOP presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy to lead the newly formed Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), an advisory board focused on reducing the size of the federal government, slashing spending and rooting out waste, fraud and abuse.
Ramaswamy departed DOGE in January and is now running to become Ohio's next governor.
Musk, who served as an adviser to the cost-cutting board, initially set the goal for DOGE to slash $2 trillion from the federal government. Later, the goal post was lowered to $1 trillion.
The latest estimate claimed that DOGE saved $180 billion.
At this point, the Trump and Musk relationship appeared strong, even though some were already wondering how long it would last and when the two would have a serious falling out.
Musk found himself at the center of a debate last December among Trump backers and MAGA-allied conservatives over the H-1B visa, a temporary, nonimmigrant work permit.
Musk fiercely defended the H-1B process, arguing that the program allows U.S. companies to hire talented employees when corporations cannot find an ample number of workers within the U.S.
The tech billionaire locked horns over the issue with far-right activist and ardent Trump supporter Laura Loomer and Trump's ex-chief strategist Steve Bannon, making a rival of Bannon in the process. Bannon and Loomer argued that the program takes away job opportunities from Americans.
Trump eventually weighed in, siding with Musk and Ramaswamy in the heated debate. The move signaled how much Trump valued Musk's insight.
'I've always liked the visas, I have always been in favor of the visas. That's why we have them,' Trump said in an interview with the New York Post in late December.
Bannon, however, continued to take public shots at Musk over the next several months.
Musk seemed as close as ever to the president as Trump launched his second term and DOGE's cost-cutting initiatives hit numerous federal agencies.
The lightning speed of DOGE's infiltration underscored Musk's sudden power over the federal government as an unelected special government employee.
The DOGE cuts stirred chaos and confusion in Washington and led to layoffs of federal employees and spending cuts across agencies.
While the official tally is unknown, a New York Times analysis estimated that there have been more than 58,000 job cuts and another 76,000 federal workers have taken buyouts as of May 12.
Several of DOGE's actions, including the team's access to sensitive data, have been challenged in court while protests unfolded across the country.
Musk's tightness with Trump was on public view when he sat in on his first Cabinet meeting in February.
While Musk's role as DOGE chief was not a confirmed Cabinet position, the tech billionaire made a statement by participating in multiple White House Cabinet meetings during his tenure.
By March, reports circulated that Trump's Cabinet members were increasingly taking issue with Musk's apparent authority through his DOGE leadership.
Up until this point, Trump was publicly supportive of Musk's work and shied away from commenting on the reported conflicts.
In one meeting, Trump asked if anyone was 'unhappy with Elon' and suggested he would throw them out, signaling a level of loyalty to his adviser.
But during a March Cabinet meeting, Trump showed early signs of shifting his tone on Musk's power. The president told his Cabinet secretaries that they lead on staffing choices and that DOGE cuts should be made with a 'scalpel' not a 'hatchet.'
'As the Secretaries learn about, and understand, the people working for the various Departments, they can be very precise as to who will remain, and who will go. We say the 'scalpel' rather than the 'hatchet,' Trump wrote in March on Truth Social.
This marked a shift from where Musk stood in February, when his power seemed above other Cabinet members.
Behind the scenes, Musk reportedly ruffled the feathers of a host of Cabinet members as his DOGE workers dug into various government agencies.
Musk clashed with Secretary of State Marco Rubio during an early March Cabinet huddle, slamming the nation's top diplomat for not terminating much of the State Department workforce and saying that he was only 'good on TV' but not much else, according to The New York Times.
Rubio fired back, saying that Musk was not telling the truth. Trump eventually stepped in to defend Rubio and commended the former senator for his work.
During the same meeting, Musk butted heads with Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy over the condition of the gear the Federal Aviation Administration uses to track aircraft and what must be done to make it better. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick was on Musk's side during the exchange.
Duffy said to Musk that DOGE staffers tried to fire air traffic controllers, a claim the tech mogul said was not true. Duffy, the former House GOP lawmaker, also criticized Musk for claiming that airport control tower staff were brought on through diversity, equity and inclusion efforts.
The heated exchange ended with, again, Trump stepping in and telling Duffy that he needs to hire 'geniuses' from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology to be air traffic controllers.
Publicly, Duffy praised DOGE's work and the administration's decision to slash the federal workforce, saying the Transportation Department would work 'closely' with Musk and the advisory board to 'revolutionize the way government is run.'
The public meetings remained largely cordial, despite reported tensions.
All the while, Trump urged Musk on.
Musk waded into the Wisconsin Supreme Court race earlier this year, fueling speculation of his continued involvement in campaigns.
He backed Brad Schimel in the race over liberal candidate Susan Crawford, spending millions through the America PAC and traveling to Wisconsin, where he handed out $1 million in checks to voters who penned a petition against 'activist judges.'
Democrats used Musk's involvement as part of their messaging in the last few days of the hotly contested election. Crawford prevailed in the match-up in early April.
In May, Musk said he would pull back his spending in elections, although he left the door open for future expenditures.
Musk, who was deemed a special government employee by the White House, told investors in April he planned to reduce his time spent on DOGE once his status expired, though it was not clear what that would look like.
His comments were welcomed by Tesla investors amid concerns the leader was not giving enough attention to his tech ventures as a result of his work in Washington.
The move did not appear to be a result of any conflict with the president, who previously said he expected Musk to eventually return to running his businesses.
Musk and Trump confirmed in late May the tech billionaire would be stepping down from DOGE on May 31, the day his special government employee status ended.
The two held a press conference celebrating his time in the White House, during which the administration said Musk would remain a 'friend and an adviser' after leaving DOGE.
Musk, standing with his arms crossed next to Trump, who was seated at the Resolute Desk, and sporting a black DOGE cap, showed up with a black eye on right side of his face. When asked what caused it, Musk said it resulted from his young son punching him while the two were 'horsing around.'
'I was just horsing around with little X and I said, 'Go ahead, punch me in the face.' And he did. Turns out even a 5-year-old punching you in the face actually is —,' Musk told reporters.
Trump gifted Musk a gold key to the White House for his 'incredible service,' and the tech mogul maintained it was 'not the end of DOGE, but really the beginning.'
While Musk appeared somewhat subdued, the two seemed to be on good terms, and Musk reiterated he would remain an adviser to Trump.
The tone from the Oval Office did not last long.
Just days later, Musk launched a public push against Trump's tax and spending bill as the Senate prepared to take it up after it passed the House last month.
'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination,' Musk posted on June 3.
The legislation, officially titled the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, extends Trump's 2017 tax cuts and boosts funding for border and defense priorities, while cutting spending on programs such as food assistance and Medicaid.
A day later, Musk called on lawmakers to kill the legislation and urged constituents to call their congressional offices to oppose the bill.
The White House, at the time, brushed off Musk's bashing of the bill, stating the criticism 'doesn't change the president's opinion.'
Up until Thursday morning, tensions seemed limited to their disagreement over the bill rather than their friendship.
Tensions rapidly boiled after Trump told reporters he was 'very surprised and very disappointed' in Musk. The comment set off an hours-long back-and-forth between the two.
Musk took credit for Trump's electoral victory last November, while the president argued Musk was upset about the legislation's repeal of the electric vehicle tax credit and that he was aware of the legislation from the beginning. Musk rejected this.
Musk later alleged Trump is included in the Jeffrey Epstein files, and he backed calls for the president to be impeached and succeeded by Vice President Vance. Musk also floated the idea of forming a third party.
Trump fired back, threatening to eliminate the federal contracts Musk's businesses have and suggested that the tech billionaire's disenchantment should have come sooner. At one point, he called Musk 'crazy,' claiming the tech billionaire was 'wearing thin.'
'I don't mind Elon turning against me, but he should have done so months ago. This is one of the Greatest Bills ever presented to Congress. It's a Record Cut in Expenses, $1.6 Trillion Dollars, and the Biggest Tax Cut ever given,' Trump wrote Thursday on Truth Social.
Musk also said he would decommission SpaceX's Dragon, the spacecraft used to shuttle astronauts and cargo to the International Space Station. Hours later, he appeared to backpedal when engaging with a user on X.
Less than a day since the blowout began, Musk signaled that he is open to brokering peace with Trump.
Amid the haymakers the two were exchanging on Thursday, allies of both men offered to be peacemakers.
'I support @realDonaldTrump and @elonmusk and they should make peace for the benefit of our great country. We are much stronger together than apart,' Bill Ackman, the CEO of Pershing Square, said Thursday on X.
In response, Musk wrote, 'You're not wrong.'
By Friday morning, The White House looked to turn the page on the feud and shut down talk of a potential call for the two men to reconcile.
'No. I won't be speaking to him for a while I guess, but I wish him well,' Trump told CNN in an interview.
While the two may need time for the dust to settle, the door for makeup may not be entirely closed.
Trump frequently clashes with advisers or allies, but some cases have resulted in a reconciliation. The president, for example, sparred memorably in the 2016 election with Rubio, who is now a key figure in Trump's second term.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why Musk's feud with Trump could jeopardize his business empire
Elon Musk, the world's richest man, may have made himself an enemy of the world's most powerful leader. The public blowout between Musk and President Trump is threatening the tech billionaire's businesses, some of which have billions of dollars' worth of federal contracts. Musk's aerospace company SpaceX alone reportedly has at least $22 billion in federal contracts — which Trump had threatened to revoke at the peak of his feud with his former adviser. 'Trump goes after people, companies and organizations he doesn't like,' said Peter Loge, a professor at George Washington University and former senior FDA adviser during the Obama administration. 'As a real estate developer, politician and president, he has used every tool at his disposal to punish people he thinks have wronged him,' Loge added. 'Unless Musk expresses contrition, Trump is likely to hurt him in every way he can think of. If Musk is contrite, he can be welcomed back into the Trump tent.' While the two could reconcile in the future, observers agree the dramatic turn of events leaves Musk's business empire vulnerable to Trump's wrath. Trump, at one point during Thursday's back-and-forth, threatened to cut Musk's government contracts as he called his former adviser 'crazy.' 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' Trump wrote in a Truth Social post. Musk, in turn, said he would decommission SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft, which is responsible for ferrying astronauts and cargo to and from the International Space Station. He later backed off, after an X user urged him to 'cool off and take a step back.' The exchange underscored how Musk's business ventures could get caught in the crosshairs of any feud with the president, who is known to have a proclivity for retribution. 'If this turns into a hot war, certainly, the consequences for Musk's business relationship with the federal government could be in peril, or at least significantly complicated,' said GOP strategist and Trump campaign alum Brian Seitchik. The tech billionaire officially departed the White House last week after a four-month stint in government in which he seemed to rarely leave Trump's side, becoming a near constant presence at Mar-a-Lago, Cabinet meetings and the Oval Office. He exited the administration seemingly on good terms with Trump despite his pushback against the president's sweeping tax and spending bill — the centerpiece of Trump's domestic policy agenda, which is projected to add trillions of dollars to the deficit. Trump presented Musk with a golden key to the White House during a Friday farewell ceremony in Oval Office, during which the duo downplayed their differences and spoke highly of each other's work. However, Musk sharpened his criticism of Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' soon after, as he slammed the legislation as a 'disgusting abomination.' The president responded Thursday, saying he was 'very surprised' and 'disappointed' by Musk's comments and cast doubt on the future of their relationship. 'Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore,' Trump said during an Oval Office appearance alongside German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. The situation quickly devolved into personal attacks. Musk fired back on his social platform X, suggesting the president would have lost the 2024 election without him, linking Trump to disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein and backing calls for the president's impeachment. As the feud dragged on Thursday, Tesla's stock plunged 14 percent Thursday, costing the electric vehicle maker more than $150 billion. The company was still trying to fully recover from the fallout of Musk's highly controversial role in the Trump administration, leading the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Tesla's stock is down 20 percent since the start of the year. 'The social media and war of words back and forth is not good for anyone and put massive pressure on Tesla shares with fears that Trump will turn from friend to foe and create a tough regulatory environment for Musk in the Beltway,' Wedbush Securities analysts wrote in a note Friday. 'Musk needs Trump and Trump needs Musk for many reasons, and these two becoming friends again will be a huge relief for Tesla shares,' they added. Ross Gerber, a longtime Tesla investor and CEO of Gerber Kawasaki Wealth and Investment Management, slammed Musk for the ripple effects his comments may have had on Tesla's stock. 'Trump is an angry and vindictive man who doesn't forget when slighted. This doesn't get solved other than Elon groveling back and publicly apologizing,' Gerber wrote on X Friday, adding in an earlier post, 'So Tesla investors are down $140 billion over this break up. About how much Musk claimed to saving for the US government.' As the back-and-forth unfolded Thursday, Gerber quipped, 'Can someone please take the phone away from him [Musk].' When pressed on the feud, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Musk has a right to speak for his companies. 'So the only difference between Friday and today is Elon went back to his companies. And, as a businessman, he has a right to speak for his companies. But as president, President Trump has a responsibility to fight for this country,' she said Thursday on FOX News Channel's 'Hannity.' While Trump could pose new risks to Musk's business outlooks, analysts say the fight could also impede the president's ability to run the government. SpaceX held federal contracts with agencies like NASA and the Pentagon long before Trump's presidency, becoming a crucial partner to the federal government as it phased out the space shuttle program. If Musk reverses on his decision to keep Dragon in commission, experts say it could debilitate the U.S. space program 'If such threats were carried out, it would be catastrophic,' said space policy expert Mark Whittington, adding later, 'Without SpaceX, we're back to being dependent on the Russians.' NASA has increasingly relied on SpaceX for its infrastructure, including the Dragon capsule, which is the only U.S. system capable of getting crews to the International Space Station. Russia's Souyuz capsules, the Associated Press reported, are the only other way to get crews to the space station. While both Trump and Musk have much to lose from a war, some Republicans veterans aren't ruling out the chance of a reconciliation. 'There's always the possibility that Trump is serious about this, but I think if you take the 'Art of the Deal' seriously, he is often maximally negotiating,' said GOP strategist Chris Johnson. The feud appeared to cool slightly Friday morning, as Musk seemingly agreed with a post from hedge fund manager Bill Ackman, who suggested the pair 'should make peace for the benefit of our great country.' But Trump has shown no desire to talk to Musk despite reports the two might speak on the phone. 'I won't be speaking to him for a while, I guess, but I wish him well,' Trump told CNN's Dana Bash on Friday. Tesla's stock partially recovered amid hopes of a détente, rising 5 percent. 'If Musk is able to sue for peace and the onus is on him to make peace with Trump, then it'll be a blip in the screen and their bromance will be restored,' Seitchik told The Hill. However, he added, 'If this call goes poorly and this continues to escalate, then certainly Trump will look for every bit of leverage to inflict pain on Elon Musk and his businesses.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Corporate support for Pride is dwindling nationwide. In NC, it's a mixed bag
Pride Month has long been an occasion for companies and institutions to display their support for the LGBTQ+ community, whether it be for profit or for principle. It's often a trivial gesture, but it can have a meaningful impact for a community that had long been relegated to the shadows of society. But more recently, that support has waned amid a regressive political climate that has made many companies rethink their commitments to diversity, equity and inclusion. A survey conducted by the national risk management firm Gravity Research found that around 39% of companies said they would reduce their engagement around Pride Month this year. Some of the top reasons for the change were the Trump administration, conservative activists and conservative policymakers, the survey found. Major corporations, including Mastercard and Pepsi, have pulled their sponsorship of major Pride events or avoided the topic on social media. In North Carolina, the results are mixed. Take Lowe's, which is based in Mooresville. Lowe's hasn't yet acknowledged Pride Month on its social media — a marked difference from past years when it openly embraced the occasion. That's not unexpected, given that Lowe's has already announced an end to many of its DEI initiatives. Last year, the company said it would no longer participate in surveys conducted by LGBTQ+ groups and ended its support of outside events like festivals, parades and fairs. (Lowe's had previously been a longtime supporter of Charlotte's annual Pride festival.) But surprising or not, it's reflective of a growing trend away from publicly embracing the LGBTQ+ community. Charlotte-based Bank of America also has remained quiet about Pride so far. In past years, Bank of America has been vocal about celebrating the occasion on social media and honoring its LGBTQ+ employees with the hashtag #BofAPride, but that support has been absent this year. Compare that with Truist, which posted in celebration of Pride on its Facebook and Instagram accounts. For North Carolina's professional sports teams, the results are mixed, too. While the Carolina Panthers and Charlotte Hornets both celebrated the start of Pride on social media, the Carolina Hurricanes have not. In fact, the team has remained largely silent about Pride since 2023 — the Hurricanes are one of just a handful NHL teams to not acknowledge it this year — a decision that has disappointed many fans who feel a simple acknowledgment of the occasion is not too much to ask. The same goes for the state's largest cities. The city of Charlotte posted on its social media accounts at the beginning of Pride, in addition to updating its profile picture to a rainbow version of the city's crown logo. The cities of Raleigh and Greensboro, however, did not. This move toward silence comes at a time when things like Pride celebrations and flags are under attack from lawmakers across the state. Legislation has been introduced at the state level that would effectively ban the display of Pride flags in government buildings, while some counties have passed ordinances governing public events that some interpret as targeting Pride events or drag performances. Of course, a social media post is just that: a social media post. It's not going to defeat anti-LGBTQ legislation, or save gay kids from being bullied, or change the country's attitude towards transgender people — at least not on its own. From some companies, it's just a lot of empty words or glorified virtue signaling. But public support for any marginalized group can be meaningful, especially when it happens on a large scale. And when institutions cower in the face of political pressure to stay silent, they're just letting the bullies win. It makes real change all the more difficult. Ultimately, it's not the silence that is the problem. It's the fact that the silence is new — a sudden absence of the public support and acceptance that existed before. It feels like another step backward during a time when progress feels like it's constantly stuck in reverse.

Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Veterans, supporters hold D-Day demonstration in Longmont
A group of demonstrators gathered at Sixth Avenue and Main Street in Longmont on Friday, the anniversary of D-Day, to advocate for veterans' jobs, benefits and health care under the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs at a time when VA jobs have come under threat of significant cuts by the Trump administration. It's been 81 years since that fateful day when U.S. troops invaded Normandy in 1944, and some local protesters say they are still fighting for the same rights and protections that were promised to U.S. veterans back when the federal government first passed the GI Bill. Longmont Community Drummers members Mary Rose, right, and Ann Hartzler, not pictured, play as demonstrators wave and hold signs during a rally to recognize the 81st anniversary of D-Day and to support veterans at Sixth Avenue and Main Street in Longmont on Friday. (Matthew Jonas/Staff Photographer) Protesters huddled together on the sidewalk, holding American flags and signs that said 'Support Our Veterans' and 'Protect the VA.' Some of them played drums. Several cars driving past the busy intersection honked their horns or rolled down their windows to lend a whoop or cheer. Mary Kathleen Rose, a Longmont resident and local activist, brought her drum set and said she was out protesting to help drive change in the country. Richard Kellog, a veteran who served in the Air Force during the 'secret war' in southeast Asia, was among the demonstrators. Kellog benefits from VA medical care, a disability pension and the college education he received through the GI Bill. Kellog said he knows many veterans who are already being negatively affected by cuts to the VA, like the roughly 6,000 or more veterans whose firings have already reportedly hit. Due to labor cuts, the VA isn't as responsive as it needs to be, he argued. And he fears it will only get worse — he is particularly concerned about losing the pensions that he depends on. Lyn Lowry, a local organizer, said she came out to rally for all the veterans who are on the verge of losing the benefits they fought so hard to gain. Despite the VA already being short-staffed, they've cut people, she argued. One piece of collateral damage from VA staff cuts could include necessary medical research, according to Lowry, such as treatment for combat soldiers with severe wounds. 'These people fought for us. We've made a promise to them, and we need to keep that promise,' she said. But across the street, a smaller group of protesters felt differently. Jann Ertl, a Longmont resident since 1944 and counter-protester, sported a Vietnam Veteran baseball cap and a jumbo-sized Donald Trump sticker poking out of the front pocket of his button-up shirt. 'As you can see, I feel a little differently than these other people do,' he said with a grin, pointing to the protesters across the street and then back at the MAGA sticker in his shirt pocket. 'With all these anti-Trumpers out here, I thought I would kind of stand out here and talk to people about all of the good things that Trump is doing.' 'Well, the way I look at it, Trump has a beautiful wife. He has lots and lots of money. He has lots of real estate and golf courses and things that will help him in his future life. But what he doesn't have is notoriety. He doesn't care about fame,' Ertl said. He argued Trump will be the best president the United States has ever had because of his unique ability to get his agenda passed, referencing Trump's 1987 book, 'The Art of the Deal.' On a local level, Ertl said, he'd like to see a new governor come in and cut out wasteful state spending, too. 'When you drive around here in Longmont, you see all kinds of projects going on that the state should not be paying for,' he said, referencing the Colorado 119 Commuter Bikeway Project that's currently underway, with construction estimated to wrap up sometime in 2027, as an example. 'It's right down the middle of this very, very busy highway. People are going to get killed on that bicycle path,' he said. Ertl is a Vietnam veteran and has had partial vision loss. 'The VA takes very good care of me,' he said. But they are often wasteful, he said, adding a personal example of an eye doctor insisting he get new glasses because they are covered by the VA, when his current glasses are perfectly fine. 'That's true waste,' he said. 'I've lived in Colorado since 1944, so you can guess how old I am. I'm a world traveler, and I think Trump knows what he's doing, and it's going very well for us.' Across the street, friends Portia Buchanan and Ana Johnson came out to Friday's rally to fight against hate, they said. Johnson comes from a family of veterans, many of whom served in World War II. She brought with her a sign that had photos of all of the veterans in her family tree, pointing out faded photographs of her Aunt Opal, an Air Force nurse; her Uncle Bill, a paratrooper; her cousin Robert, who was killed in Vietnam. 'Veterans are a big deal in my family, and what the current government is doing is pretty terrible to our veterans,' she said, citing information on a flyer from that 1.2 million veterans live in SNAP-dependent households and that 80,000 VA jobs are potentially on the chopping block. An estimated 30% of federal employees are veterans, according to a report on 2023 data by the Partnership for Public Service, a significantly higher figure than the estimated 5% of veterans in the overall civilian labor force. 'I'm very concerned because all of these people served to defend our democracy. Now it's time for us to do everything we can to fight for our democracy,' Johnson said.