logo
Analysis: Is Israel planning to strike Iran, or is it bluffing?

Analysis: Is Israel planning to strike Iran, or is it bluffing?

Al Jazeeraa day ago

Israel has been pushing to strike Iran for months, if not years. Signs this week that an attack on Iran's nuclear facilities was potentially imminent have ratcheted up fears of a regional conflict, particularly in light of the US withdrawal of some diplomatic staff and their dependents from Iraq and the wider region.
US President Donald Trump's comments have added to the sense that a military confrontation is coming, saying on Thursday that a strike 'could very well happen'.
And yet, at the same time, Trump said that he would not call the strike imminent, and wanted to avoid a conflict.
Earlier in the week, Israeli media reported that Trump had also asked Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to dial down talk of a strike against Iran, adding to the sense that Trump himself wanted to avoid any conflict with Iran, especially as nuclear talks between Iran and the US are ongoing – with the next round set to take place on Sunday.
Whether an Israeli strike will take place in the short term is thus still unclear.
'One way of looking at this is that it may be part of the larger picture,' Yossi Mekelberg, a senior consulting fellow at Chatham House, said of the role the threat of unilateral action from Israel may play in US negotiations with Iran. 'It may be that the US is using their 'crazy friend' as a tactic to bring pressure upon Iran … On the other hand, it may be that the crazy friend means business.'
Israel's opposition to Iran is longstanding.
Through the course of its 20-month-long war on Gaza, Netanyahu has seized on the opportunity to confront a foe he has consistently pitched as his country's ultimate nemesis.
In addition to boasting that he was responsible for Trump's decision to withdraw from the nuclear deal limiting Iran's nuclear programme in 2018, Netanyahu has also ordered air strikes, assassinations and cyberattacks designed to either slow or halt Iran's nuclear programme.
The Israeli right-wing, led by Netanyahu, has long considered Iran an existential threat and believes that the country seeks a nuclear weapon, despite Iranian denials.
Iran also supports anti-Israeli groups across the region, including the Lebanese group Hezbollah and Yemen's Houthis. With many of Iran's allies, particularly Hezbollah, severely weakened after fighting Israel since 2023, some in Israel view this as the perfect opportunity to also deliver a knockout blow to Iran itself.
Speaking to the New York Times on Wednesday, a senior Iranian official said that military and government officials have already met in anticipation of a potential Israeli strike.
According to the unnamed official, any strike by Israel would be met with the immediate launch of hundreds of ballistic missiles.
'Logically, and I'm stressing 'logically,' Israel shouldn't strike at Iran,' Mekelberg said, 'Even with US support, it likely wouldn't be a good idea.'
'However, in this environment, there are no voices that are going to restrain Netanyahu: not the foreign minister, not the defence minister,' he said.
'The head of the Shin Bet [domestic intelligence service], who would normally counsel Netanyahu, has been forced out, and the attorney general, who might also advise him, [Netanyahu is] trying to get dismissed,' Mekelberg added. 'That leaves no one, perhaps other than some voices in the military and Mossad, that could act as a check on Netanyahu.'
Internationally, both Israel and Netanyahu have become increasingly isolated, throwing their relationship with the US into sharp focus.
In the last few weeks, many Western states have increased their opposition towards Israel's war on Gaza.
Earlier in the week, five countries – Australia, Canada, New Zealand, Norway and the United Kingdom – sanctioned two of Netanyahu's government ministers, National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, leaving Israel more reliant upon US support than ever, observers said.
'I can't see Israel taking any action without the US,' Mitchell Barak, an Israeli pollster and former political aide to several senior Israeli political figures, including Netanyahu, told Al Jazeera.
'Something is definitely going on, but I can't see Israel doing anything without the tacit or active support of the US.'
'This could be a negotiating tactic on the part of Trump. He's entered negotiations, and he wants results. Now, he sees Iran stalling, the IAEA report condemning them, and suddenly, he's got Netanyahu threatening to strike if they don't cut a deal,' he said.
Other observers questioned the timing of both reports of Trump restraining Netanyahu's threat of strikes, as well as the International Atomic Energy Agency report – which determined that Iran was not complying with its commitment to international nuclear safeguards – falling so close to Sunday's talks.
'Right now, every taxi in Tel Aviv will tell you that Israel's about to strike at Iran,' Alon Pinkas, a former Israeli ambassador and consul general in New York, told Al Jazeera. 'I may be wrong, but I really doubt it.
'Netanyahu's unlikely to do anything without the US's greenlight. It's not the way he or Israel works,' he said.
'I don't think that's going to let up,' Pinkas said of negotiations likely to continue beyond Sunday, 'I fully expect Trump to again speak of having to restrain Netanyahu. It's just another means of exerting pressure on Iran.'
However, that is not to rule out a strike from Israel altogether.
'There may be one, but if there is, it'll come at the US's request and be of some peripheral target with no real value.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US Marines arrive at Los Angeles federal sites as court battle unfolds
US Marines arrive at Los Angeles federal sites as court battle unfolds

Al Jazeera

time21 minutes ago

  • Al Jazeera

US Marines arrive at Los Angeles federal sites as court battle unfolds

The United States Marines have deployed to Los Angeles following criticism and legal battles over whether President Donald Trump had the authority to use the military to quell civilian protests without state approval. On Friday, Major General Scott Sherman of the US Army confirmed that 200 Marines were arriving in southern California to protect a federal building. A total of 700 Marines have been authorised for deployment to the region. 'I would like to emphasise that the soldiers will not participate in law enforcement activities,' Sherman said during a briefing. The Marines join National Guard troops already in the Los Angeles area following the eruption of protests on June 6, when residents took to the streets to express their displeasure with President Trump's immigration raids, some of which targeted local hardware stores and other workplaces. While many of the demonstrations were mostly peaceful and limited to a small part of the city, the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) did experience tense clashes with some protesters, who hurled objects and set driverless Waymo vehicles on fire. Police responded with flashbangs, tear gas and rubber bullets. Trump, meanwhile, dubbed the protesters 'bad people' and 'insurrectionists' and announced the deployment of the National Guard on the evening of June 7. The president cited Title 10 of the US Code, which allows a president to call up the National Guard if there is a 'rebellion or danger of rebellion' against the federal government. Trump and his allies framed the demonstrators as part of a migrant 'invasion' imperilling the US. 'To the extent that protests or acts of violence directly inhibit the execution of the laws, they constitute a form of rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States,' Trump wrote in a presidential memorandum. It was the first time since 1965 that a US president had authorised the National Guard's deployment to a state without the governor's permission. The last time was to protect civil rights protesters who were marching through segregated Alabama and faced threats of violence. Presidents have called up the National Guard to address domestic unrest in the years since, but only with the cooperation of local authorities. In 1992, for instance, then-President Bill Clinton answered a request from California's governor at the time to send National Guard members to address the Rodney King protests in Los Angeles. Trump's decision to circumvent the authority of California's present-day governor, Gavin Newsom, has led to a legal fight over whether he exceeded his powers as president. Newsom filed a lawsuit to block the use of military troops outside of federal sites, and on Thursday, a pair of court decisions left the future of the recent deployment unclear. First, on Thursday afternoon, District Court Judge Charles Breyer of San Francisco sided with Newsom, calling Trump's actions 'illegal' and a violation of the US Constitution. In his 36-page decision, Breyer ruled that the Trump administration had failed to show a danger of rebellion in Los Angeles. 'While Defendants have pointed to several instances of violence, they have not identified a violent, armed, organized, open and avowed uprising against the government as a whole,' he wrote. 'The definition of rebellion is unmet.' He added that he was 'troubled' by the Trump administration's argument that a protest against the federal government could be tantamount to rebellion, warning that such logic could violate the First Amendment right to free speech. 'Individuals' right to protest the government is one of the fundamental rights protected by the First Amendment, and just because some stray bad actors go too far does not wipe out that right for everyone,' Breyer said. He called for an injunction against Trump's use of National Guard members, saying 'it sets a dangerous precedent for future domestic military activity' and 'deprives the state for two months of its own use of thousands of National Guard members'. Nearly 4,000 members of the California National Guard have been authorised for deployment to Los Angeles under Trump's command. But the Trump administration quickly appealed Judge Breyer's injunction. By late Thursday, the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals had temporarily blocked the injunction, allowing Trump to continue using the National Guard until a hearing could be held on the matter next week. On Friday, Trump celebrated that decision on his social media platform, Truth Social. 'The Appeals Court ruled last night that I can use the National Guard to keep our cities, in this case Los Angeles, safe,' Trump wrote. 'If I didn't send the Military into Los Angeles, that city would be burning to the ground right now. We saved L.A. Thank you for the Decision!!!' Newsom, meanwhile, has continued his call for Trump to end what he framed as illegal control of the National Guard. He has also accused the military presence of heightening tensions with protesters, not dissipating them. '@RealDonaldTrump, you must relinquish your authority of the National Guard back to me and back to California,' Newsom wrote on social media Thursday. He has called the Republican president's federalisation of the National Guard an 'unmistakable step toward authoritarianism'. The California governor is seen as a possible Democratic contender for the presidency in the 2028 election cycle.

Iran launches waves of missiles at Israel in response to attacks
Iran launches waves of missiles at Israel in response to attacks

Al Jazeera

time36 minutes ago

  • Al Jazeera

Iran launches waves of missiles at Israel in response to attacks

Iran has launched hundreds of ballistic missiles towards Israel in retaliation for a major attack on Tehran's nuclear sites. Explosions were heard over Tel Aviv and Jerusalem as sirens sounded across Israel on Friday night. This follows an unprecedented attack by Israel in the early hours of Friday, which targeted Iranian nuclear sites, senior military commanders and scientists. Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei said Israel's strikes had 'initiated a war' and it would not be allowed to do 'hit and run' attacks without consequences. 'The Zionist regime [Israel] will not remain unscathed from the consequences of its crime. The Iranian nation must be guaranteed that our response will not be half-measured,' Khamenei said in a statement. Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) said Iran 'carried out its crushing and precise response against dozens of targets, military centres and airbases' in Israel at the command of Supreme Leader Khamenei. Three separate waves of attacks were launched at Israel on Friday night, Iranian state news agency IRNA said. At least one projectile impacted central Tel Aviv, said Al Jazeera's Nour Odeh, reporting from Amman, Jordan. A modern apartment block was hit in central Tel Aviv, and according to live footage from the scene, fires raged inside some of the apartments, with smoke billowing from the building. Another residential building, next to the apartment block, also appeared to have suffered significant damage, with windows blown and pieces of twisted metal hanging from its exterior. Israeli newspaper Haaretz, citing emergency services, said 15 people have been wounded in central Israel, with one in moderate condition. The Israeli public has been instructed to remain in shelters. Israel's attacks on Iran killed several top Iranian generals and scientists, including the armed forces chief of staff, Major-General Mohammed Bagheri, and the IRGC chief, Hossein Salami. However, Major-General Mohammed Pakpour was swiftly promoted to replace Salami. In a letter to Khamenei read out on state television, Pakpour promised that 'the gates of hell will open to the child-killing regime', referring to Israel. During Israel's surprise attack in the early hours of Friday, its military said it had struck more than 200 targets across Iran. Before Iran's retaliatory strikes, Israeli military spokesperson Brigadier-General Effie Defrin told journalists that Israel's army was 'continuing to strike'. 'Iran has the ability to significantly harm the Israeli home front', Defrin told a televised news conference that was cut short due to what the army said was an incoming attack. The army also urged citizens to stick close to 'protected spaces' and avoid public gatherings amid a potential Iranian attack on Israel. In a statement earlier on Friday, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said he expected 'several waves of Iranian attacks'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store