Committee urges action from Scottish and UK governments to save Alexander Dennis
Holyrood's Economy and Fair Work Committee urged the administrations north and south of the border to do all they can to stop the closure of Alexander Dennis in Scotland.
Some 400 workers are at risk of redundancy as the company proposes moving its manufacturing from Falkirk and Larbert to Scarborough in North Yorkshire.
Colin Smyth, the Labour MSP who convenes the committee, has written to finance secretary Shona Robison and Scottish secretary Ian Murray asking them to set out their plans to save the jobs and wider industry.
He said the loss of so many highly-skilled job would be 'devastating' to the local community and country as a whole.
'The committee is clear that the situation is so serious that every possible effort must be made to retain these jobs in Scotland,' he told Robison.
Alexander Dennis has said it needs up to 100 bus orders this year and up to 400 next year to avoid the closure of its factories in Scotland.
Mr Smyth urged the finance secretary to explain what she is doing to bring new orders forward and stimulate demand for the sector.
He urged Robison to strengthen procurement to ensure that local firms are prioritised.
The SNP has come under fire from opposition politicians for the number of Scottish buses being built in countries like China, rather than at home, which they say has contributed to the company's decision to move to England.
Mr Smyth also expressed concerns around reports that £20 million in support from Scottish Enterprise for Alexander Dennis to research and develop net-zero buses may no longer result in any vehicles being built in the country.
The committee has written separately to Scottish Enterprise over the funding.
He said to Robison: 'Given the strategic importance of Alexander Dennis, the high quality of its workforce and the role of manufacturing in Scotland's future economy, it is vital that every possible action is taken to retain manufacturing, and the jobs it provides.
'The committee urges the Scottish Government to do all it can, working with partners at every level, to secure a positive outcome.
'Ministers must act with urgency and ambition to help keep these jobs and avoid a world-class manufacturer shutting its doors in Scotland.'
In his letter to the Scottish secretary, the committee convener described Alexander Dennis's potential loss as 'deeply concerning'.
He said co-operation between Westminster and Holyrood would be 'essential if a viable and sustainable future is to be secured for bus manufacturing in Scotland'.
He added: 'I know you agree that the potential end of bus manufacturing in Scotland — with the direct loss of 400 jobs and further losses across the domestic supply chain—would be devastating for the area and for Scotland.
'This is all the more concerning given the growing UK and European demand for buses to support climate, transport, and industrial goals.'
He said that while a cross-governmental working group on the issue has already met several times, it was 'clear that urgent decisions are required' as the the redundancy consolation process is set to wrap up on August 15 – something that has already been extended by two weeks.
Mr Smyth again raised concerns around the procurement process, saying: 'During our evidence sessions, the Committee heard concerns that, in practice, local content is not being adequately recognised or prioritised in the tendering process.'
He added: 'The committee understands that the UK Subsidy Control Act does allow social value to be considered when evaluating bids, enables direct awards, and permits some differential treatment in awarding subsidies.'
And he asked Murray to set out what action the UK Government is taking to ensure to ensure domestic manufacturing is prioritised.
He said: 'Given the scale of potential job losses in Scotland, the importance of maintaining a strong manufacturing base in the UK, and the proven capability of the workforce at Alexander Dennis Ltd, the Committee believes that urgent and coordinated action is essential.
'We therefore urge the UK Government to use every lever at its disposal – particularly through procurement, investment, and industrial strategy — to help secure a future for bus manufacturing in Scotland and protect these skilled jobs.'
The Scottish Government, the UK Government and Scottish Enterprise have been approached for comment.
Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News
Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
4 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
SNP needs to learn it's not their beliefs that matter – it's the laws they've spent our cash defying
HOW does it feel to see your taxes being spent on defying the law? That's exactly what the Scottish Government is doing following the Supreme Court ruling on gender in April, with SNP ministers and their officials using public resources to dig in their heels. 3 For Women Scotland celebrate their victory at the Supreme Court in April 3 John Swinney's government is dragging its heels over implementing the Supreme Court ruling 3 Chris says the Scottish Government should implement the law - or be nowhere near power The landmark judgment four months ago clarified that 'sex' means biological sex under equalities law — and not the gender a person says they are. As many had suspected, it turned out this had been misrepresented for years by those including Holyrood ministers, who fought to the bitter end to defend their stance. Two years earlier, the same Scottish Government had failed in its bid to bring in a system of gender self-ID, which amounted to an attempt to remove any form of gatekeeping on who can access women's spaces, or participate in female-only activities. SNP ministers wanted — and still want — a law where if you say you are female or male, then you legally become exactly that. As simple as that. The self-ID bid ultimately failed as the Holyrood Bill interfered with wider UK law. Nonetheless, the magical thinking persisted that a man can turn into a woman simply by saying so. In fact, it seemed to become as much a pillar of SNP wisdom as independence. With both indy and gender, the end always justifies the means. Any damage — no matter how plain to see — must be denied. Landmark UK Supreme Court rules 'woman' means biological female in humiliating defeat for SNP With independence, the end is a world where Scotland alone is in charge of its affairs. The means to this end may well be economic ruin but any risks must be rubbished, and any disbelievers vilified. It's similar with the transgender ideology so beloved of the SNP. The desired end is a world where anyone can be who they say they are. And while I have no doubt gender ideology is pursued by many in the name of kindness, this kindness can also be misplaced. One means to this end is, for example, the ruin of women and girls' ability to have spaces free from males, or to play sport without men muscling in. It's also the case that the idea a man can turn into a woman by signing a piece of paper is reality-denying madness, and arguably yet another sign of a society where child-like, narcissistic entitlement is increasingly pandered to. But as we've seen in recent years, anyone who dared point out the potential flaws — let alone insanity — of self-ID was demonised amid a groupthink orchestrated by Nicola Sturgeon and cronies including the now First Minister John Swinney. Perhaps we should not be surprised that — following April's Supreme Court ruling and clear guidance from regulator the Equality and Human Rights Commission — the Scottish Government has decided just to carry on regardless, and refused to alter its rules. Laughably, it claims it has 'accepted' the judgement, when its bureaucratic stalling shows the opposite to be true. It says it must wait for more detailed EHRC guidance, even though the watchdog says this is not the case. FRANKLY... Sturgeon ain't being frank IT is remarkable what one will say when one is trying to enrich oneself by flogging one's book. Well, almost say. In Nicola Sturgeon's case, it's things like almost admitting to being bisexual, by saying she doesn't think her sexuality is 'binary'. Or hinting that she thinks Alex Salmond leaked details about a probe into himself in a 'classic Alex' move, but not emphatically saying so. Or suggesting she was wrong for dismissing criticism of gender-self ID, but not conceding an inch about the fundamental principle. From extracts I've seen of her memoir, Frankly, left, there's a lot of what I call 'classic Nicola'. Deftly talking around a subject, giving people the impression something has been said, when in fact it hasn't quite. And keeping them guessing. And 'Frankly', that ain't being frank. It's the same old story. The Scottish Government's position is not just that of a sore loser, it flouts the Ministerial Code — which places an 'overarching duty on Ministers to comply with the law' — and leaves public bodies like schools and health boards open to legal action. It says any changes to policies will have to be 'consulted on in line with normal practice'. In other words, many more months of stalling. Others have already done what they are legally and morally obliged to. So, the SFA has said that only biological females will be permitted to play in competitive girls' and women's football. At the Scottish Parliament — run independently from government — all male and female toilets are now single-sex according to biological sex. Some have been designated as 'gender-neutral' to ensure facilities are available to all. Police Scotland fell into line last week, after years of drinking the gender ideology Kool Aid. But at the Scottish Government, guidance remains that 'Trans staff should choose to use the facilities they feel most comfortable with'. NHS Scotland rules are still based on the same principles which led us to a place where the word 'women' was replaced by 'anyone with a cervix' in public information ads about smear tests. In schools, too, the Scottish Government rulebook remains the same, including an insistence there is 'no law' which 'states that only people assigned male at birth can use men's toilets and changing rooms, or that only people assigned female can use women's toilets and changing rooms'. It's hard to see how this could be any more wrong given the April ruling and EHRC advice. Find out what's really going on Register now for our free weekly politics newsletter for an insightful and irreverent look at the (sometimes excruciating) world of Scottish Politics. Every Thursday our hotshot politics team goes behind the headlines to bring you a rundown of key events - plus insights and gossip from the corridors of power, including a 'Plonker' and 'Star' of the Week. Sign up now and make sure you don't miss a beat. The politicians would hate that. SIGN UP FOR FREE NOW The section of schools guidance relating to sport also says pupils 'should be allowed to take part in the group which matches their gender identity'. Worryingly, the document supports the use of breast binders for female pupils who identify as boys, saying they can have 'a positive impact on a young person's mental health' — the line after admitting they 'can lead to shortness of breath, can be painful during physical exertion and there are health risks associated with binders'. In effect, an adolescent's ruined body is collateral damage in the war against reality. 'Being kind' is often cited as a reason for affirming someone's chosen gender but, especially with children, the opposite argument is easily as compelling. Should we not be comforting a child that they were not born into the wrong body, that they are perfect as they are, rather than cementing a belief they are somehow defective? It may be hard, impossible even, to change beliefs, and SNP ministers are unlikely to. But it is not beliefs that matter here. It is following the law. If those running the government are unwilling to do so, they should be nowhere near power.
STV News
4 minutes ago
- STV News
Drivers over 70 could face mandatory eye tests every three years
The UK Government is considering compulsory eye tests every three years for drivers aged over 70 and a driving ban for those who fail. Ministers are also considering cutting the drink-drive limit in England and Wales to bring it in line with Scotland, according to The Times. The proposals, set to be published as part of a road safety strategy in the autumn, come amid concern about the number of people being killed or seriously injured on Britain's roads. Last year, 1,633 people were killed and almost 28,000 seriously injured in traffic incidents, and numbers have remained relatively constant following a large fall between 2000 and 2010. A Labour source said: 'At the end of the last Labour government, the number of people killed and seriously injured on our roads was at a record low, but numbers have remained stubbornly high under successive Conservative governments. 'In no other circumstance would we accept 1,600 people dying, with thousands more seriously injured, costing the NHS more than £2 billion per year.' Meanwhile, the number of people killed in drink-driving incidents has risen over the past decade, reaching a 13-year high in 2022 and prompting concern that existing road safety measures are no longer working. Under the plans being considered by Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander, the drink-drive limit in England and Wales could be cut from 35 micrograms of alcohol per 100ml of breath to 22 micrograms. This figure would be in line with Scotland, which cut its drink-drive limit in 2014, and the rest of Europe, where no other country has a limit as high as that in England and Wales. The UK is also one of only three European countries to rely on self-reporting of eyesight problems that affect driving, leading ministers to consider compulsory eye tests every three years for drivers aged over 70 and a driving ban for those who fail. Other proposals are reported to include allowing the police to bring prosecutions for drug-driving on the basis of roadside saliva tests rather than blood tests as increasing numbers of drivers are being caught with drugs in their system. The Labour source added: 'This Labour Government will deliver the first road safety strategy in a decade, imposing tougher penalties on those breaking the law, protecting road users and restoring order to our roads.' The strategy is due to be published in the autumn, and all proposals will be subject to consultation. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Daily Mirror
5 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Elon Musk wants to start supplying energy to your home with new British Gas rival
The company has sought approval for an energy licence from regulator Ofgem in order to take on energy supply giants including British Gas owner Centrica and Octopus Energy Elon Musk's Tesla is gearing up to break into the energy market and could start supplying British households within months. The firm has applied for an energy licence from regulator Ofgem, setting its sights on competing with big players like British Gas owner Centrica and Octopus Energy. Since 2020, Tesla has been involved in the UK energy market, when it's licence to be an electricity generator was approved. It plans to begin providing power to homes and businesses across England, Scotland, and Wales as early as next year. Tesla Energy Ventures lodged the application last month, as revealed in a recent filing published by Ofgem. This news comes after a major broadband provider introduced a new £60 charge and issued a deadline to act. Andrew Payne, Director of Tesla's European energy business, signed off on the application. The electric car giant, helmed by the world's wealthiest man, also operates a solar energy and battery storage enterprise. This move comes about two years after Tesla began recruiting for a Head of Operations to oversee its proposed energy supply venture. Tesla has been a player in the UK energy market since 2020. In America, Musk's group acted as an electricity supplier in Texas for the past three years. However, it now appears that this need to infiltrate the UK market comes during a decrease of demand for Tesla's electric vehicles across Europe. Industry data revealed a nearly 60 percent drop in new Tesla registrations in the UK in July compared to the same period last year. Figures showed that 987 new vehicles were registered in the UK in July, down from 2,462 in the same month the previous year. Reporting that Ofgem can take up to nine months to process applications for energy supply licences, the BBC also highlighted Tesla's harsh competitors EV maker, China's BYD. Tesla's dropping numbers can be linked to Musk's involvement in the White House, his work with US President Donald Trump being widely criticised, despite their online 'break up' on X (Twitter). Musk's efforts in right-wing politics has found him involved in the UK, Italy and Germany - creating a rift between owners and would-be buyers Tesla's electric cars. British bill payers should note that Tesla's energy supply would not apply to dual-fuel contract households due to the car manufacturer applying for the electricity licence alone, states the Guardian.
