Iran's supreme leader says US-Iran talks unlikely to succeed
Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said he does not expect negotiations with the United States over Tehran's nuclear program to 'reach a conclusion' as Washington toughens its conditions for a deal.
'During (former President Ebrahim) Raisi's time there were also indirect negotiations that didn't result in anything, and now we also doubt we will reach a conclusion, and we don't know what will happen,' he was cited as saying on his website.
Khamenei called the US demand that Iran not enrich uranium a 'big mistake,' saying that Tehran won't wait for American permission. Addressing American negotiators, he added: 'Try not to talk nonsense.'
American officials have sent mixed signals about whether they will allow Iran to enrich uranium domestically under a nuclear agreement. Uranium is a nuclear fuel that can be used to produce a bomb if enriched to high levels.
Iran insists it has a right to enrich under the United Nations' Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and says it will not relinquish that right under any circumstances.
US President Donald Trump has threatened to attack Iran if it doesn't agree to a nuclear deal, but he did not explicitly rule out its right to enrich uranium when reiterating that threat during his Middle East trip last week.
But US special envoy Steve Witkoff, who is leading the American delegation to the talks and had previously suggested Iran could be permitted to enrich uranium, told ABC over the weekend that Washington 'cannot allow even 1% of an enrichment capability' under an agreement. 'We've delivered a proposal to the Iranians that we think addresses some of this without disrespecting them,' he said.
Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister Majid Takht Ravanchi was cited as saying by Iran's Nour News on Monday that nuclear talks with the US 'will not actually get anywhere' if Washington insists that Tehran abandon enrichment.
Iran and the US held their fourth round of talks in Oman earlier this month, aimed at curbing Tehran's nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief. The Iranian foreign ministry described those talks as 'difficult.'
Witkoff said the next round of talks may take place in Europe this week. 'We hope that it will lead to some real positivity,' he added.
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said on Tuesday that Iran has been offered a date for the next round of talks, but that it has yet to accept it.
Asked how negotiations were going so far, he jokingly said the two sides are still tussling.
CNN's Leila Gharagozlou contributed reporting.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk calls Donald Trump-backed tax bill a 'disgusting abomination'
Elon Musk has criticised US President Donald Trump's tax and spending bill, calling it "outrageous" and a "disgusting abomination". The bill, which includes multi-trillion-dollar tax breaks, was passed by the House Republicans in May, and has been described by the president as a "big, beautiful bill". The tech billionaire hit out at the tax cuts on his platform X, writing: "This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. "Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it." In American politics, "pork" is a political metaphor used when government spending is allocated to local projects, usually to benefit politicians' constituencies. Musk left the administration abruptly last week after working to cut costs with his team, the newly formed Department of Government Efficiency - known as DOGE - with the ambition of sacking federal workers and cutting red tape. The White House brushed Musk's comments aside, claiming they did not surprise the president. In a press conference on Tuesday, press secretary Karoline Leavitt said that "the president already knows where Elon Musk stood on this bill". She added: "This is one, big, beautiful bill. "And he's sticking to it."
Boston Globe
31 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Secretary Galvin, Park Service announce Battle of Bunker Hill 250th anniversary events
Advertisement Although the Regulars took the hill that day and burned most of Charlestown down, the Patriots inflicted over 1,000 casualties on the British, including more than 200 killed. The British suffered more than twice the American losses, proving to both King and colonies that the fight for independence would be long and bloody, but winnable for the Americans. 'It unified the colonies in the belief that they had to take a stand to be independent, culminating just a year later on July 4, 1776, with the Declaration of Independence,' Galvin said. 'So in a very real way, the blood that was spilled here set the scene for the founding of the United States.' The new additions to the 'Upon Such Ground' exhibit, which opened in March at the Commonwealth Museum, 220 Morrissey Blvd., in Dorchester, will include original documents relating to the Battle of Bunker Hill, such as pay records for veterans, an 1823 petition to erect the monument that now towers above the site, and a list of survivors who returned for the battle's 50th anniversary in 1825. Advertisement The exhibit's title comes from a June 18, 1775, In addition to the extended exhibit, Galvin announced the return of the Commonwealth Museum's Fourth of July display of Massachusetts' original copy of the Declaration of Independence, signed by John Hancock. That same day, the crypt at the United First Parish Church in Quincy — final resting place of Presidents John and John Quincy Adams and their wives — will also be open to the public. Offered in partnership with the National Park Service and funded by the Massachusetts Historical Commission, the special opening marks the 199th anniversary of John Adams's death, exactly 50 years after he signed the Declaration of Independence. Simeon Monteleone, superintendent of the National Parks of Boston, said the Park Service is prepared for increased visitation to the Bunker Hill Monument leading up to and during 'This monument continues to serve as a vital commemorative space, rallying point, and inspiration to veterans, community members, and visitors alike,' Monteleone said. Advertisement While the Park Service has Asked why no full battle reenactment would take place in Charlestown itself, officials cited logistical and environmental constraints. 'This is an urban environment,' Galvin said. 'The hills have been filled with houses now. I don't think it could be a faithful reenactment.' He added that reenactments planned elsewhere — including in Gloucester — could better replicate the topography and scale of the original battle. The 250th anniversary As Massachusetts marks the Revolution it helped ignite, Galvin suggested the anniversary carries added weight in light of recent federal actions that have rattled institutions and residents across the state. 'I don't think it's political to say that democracy is under threat,' he said. 'If these commemorations provide some additional inspiration now and in the future, it's the importance of recognizing that it's our turn — as it was theirs back then — to protect and preserve democracy.' Nathan Metcalf can be reached at
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Musk calls Trump's big tax break bill a 'disgusting abomination,' testing his influence over the GOP
WASHINGTON (AP) — Elon Musk blasted President Donald Trump's'big, beautiful bill" of tax breaks and spending cuts as a 'disgusting abomination" on Tuesday, testing the limits of his political influence as he targeted the centerpiece of Republicans' legislative agenda. The broadside, which Musk issued on his social media platform X, came just days after the president gave him a celebratory Oval Office farewell that marked the end of his work for the administration, where he spearheaded the Department of Government Efficiency. 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore,' Musk posted on X. "This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' The legislation, which has passed the House and is currently under debate in the Senate, would curtail subsidies that benefit Tesla, Musk's electric automaker. The tech billionaire followed his criticism with a threat aimed at Republicans. 'In November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people,' he wrote in another X post. It's a sharp shift for Musk, the world's richest person who spent at least $250 million supporting Trump's campaign last year. He previously pledged to help defeat Republican lawmakers deemed insufficiently loyal to Trump, but now he's suggesting voting them out if they advance the president's legislative priority. However, it's unclear how Musk will follow through on his criticism. He recently said that he would spend 'a lot less' on political campaigns, though he left the door open to political involvement "if I see a reason." The tech titan's missives could cause headaches for Republicans on Capitol Hill, who face conflicting demands from Trump and their party's wealthiest benefactor. Alex Conant, a Republican strategist, said 'it's not helpful' to have Musk criticizing the legislation, but he doesn't expect lawmakers to side with Musk over Trump. 'Senate Republicans are not going to let the tax cuts expire,' Conant said. 'It just makes leadership's job that much harder to wrangle the holdouts.' Trump can change the outcome in Republican primaries with his endorsements; Musk doesn't wield that level of influence, Conant said. 'No matter what Elon Musk or anybody else says — and I don't want to diminish him because I don't think that's fair — it's still going to be second fiddle to President Trump,' said Republican West Virginia Sen. Shelley Moore Capito. Musk's business interests stand to take a hit if lawmakers approve Trump's bill, which would slash funding for electric vehicles and related technologies. Musk is the chief executive of Tesla, the nation's largest electric vehicle manufacturer, and SpaceX, which has massive defense contracts. Last month, Musk said he was 'disappointed' by the spending bill, a much milder criticism than the broadside he leveled on Tuesday. The budget package seeks to extend tax cuts approved in 2017, during Trump's first term at the White House, and add new ones he campaigned on. It also includes a massive build-up of $350 billion for border security, deportations and national security. To defray some of the lost tax revenue to the government and limit piling onto the nation's $36 trillion debt load, Republicans want to reduce federal spending by imposing work requirements for some Americans who rely on government safety net services. Musk's post threw another hurdle in front of Senate Majority Leader John Thune's already complex task to pass a bill in time for Trump to achieve his goal of signing it by July 4. The South Dakota Republican has few votes to spare in the GOP's slim 53-seat majority. Two of the Senate's most fiscally hawkish Republicans quickly backed Musk. 'We can and must do better,' Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul wrote on X. Utah Sen. Mike Lee said 'federal spending has become excessive,' adding that it causes inflation and 'weaponizes government.' Still, Trump enjoys fierce loyalty among the GOP base, and in the end, his opinion may be the only one that matters. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt played down Musk's criticism. 'The president already knows where Elon Musk stood on this bill,' Leavitt said, and Musk's post 'doesn't change the president's opinion.' The tension in the GOP delighted Democrats, who found themselves in the unlikely position of siding with Musk. Democrats are waging an all-out political assault on GOP proposals to cut Medicaid, food stamps and green energy investments to help pay for more than $4.5 trillion in tax cuts — with many lawmakers being hammered at boisterous town halls back home. 'We're in complete agreement,' House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries said of Musk. The New York Democratic lawmaker stood alongside a poster-sized printout of Musk's post during a Capitol news conference. The last time Musk weighed in significantly on legislation, the scenario was far different. His power was ascendant after the election, with Trump joining him for a rocket test in Texas and appointing him to spearhead the Department of Government Efficiency. During the transition period, Musk started whipping up opposition to legislation that would prevent a government shutdown, posting about it repeatedly on X, his social media platform. Trump soon weighed in, encouraging Republicans to back out of a bipartisan deal. Lawmakers eventually patched together a new agreement. ___ Cooper reported from Phoenix. Associated Press writers Joey Capelletti and Mary Claire Jalonick in Washington contributed reporting.
