logo
An Auspicious Day Tainted By Child Sexual Abuse

An Auspicious Day Tainted By Child Sexual Abuse

NDTV30-04-2025

New Delhi: Akshaya Tritiya is regarded as an auspicious day—a marker of new beginnings. It is a day marked by prayers for prosperity and devotion to the Goddess who embodies good fortune. Yet, how tragic it is that a day meant to usher in prosperity becomes a day of misfortune for our daughters, who are married off as children.
It is time we call this for what it is: not tradition, but a crime—and act with urgency, intention, and accountability to return to our daughters their dreams, their choice, and the promise of a wholesome life. When families fail their children, the community and the state must unite with unwavering resolve to protect and support them. The community around our children—beyond the family—cannot stand by as silent witnesses to this betrayal of trust. Those who perform, conduct, direct, organise, or abet child marriages must be held fully and fearlessly accountable.
Faith and religious leaders are powerful moral anchors in their communities. They can become the strongest barrier against crimes committed on children. In a society like ours, child marriage cannot take place—especially not without the involvement of a faith or religious leader to solemnise or officiate the ceremony, since such a marriage cannot be recognised in a court of law. That is why their coming together to shoulder this responsibility is both urgent and deeply heartening.
When faith stands firmly with justice, the end of child marriage is not just possible—it becomes inevitable.
A Child Marriage Free India
Child marriage is not merely a legal or societal issue; it is a crime against our children's dignity and future. A national movement for a Child Marriage Free India, rising from the grassroots and led by courageous women leaders, has, in just two years, grown into the largest civil society action to end this entrenched social crime. It has reignited the spirit and moral force of the law, influencing the most recent judicial rulings and inspiring a Government of India national campaign—bringing the protection, dignity, and education of our daughters to the forefront, with 250 million citizens of this great country standing together with one unwavering resolve: to end child marriage.
Let this day mark a new beginning—a solemn pledge drawn from our most resolute selves and from those we look up to, including leaders of faith, to stand united and end child marriage by 2030.
Legal Framework working to end this injustice
On the surface, the laws are clear. In fact, our legal system has some of the most comprehensive frameworks to prevent child marriage—from the Age of Consent Bill of 1860, to the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006 (PCMA), and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO). In 2017, the Supreme Court made it unequivocally clear that sexual intercourse with a minor, even within marriage, is tantamount to rape. This is why, in many child marriage cases, perpetrators can be arrested under both the PCMA and POCSO.
Data from the 2011 Census, the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB), and the National Family Health Survey-5 (NFHS-5, 2019–21) reveals a stark reality: three girls are forced into child marriage every minute in India.
Elimination of Child Marriage Is Not Only Possible but Imminent—If We Act Now
In its landmark judgment on 18 October 2024, the Supreme Court recognised the urgency of addressing the scourge of child marriage.
The Court issued a slew of directions to strengthen implementation of PCMA, noting that 'prevention before protection, protection before prosecution, and prosecution for prevention' must be the systemic safeguard to end child marriage.
In When Children Have Children, I have outlined the PICKET strategy—Prevention, Investments, Convergence, Knowledge, Education, and Technology—as a comprehensive, action-oriented roadmap to end child marriage. This framework is now reinforced by the Court's ruling and has become a rallying point for governments, civil society, communities, and girls themselves.
To Make the Vision Real, We Must Act Across Every Pillar
Policy for Prevention, Protection, and Prosecution: We must rigorously enforce existing laws. For example, the Supreme Court's judgment that empowers magistrates to issue injunctions preventing child marriages is a step in the right direction. In Karnataka, the Department of Women and Child Welfare has, for the first time, included pre-university (PU) college principals as Child Marriage Prohibition Officers (CMPOs), responsible for preventing any girl child studying in their college from marrying before 18.
But laws alone are not enough. We need the entire societal apparatus—from law enforcement to local leaders—to act. The Assam government's crackdown is a case in point: over 3,000 arrests and a recorded 81% decline in child marriages since 2021. A zero-tolerance approach works.
Investments and Incentives: Punitive action must be matched with structural support. Assam's model of providing financial support to girls continuing their education has proven effective in delaying marriage. This must be scaled nationwide, especially in high-prevalence districts. Targeted investments and direct cash incentives to keep girls in school will be powerful barriers to child marriage.
Convergence of Systems: We cannot fight child marriage in silos. Cross-sector collaboration—among education, health, police, and social welfare systems—is essential. At-risk girls must be involved in shaping the strategies that impact their lives. Solutions must rise from the ground up.
Knowledge and Education: Knowledge is a protective tool. Legal literacy, especially around child rights and the consequences of child marriage, must reach every home. Schools, anganwadis, community centres, and local media have vital roles to play. Education isn't just empowerment—it is the most effective intervention against child marriage.
Technology: From real-time attendance tracking to reporting abuse, technology can enable prevention. Tamil Nadu's school attendance monitoring system is a prime example. Technology must also be leveraged to raise awareness and facilitate community-based reporting.
Dismantling the Ecosystem That Enables This Crime
To end child marriage, we must confront the ecosystem that enables it. This includes religious leaders—clerics, maulvis, and pundits—as well as local vendors such as tent suppliers, jewellers, printers, and caterers, along with panchayat members. These stakeholders play a critical role in realisation of this crime.
Under Section 10 of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act (PCMA), any individual who performs, conducts, directs, or abets a child marriage is liable for up to two years of rigorous imprisonment and a fine of ₹1 lakh. Religious leaders must refuse to solemnise any marriage involving minors—or face prosecution.
Panchayats, too, must fulfil their legal obligations. Child Protection Committees at the village, block, and district levels must be active in monitoring and reporting cases of child marriage.
Across the country, we are witnessing action—from grassroots networks to state departments to civil society or community influencers —reaching every corner of India.
The End Is in Sight
Sustainable Development Goal 5.3 calls for an end to child marriage by 2030. In the last two years, we have seen remarkable momentum—from the judiciary, civil society, communities, and the government—coalescing into a movement of national urgency and resolve.
The Ministry of Women and Child Development has been allocated ₹26,890 crore in the FY 2025–26 budget. Of this, ₹629 crore is earmarked for Beti Bachao Beti Padhao, under the Sambal component of Mission Shakti. On 27 November 2024, the national campaign to end child marriage was officially launched by Union Minister of Women and Child Development, Smt. Annpurna Devi. What's needed now is a dedicated budget line to realise the vision it outlines and ensure that the financial provisions match this commitment.
Tipping Point to End Child Marriage before 2030
The tipping point to end child marriage is in sight. With the right strategies and resources—and the active engagement of every stakeholder—India can become child marriage free before 2030. This is the call: to every student, family, community leader, panchayat, faith leader, business, public servant, judge, and police officer—the time to rally our resolve is now.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Will Trump get to pick US Supreme Court justices in his second term?
Will Trump get to pick US Supreme Court justices in his second term?

Time of India

time42 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Will Trump get to pick US Supreme Court justices in his second term?

Legal experts suggest that Donald Trump may have the opportunity to appoint additional Supreme Court justices during a potential second term, potentially reshaping the court's direction for decades. Justices Thomas, Alito, and Roberts may face pressure to retire, allowing Trump to install younger, like-minded individuals. Experts have said Trump might appoint loyalist justice. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Can Trump overhaul judiciary? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Can Trump pick judges? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Trump may seek loyalty over ideology During his first term in office, President Donald Trump appointed 226 federal court judges, including three US Supreme Court justices. Trump successfully installed judges who promoted his political agenda, including overturning the landmark ruling from 1973 that declared the Constitution guaranteed the right to abortion, Roe v. something unusual appears to be unfolding in his second term. Rather than reinforcing Trump-era policies, federal judges — even those appointed by Trump himself — are now halting key parts of the president's second-term initiatives. So, a question that keeps popping up on everyone's mind is that- Will Donald Trump appoint Supreme Court judges in the US?Trump may have the opportunity to appoint new Supreme Court justices during his second term in office, legal experts told Newsweek. During his first term in office, Trump appointed three justices to the US Supreme Court, thus significantly influencing the judiciary system. Trump may have another chance to nominate a justice in the coming years- —an appointment that could shape the Court's direction for decades. Such a move would likely have profound effects on public policy, particularly in areas like abortion, LGBTQ+ rights, immigration, and executive Justices Clarence Thomas (76), Samuel Alito (75), and Chief Justice John Roberts (70) are already facing calls from some on the right to consider retirement in the coming years. With Republicans currently holding control of the presidency and a 53-seat majority in the Senate, they are in a strong position to confirm new Supreme Court justices without Democratic argue that Republicans should take a lesson from Democrats, who have previously faced setbacks when their justices chose not to retire during favorable political Urman, a law professor at Northeastern University, told Newsweek that while it's impossible to predict exactly when a justice might step down, Justices Alito and Thomas are the most likely candidates for retirement—primarily to allow a like-minded successor to be appointed. However, he noted that this isn't a certainty, as both justices are now part of the majority after spending years as dissenting voices on the Court, a position they deeply from the right may not be convincing to the justices, he said."Judges and especially Justices are very independent, and I don't think they will be too influenced by the pressure campaign," he said. "It's ultimately a very personal decision and the Ginsburg example is important but she was older and faced more health issues than the current justices."None of the current justices on the court have publicly said they plan to retire anytime federal prosecutor Gene Rossi told Newsweek Thomas could wait until after the 2026 midterms to avoid giving Democrats a motivating issue ahead of the elections."However, if that happens, President Trump will pick a very young and conservative nominee because in his mind, he got burned with Justice Barrett," he said. "And he wants to put his further imprint on the tenor of the High Court."Former federal prosecutor Neama Rahmani told Newsweek: "It's likely Trump appoints at least one Supreme Court Justice, and maybe two. The odds increase over his four-year term, especially with Justices Thomas and Alito being in their mid-70s.""Trump's Cabinet and officer appointees during his second term have been largely loyalists without the experience or independent streaks that frustrated him during his first term. His Supreme Court appointment(s) will likely reflect those same values, especially given the importance of the judiciary in standing in the way of his executive orders."Stephen Wermiel, a constitutional law professor at American University, told Newsweek, "It's uncertain whether Trump will have another Supreme Court vacancy. But there's a good chance conservatives will begin urging Roberts, Thomas, and Alito to retire after this term so Trump could install younger, like-minded justices.'Legal analysts believe Trump may prioritize personal loyalty over ideological alignment when choosing future Supreme Court McQuade, a former federal prosecutor, told Newsweek that frustration with decisions made by Justices Barrett and Roberts may drive Trump to look for candidates who are not only conservative but personally loyal to him."Trump could seek justices who won't break from him on major rulings," McQuade said. "That could have a major impact on upcoming cases dealing with birthright citizenship, transgender healthcare, and the limits of executive power."Justice Amy Coney Barrett has occasionally sided against Trump's positions, including a ruling against deporting alleged gang members under the Alien Enemies Act of 1798. Her independent stance has drawn criticism from Trump-aligned analyst Urman agreed that loyalty may guide Trump's future selections, noting that he 'appears to value loyalty above all else in his nominees.' Any new appointments, Urman added, would likely align more closely with the judicial philosophies of Justices Thomas or Alito than Barrett.

Hong Kong Appoints New Zealand Judge To Top Court
Hong Kong Appoints New Zealand Judge To Top Court

NDTV

time42 minutes ago

  • NDTV

Hong Kong Appoints New Zealand Judge To Top Court

Quick Read Summary is AI generated, newsroom reviewed. A New Zealand judge has been appointed to Hong Kong's top court amid overseas jurist exodus. William Young, 73, joins five other overseas non-permanent justices from the UK and Australia. Hong Kong invites overseas judges to its Court of Final Appeal to uphold common law jurisdiction. Hong Kong: A New Zealand judge has been appointed as a justice of Hong Kong's top court, after a years-long exodus of overseas jurists following Beijing's imposition of a sweeping security law on the finance hub. Hong Kong's lawmakers on Wednesday approved the appointment of William Young, 73, to join five other overseas non-permanent justices from the UK and Australia. Hong Kong is a common law jurisdiction separate from mainland China and invites overseas judges to hear cases at its Court of Final Appeal. Their presence has been seen as a bellwether for the rule of law since the former British colony was handed back to China in 1997. Beijing passed a national security law on Hong Kong in 2020, following huge and often violent pro-democracy protests in the Chinese city the year before. Since then, several overseas judges have quit the Court of Final Appeal without finishing their terms, while others have not renewed their appointments. The lineup of overseas judges has gone from 15 at its peak down to five, not including Mr Young. The newly appointed justice, who retired from his role as a New Zealand Supreme Court judge in April 2022, is expected to start in Hong Kong this month. Hong Kong leader John Lee accepted a recommendation to appoint Mr Young in May and praised him as "a judge of eminent standing and reputation". Cases at the top court in Hong Kong are typically heard by a panel of four local judges and a fifth ad hoc member, who may be a foreign judge. In January, Hong Kong's chief justice said recruiting suitable overseas judges "may be less straightforward than it once was", given geopolitical headwinds. The government has defended the security law as necessary to restore order after the 2019 protests and said the city remains a well-respected legal hub.

Stop cattle slaughter for Bakrid, says Vishwa Prani Kalyana Mandali
Stop cattle slaughter for Bakrid, says Vishwa Prani Kalyana Mandali

The Hindu

timean hour ago

  • The Hindu

Stop cattle slaughter for Bakrid, says Vishwa Prani Kalyana Mandali

Sri Dayananda Swami of the Vishwa Prani Kalyana Mandali has appealed to the Union and State governments to stop cattle slaughter during Bakrid festival across Karnataka. In a letter to the governments, he demanded that cattle slaughter and animal sacrifice be banned on Bakrid falling on Saturday (June 7 this year) and subsequent days as per provisions of the Prevention of Slaughter and Preservation of Cattle Act 2020 and the Prevention of Animal Sacrifices Act 1959, Rules 1963 and Amendment Act 1975. He has attached copies of some Supreme Court and High Court orders in support of his demand. Members of the mandali, including Uttam Chand Jajed, Suresh Runawal, Ashok Nagore, Sukhveer Jain, and others have signed the letter.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store