&w=3840&q=100)
TCS and Virgin Airlines sign 7-year agreement for AI, cloud upgrade
Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) has signed a new seven-year agreement with British airline Virgin Atlantic, building on a partnership that has lasted over 20 years. The renewed collaboration aims to support Virgin Atlantic's digital transformation, with a focus on artificial intelligence (AI) and cloud-based technologies, the tech giant said in an exchange filing on Tuesday.
As part of the agreement, TCS will help modernise the airline's core technology systems, using AI and cloud platforms to improve agility, resilience, and scalability. A key feature of this effort is the creation of a new Technology Command Centre, designed jointly by the two companies. This centre will act as a central hub for real-time operational data, helping staff make quicker, more informed decisions, something expected to improve the experience for both passengers and crew.
Focus on pricing, seat allocation, meal preference
Virgin Atlantic CEO Shai Weiss described the partnership as a shift 'from outsourcing to innovation", with a strong emphasis on personalisation and the use of generative AI. According to Weiss, the technology will support areas like pricing, seat allocation, and maintenance, as well as anticipate customer preferences and meal choices.
"Every single flight that Virgin Atlantic flies into and from India have four local cabin crew, we have beautiful 'samosas' on board. So that's the point of seeing the world differently. That's the point of adaptation. That's the point of respect to the local culture that we do so differently," he told news agency PTI.
India's role in global tech innovation
Weiss highlighted India's growing role in global tech innovation, noting that firms like TCS are no longer just service providers but key players in digital strategy. TCS is using its proprietary platforms, including TCS Cognix and AI WisdomNext, to support both the airline's customer experience goals and its sustainability targets, he said.
Virgin Atlantic flew more than five million passengers in 2024 and is now looking to use these digital upgrades to streamline operations and improve travel experiences.
TCS will also provide onsite teams to support the rollout.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
Young workforce shrinks at TCS and Infosys. Is the pyramid model breaking?
India's top two IT companies—Tata Consultancy Services Ltd (TCS) and Infosys Ltd—are seeing a sharp decline in their young workforce, raising concerns over the sustainability of the traditional employee pyramid model. Analysts warn that the shrinking number of employees aged under 30 could indicate automation-led redundancy in entry-level roles and point to broader shifts in the IT services market. Young graduates increasingly prefer startups, captive tech centres of global firms like Google and Microsoft, and product-based tech companies—drawn by better pay, faster growth, and more creative, less mundane work, they added. This assumes significance as it signals cracks in the traditional pyramid model used by Indian IT firms, where a wide base of young workforce supports a narrower band of experienced professionals and management. With fewer young hires, slower hiring, and narrow margins, companies like TCS and Infosys are under pressure to rethink their workforce plans amid weak global tech demand. Also read: TCS, Infosys hop onto Adobe's new platform to sell AI services to clients Falling numbers At TCS, just 47.7% of employees in India were below 30 years of age as of March 2025—down from 59% in FY22. This implies 44,542 fewer young employees at TCS than it had three years earlier. While the company doesn't provide region-wise data, about three-fourths of its global workforce of 607,979 is based in India. Infosys shows a similar pattern. Only 52% of its 323,578 employees were equal to or under 30 years of age at the end of FY25, down from 60% in FY22—a net drop of about 17,609 younger employees. 'It is interesting to note that the percentage of employees in the less-than-30 years' age group is at the lowest level over the past six years across most geographies," said Kotak Institutional Equities analysts Kawaljeet Saluja, Sathishkumar S., and Vamshi Krishna, in a note dated 3 June. Analysts say automation is partly to blame. 'The primary areas of deployment for entry-level employees was managed services where these employees handled customer support roles. With automation tools on offer, there is lesser need for such people which can be another reason for the lowering count of those aged 30 and below," said Ashutosh Sharma, research director at Forrester Research, a Massachusetts-based research and advisory firm. Phil Fersht of HFS Research echoed this view: 'Advances in automation and AI have enabled these firms to deliver traditional services with fewer headcounts. In addition, many clients are demanding lower prices, which is driving providers like TCS and Infosys to deliver with fewer people." Also read: How India's mid-cap IT bested the Big Four in hiring Broken pyramid Analysts are flagging the structural challenge this poses to the pyramid model. 'Significant improvement in the pyramid from the current levels requires healthy revenue growth in the normal course of business, not our base case in FY2026E," said the Kotak analysts. TCS's revenue in FY25 rose only 3.78% to $30.18 billion—its slowest growth in four years. Infosys's revenue growth was similarly sluggish at 3.85%, touching $19.28 billion. India's IT outsourcers saw slower growth last year as global clients cut back on tech spending due to economic uncertainty. 'Improving the employee pyramid will help in structurally better margins," said the Kotak analysts. Hiring entry-level employees increases operating margins of an IT outsourcer as they can be deployed in projects at lower costs compared with executives of higher experience, for whom the client has to shell out a greater amount. TCS and Infosys posted operating margins of 24.3% and 22.1%, respectively, in FY25. A Mumbai-based analyst, speaking on condition of anonymity, noted that slow hiring reflects sluggish demand for IT services. 'IT service providers hire junior employees, most of whom fall under 30, when there is high demand for tech services. This was the case in FY22 when plenty of freshers were added. Now because growth has been a little sluggish, hiring has been low and which is why we see fewer young people." In FY22, TCS and Infosys had added over 157,000 employees combined. In FY25, that number dropped to just 12,771. This also shows up in campus placement data. Engineering colleges across India have reported fewer offers from top-tier IT services companies over the past two years. Many final-year students who would typically receive early offers from TCS and Infosys are now seeking opportunities at product firms, fintech startups, or overseas universities instead, according to placement officers at institutions in Bengaluru and Pune. Also read: TCS vs Infosys vs Wipro: How many freshers are IT majors hiring in FY26? Job outlook for upcoming year explained Ageing abroad TCS faces a more pressing issue abroad: an ageing workforce in key markets. In North America, which contributes over half of TCS's revenue, more than 20% of its workforce is over 50 years old. In Europe, nearly 28% of its employees are above 50. Worryingly, the firms are also losing their appeal among young jobseekers. This shift in demographics isn't just a TCS or Infosys problem—it reflects a broader transformation in the Indian IT services landscape, which has historically relied on a large, young, and inexpensive workforce to deliver cost-effective offshore services to global clients. With that model under strain, the entire sector may be heading for a reset. Infosys received 4.46 million job applications in FY25—a 24% drop from FY22. TCS does not share comparable data. While neither company responded to emails seeking comment, people familiar with internal HR strategies at TCS and Infosys said both firms are exploring re-skilling and AI-integrated training programs to improve employee productivity. Also read: Primer: Is geopolitics to blame for your missing pay hike?
Mint
3 hours ago
- Mint
Labour Has No Choice But to Break Its Promises
(Bloomberg Opinion) -- Most governments, of whatever political stripe, would agree there's never enough money to go around. It's a problem that's particularly acute for UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer as he prepares to launch the results of his year-old administration's 'comprehensive spending review,' setting out budgets for each department for the next few years. Starmer's team not only lacks the funds to deliver what they'd like to do during their time in power, they don't have the money to do what they've already committed to. Something has to give, and Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves will ultimately need to do at least one of three things: slash spending, raise taxes or increase borrowing. Right now, she's not being clear which. Voters deserve at least a vague understanding of what tough decisions need to be made. It's a clarity Starmer and Reeves have seemed unwilling or unable to provide; instead, they've hoped for economic expansion to bring additional tax revenue to pay for their plans. Unfortunately, the boom is proving elusive: The OECD has downgraded Britain's growth forecast to 1% from 1.2% for 2026. Much of that contraction, the OECD said, is due to Donald Trump's tariffs, which may not be as punitive for the UK as on much of the rest of the world. But they will still likely have a significant impact, even if Britain can stave off 50% tariffs on steel within the capricious president's capricious new five-week deadline. Trump's move to pull back in Ukraine is also adding pressure on the British economy. This week, a UK government defense review confirmed an 'ambition' to raise spending on the military to 3% of gross domestic product, a hike Starmer believes is necessary as he continues to pursue his plan for a 'coalition of the willing' to counter the threat from Vladimir Putin in Ukraine without depending on the US. As my Bloomberg Economics colleague Dan Hanson has calculated, this would cost £17.3 billion by 2029-30, the equivalent of an increase in debt of 1.5 percentage points. NATO, which is preparing to gather this month, is pushing for a hike to 3.5% of members' GDP, rising to 5%, which Bloomberg calculates would cost the UK £350 billion ($475 billion). When she sets out her CSR on Wednesday, Reeves should be overt about how much the unfavorable economic winds are driven by Trump — voters are more likely to accept pain if they understand the reasons for it. And she should go further and provide a coherent sense of what the government believes, an ideological prism though which tricky choices can be viewed. It's something severely lacking from the government's messaging. Having witnessed the disastrous mini-budget of Liz Truss and following painful tax rises on farmers and employers in last October's budget, the mantra from Starmer and Reeves had been that the books would be balanced not via further borrowing or tax increases but through departmental cuts. That commitment was difficult for a left-leaning government that would rather be spending money on things it cares about, but it was at least intellectually coherent. It's no longer clear that the government will stand firm. Last month, Starmer unwisely gave in to pressure from his own MPs to partially reverse the move to withdraw winter fuel benefits from pensioners. The reversal revealed a soft underbelly in the iron chancellor's armor. Labour MPs are now pressing Reeves to also end a controversial two-child benefit limit and relax plans to remove some disability benefits, even if that means either increasing borrowing or taxes. If she does stick to her guns and square the fiscal circle by spending restraint, the UK will surely fall into the austerity she has vowed to resist. At minimum, she'll have to let go of manifesto commitments such as halving violence against women and girls, making homes more energy efficient and building affordable social housing. There is no way Labour can avoid breaking some of its promises; now we need to know the rationale shaping which promises they are. None of this is simple — which is why it's important the government's priorities are made explicit. Instead, Starmer is offering mixed messaging. In speeches and interviews, he's said his first priority is the defense of the realm, but also that he sees nothing more important than protecting 'working people' from the consequences of market turmoil, and also that he believes 'profoundly in driving down poverty and child poverty.' As Labour resists the threat from the upstart populist Reform UK party, Starmer has pledged to fix public services, slash NHS waiting lists and reduce immigration by making it harder to come to Britain to work and study (which Bloomberg estimates will cost £9 billion by 2028-2029.) At the same time, the PM seeks to drive growth through a youth-mobility arrangement with the European Union that leaves him vulnerable to accusations of open borders. Does he avoid strikes by boosting public-sector pay or focus on keeping down inflation? Encourage entrepreneurship or tax the rich so that many quit these shores? No wonder voters are confused — they've been given no framework within which to anticipate where the ax will fall or how else the government will make the sums add up. If Starmer's team doesn't lay out a clear vision for how they'll approach these touch choices, then they'll be more than confused — they'll be let down. More From Bloomberg Opinion: This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners. Rosa Prince is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering UK politics and policy. She was formerly an editor and writer at Politico and the Daily Telegraph, and is the author of 'Comrade Corbyn' and 'Theresa May: The Enigmatic Prime Minister.' More stories like this are available on
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
UK's Warehouse REIT agrees to Blackstone's $635.35 million bid
BENGALURU: UK's Warehouse REIT has agreed to sell itself to Blackstone for 470 million pounds ($635.35 million), days after the investment firm lowered its bid for the company due to valuation-related issues uncovered during due diligence. The 110.6 pence per share offer price agreed on Wednesday represents a 34.2% premium to Warehouse REIT's closing stock price on February 28, the day before Blackstone's initial bid with global investment firm Sixth Street Partners was disclosed. Blackstone raised its bid to 489 million pounds in March but knocked off the sweetener, citing differing views on the value of an asset. The final offer price includes a dividend of 1.6 pence per share. "The company's growth has been constrained by the weak macroeconomic backdrop, high interest rates, and an inability to raise new equity," said Neil Kirton , the chair of Warehouse. Kirton said these factors, paired with the current macroeconomic conditions, make Blackstone's offer particularly attractive. U.S.-based firms have been snapping up British assets recently, taking advantage of a market that is plagued with comparatively weaker valuations and stunted growth. In recent months, companies such as Dowlais and Deliveroo have been bought out by their American rivals or by investment firms.
