'Sextortion' scheme linked to California teen's death leads to arrests in West Africa
'Sextortion' scheme linked to California teen's death leads to arrests in West Africa
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Investigation: Sextortion victims pay high price to recover photos
After falling prey to sextortionists, victims turn to companies promising to get rid of the content in exchange for high fees.
SAN FRANCISCO – The U.S. Department of Justice recently announced the arrest of four men in West Africa for their roles in an international "sextortion" scheme that targeted thousands of victims, including minors, throughout the United States, Canada, and Europe.
The arrest of Alfred Kassi and three alleged accomplices, all in Côte d'Ivoire, represents the latest major development in the efforts to counter online shakedowns that have resulted in the suicide deaths of at least 30 American boys since 2021.
In sextortion cases, the perpetrators typically contact their victims through social media and gain their trust, then convince them to share sexually explicit pictures, followed by a threat to post the photos online and a demand for payment.
Among the victims, prosecutors said, was a high school senior from San Jose, California. Ryan Last, 17, took his own life in February 2022, "hours after being sextorted online" by an individual he thought was a 20-year-old woman, according to prosecutors. He had already paid $150 by then.
'Significant step in the fight against child exploitation'
In addition to Kassi, Ivorian law enforcement also arrested two other individuals, Moussa Diaby and Oumar Cisse. Prosecutors said Diaby and Cisse are part of Kassi's alleged sextortion network and admitted to their sextortion crimes
"At the time of his arrest, Kassi allegedly still had the sextortion messages he sent to the 17-year-old victim in February 2022 on his phone," the Justice Department said in a news release that also noted the department conducted a lengthy investigation with the help of Ivorian law enforcement.
Federal prosecutors added that Oumarou Ouedraogo, an alleged money launderer, was arrested by Ivorian law enforcement last month. The accused men will be prosecuted in Côte d'Ivoire because the country does not extradite its citizens, the Department of Justice said.
A U.S.-based accomplice, Jonathan Kassi, was convicted in a California state court in 2023 and sentenced to 18 months in jail, according to the Justice Department.
The FBI said last month that a new global operation focusing on battling financial sextortion from Nigeria — another hotbed of the crime — had led to 22 arrests. About half of those were linked to suicides, according to the FBI.
"This operation marks a significant step in the fight against child exploitation and brings justice and accountability to international perpetrators hiding anonymously behind screens," said the agency, which also listed guilty pleas in several sextortion cases since February among recent successes.
Sextortion-related tips to the FBI rose by 30%
The FBI said it has detected "a huge increase" in sextortion attempts on minors, often males between the ages of 14 and 17, reached via Instagram. The number of sextortion-related reports made to the FBI's national tip line soared by 30% from October 2024 to March 2025 compared to the previous such stretch.
The victim total also spiked, from 34,000 in 2023 to 54,000 last year, resulting in about $65 million in financial losses.
In its yearly report on internet crime released April 23, the bureau said complaints of online extortion attempts, not necessarily sextortion, more than doubled in recent years, from 39,416 in 2022 to 86,415 in 2024. It was the fastest-growing of the agency's 26 cybercrime categories.
And the consequences are devastating for families, well beyond any financial losses.
"Financial sextortion represents a grave and growing threat to children, especially teenage boys," said Julie Cordua, CEO of the technology nonprofit Thorn. "For our society, it's a reminder of the urgent need for layered protections to keep our kids safe online."
The FBI urges victims of sextortion and their loved ones to contact their local FBI field office, call 1-800-CALL-FBI (1-800-225-5324), or make a report online at the Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3). Additional resources can be found at Financially Motivated Sextortion – FBI.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
New '1984' Foreword Includes Warning About 'Problematic' Characters
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The 75th anniversary edition of George Orwell's novel 1984, which coined the term "thoughtcrime" to describe the act of having thoughts that question the ruling party's ideology, has become an ironic lightning rod in debates over alleged trigger warnings and the role of historical context in classic literature. The introduction to the new edition, endorsed by Orwell's estate and written by the American author Dolen Perkins-Valdezm, is at the center of the storm, drawing fire from conservative commentators as well as public intellectuals, and prompting a wide spectrum of reaction from academics who study Orwell's work. Perkins-Valdez opens the introduction with a self-reflective exercise: imagining what it would be like to read 1984 for the first time today. She writes that "a sliver of connection can be difficult for someone like me to find in a novel that does not speak much to race and ethnicity," noting the complete absence of Black characters. She also describes her pause at the protagonist Winston Smith's "despicable" misogyny, but ultimately chooses to continue reading, writing: "I know the difference between a flawed character and a flawed story." "I'm enjoying the novel on its own terms, not as a classic but as a good story; that is, until Winston reveals himself to be a problematic character," she writes. "For example, we learn of him: 'He disliked nearly all women, and especially the young and pretty ones.' Whoa, wait a minute, Orwell." That framing was enough to provoke sharp critique from novelist and essayist Walter Kirn on the podcast America This Week, co-hosted with journalist Matt Taibbi. Kirn characterized the foreword as a kind of ideological overreach. "Thank you for your trigger warning for 1984," he said. "It is the most 1984ish thing I've ever f***ing read." In which you will learn that the current leading paperback version of 1984, its official Orwell-estate-approved 75th anniversary edition, includes a 1984-ish trigger-warning introduction calling the novel's hero "problematic" because of his "misogyny." I am not making this up. — Walter Kirn (@walterkirn) June 2, 2025 Later in the episode, which debuted on June 1, Kirn blasted what he saw as an imposed "permission structure" by publishers and academic elites. "It's a sort of Ministry of Truthism," he said, referring to the Ministry of Truth that features prominently in the dystopian novel. "They're giving you a little guidebook to say, 'Here's how you're supposed to feel when you read this.'" Conservative commentator such as Ed Morrissey described the foreword as part of "an attempt to rob [Orwell's work] of meaning by denigrating it as 'problematic.'" Morrissey argued that trigger warnings on literary classics serve to "distract readers at the start from its purpose with red herrings over issues of taste." But not all responses aligned with that view. Academic Rebuttal Peter Brian Rose-Barry, a philosophy professor at Saginaw Valley State University and author of George Orwell: The Ethics of Equality, disputed the entire premise. "There just isn't [a trigger warning]," he told Newsweek in an email after examining the edition. "She never accuses Orwell of thoughtcrime. She never calls for censorship or cancelling Orwell." In Rose-Barry's view, the foreword is neither invasive nor ideological, but reflective. "Perkins-Valdez suggests in her introduction that 'love and artistic beauty can act as healing forces in a totalitarian state,'" he noted. "Now, I find that deeply suspect... but I'd use this introduction to generate a discussion in my class." Taibbi and Kirn, by contrast, took issue with that exact line during the podcast. "Love heals? In 1984?" Taibbi asked. "The whole thing ends with Winston broken, saying he loves Big Brother," the symbol of the totalitarian state at the heart of the book. Kirn laughed and added, "It's the kind of revisionist uplift you get from a book club discussion after someone just watched The Handmaid's Tale." Photographs of Eric Blair, whose pen name was George Orwell, from his Metropolitan Police file, c.1940. Photographs of Eric Blair, whose pen name was George Orwell, from his Metropolitan Police file, c.1940. The National Archives UK Perkins-Valdez, a Black writer, Harvard graduate and professor of literature at American University, also noted the novel's lack of racial representation: "That sliver of connection can be difficult for someone like me to find in a novel that does not speak much to race and ethnicity at all." Kirn responded to that sentiment on the show by pointing out that Orwell was writing about midcentury Britain: "When Orwell wrote the book, Black people made up maybe one percent of the population. It's like expecting white characters in every Nigerian novel." Richard Keeble, former chair of the Orwell Society, argued that critiques of Orwell's treatment of race and gender have long been part of academic discourse. "Questioning Orwell's representation of Blacks in 1984 can usefully lead us to consider the evolution of his ideas on race generally," he told Newsweek. "Yet Orwell struggled throughout his life, and not with complete success, to exorcise what Edward Said called 'Orientalism.'" Keeble added, "Trigger warnings and interpretative forewords... join the rich firmament of Orwellian scholarship—being themselves open to critique and analysis." Cultural Overreach The 75th anniversary edition of George Orwell's 1984 has become a lightning rod in debates over alleged wokeness, censorship and the role of historical context in reading classic literature. The 75th anniversary edition of George Orwell's 1984 has become a lightning rod in debates over alleged wokeness, censorship and the role of historical context in reading classic literature. Newsweek / Penguin Random House While critics like Kirn view Perkins-Valdez's new foreword as a symptom of virtue signaling run amok, others see it as part of a long-standing literary dialogue. Laura Beers, a historian at American University and author of Orwell's Ghosts: Wisdom and Warnings for the Twenty-First Century, acknowledged that such reactions reflect deeper political divides. But she defended the legitimacy of approaching Orwell through modern ethical and social lenses. "What makes 1984 such a great novel is that it was written to transcend a specific historical context," she told Newsweek. "Although it has frequently been appropriated by the right as a critique of 'socialism,' it was never meant to be solely a critique of Stalin's Russia." Dolen Perkins-Valdez. Dolen Perkins-Valdez. Courtesy American University "Rather," she added, "it was a commentary on how absolute power corrupts absolutely, and the risk to all societies, including democracies like Britain and the United States, of the unchecked concentration of power." Beers also addressed the role of interpretive material in shaping the reading experience. "Obviously, yes, in that 'interpretive forewords' give a reader an initial context in which to situate the texts that they are reading," she said. "That said, such forewords are more often a reflection on the attitudes and biases of their own time." While the foreword has prompted the familiar battle lines playing out across the Trump-era culture wars, Beers sees the conversation itself as in keeping with Orwell's legacy. "By attempting to place Orwell's work in conversation with changing values and historical understandings in the decades since he was writing," she said, "scholars like Perkins-Valdez are exercising the very freedom to express uncomfortable and difficult opinions that Orwell explicitly championed."
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Are the Epstein files still sealed? Here's what we know
The Brief Elon Musk claimed Donald Trump is named in the Epstein files, reigniting public interest and online speculation. The FBI says it's reviewing tens of thousands of Epstein-related materials but has not confirmed any names or release dates. Only partial records have been made public, and pressure is mounting on the DOJ to release more. LOS ANGELES - After years of speculation and partial disclosures, the Epstein files have returned to the national spotlight — this time because of Elon Musk. In a social media post Thursday, Musk accused former President Donald Trump of being named in the documents related to Jeffrey Epstein, the convicted sex offender whose high-profile associations have fueled conspiracy theories across the political spectrum. RELATED: Musk says 'Trump is in the Epstein files' as public feud escalates Musk offered no proof, but his claim immediately reignited public interest in the long-secret files. What exactly is in the Epstein files? Why haven't they been fully released? And is there any truth to the idea that names are being protected? What we know The government has acknowledged ongoing internal reviews of Epstein-related materials, but so far, only select records have been released. The term "Epstein files" refers to thousands of documents, videos, and investigative materials gathered by federal and state authorities across multiple cases tied to Epstein and his associates. Many court documents, particularly from Epstein's 2008 Florida case and the 2019 charges in New York, have been made public, but others remain sealed or redacted. Attorney General Pam Bondi said last month that the FBI is reviewing "tens of thousands" of Epstein-related videos and documents. Bondi said materials will be released once redactions are made to protect victims and ongoing investigations. FBI Director Kash Patel and Deputy Director Dan Bongino said in a Fox News interview that they've seen the full file and maintain Epstein died by suicide. They also said surveillance video from Epstein's cell will be released in the coming months. What we don't know Despite growing public pressure, key questions about the files — including who is named and when the material will be released — remain unanswered. No official source has confirmed that Trump appears in any Epstein-related documents. Musk did not specify which documents he was referring to or provide supporting material. The timeline for the full release of videos or unsealed documents has not been made public. The total scope of what the FBI or DOJ intends to keep classified — permanently or temporarily — remains unclear. The backstory Donald Trump built much of his political identity on promises to expose the "deep state" and reveal hidden truths — including, at times, alluding to Epstein. As president, he claimed his administration would declassify major troves of government records. While he did release over 63,000 pages tied to the JFK assassination, he has not fully followed through on releasing Epstein-related materials. The skepticism deepened after Trump's own FBI officials dismissed theories that Epstein was murdered. Patel and Bongino both asserted Epstein's death was a suicide, contradicting some of their earlier public skepticism. Online, Trump supporters and critics alike responded with frustration, asking why the administration, which has stacked agencies with loyalists, still hasn't produced answers. What they're saying "You know a suicide when you see one, and that's what that was," FBI Director Kash Patel told Fox News. "I have seen the whole file," Bongino added. "He killed himself." Their comments contradicted earlier statements Bongino made as a podcast host, when he suggested the government was covering up Epstein's death. Tucker Carlson echoed that sentiment on his show: "No matter who gets elected… the Epstein videos remain secret." Newsmax host Todd Starnes posted, "They told us for months leading up to the Election that it wasn't suicide. But now they tell us it was suicide. Pardon me, but what the heck is going on at DOJ?" Even some Trump allies questioned the silence. "If it's easy, why hasn't your administration found these criminals already?" one user posted on Trump's Truth Social platform. The other side Elon Musk's accusation came amid a personal and political falling out with Trump, whom he had supported just months earlier. After Musk blasted Trump's federal spending bill as "pork-filled," Trump threatened to pull billions in government contracts from Musk's companies. Musk responded by making the explosive Epstein claim — without documentation — on X. While many saw it as retaliation, the statement pushed the Epstein issue back into public view, and with it, longstanding demands for government transparency. What's next The DOJ has said more releases are coming — including possible surveillance footage from Epstein's jail — but hasn't provided a schedule. Bondi insists the delay is due to the need to protect victims, but some right-wing influencers and Trump supporters view the delay as stonewalling. There are no public plans to unseal the full list of names connected to Epstein's case files, despite repeated calls from across the political spectrum. Until more documents are released or the DOJ directly addresses Musk's accusation, public suspicion is likely to grow. The Source This article is based on reporting from the Associated Press and statements from Elon Musk and Donald Trump on social media. Quotes from FBI Director Kash Patel, Deputy Director Dan Bongino, and Attorney General Pam Bondi were taken from a recent Fox News interview. Additional commentary came from figures like Tucker Carlson and Todd Starnes, as well as publicly available court records and previous DOJ statements regarding the Epstein investigation.
San Francisco Chronicle
2 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Israel says it has retrieved the body of a Thai hostage kidnapped into Gaza on Oct. 7, 2023
TEL AVIV, Israel (AP) — Israel says it has retrieved the body of a Thai hostage kidnapped into Gaza on Oct. 7, 2023, as it continues its military offensive across the strip, killing at least 22 people overnight, according to health officials. The Prime Minister's office said Saturday that the body of Thai citizen Nattapong Pinta was returned to Israel in a special military operation. Pinta was kidnapped from Kibbutz Nir Oz and killed in captivity near the start of the war, said the government. This comes two days after the bodies of two Israeli-American hostages were retrieved. Fifty-five hostages remain in Gaza, of whom Israel says more than half are dead. The defense minister said Saturday that Pinta's body was retrieved from the Rafah area. He had come to Israel from Thailand to work in agriculture. A statement from the hostage forum, which supports the hostages, said it stands with Pinta's family and shares in their grief. It called on the country's decision makers to bring home the remaining hostages and give those who have died a proper burial. Thais were the largest group of foreigners held captive by Hamas militants. Many of the Thai agricultural workers lived in compounds on the outskirts of southern Israeli kibbutzim and towns, and Hamas militants overran those places first. A total of 46 Thais have been killed during the conflict, according to Thailand's Ministry of Foreign Affairs. One strike hit an apartment killing seven people including a mother and five children. Their bodies were taken to Shifa hospital. Israel said Saturday that it's responding to Hamas' 'barbaric attacks' and is dismantling its capabilities. It said it follows international law and takes all feasible precautions to mitigate civilian harm. ——
