
Canada's Indigenous leaders on losing Pope Francis: ‘An ally and a friend'
Gov-Gen. Gen. Mary Simon and chiefs Wilton Littlechild, Phil Fontaine and Cindy Woodhouse Nepinak were among the thousands of dignitaries and Catholic faithful who filled St. Peter's Square to honour Francis and his dedication to a myriad of issues, including concerns facing migrants, marginalized groups and the poor.
Afterwards, the head of the Assembly of First Nations remembered Francis for apologizing during his visit to Canada in July 2022 for the Catholic Church's role in widespread abuses at residential schools.
'I stand with people around the world and in mourning the loss of an ally and a friend to First Nations, Pope Francis,' National Chief Nepinak said by phone Saturday, reached on a busy Rome street hours after the mass.
'No other pope before him had done that, had done that work and had apologized, and so I thank him for his life.'
Nepinak acknowledged a sad day in marking the pontiff's death, but also a day for looking to the future, 'knowing that we have to still build the relationships and change the conversation on some really difficult issues within the Catholic Church.'
Simon, Canada's first Indigenous governor general, said the pontiff's apology for abuses in the residential school system was a significant step in addressing historical injustices.
'I hope that the new pope will carry on the work that Pope Francis was doing,' said Simon, who led the Canadian delegation to Rome.
'The apology was a significant milestone, and we have to continue working together on the journey of reconciliation. The fact that he came to Canada and apologized on Canadian lands, on Indigenous lands, was very significant.'
Littlechild said it's important to continue that work for 'our healing journeys.'
Nepinak said she, Littlechild and Fontaine met with several Canadian cardinals after the funeral to informally discuss next steps in healing relations between the Church and Indigenous Peoples.
'We talked about some of the work that he had done in the past couple of years. So it was a good day that way, where I was able to build relations with Vatican officials and cardinals and bishops,' she said.
The road ahead is not smooth, she added, noting resistance remains among some in the Church and in Indigenous communities to both change and accepting the apology.
'I think it's very raw. And residential schools is just very, still, very raw for Canada.'
The papal visit in July 2022 was described as a 'penitential pilgrimage' because Pope Francis insisted on meeting with Indigenous survivors of residential schools and hearing their stories.
In Maskwacis, Alta., Francis begged for forgiveness and expressed shame for abuses committed by some members of the Church. In Nunavut, he met survivors who showcased traditional practices banned in residential schools, including dancing, drumming and throat singing.
While the visit was recognized as a milestone, some criticized Francis for not naming the crimes and abuses. Others called for action, such as the return of sacred artifacts held by the Vatican.
Nepinak said she saw signs of a possible renewed relationship with the Church, noting that when she arrived at the funeral, she initially took her place towards the back of a VIP section.
But then a Vatican official approached and pulled her closer to the front.
'I was sitting in the back row, and some of the Vatican officials came and got me, and they brought me up to the stage, closer to his coffin and with the dignitaries up top,' she said.
'I want to be hopeful.'
Simon said it's important for the Vatican to continue efforts at reconciliation.
'It's a long process, but you see things moving forward. And I hope that will continue to happen.'
About 150,000 Indigenous children were forced to attend residential schools, more than 60 per cent of which were run by the Catholic Church.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published April 26, 2025.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Air Canada union takes aim at Feds as company seeks binding arbitration
After Canadian Job Minister Patty Hajdu asked the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) to respond to Air Canada's request for her to send the two parties to binding arbitration, the union representing the airline's flight attendants has responded with frustration.
![[PREMIERING 9PM ET] The Movie Beijing Doesn't Want You to See](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fimg.theepochtimes.com%2Fassets%2Fuploads%2F2025%2F08%2F14%2Fid5901322-250813-ATL_Yan-Ma_HD_TN.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
Epoch Times
2 hours ago
- Epoch Times
[PREMIERING 9PM ET] The Movie Beijing Doesn't Want You to See
Canadian-Chinese filmmaker Yan Ma knew from the outset that he was putting himself at risk for making a political thriller about a lab leak in China. 'The Unrestricted War' is a movie that was inspired by the cover-up and outbreak of COVID-19 and spotlights how the Chinese Communist Party coerces its citizens, and even foreigner...


Atlantic
3 hours ago
- Atlantic
The Damage to Economic Data May Already Be Done
If you have been closely following the ongoing Bureau of Labor Statistics story—in which Donald Trump fired then-Commissioner Erika McEntarfer after being displeased by the bureau's July jobs report and selected the Heritage Foundation economist E. J. Antoni to succeed her—you will have heard an unusual consensus about the airtight political independence of the agency and the people who work there. Among BLS employees, including former Commissioner William Beach, whom Trump appointed in his first term, a fierce loyalty to the data is bone deep. Antoni does not appear to share that spirit of independence, nor does he seem to have a great deal of talent for economics or statistics, according to economists from across the political spectrum. Even so, his power to avoid future reports that embarrass Trump appears to be limited. In an interview recorded on August 4, before his nomination, Antoni proposed eliminating the monthly release of employment data, but the administration has already insisted that that won't happen. BLS data may not be completely tamper-proof, but they're pretty close. The sharpest economic minds in this country, both inside and outside the bureau, pay meticulous attention to the deepest layers of the data, many strata below the headline-unemployment rate and change-in-payroll employment. Deceiving them all would be very hard to do. Unfortunately, that might not matter. Antoni doesn't have to manipulate any data to undermine the reliability of the government's economic statistics. That damage might already have been done. I was a career press official at the Department of Labor who prepared a series of labor secretaries for their TV appearances early on the first Friday morning of every month. The release of the jobs report—'Jobs Day'—is a marquee event in this little corner of the federal government, when the press and the financial world's attention is fixed on the plaza of the Frances Perkins Building, in Washington. I lasted only one Jobs Day into the tenure of Trump's labor secretary, Lori Chavez-DeRemer, before taking DOGE's buyout deal. I decided to leave the government in large part out of fear of precisely the kind of demands for oaths of political loyalty that were being threatened then and are now being implicitly exacted on every career civil servant at the BLS. Brian Klaas: Will Trump get his Potemkin statistics? Most labor secretaries, understanding the power of jobs data to create or destroy value in the financial markets, have taken a sober and restrained approach to these press appearances. Then there's Chavez-DeRemer. One of her prime talking points has been that 'native-born workers have accounted for all job gains since Inauguration Day.' Every single one. Not a single Russian surgeon or Canadian blackjack dealer got a job after January 20 of this year. In fact, the BLS makes no such assertion. The claim is absurd on its face—the kind of political catnip that a Cabinet secretary in the Trump administration is expected to put forward without shame, as a kind of homage to the boss. The existence of an independent BLS commissioner is predicated on the idea that someone needs to talk about the labor market who is never tempted to say such things. It's a public service, primarily for investors. Might a member of the Cabinet say something iffy as a result of her political loyalties? That's not ideal, but here's someone else you can listen to who doesn't have that problem. Until now, this arrangement allowed the president's representative to attempt to convince the public of the effectiveness of his priorities while reinforcing the objective, nonpartisan genesis of the underlying data. If the BLS commissioner is now every bit the political animal that the labor secretary is, then what is the purpose of the BLS commissioner? I am not a statistician; perhaps Antoni can mandate methodological deviations that bias the numbers in Trump's preferred direction. But I don't think he needs to. Confidence in the bureau is already badly weakened. This is about more than just our trust as consumers of the jobs report, because we are also its producers. To create its reports, the BLS needs businesses and citizens to take the time to respond to surveys about changes to their payroll and about who is going to work or looking for a job in their household. Even before Trump won the election last November, the trend in survey responsiveness was declining, posing an existential threat to the robustness of the data. The appointment of a transparent partisan to the head of the BLS is unlikely to improve matters. Why should we take the time to report our economic circumstances to the government if we believe the government isn't interested in the truth? If fewer Americans think that contributing to the creation of these reports is a valuable use of their time, the civil servants at the BLS will struggle to produce reliable numbers, regardless of what policies Antoni puts into place. The damage to our understanding of the economy would be far more consequential than a month of bad jobs numbers.