Trump administration signals it will slash funds for long-delayed California high-speed rail project
LOS ANGELES (AP) — The Trump administration signaled Wednesday that it intends to cut off federal funding for a long-delayed California high-speed rail project plagued by multibillion-dollar cost overruns, following the release of a scathing federal report that concluded there is 'no viable path' to complete even a partial section of the line.
Voters first authorized $10 billion in borrowed funds in 2008 to cover about a third of the estimated cost, with a promise the train would be up and running by 2020. Five years beyond that deadline, no tracks have been laid and its estimated price tag has ballooned to over $100 billion.
In a letter to the California High-Speed Rail Authority, which oversees the project, Federal Railroad Administration acting Administrator Drew Feeley wrote that what was envisioned as an 800-mile system connecting the state's major cities has been reduced to a blueprint for 'a 119-mile track to nowhere.'
After a $4 billion federal investment, the California agency 'has conned the taxpayer … with no viable plan to deliver even that partial segment on time,' Feeley wrote.
State officials defended what's known as the nation's largest infrastructure project and said they remain committed to construction, though it's not clear what funding would replace the federal support if it's withdrawn. Feeley noted the FRA could seek repayment of the federal funds but is not proposing to claw back those dollars at this time.
Carol Dahmen, the state authority's chief of strategic communications, said in a statement that the federal conclusions are misguided and 'do not reflect the substantial progress made to deliver high-speed rail in California.'
Dahmen noted that the majority of the funding for the line has been provided by the state and that Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom's budget proposal would extend at least $1 billion a year for 20 years to complete an initial segment of the line.
State officials are focused on a stretch connecting the Central Valley cities of Bakersfield and Merced, which is set to be operating by 2033.
The state agency has about a month to formally respond to the FRA, after which the grants could be terminated.
State Sen. Tony Strickland, a Republican from Huntington Beach who is vice chair of the Transportation Committee, said that 'commonsense has prevailed' and urged the Legislature's dominant Democrats to redirect the funds from the rail line to lowering gas prices or investing in viable construction projects.
'Let's stop wasting California's hard-earned taxpayer dollars,' Strickland said.
Monday Mornings
The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week.
There is no known source for the billions of dollars that would be needed to complete the line.
California High-Speed Rail Authority CEO Ian Choudri suggested in April that private investors could step in and fill the funding gap for the project that promised nonstop rail service between San Francisco and Los Angeles in under three hours. At the time, he acknowledged that even if funding is secured, it might take nearly two more decades to complete most of that segment.
President Donald Trump — who canceled nearly $1 billion in federal dollars for the project in his first term — said in May that his administration will not continue to fund the line. 'That train is the worst cost overrun I've ever seen,' Trump told reporters at the time, calling it 'totally out of control.'
California Democratic U.S. Sens. Alex Padilla and Adam Schiff called the administration's announcement a 'devastating' blow for 21st century transportation and an effort to punish a heavily Democratic state that didn't support the Republican president in the election.
'High-speed rail is the future of transportation with the potential to bring customers to new businesses, businesses to new employees and to connect communities hundreds of miles away with affordable and faster transit,' they said in a joint statement.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Market Online
20 minutes ago
- The Market Online
Two high-conviction stocks to leverage record gold prices
At the time of writing on Thursday, gold traded at US$3,373.3 per ounce, just shy of the all-time-high set just last month, having gained over 40 per cent year-over-year and almost 100 per cent since 2020, reinforcing its reputation as a safe-haven investment during economically trying times. Gold's gains have mitigated risks associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, which dropped the TSX by 30 per cent in March 2020; inflation driven by quarantines lifted across the globe; ongoing conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East; as well as renewed price pressures from U.S. president Trump's global tariff initiative. At the same time, higher gold prices are improving economics from exploration to production, enticing investors back into the space now that there's real money to be made. The lowest-hanging fruit in the gold stock universe will likely be found in producers with differentiated income statements and balance sheets, most of their growth likely behind them, making them best suited for moderate long-term returns. There is, however, a higher risk-reward option capable of delivering potentially exponential returns, supposing you're willing to size up early-stage mining projects and stick with them through development and hopefully production. We're of course talking about junior mining stocks, whose underlying pre-revenue operations rely on geological expertise, mining cycle timing and sound capital allocation to traverse the often volatile path to shareholder value. In the newest edition of Stockhouse's Weekly Market Movers, I'll introduce you to a pair of junior gold stocks equipped with assets and management teams worth believing in when it comes to generating leverage beyond the gold price. Chesapeake Gold Our first high-conviction stock to optimize your gold exposure is Chesapeake Gold, market cap C$96.44 million, whose flagship Metates project in Durango State, Mexico, hosts one of the largest undeveloped gold-silver deposits in the world. Metates' resource comes in at an estimated 16.77 million ounces of gold measured and indicated and 2.13 million ounces inferred, representing over US$60 billion in gold in the ground. The project's 2021 preliminary economic assessment details a pre-tax net present value of C$1.43 billion and initial capital costs of only C$359 million at heavily discounted base cases of US$1,600 gold and US$22 silver. Supported by C$11 million in treasury at year-end 2024, Metates' ample room for resource expansion, a management team with decorated histories in exploration and development in the Americas, as well as a recent acquisition of sulfide leaching technology that vastly increases recoveries and project economics (slide 8), there's no good reason Chesapeake should be trading at a 90 per cent discount to its peers on an enterprise value/ounces basis (slide 16). Jean-Paul Tsotsos, Chesapeake Gold's chief executive officer (CEO), spoke with Stockhouse's Lyndsay Malchuk about the benefits of the company's news sulfide leaching technology. Watch the interview here. Chesapeake Gold stock (TSXV:CKG) has given back 41.91 per cent year-over-year and 65 per cent since 2020. Shares last traded at C$1.40. Our second high-conviction junior gold stock, Tectonic Metals, market cap C$37.37 million, was founded by a team whose past successes speak for themselves, as highlighted by ushering Kaminak's Coffee gold project from a C$3 million venture through bankable feasibility, followed by a C$520 million sale to Goldcorp (now Newmont). As a whole, the team is responsible for: Over 30 million ounces in gold discoveries. 18 feasibility studies. 20 projects permitted. More than $3 billion in M&A transactions. More than $2 billion in capital raised. Tectonic is keen on expanding its track record with its flagship Flat gold project in Alaska, located only 40 kilometres from Novagold's Donlin project, host to one of the largest undeveloped gold deposits in the world at an estimated 39 million ounces. The 99,800-acre Flat has yielded 1.4 million ounces in historical placer gold production and delivered a 100-per-cent drill success rate to date, intersecting gold in all 86 drill holes across 3 kilometres of mineralized strike up to 325 metres deep. The company has identified six potential district-scale deposits on the project, granting Flat multi-million-ounce potential. With numerous analogous mines (slide 17) strengthening Flat's case for a company-making initial resource estimate, and C$12.5 million in funding in place for phase-I drilling to follow up on 2024's Alpha Bowl discovery – 65.53 metres grading 1.22 grams per ton (g/t) of gold – Tectonic is a reasonable candidate for transforming robust exploration upside into an outsized stock price re-rating. Tectonic Metals stock (TSXV:TECT) is up by 12.5 per cent year-over-year but remains down by 59.09 per cent since 2020. Tony Reda, Tectonic Metals' founder, president and CEO, sat down with Coreena Robertson to discuss the company's recently closed funding round. Watch the interview here. Thanks for reading! I'll see you next week for a new edition of Stockhouse's Weekly Market Movers. Here's the most recent article, in case you missed it. Join the discussion: Find out what everybody's saying about these junior gold mining stocks on the Chesapeake Gold Corp. and Tectonic Metals Inc. Bullboards and check out Stockhouse's stock forums and message boards. This is sponsored content issued on behalf of Chesapeake Gold Corp. and Tectonic Metals Inc., please see full disclaimer here.
Winnipeg Free Press
25 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Federal vs. state power at issue in a hearing over Trump's election overhaul executive order
BOSTON (AP) — Democratic state attorneys general on Friday will seek to block President Donald Trump's proposal for a sweeping overhaul of U.S. elections in a case that tests a constitutional bedrock — the separation of powers. The top law enforcement officials from 19 states filed a federal lawsuit after the Republican president signed the executive order in March, arguing that its provisions would step on states' power to set their own election rules and that the executive branch had no such authority. In a filing supporting that argument, a bipartisan group of former secretaries of state said Trump's directive would upend the system established by the Constitution's Elections Clause, which gives states and Congress control over how elections are run. They said the order seeks to 'unilaterally coronate the President as the country's chief election policymaker and administrator.' If the court does not halt the order, they argued, 'the snowball of executive overreach will grow swiftly and exponentially.' Trump's election directive was part of a flurry of executive orders he has issued in the opening months of his second term, many of which have drawn swift legal challenges. It follows years of him falsely claiming that his loss to Democrat Joe Biden in the 2020 presidential election was due to widespread fraud and an election year in which he and other Republicans promoted the notion that large numbers of noncitizens threatened the integrity of U.S. elections. In fact, voting by noncitizens is rare and, when caught, can lead to felony charges and deportation. Trump's executive order would require voters to show proof of U.S. citizenship when registering to vote in federal elections, prohibit mail or absentee ballots from being counted if they are received after Election Day, set new rules for voting equipment and prohibit non-U.S. citizens from being able to donate in certain elections. It also would condition federal election grant funding on states adhering to the strict ballot deadline. The hearing Friday in U.S. District Court in Boston comes in one of three lawsuits filed against the executive order. One is from Oregon and Washington, where elections are conducted almost entirely by mail and ballots received after Election Day are counted as long as they are postmarked by then. The provision that would create a proof-of-citizenship requirement for federal elections already has been halted in a lawsuit filed by voting and civil rights groups and national Democratic organizations. In that case, filed in federal court in the District of Columbia, the judge said the president's attempt to use a federal agency to enact a proof-of-citizenship requirement for voting usurped the power of states and Congress, which at the time was considering legislation that would do just that. That bill, called the SAVE Act, passed the U.S. House but faces an uncertain future in the Senate. Trump's executive order said its intent was to ensure 'free, fair and honest elections unmarred by fraud, errors, or suspicion.' The Justice Department, in arguing against the motion by the attorneys general for a preliminary injunction, said the president is within his rights to direct agencies to carry out federal voting laws. The order tasks the U.S. Election Assistance Commission with updating the federal voter registration form to require people to submit documentation proving they are U.S. citizens. Similar provisions enacted previously in a handful of states have raised concerns about disenfranchising otherwise eligible voters who can't readily access those documents. That includes married women, who would need both a birth certificate and a marriage license if they had changed their last name. A state proof-of-citizenship law enacted in Kansas more than a decade ago blocked the registrations of 31,000 people later found to be eligible to vote. The two sides will argue over whether the president has the authority to direct the election commission, which was created by Congress as an independent agency after the Florida ballot debacle during the 2000 presidential election. In its filing, the Justice Department said Trump's executive order falls within his authority to direct officials 'to carry out their statutory duties,' adding that 'the only potential voters it disenfranchises are noncitizens who are ineligible to vote anyway.'
Winnipeg Free Press
30 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Jury finds 2 men guilty of supplying the bomb used to kill Maltese journalist Daphne Caruana Galizia
VALLETTA, Malta (AP) — A Maltese jury found two men guilty of complicity in the murder of Maltese journalist Daphne Caruana Galizia, after a six-week long trial covering two homicides wrapped up late on Thursday. Jamie Vella and Robert Agius were accused of supplying the bomb that killed her. Both were found guilty of the charges. The journalist was murdered on Oct. 16, 2017, by a car bomb that was detonated while she was driving near her home. Caruana Galizia, 53, had written extensively about suspected corruption in political and business circles in Malta. Her murder shocked Europe and triggered angry protests in Malta. Caruana Galizia's investigative reports had targeted people in then-Prime Minister Joseph Muscat's inner circle whom she accused of having offshore companies in tax havens disclosed in the Panama Papers leak. She also targeted the opposition. When she was killed, she was facing more than 40 libel suits. The Caruana Galizia family said in a statement that Thursday's verdict brings them a step closer to justice. 'Yet, eight years after Daphne's brutal assassination, the institutional failures that enabled her murder remain unaddressed and unreformed,' the family added. Vella and Robert Agius, together with two other men – George Degiorgio and Adrian Agius – also faced charges related to the separate murder of a lawyer, Carmel Chircop, who was shot and killed in 2015. Vella, Degiorgio and Adrian Agius were found guilty of charges tied to the murder, while Robert Agius was found not guilty. The judge will decide on sentencing at a later date. George Degiorgio and his brother Alfred Degiorgio both pleaded guilty in 2022 to carrying out the murder of Caruana Galizia. They were each sentenced to 40 years in prison. A third man, Vincent Muscat, pleaded guilty in 2021 for his role in the Caruana Galizia murder, and was sentenced to 15 years in prison. He testified in the recent jury trial after being granted a presidential pardon for his role in the Chircop murder on the condition he tell the whole truth. Yorgen Fenech, a prominent Maltese businessman, is currently out of jail on bail awaiting trial on charges of alleged complicity in the Caruana Galizia murder.
