logo
LA protesters and police in standoff as Trump doubles National Guard deployment

LA protesters and police in standoff as Trump doubles National Guard deployment

CNN10-06-2025
Update:
Date:
Title: In pictures: Protesters clash with police in Downtown Los Angeles on Monday
Content:
Update:
Date:
Title: Who is protesting in LA?
Content:
The protests appear divided into separate groups: progressive citizens who felt called to defend the rights of the undocumented, and protesters who appeared determined to drag the city into violent chaos.
A senior law enforcement source told CNN that intelligence analysts have been conducting assessments on the crowds that gathered Sunday night. They found the many of the protesters were motivated by the recent immigration raids and disdain for the federal government's deployment of National Guard troops in Los Angeles.
But some protesters, the intelligence source said, fit law enforcement profiles of so-called 'professional rioters,' who continually seek out confrontation with law enforcement.
Defending 'La Raza': Unión del Barrio, an organization whose members are dedicated to defending the rights of 'la raza' — or Mexican and indigenous people — within the US, praised the efforts to fight back against ICE and other agencies.
The Los Angeles community has 'the moral authority and universal right to defend our people from kidnappings and family separation,' a spokesman said.
Toll on vulnerable communities: After being informed ICE agents were questioning workers at a Pasadena hotel, Pablo Alvarado, the co-executive director of the National Day Laborer Organizing Network, began calling for protests to protect vulnerable immigrant communities throughout the city.
'The Pasadena community showed up in large numbers and the message was loud and clear, we don't want to see your armored vehicles, men in masks coming to our communities to pick people up to rip families apart.'
But, Alvarado added, he felt the violence that spread throughout the city in response to the raids was tainting their cause.
Read the full story.
Update:
Date:
Title: Analysis: LA's crisis rests on what Trump does next
Content:
Donald Trump is talking and acting like an authoritarian as he escalates a constitutional clash with California over his migration crackdown.
Much now depends on whether he's simply talking tough or if he's ready to take an already-tense nation across a fateful line in his zeal for strongman rule.
On Monday, the president of the United States — the country seen as the world's top steward of democracy for 80 years — endorsed the arrest of the Democratic governor of the nation's most populous state. 'I think it would be a great thing,' Trump said.
Trump's decision to deploy troops despite the opposition of California Gov. Gavin Newsom represented the latest example of his willingness to flex extraordinary executive power and marked a break with a first term when he was often talked out of his extreme impulses by establishment officials.
For all Trump's multiple previous challenges to the rule of law and democracy, a grave new chapter may be opening.
The trajectory of the crisis could now turn on whether Trump follows through on his dictator's theatrics by crossing lines not approached by modern presidents — notably on the use of troops in a law enforcement capacity.
It may also rely on the restraint of protesters, who would play into Trump's hands by taking part in more unrest that creates alarming television pictures that can fuel Trump's dystopian rhetoric.
Creating or escalating a law-and-order crisis or threat to public security and then using it to justify the use of the military on domestic soil would mirror the methodology of tyrannical leaders throughout history.
Read the full analysis.
Update:
Date:
Title: Newsom hasn't done anything to warrant arrest, Trump's border czar says
Content:
White House border czar Tom Homan joined CNN's Kaitlan Collins to discuss comments President Donald Trump made suggesting Homan arrest California Governor Gavin Newsom.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump administration to seek federal charges against people snared in DC crackdown, sources say
Trump administration to seek federal charges against people snared in DC crackdown, sources say

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump administration to seek federal charges against people snared in DC crackdown, sources say

By Sarah N. Lynch and Ned Parker WASHINGTON (Reuters) -President Donald Trump's administration this week ordered federal prosecutors in Washington, D.C., to be more aggressive in pursuing criminal cases against people arrested as part of a crackdown in the nation's capital, three people familiar with the matter told Reuters. The move marks an escalation of Trump's push against what he has described as a wave of crime and homelessness in Washington, in which the Republican president has already called up hundreds of National Guard troops and temporarily taken over the Democratic-led city's police department. The head of the criminal division of the Washington, D.C., U.S. Attorney's office, Jonathan Hornok, on Monday told prosecutors to charge as many federal cases as possible against people arrested in the sweeps, a move that could both strain the court system and raise the stakes for criminal defendants because convictions for federal crimes can carry weighty sentences, said the people, who were granted anonymity to discuss internal department matters. While many of the U.S. federal prosecutors in that office focus on higher-level offenses such as terrorism and fraud, the Washington office plays a dual role in prosecuting both federal and local crimes. In a post on X on Tuesday, Attorney General Pam Bondi said that since Trump's takeover of the Metropolitan Police Department began, there have been 465 arrests made for a variety of offenses, including homicide, narcotics, and firearm offenses. It was not clear how many of these could be eligible for federal charges. "In line with President Trump's directive to make D.C. safe, U.S. Attorney (Jeanine) Pirro has made it clear that the old way of doing things is unacceptable. She directed her staff to charge the highest crime that is supported by the law and the evidence," a spokesperson for Pirro's office said on Tuesday. Dozens of prosecutors have voluntarily left the Washington U.S. Attorney's office since Trump took office in January, while others have been fired. The orders could place additional stress on federal law enforcement agents including those from the FBI who are already stretched thin because they have been ordered to participate in nightly rotational shifts to patrol the capital's streets. That could leave them less time and resources to help do the follow-up investigations that will be required to support criminal charges, such as interviewing witnesses, canvassing for CCTV footage or following up to obtain DNA evidence, which is often required to win a conviction in D.C. for unlawful firearm possession cases. The U.S. Attorney's office is planning to bring in about 20 people from the Department of Defense on Monday to serve as special assistant U.S. attorneys to help prosecute the misdemeanor cases, a spokesperson confirmed.

He Stalked Her for 12 Years — Culminating in 14 Hours of Terror Inside a Soundproof Bunker
He Stalked Her for 12 Years — Culminating in 14 Hours of Terror Inside a Soundproof Bunker

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

He Stalked Her for 12 Years — Culminating in 14 Hours of Terror Inside a Soundproof Bunker

Samantha Stites is speaking out about her experience after surviving a kidnapping in 2022 NEED TO KNOW Samantha Stites spoke to ABC News ahead of Hulu's Stalking Samantha: 13 Years of Terror, about her harrowing experience Christopher Thomas pleaded guilty to kidnapping, torture and aggravated stalking in December 2023 Thomas is serving a minimum of 40 years in a Michigan state prison A Michigan woman lived through a nightmare when she was stalked for years by a man who later kidnapped and tortured her. Now, after her stalker was sentenced to decades in prison, Samantha Stites is telling her story. Speaking to ABC News ahead of a Hulu documentary series about the case, Stalking Samantha: 13 Years of Terror, Stites says she first thought her stalker was just "lonely." "At first I think he is just lonely and for some reason finds me an approachable person to talk to," Stites told the outlet. "And then at some point, it kind of changes." According to Michigan prison records, Christopher Thomas, 41, is currently serving a minimum of 40 years behind bars, and faces a maximum of 60 years. Prison records show that that Thomas pleaded guilty to kidnapping, torture and aggravated stalking in December 2023. ABC reported that Thomas first started stalking Stites in 2011, when he went to the same Christian group she attended while she was a college student. Thomas eventually began following Stites for years, going so far as to place GPS trackers on her in 2022, WPBN reported, Thomas was arrested after he kidnapped Stites and held her in a soundproof storage unit for almost 15 hours. Stites was able to escape after convincing her captor to let her go by promising not to report the crime, ABC reported. Thomas was sentenced in 2024 after pleading guilty in December 2023. "Justice is a funny thing. It doesn't necessarily come in the form of prison years," Stites said, according to ABC. "I can't ever go back to before I was kidnapped. And that's something I had to grieve. But knowing that I'm finally turning the page on this and that I should feel safe with him off the street and that I am protected meant a lot. I felt free." Read the original article on People

Trump wants to get rid of mail-in voting. It's become an increasingly important part of American elections.
Trump wants to get rid of mail-in voting. It's become an increasingly important part of American elections.

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump wants to get rid of mail-in voting. It's become an increasingly important part of American elections.

More and more voters, including Republicans, have been opting to cast their ballots through the mail. President Trump on Monday said he would lead a movement to get rid of mail-in voting, based on the false claim that they lead to widespread fraud. 'ELECTIONS CAN NEVER BE HONEST WITH MAIL IN BALLOTS/VOTING,' he wrote in a post on Truth Social in which he also railed against voting machines used across the country. Trump wrote that he would be signing an executive order to 'to help bring HONESTY' to next year's midterm elections, but didn't share any details on what that order might include or what legal authority he would rely on to issue it. The Constitution gives states the power to control their own elections within the confines of laws set out by Congress. The president does not have the ability to unilaterally change voting laws. Trump has a long history of opposition to mail-in voting, also known as absentee voting. False claims about mail ballots being rife with fraud are central to his unfounded belief that the 2020 presidential election was rigged against him. 'We gotta stop mail-in voting and the Republicans have to lead the charge,' Trump told reporters at the White House Monday. 'If you [end] mail in voting, you're not gonna have many Democrats get elected.' It is true that Democrats voted by mail in much larger numbers than Republicans during the 2020 election, but that discrepancy was largely attributable to the unique circumstances of the COVID pandemic, along with Trump's persistent criticism of the practice in the months before Election Day. Historically, mail ballots have not given either party a strong partisan advantage. The GOP also closed, or in some states even flipped, the mail-in voting gap during last year's presidential race. Trump's renewed focus on mail-in voting seemed to come after his conversation with Russian President Vladimir Putin during their summit in Alaska last week to discuss a potential end to the war in Ukraine. 'Vladimir Putin, smart guy, said you can't have an honest election with mail-in voting,' he told Fox News host Sean Hannity in his first interview after the summit. During the Fox News interview, he also falsely claimed that the U.S. is 'the only country in the world' that allows mail-in voting because it's so rife with fraud. In fact, dozens of countries permit at least some voters to cast their ballots through the mail. Growing importance There has been limited use of absentee ballots since the earliest days of the United States, but the practice has become much more common in recent decades. The share of ballots cast by mail during presidential election years doubled between 2000 and 2016, reaching 21% during Trump's first successful presidential run, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. Four years later, concerns about COVID infection and more permissive absentee ballot rules caused the use of mail-in voting to spike dramatically. More than 40% of ballots cast in the 2020 race were sent through the mail. Mail-in voting declined to 29% of all ballots last year, but that was still well above any previous non-pandemic year on record. Every state allows mail-in voting to a certain extent, but access to absentee ballots varies a lot. Some states require anyone who wants to vote by mail to provide a valid excuse for why they're unable to cast their ballot in person. About two dozen states allow anyone to apply for a mail-in ballot without providing a reason. A handful of states conduct what are known as 'all-mail' elections, where people can still vote in person if they choose, but ballots are automatically sent to all registered voters. States can also have very different rules for when absentee ballots must be requested, when they must be received and when they can be counted. Fraud in American elections is exceedingly rare, regardless of how votes are cast. Experts have found that mail-in ballots do have a slightly elevated rate of fraud compared to in-person voting, but the overall numbers are far too low to have had a meaningful effect on any election, let alone a presidential race in which more than 150 million ballots are cast. A database of known electoral fraud incidents compiled by the staunchly conservative Heritage Foundation found just 378 cases of mail-in voting fraud in the U.S. since 1982, a time period in which more than 1.2 billion votes were cast in presidential elections alone. GOP attitudes shifting Trump's opinion of mail-in voting hasn't changed, but that's not the case with members of his party. Republican voters have almost completely flipped their views on the practice over the past few years. Less than one in five GOP voters said they were confident that mail-in ballots were counted accurately in the wake of Trump's loss in 2020, according to the Pew Research Center. After his victory last year, however, 72% of Republicans said they had faith that mail-in votes were fairly counted. Confidence among Democrats also shifted, dropping from 95% in 2020 to 78% last year. It remains to be seen what will happen to public opinion in the wake of Trump's new attacks on mail-in voting. It's also unclear how much, if at all, he might be able to limit access to absentee ballots through executive action. Any steps he does attempt to take will likely face an immediate legal challenge.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store