Du Val directors Kenyon and Charlotte Clarke want assets unfrozen and passports back
Du Val director Kenyon Clarke.
Photo:
kenyonclarke.com
The Financial Markets Authority has hit back at claims by Du Val directors that it is to blame for the "train wreck" collapse of the property group.
Lawyers for the authority and for
Du Val's directors Kenyon and Charlotte Clarke have been in the High Court
at Auckland this week, arguing about whether receivership should continue for the couple and the handful of Du Val companies not in statutory management.
The Clarkes want to be out of receivership, their assets unfrozen and their passports returned from the control of the High Court.
Their lawyer Ron Mansfield said receivership orders were "excessively broad" and oppressive and should end.
The FMA had had months to investigate but had not come up with any solid evidence - and the Clarkes claim it was the FMA action that cause the train wreck, he said.
However, FMA lawyer Jenny Cooper said that claim could not go unanswered.
"It is assertion without substance," she said.
The FMA had good grounds to step in and to keep investigating because the investigation was a complex one that would take time, she said.
The Clarkes could speed it up by being more open with receivers and investigators, she said.
A court directive to force the Clarkes to be interviewed by receivers under oath about their assets was currently being heard by the Court of Appeal.
Cooper noted the very complex and large company structure of about 70 entities.
"The Clarkes are not people who have straightforward accounting arrangements," she said.
The receivership and associated orders were still needed because there was an ongoing investigation into the group, Cooper said
The FMA presented evidence about why that should continue but much of it was suppressed so it would not prejudice any civil or criminal action that could follow.
Justice Jane Anderson also noted the FMA was still in an investigation phase and the Clarkes had not had a chance to respond - and were not in a position to because of a lack of information.
The FMA did not have to prove any wrongdoing at this hearing, just that there was enough evidence to show more investigation was needed and the receivership should stay.
Most of the arguments about why the Clarkes should or should not get their passports back were also suppressed.
Justice Anderson had initially allowed the argument to be reported, but Mansfield was seeking leave to appeal.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
4 hours ago
- RNZ News
Press secretary sex scandal: Investigation to conclude in August
Michael Forbes had audio recordings of multiple sessions with sex workers, as well as zoomed-in photos of women in public and footage of women getting changed for a night out. Photo: LinkedIn/Michael Forbes The government says it will "consider what information can be made public" about the sex scandal surrounding the prime minister's former deputy chief press secretary, after the investigation ends in August. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has ordered Ministerial Services - run by the Department of Internal Affairs - to carry out a "deep dive" investigation after it was revealed Michael Forbes had audio recordings of multiple sessions with sex workers, as well as zoomed-in photos of women in public and footage of women getting changed for a night out, filmed through a window. Forbes resigned as Luxon's deputy chief press secretary this month after the Stuff investigation looking into the matter contacted him for comment. The recordings, photos and footage was discovered by a Wellington sex worker in July last year. In a statement, the Department of Internal Affairs said its investigation would look into "employment and device policies, procedures and information sharing practices". "The deep dive is expected to conclude in August 2025, at which point DIA will determine what information can be shared and when. "We will not be commenting further as the deep dive is in progress." The statement follows a report by the NZ Herald quoting DIA chief executive Paul James, who said he did not have terms of reference "per se", but that he expected to release the investigation's findings publicly in August. James told the Herald officials were checking the range of security clearances Parliamentary staff had, and with police and the Security Intelligence Service would assess information sharing practices - likely in July. James also told the paper he did not expect the inquiry would prompt wide-ranging changes but he wanted to remain open minded, including around whether employees were expected to raise concerns about a change in their circumstances, or whether departments should check in about that regularly. In statements after the scandal was revealed, Forbes said he had sought therapy over the past year, and should have apologised to the women affected at the time. Police investigated the same month the recordings were discovered and seized two phones in a search warrant, but said the available evidence did not meet the threshold for criminal prosecution. After the scandal broke, the DIA said all Ministerial Services staff were subject to standard pre-employment checks including reference checks, serious misconduct checks and a criminal conviction check when first employed - but this was not required when Forbes was temporarily assigned to the PM's office. Luxon himself told reporters it was Forbes' responsibility "to actually declare those issues or those incidents to us - that didn't happen which is why his employment would have been terminated, obviously". Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
5 hours ago
- RNZ News
Bay of Islands cruise ship numbers set to plummet
Cruise ships feature prominently in the Bay of Islands tourist scene over summer. Photo: NZME The Bay of Islands $23.34 million cruise ship industry will be hit hard next season with the number of visiting ships set to plummet. Bookings for the tourist mecca's 2025/2026 cruise season have almost halved from the peak two years ago. A cruise ship representative blamed the decline on a number of factors affecting New Zealand's cruise industry, including tougher biofouling rules along with compounding cost increases from central government, ports and regional authorities. There are just 47 cruise ships scheduled to visit the Bay of Islands for the coming season. This compares with 92 cruise ships booked for the peak 2023/2024 season. The coming season's numbers have reinforced the annual bookings decline in the Bay of Islands since the peak. Bookings for the 2024/2025 season were almost 20 percent down on 2023/2024. Seventy-four ships were booked. New Zealand Cruise Association chairperson Tansy Tompkins said the drop in numbers had many in the industry deeply concerned about the future. "New Zealand's booking momentum, has slowed significantly, and while final itineraries are still being confirmed, current projections indicate a major downturn," Tompkins said. The decline from the peak was "sobering", Tompkins said. She said the forecast for the coming season put New Zealand back to 2017/2018 season levels. Tompkins said the risk of cruise ships being refused entry into New Zealand because of dirty hulls was one of several key reasons for the decline. The risk threatened New Zealand cruise ship destination brand. Tougher biofouling rules for visiting cruise ships came into force for the Bay of Islands and the rest of New Zealand in October 2023, just as the 2023/2024 season got underway. Eighty-seven cruise ships arrived in Bay of Islands' 2023/2024 season - meaning five vessels did not turn up. Four cruise ships did not turn up in the 2024/2025 season - including the last two for the season due on 30 May - due to weather, according to Far North Holdings chief operating officer Robert Binney. All cruise ships entering New Zealand must have no more than a thin layer of slime and goose barnacles on their hulls when they arrive. Biofouling can introduce foreign marine species. These can threaten the environment, economy, and cultural values. It happens when too much sea life - including foreign algae, barnacles and other marine growth and may include shrimps and crabs - builds up on ship hulls. Tompkins said unpredictability around the introduction of new regulations also contributed to the decline. Cruise companies had to deal with the outcome of this when passengers booked up to two years in advance. And New Zealand was now the world's most expensive place for cruise ships to visit with significant compounding cost increases including from central government, ports and regional authorities. This was putting New Zealand at a competitive disadvantage. She said senior cruise line executives had a perception New Zealand was difficult to operate in and an unwelcoming destination. LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
RNZ News
5 hours ago
- RNZ News
Du Val directors Kenyon and Charlotte Clarke want assets unfrozen and passports back
Du Val director Kenyon Clarke. Photo: The Financial Markets Authority has hit back at claims by Du Val directors that it is to blame for the "train wreck" collapse of the property group. Lawyers for the authority and for Du Val's directors Kenyon and Charlotte Clarke have been in the High Court at Auckland this week, arguing about whether receivership should continue for the couple and the handful of Du Val companies not in statutory management. The Clarkes want to be out of receivership, their assets unfrozen and their passports returned from the control of the High Court. Their lawyer Ron Mansfield said receivership orders were "excessively broad" and oppressive and should end. The FMA had had months to investigate but had not come up with any solid evidence - and the Clarkes claim it was the FMA action that cause the train wreck, he said. However, FMA lawyer Jenny Cooper said that claim could not go unanswered. "It is assertion without substance," she said. The FMA had good grounds to step in and to keep investigating because the investigation was a complex one that would take time, she said. The Clarkes could speed it up by being more open with receivers and investigators, she said. A court directive to force the Clarkes to be interviewed by receivers under oath about their assets was currently being heard by the Court of Appeal. Cooper noted the very complex and large company structure of about 70 entities. "The Clarkes are not people who have straightforward accounting arrangements," she said. The receivership and associated orders were still needed because there was an ongoing investigation into the group, Cooper said The FMA presented evidence about why that should continue but much of it was suppressed so it would not prejudice any civil or criminal action that could follow. Justice Jane Anderson also noted the FMA was still in an investigation phase and the Clarkes had not had a chance to respond - and were not in a position to because of a lack of information. The FMA did not have to prove any wrongdoing at this hearing, just that there was enough evidence to show more investigation was needed and the receivership should stay. Most of the arguments about why the Clarkes should or should not get their passports back were also suppressed. Justice Anderson had initially allowed the argument to be reported, but Mansfield was seeking leave to appeal. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
