Russia tries to align stars for historic deal with Trump at Alaska summit
US
president
Donald Trump
try to reassure
Kyiv
and other European capitals that he will not do anything rash at Friday's summit in Alaska,
Russia
wants the talks to mark a dramatic – even historic – shift in relations between the nuclear powers.
US secretary of state Marco Rubio has said it will be just a 'feel-out meeting', and White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt has called it a 'listening exercise,' amid concerns that Trump and Russian president
Vladimir Putin
could make sweeping decisions about the war in Ukraine and the continent's security without Kyiv or Europe being at the table.
The rhetoric in Russia is very different. The Kremlin often says that Putin sees no point in talks for the sake of talks, and Moscow expects the summit to deliver concrete benefits that were unimaginable before Trump returned to power in January.
'The Alaska summit could be historic in terms of delivering complex solutions to key problems. Including in Russian-American relations,' said Leonid Slutsky, chairman of the foreign relations committee in Russia's lower house of parliament.
READ MORE
'Most constructive politicians in the world are hoping for this ... At the same time, putting pressure on our country or speaking in the language of ultimatums is useless.'
Politicians and state media in Moscow say the summit could deliver not only a favourable outcome to Russia's invasion of Ukraine, but set the stage for grand US-Russia agreements on everything from arms control to co-operation in the Arctic.
Kirill Dmitriev, the senior Russian finance official and former Goldman Sachs banker who has become a key point man in Moscow for Trump's team, said the choice of Alaska as the summit venue had particular significance.
'Born as Russian America – Orthodox roots, forts, fur trade – Alaska echoes those ties and makes the US an Arctic nation. Let Russia and the US partner on environment, infrastructure and energy in Arctic and beyond,' he wrote on social media.
Dmitriev described Alaska – a Russian colony from 1799 to 1867 – as the 'perfect stage' for the summit, because of its history and its location as the closest US point to Russia, where they are separated by the Bering Strait and the international date line.
'Let us go from yesterday to tomorrow in peace,' he said.
[
Why Putin has good reasons to be hopeful for Friday's summit meeting with Trump
Opens in new window
]
Dmitriev's posts on X relentlessly amplify Maga talking points: that Trump and Putin want peace and their critics are warmongers; media that question Trump's attitude to Russia are the same ones that pushed the 'Russia hoax' about alleged collusion between the Trump camp and Moscow in 2016; advocates of tougher action against Russia are repeating the 'failed' policy of Trump's predecessor, Joe Biden.
'Neocons and other warmongers won't be smiling on Aug 15, 2025. Putin-Trump dialogue will bring hope, peace and global security,' he wrote. In a subsequent post, referring to one of Trump's books, he said: 'The Art of the Deal on Friday August 15.'
The Art of the Deal on Friday August 15.
— Kirill A. Dmitriev (@kadmitriev)
Russia has been assiduously preparing the ground for the sort of deal, or deals, that it desires from the summit.
Over several months this year, Kyiv and Europe strengthened co-ordination with the White House over the war in Ukraine, as Trump become increasingly annoyed by what he called Putin's 'bullshit' on the issue.
Putin changed the mood music simply by agreeing to meet. It prompted Trump to quietly shelve plans to impose sanctions on all countries that buy Russian oil, and pitched Ukraine and Europe back into the position of trying to rein in Trump – a dynamic that is only likely to renew friction between the US and its erstwhile allies.
Putin has also brought Trump to the table without agreeing to a ceasefire or any concessions.
Russia still demands permanent control of five regions of Ukraine and limits on its future sovereignty, including a ban on joining Nato. Kyiv says that would be a capitulation, and European states insist borders cannot be changed by force – leaving them vulnerable to allegations from Moscow and some US politicians that they are blocking a deal and should be ignored by America's self-declared 'president of peace'.
Moscow also knows that Trump wants a bigger US role in the resource-rich and strategic far north – having threatened to take over Greenland – and more than half the entire coastline of the Arctic Ocean is Russian territory.
'It is in Alaska and in the Arctic that the economic interests of our countries converge and prospects for implementing large-scale mutually beneficial projects arise,' said senior Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov.
Trump said last month that he wanted to begin work on arms control with Moscow before the expiry next February of the 2010 New Start agreement, which is the last remaining US-Russia nuclear arms pact.
The Kremlin flagged the issue last week by saying it had scrapped a self-imposed moratorium on deployment of short- and mid-range missiles and would now place them wherever it liked, in response to alleged US threats in Europe and Asia.
On the battlefield too, Moscow is trying to strengthen its position before the summit.
In recent days, Russian troops have pierced a section of the front line in eastern Ukraine and advanced about 10km near the mining town of Dobropillia, as they try to encircle the nearby small cities of Pokrovsk and Kostyantynivka and put more pressure on Kyiv's two main strongholds in Donetsk region – the cities of Slovyansk and Kramatorsk.
Kyiv says these are very small groups, moving on foot or in light vehicles, who cannot hold territory but aim to sow chaos behind the front line and – above all – give the impression that Ukraine's defences are collapsing on the eve of the summit.
Russian media claim Ukrainian troops are nearly surrounded in some areas, which Kyiv denies. It recalls how Trump said in March that he had asked Putin to spare the lives of 'thousands' of Ukrainian soldiers who were supposedly encircled in Russia's Kursk region. The claim was false, but no one in Trump's administration acknowledged that fact or explained why Trump was unquestioningly repeating Kremlin propaganda.
While Moscow's preparations for the summit have been meticulous, Washington's look haphazard, even amateurish.
The meeting was agreed when Steve Witkoff, one of Trump's special envoys, visited Moscow last week. US and European media reports say Witkoff – a real-estate developer and donor to Trump's re-election campaign – may have misunderstood Putin's position on Ukraine. He has also been accused of parroting positions espoused by the Kremlin.
To compound the sense of chaos, Trump has placed inexperienced loyalists in important intelligence and foreign policy roles, and approved massive cuts at the state department that have culled many of its analysts on Ukraine and Russia.
With so many factors in its favour, Russia wants to strike a deal now, not least to gain relief from western sanctions that are combining with high inflation and labour shortages to slowly strangle its economy. Ukrainian drone strikes on oil facilities are also taking their toll, and petrol prices in Russia are now at record highs despite an export ban.
Russia's main stock market reflects the national mood, having surged by more than 8 per cent since the summit was announced.
'Everyone is expecting a breakthrough in Russia-US relations,' said Alexei Antonov at Moscow investment firm Alor Broker, 'and also the beginning of a resolution to the Ukrainian problem.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
26 minutes ago
- Irish Examiner
Melania Trump threatens to sue Hunter Biden over ‘salacious' Epstein comments
US first lady Melania Trump has demanded that Hunter Biden retract comments linking her to sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein and threatened to sue if he does not. Ms Trump takes issue with two comments Mr Biden, son of former president Joe Biden, made in an interview this month with American journalist Andrew Callaghan. He alleged that Epstein introduced the first lady to now-President Donald Trump. Hunter Biden listens while his father, then-president Joe Biden, speaks at the White House (Rod Lamkey/AP) The statements are false, defamatory and 'extremely salacious' Melania Trump's lawyer, Alejandro Brito, wrote in a letter to Mr Biden. Mr Biden's remarks were widely disseminated on social media and reported by media outlets around the world, causing the first lady 'to suffer overwhelming financial and reputational harm', he wrote. Mr Biden made the Epstein comments during a sprawling interview in which he lashed out at 'elites' and others in the Democratic Party he says undermined his father before he dropped out of last year's presidential campaign. 'Epstein introduced Melania to Trump. The connections are, like, so wide and deep,' Mr Biden said in one of the comments Ms Trump disputes. Mr Biden attributed the claim to author Michael Wolff, whom Mr Trump disparaged in June as a 'Third Rate Reporter'. He has accused Mr Wolff of making up stories to sell books. The first lady's threats echo a favoured strategy of her husband, who has aggressively used litigation to go after critics. Public figures like the Trumps face a high bar to succeed in a defamation case. The president and first lady have long said they were introduced by Paolo Zampolli, a modelling agent, at a New York Fashion Week party in 1998. The letter is dated August 6 and was first reported on Wednesday by Fox News Digital. Abbe Lowell, a lawyer who has represented Mr Biden in his criminal cases and to whom Brito's letter is addressed, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The Irish Sun
an hour ago
- The Irish Sun
Putin's nuke button, ‘poo briefcase' & army of bodyguards… Giant security op that will go with Vlad for Trump showdown
AS one of the world's most powerful man on Earth, his security entourage will do anything to save his life from bloodthirsty would-be assassins. Vladimir Putin is expected to be surrounded by a high-profile security entourage as the despot with an international arrest warrant steps out of Russia. 10 Russian President Vladimir Putin, surrounded by his bodyguards, leaves the car Credit: Getty 10 Russia's President Vladimir Putin surrounded by bodyguards, as he leaves the Europe-Asia summit in 2014 Credit: Reuters 10 Russian nuclear briefcase was shown for the first time on state televison Credit: Wikipedia 10 The world's eyes will be on Alaska on Friday as leaders of the two superpowers sit down for a showdown that will decide Ukraine's fate. Trump and Vladimir Putin will sit down "one-on-one" at the Elmendorf-Richardson base in Alaska. The Kremlin confirmed key details of the crunch talks - with the showdown kicking off at 11.30am Alaskan time (8.30pm UK time). Putin, who has rarely set foot in a foreign country since begining his invasion of Ukraine in 2023, will be surrounded by his highly-trained bodyguards to ensure maximum protection. The former KGB agent, who has been ruling Russia for 25 years, is said to be obsessed with his security. A Russian official who attended the Victory Day parade on May 9 told The Moscow Times: "The Kremlin takes Vladimir Putin's security very seriously. He is protected by a whole army of visible and invisible guards." Members of ageing Putin's security team, who call themselves his "Musketeers", are said to be from a special unit within Russia's Federal Protective Service (FSO), according to The Economist. Among the many things they are expected to carry are a number of suitcases, but they are not ordinary luggage. Each one comes with a bulletproof protection that can be used as a shield in case shots are fired at Putin. One of them is said to be a "Poo suitcase", which is used to collect his stools and urine and deliver them back to Moscow. Inside remote Alaska ice base where Trump and Putin go head-to-head in CRUCIAL Ukraine war showdown French magazine Paris Match claimed that the bizarre practice was first noted in 2017 during a state visit to France. It is thought that Putin - who over the years has been at the centre of health rumours - does not want outsiders to know his physical condition, which could be studied using his faecal matter. In 2019, a strange video showed paranoid Vlad being accompanied to the bathroom by six male bodyguards during Ukraine peace talks at Paris' Elysee Palace. Putin also likes to carry his dreaded nuclear briefcase dubbed "Cheget". Developed during the 1980s for the Soviet KGB, earlier versions of these were said to have an explosive charge of one kiloton, equivalent to one thousand tons of TNT. That's enough to destroy everything within a half-mile radius. The current version is thought to act as a communication device, relaying orders to launch a nuclear attack. With just the press of a button, the General Staff in Moscow receives the signal and initiates the nuclear attack. 10 Russian President Vladimir Putin's bodyguard carrying special suitcases Credit: EPA 10 The despot is always pictured with suitcases close to him whenever he steps out in public Credit: EPA Meanwhile, Putin's bodyguards are said to be handpicked for qualities that include 'operational psychology,' physical stamina and the ability to withstand cold and not sweat in heat. They are equipped with an SR-1 Vektor pistol said which can fire armour-piercing bullets. Before Putin travels, advance teams scout out his destination months ahead of time, checking to see how the public will likely respond and even if the area could be affected by bad weather or natural disasters. Wherever he's going to stay gets inspected, jamming devices are installed to prevent remote detonation of bombs, and technicians conduct electronic surveillance of cellphones and other devices in the area. On the road, Putin rides amid a convoy of heavily armoured vans that carry military special operators armed with AK-47s, anti-tank grenade launchers and portable anti-aircraft missiles. The Friday summit is said to have a ring of steel security, made up of both Russian and American special agents. The base, near Anchorage, is bristling with troops from the US Air Force, Army, Navy and Marine Corps - as well as National Guardsmen and Reserves. 10 Elmendorf-Richardson base in Anchorage, Alaska, has been named as the setting for Trump's meeting with Putin Credit: DVIDS 10 Trump and Putin will touch down on the massive military runway on Friday Credit: DVIDS/USAF Airman First Class Mario Calabro 10 Trump and Putin will sit down for what the White House calls a 'listening exercise' Credit: Reuters In all, over 32,000 military personnel and their families live there - ten per cent of the population of Anchorage, Alaska's largest city - alongside grizzly bears, moose and wolves. It played a "particularly important" role in defending the US against the Soviet Union during the Cold War, according to the Library of Congress. The White House apparently wanted to avoid the sight of a Russian leader being welcomed into a US military setting - but concluded there was no other option. Elmendorf-Richardson is reportedly considered the only site in Alaska which could be locked down to the required level of security for the high-stakes meeting. Putin will fly the nine hours from Moscow and Trump the seven-and-a-half hours from Washington, with ample room on the runway for both their presidential aircraft.
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
From pharma to food, the known unknowns of Trump's EU tariffs deal
The US/ EU tariff deal was meant to bring certainty for exporters. But almost three weeks later there is a lot that we don't know – and more that remains uncertain. A joint statement signed off by both sides had been expected shortly after the big summit in Scotland at the end of July , clarifying key parts of the deal and how it would be implemented. But this week, a European Commission spokesperson said, in best bureacrateese, that while further contacts with the US were expected on this, 'I don't believe at this stage we can put a timeline on these engagements.' 1. What is covered by the new tariffs? The deal had been hailed as bringing 'certainty' to Irish exporters. And it has done so, but only up to a point. A blanket 15 per cent tariff now applies on most categories or exports from Ireland to the US. READ MORE As ever with trade, there are tweaks. Some goods which had been subject to previous higher tariff charges (under the most favoured nation or MFN system) will still pay these. For Ireland, the main product affected here is butter – with Kerrygold now the second biggest seller on the US market. Before Trump came to office it had been levied at a rate based on weight – rather than the more usual percentage calculation. However, this worked out at somewhere over 16 per cent in practice. So this slightly higher rate will remain. Other sectors face tariffs for the first time, or higher charges. For example, the large medical products sector had previously been largely exempted, but is now being levied at 15 per cent. So are parts of the food sector and spirits. 2. What is not covered? US customs has published a list of goods that are excluded from the 15 per cent tariff and Carol Lynch, customs partner at BDO, says this is a good place for SMEs unsure if they are covered to check. A key point for Ireland is that pharma products, by far the State's biggest in value terms, are not currently subject to the 15 per cent tariff. This may change, as the Trump administration is undertaking a study of pharma supply into the US market and the national security issues that apply – the so-called section 232 investigation which refers back to a 1960s act of congress. This is the backdrop to Trump's talk of 150 per cent or 250 per cent tariffs on pharma in 18 months or two years' time, applying to companies that do not play ball and return production to the US market. The EU believes the US has signed up to a 15 per cent cap on pharma – and semiconductor – tariffs under the deal, but Trump's subsequent statements suggest otherwise. This is why the absence of a joint agreed statement between the EU and US is important. 3. What might change? Another frustration for the EU is that the outline agreement suggested that more areas would be excluded from the 15 per cent tariff net but, beyond aircraft and aircraft parts, none of these has yet been spelt out. These 'carveouts' were due to cover some areas of food of potential interest to Ireland, some generic drugs and chemicals and perhaps medical devices, a sector which typically has lower margins and fixed price contracts with US buyers. The EU had also been pushing for a 'zero for zero' tariff deal on wines and spirits, though the indications were the US was unlikely to concede this. So bar the list published by US Customs, we are no wiser on what other sectors may, in time, get a pass. 4. What can companies do? The practical steps, according to Lynch of BDO, are, first, to check whether goods were in transit before August 7th, in which case the old 10 per cent rate would apply rather than the new 15 per cent. Companies need to know the tariff codes being used by those importing their products and whether any of the exclusions they know about so far apply. And, she says, they need to examine whether they have any flexibility under the rules in terms of the value of goods declared for customs purposes. This is a complex area with detailed pricing rules applying but, particularly in high value sectors like pharma, companies may have options to readjust supply changes or pricing policies to cut their tariff bills. 5. Where next on pharma? The Trump administration has been promising the results of its section 232 investigation shortly, expected by way of a big report. Alongside this, Trump's team have been negotiating on prices with the big US pharma companies, demanding that they charge the same prices in the US as other countries. A 2022 study showed that US prices were, on average, three times higher than the OECD average. This – in Trump's view- means prices should fall in the US and rise in other countries, thus giving the US consumer a better deal while giving companies ongoing revenue to fund research. It is unclear what the outcome of this will be but the two areas are linked. Imposing tariffs on imports risks increasing prices on the US market, the opposite of the goal of the price negotiations. The US president is threatening tariffs which would gradually increase over time as a way of getting big pharma to relocate more production to the US of key drugs and ingredients. So will we see 15 per cent pharma tariffs when the result of the Section 232 probes are out? Or will the US president hold off for now while holding out the threat of tariffs if big pharma does not fall into line on prices and investment? 6. Ireland's pharma exposure: In a post on the pharma issue on LinkedIn, Ben McConkey, an Irish MSc student at the London School of Economics, underlines the extent of Ireland's 'pharma' exposure by pointing out that the US imported over $50 billion worth of Irish pharmaceutical products in 2004, making it the single largest category of goods imported from any EU country by a margin of $15 billion and representing 8.3 per cent of all US imports from the EU. While the noise around the trade talks was about German cars, Irish pharma exports have a higher value, though this is of course hugely inflated by the pricing practices of the firms involved, which have a financial incentive to declare as much profit as possible in low tax Ireland. McConkey also makes the interesting point that the bulk of Irish pharma and organic chemicals go to republican states such as Indiana – home of Eli Lilly – as well as Puerto Rico, North Carolina and Illinois. Many are not finished drugs but are high value ingredients in drugs then sold across the US. As tariffs will have an economic impact on these companies – and on US consumers – it remains to be seen what the president decides. But the stakes for Ireland in the Section 232 process are huge as it could influence both future manufacturing investment and the transfer pricing structures the companies employ which led to huge profits being declared in Ireland and a lot of corporate tax being paid here. 7. The uncertainty may just roll on: The EU's belief was that a joint statement would be agreed with the US on the basis of the political agreement between Trump and European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen in Scotland. This would then be followed by further detailed negotiations. It is unclear if the absence of even a basic, joint written understanding is just a result of August holidays or whether it is a sign of the way the US president tends to operate – in headlines and in a way which leaves him with maximum flexibility to change tack. The president and his team have been continuing to push the boat out in terms of tariffs and pressure on US businesses to bend to their will. There is a fair chance that the uncertainty will roll on – and on. And this in itself will have a cost on businesses, even if the 15 per cent deal will have left many feeling they have some more solid ground on which to plan. And, it must be remembered that the US president's right to impose the 15 per cent tariffs at all is being challenged in the courts – a process likely to go right to the US supreme court for an ultimate decision.
