UK Plans New Measure to Boost EV Sales, Transport Secretary Says
Singer Akon's Failed Futuristic City in Senegal Ends Up a $1 Billion Resort
Why Did Cars Get So Hard to See Out Of?
Can Americans Just Stop Building New Highways?
How German Cities Are Rethinking Women's Safety — With Taxis
Philadelphia Trash Piles Up as Garbage Workers' Strike Drags On
Speaking on Sunday, Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander confirmed she will be announcing new measures to boost sales of EVs this week but declined to directly address reports in the Telegraph and the Times that the incentives will include up to £700 million ($948 million) in new subsidies and grants to buyers to help offset costs.
'We will be making it cheaper for those who do want to make the switch to electric vehicles,' she told the BBC in an interview.
As part of those efforts, Alexander's office on Sunday announced plans to invest £63 million in building charging points at homes and logistics depots around the UK, including funds for charging points at residences without driveways. Her department also outlined a £2.5 billion program to support automakers in the transition to zero-emission vehicle manufacturing.
The investments are part of the government's efforts to boost new sales of EVs, which are on average more than twice as expensive as their petrol counterparts. The UK is Europe's biggest EV market and the government has set a 2030 deadline to fully phase out sales of petrol- and diesel-powered automobiles and a 2035 cutoff for hybrids.
Sales statistics show automakers are falling short of government-mandated targets to increase the proportion of EVs sold ahead of those deadlines. Automakers have blamed the shortfall on consumer anxieties about the high cost of EVs and lack of charging stations.
Trump's Cuts Are Making Federal Data Disappear
'Our Goal Is to Get Their Money': Inside a Firm Charged With Scamming Writers for Millions
Soccer Players Are Being Seriously Overworked
Will Trade War Make South India the Next Manufacturing Hub?
Trade War? No Problem—If You Run a Trade School
©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
9 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Trump must not TACO his way out of helping Ukraine
President Donald Trump on Monday finally announced he would send more weapons to Ukraine, a sign of renewed attention to and appreciation of the besieged country's position. He also issued a risky ultimatum to Russian President Vladimir Putin, warning he would apply punishing 'secondary sanctions' on countries that continue to trade with Russia if the Kremlin fails to reach a peace deal with Ukraine within 50 days. If the sanctions kick in, they could hurt Russia — but also the whole world economy. To this point, Putin has calculated that time is his ally; he could wait out the West's patience with a grinding, expensive war of attrition. Trump is trying to change Putin's assumptions, forcing substantive negotiations on a deadline by brandishing an economic weapon — secondary sanctions — the United States has hesitated to use. Yet Moscow might see Trump's latest move as the opening bid in a negotiation or otherwise discount the likelihood that the United States will follow through. 'In another six months or so, the pendulum could swing back the other way,' Sergey Poletaev, an analyst at the Russian analytical platform Vatfor, told NPR. For the sake of Ukraine specifically and American credibility generally, Trump cannot back down. Trump is clearly frustrated with Putin. On Monday, he described having 'pleasant' and 'lovely' telephone conversations with the Russian president, only to find out soon after that Russian missiles and drones were pulverizing yet another Ukrainian city. Whether that frustration manifests in strong, sustained U.S. support for Ukraine, in weapons shipments and other measures, will determine how this conflict finally ends. Trump was typically vague in describing which actual weapons systems would be shipped to Ukraine, other than confirming that Patriot batteries and missiles, key air defense systems, would be among the hardware. This is crucial, as Russia in recent weeks has stepped up its devastating aerial bombardment as part of its much-telegraphed summer offensive, even as ground operations seem mired in a bloody stalemate. Ukraine also needs more offensive weapons to hit targets behind the front line. This is where the previous Biden administration moved too timidly, and too late, always fearing that more direct Ukrainian attacks on Russia might ignite a broader regional conflict against a nuclear power. (They didn't.) The Trump administration should continue to follow the Biden team's belated policy to let the Ukrainians use the Army Tactical Missile System, or ATACMS, to fire long-range ballistic missiles to strike targets deep inside Russia. Meanwhile, sanctioning Russia's ongoing trading partners would be a powerful tool to help bring Putin to the negotiating table. This is the path being pursued by a bipartisan group in Congress, which is proposing even higher sanctions of up to 500 percent on goods from countries that continue to buy Russian oil, gas, uranium and other exports. These sanctions would particularly hit China and India, which buy the bulk of Russia's oil. But what if Putin refuses to make peace and sticks with his maximalist demands for a dismembered Ukraine under Russia's thumb? Is Trump ready to ramp up the pressure? Will he sustain the arms shipments once the stockpiles run dry? Will he seize billions of dollars in frozen Russian assets? Will he try to crack down on the shadow tanker fleet that moves Russian oil? And will he follow through on his secondary sanctions threat, with its potentially vast implications for trade with countries such as China and India? The war against Ukraine has already persisted for far too long, with horrific casualty tolls on both sides. It will only end when Putin realizes he has nothing more to gain, and much more to lose, the longer it goes on. The arms shipments to Ukraine might bring that realization closer. More pressure can bring that day closer still. Now that Trump has issued his ultimatum, he needs to make clear to Putin he means what he says.
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Grants for new electric cars to be reintroduced
Grants for new electric cars are being reintroduced after being scrapped in June 2022, the Department for Transport (DfT) has announced. Drivers will be able to reduce the purchase cost of a new electric car by up to £3,750. Officials hope the measure – restricted to vehicles priced at up to £37,000 – will encourage more drivers to switch to electric motoring. The DfT said 33 new electric car models are available for less than £30,000. The Government has pledged to ban the sale of new fully petrol or diesel cars and vans from 2030. Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said: 'This EV grant will not only allow people to keep more of their hard-earned money – it'll help our automotive sector seize one of the biggest opportunities of the 21st century. 'And with over 82,000 public chargepoints now available across the UK, we've built the infrastructure families need to make the switch with confidence.' Drivers buying electric cars can benefit from tax breaks if their employer has a company car scheme, but there have been no universally available grants since they were axed by the Conservative government in June 2022. The new grants will be funded through a new £650 million scheme. Amounts will be based on a car's 'sustainability criteria', the DfT said. The greenest vehicles will be in band one, which means a grant of up to £3,750. Band two vehicles will receive up to £1,500. Car manufacturers will be able to apply for the money through the Electric Car Grant from Wednesday. Mike Hawes, chief executive of the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders, said the announcement is a 'clear signal to consumers that now is the time to switch'. He went on: 'Rapid deployment and availability of this grant over the next few years will help provide the momentum that is essential to take the EV market from just one in four today, to four in five by the end of the decade.' RAC head of policy Simon Williams said discounted cars should start appearing at dealerships 'within weeks'. He added: 'As the biggest savings will be given to cars with the strongest green manufacturing credentials, drivers will be picking models that are not only better for their wallets, but better for the planet too.' Dan Caesar, chief executive of lobby group Electric Vehicles UK, said: 'While battery-only EVs are much cheaper to buy and run than most realise, surveys show that cost misperceptions are the primary reason for hesitance. 'A generous grant of this nature gives a new group of interested buyers a gentle nudge.' Ian Plummer, commercial director of online vehicle marketplace Auto Trader, said 'any incentives' to help people buy an electric car are welcome as many drivers are 'put off by the high upfront cost'. The DfT announced last week that road signs for electric vehicle charging hubs will be introduced on major A roads in England. It also launched a £25 million scheme for local authorities to support residents without off-road parking to recharge electric cars using cables connected to their homes which run along gullies embedded in pavements. Under the Government's zero emission vehicle (Zev) mandate, at least 28% of new cars sold by each manufacturer in the UK this year must be zero emission, which generally means pure electric. Across all manufacturers, the figure during the first half of the year was 21.6%. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer announced in April that sales of new hybrids that cannot be plugged in will be permitted to continue until 2035. Changes to the Zev mandate also mean it will be easier for manufacturers who do not meet the targets to avoid fines. Conservative shadow transport secretary Gareth Bacon accused the Government of 'forcing families into more expensive electric vehicles before the country is ready', adding the reintroduction of grants would mean 'more pain for taxpayers'. He said: 'Last year, only one in 10 private purchases of new cars was electric. This is a product people demonstrably do not want. 'Last week, the Office for Budget Responsibility made clear the transition to EVs comes at a cost, and this scheme only adds to it. Make no mistakee: more tax rises are coming in the autumn.' The Conservative Environment Network also described the grants as 'a waste of taxpayers' money', given declining prices for electric vehicles, but urged the Government to invest in charging infrastructure instead, 'giving confidence to a new generation of drivers to go electric'.
Forbes
15 minutes ago
- Forbes
Stuttgart Turn Down Bayern Offer For Nick Woltemade. What Happens Next?
Bayern Munich has seen a first offer for Nick Woltemade turned down by league competitors VfB ... More Stuttgart. (Photo by) Could Bayern Munich miss out on yet another transfer target? On Monday, multiple reports in Germany indicated that Bayern had an offer for Nick Woltemade turned down by Bundesliga competitors VfB Stuttgart. A report by Zeitungsverlag Waiblingen indicated that officials at VfB Stuttgart considered Bayern's offer laughable. According to the report, Bayern offered €40 million ($46.7 million) plus €5 million ($5.8 million) in bonuses. The initial fee was going to be paid in four installments. The report then adds that there have been no further negotiations between the two camps. While the talks between Bayern director of sport Max Eberl and the VfB bosses have been considered positive, some of the outside noise has been considered an obstacle to getting a deal done. Not for the first time, the main issue at Bayern appears to be the fact that the club isn't speaking in one voice. Public statements by Bayern CEO Jan-Christian Dreesen and former Bayern boss Uli Hoeneß were received negatively in Stuttgart. Indeed, Dreesen and Hoeneß have delivered very different messages to the public. "There's only one thing to say about that—Nick Woltemade is a VfB Stuttgart player,' Dreesen said to Sky Germany on Jul. 4, 2025, while the club was in the United States at the FIFA Club World Cup. 'And it's not appropriate to stir up any discussions or make comments." Then, one day later, in Bavaria, Hoeneß offered his remarks on the Woltemade situation. 'We still have time until the end of August,' Hoeneß said to the Bayerische Rundfunk. 'I consider him a very, very good player who would fit in perfectly with us, and I would be very pleased if that happens this year—and if not, then next year.' In other words, while one club official tried to calm down the situation in the United States, Hoeneß opted to pour further gasoline into the fire. It isn't the first time that Hoeneß publicly commented on the ongoing negotiations between his club and a player under contract at another team. Nick Woltemade led Stuttgart to the DFB Pokal title this spring. (Photo by JOHN MACDOUGALL/AFP via ... More Getty Images) Back in 2023, when Bayern was in talks with Tottenham to sign Harry Kane, Hoeneß also publicly weighed in; those comments angered Spurs boss Daniel Levy at the time and ultimately meant that Bayern had to pay a significantly higher transfer fee to get the deal done. The same could happen here as well. "We signed a long-term contract with Nick a year and a half ago,' Stuttgart sporting director Fabian Wolgemuth said to ZVW earlier in the month when asked about Bayern's interest. 'It's still valid, and therefore we expect Nick to continue playing football with us next season. I believe he'll stay here next season. Nick Woltemade is a VfB player.' What will Woltemade cost? Stuttgart will be emboldened by the fact that Eintracht Frankfurt sold Randal Kolo Muani for over $100 million to PSG in 2023 and then Omar Marmoush for €75 million ($88 million) to Man City this January. Per a report by Transfermarkt, Frankfurt has also set a price tag of over €75 million for striker Hugo Ekitiké. According to a report by Gegenpressing, the three forwards are seen as comparable players by industry insiders to Woltemade. As a result, the Swabians aren't interested in starting talks unless Bayern Munich makes an offer in the €60 million ($70 million) range. That figure is considered a starting point in transfer talks. For Bayern, however, those kinds of fees for Bundesliga players are unheard of. The Rekordmeister still lives in a world in which they could sign players from competitors for relatively little money. The rest of the league is now aware of Bayern's finances and, as a result, essentially demands Premier League money for transfers. It is a difficult situation for the Bayern bosses. On the one hand, Bayern wants to improve the roster. On the other hand, the club also intends to bring salaries and fees down to a more sustainable level. The situation might require some out-of-the-box thinking. It could also mean that Woltemade won't join Bayern after all this summer. By the way, Stuttgart signed Woltemade on a free transfer last summer from Werder Bremen.
