City asks for meeting on Park Street services, but P.E.I. housing minister says it's pointless
Social Sharing
The City of Charlottetown wants more details on the province's long-term plan for services within its boundaries directed at those facing homelessness, but Prince Edward Island's housing minister says he doesn't know what such a meeting would accomplish.
Steven Myers and the city have been at odds about the location of an emergency overnight shelter and the Community Outreach Centre, which currently sit at 15 Park St. in Charlottetown's southeast end.
In late April, Mayor Philip Brown sent a letter to Myers asking for a meeting to discuss what's going to happen with the services.
"From a planning perspective, we stand by our decision in rejecting the province's proposed amendment to [the] Zoning and Development Bylaw that would allow the continued operation of the shelter and centre," Brown wrote in the letter.
"However, since the province has affirmed its intention to continue operations at the Park Street site through changes to the Planning Act, it's vital that the city and the province work together toward long-term solutions to support individuals with complex social service needs in appropriate community settings."
Back in March, Charlottetown council voted to reject the province's request for a zoning change that would have allowed the shelter and outreach centre to remain on Park Street.
Two days later, Myers said that vote didn't matter: The province would set up a special planning zone in the area that would allow both operations to stay in place, effectively overriding council's decision.
The mayor could say 'Put it on the moon,' and I could care less what he thinks. — Steven Myers, P.E.I.'s housing minister
On Friday, the housing minister told CBC News there have been several meetings between the province and city, so he's not sure what's left to discuss.
"I don't know what would be accomplished in a meeting. We have a minister's task force on housing that the mayor was invited to be a part of and he decided he didn't want to be part of it, so he's had lots of opportunity to be a willing part of this," Myers said.
"I'm not really sure where this would come from at this point, after being such a negative force on such a positive solution."
WATCH | 'I could care less what he thinks': Myers dismisses Charlottetown mayor's opinions on Park Street:
'I could care less what he thinks': Myers dismisses Charlottetown mayor's opinions on Park Street
25 minutes ago
Duration 1:58
The City of Charlottetown wants to meet with P.E.I. Housing Minister Steven Myers about the provincial emergency shelter and outreach centre located on Park Street, but Myers doesn't think that's necessary. He says the province has bought some homes in the area and the plan is to turn them into social housing. CBC's Tony Davis reports.
The mayor has suggested Acadian Drive near the Queen Elizabeth Hospital as a possible location for the services.
On Friday, Myers made it clear that he's not taking any suggestions.
"The mayor could say 'Put it on the moon,' and I could care less what he thinks."
In the meantime, the province has been buying up some properties near Park Street, and those homes might be turned into social housing.
The province's long-term plan to help fight homelessness is to transition to a model that involves providing stable housing first, then incorporating support services.
Myers says the province hopes to do that starting with a 24-unit building in the Park Street area later this year.
"We think that when that happens, the sheltering need will lower a lot," he said.
"Some of our long-term tenants… the ones that come every night and we know are participating and trying to work inside our system to get on a better track, we think we can put them in a better housing situation."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
Ford government used code words to make it 'unduly difficult' to search Greenbelt records: report
Social Sharing Ontario Premier Doug Ford's government broke its legal, record-keeping obligations amid its now-reversed decision to open up parts of the protected Greenbelt lands for housing, the province's information and privacy commissioner has found. Political staff were using code words to thwart document requests and left a surprisingly small paper trail for such a consequential policy, Commissioner Patricia Kosseim wrote as part of her annual report. A number of freedom-of-information appeals her office received on Greenbelt-related requests revealed concerning, systemic issues, she wrote. "The Greenbelt-related appeals offer a clear example and cautionary tale about the consequences of inadequate recordkeeping," the IPC report said. "When key government decisions are not properly documented, when code words are used, or when records are stored in fragmented ways across personal and official systems, transparency suffers, and with it, public trust." In addition to issues previously highlighted by the auditor general around political staff deleting Greenbelt emails and using personal accounts, the government sometimes used code words in communications. Staffers sometimes referred to the Greenbelt project in messages as "special project," or "GB," or "G..," with references to G.. being next to impossible to find. Those terms and their inconsistent use made it "unduly difficult" to search for Greenbelt-related records, Kosseim wrote. "Worse, the use of the code word "G.." made it virtually impossible to find relevant records, given that the asterisk ("..") is used as a technical wildcard when conducting text searches, returning any word starting with "G," she wrote. That meant having to forego using the code word "G.." as a search term, so some Greenbelt records may have been missed, Kosseim wrote. "These practices not only violate legal record-keeping obligations, they also erode public trust in the integrity of government decision-making," she wrote. "The public has a fundamental right to know how and why decisions are made, especially those that impact protected lands like the Greenbelt. When records are obfuscated and made difficult, if not impossible, to find through evasive code words, transparency is compromised, and oversight becomes illusory." But there was also a "surprising" lack of Greenbelt documentation at all, which undermines transparency, Kosseim found. "The near-total absence of decision-making documentation is particularly concerning, especially on a file as high profile and consequential as changes to the Greenbelt," the report said. "Despite evidence of meetings and discussions involving premier's office staff and ministry staff about the Greenbelt, there was very little documentation of what was said or decided in those conversations, aside from a few contemporaneous notes taken by ministry staff." The RCMP is in the midst of an investigation into the government's decision to remove 15 parcels of land from the Greenbelt to remove 50,000 homes — a process the auditor general and integrity commissioner have found favoured certain developers. Premier Doug Ford's office says the government has taken several steps to strengthen record-keeping practices, including reminding staff to preserve and manage records in accordance with requirements and holding training sessions, and will continue to comply with legal obligations. NDP Leader Marit Stiles said "enough is enough," because the last time political staff were found to be deleting government records, one went to jail. A top aide to former premier Dalton McGuinty was convicted of illegal use of a computer relating to his destruction of potentially embarrassing documents about the Liberal government's costly decision to cancel two gas plants before the 2011 provincial election. Stiles said there should be consequences for these new failings. "When will the premier finally answer for the disturbing culture of dodging accountability and disappearing records within this government?" she wrote in a statement.
National Post
an hour ago
- National Post
Randall Denley: Ontario's private eye-surgery experiment can give sight to the ideologically blind
Article content The government does not cover those other lenses on the premise that OHIP's responsibility is to prevent blindness, not to perfect everyone's vision. Just as the government doesn't cover the cost of glasses, it doesn't cover lenses for non-cataract vision issues. Article content The health coalition seems offended that patients are offered these choices, but what business is it of theirs? People can spend money on enhanced lenses to fix their vision problems or they can spend money on glasses. The lens choice doesn't involve any extra cost to the public system. Article content In the view of hardcore proponents of public health care, all care must be provided directly by government, not a penny can change hands directly, and everyone should receive exactly the level of care approved by government and nothing more. It's an inflexible, out-of-date approach that denies patients the right to make choices for themselves. Article content The OHC would like to see eye surgeries take place only in hospitals, or at least be conducted under hospital supervision, but the health coalition's vision of good, honest doctors working in hospitals versus greedy, dishonest doctors working in privately owned clinics doesn't pass the reality test. Article content Article content Doctors who work in clinics typically do work in hospitals, too. The more expensive lenses that fix more eye problems are available to patients getting their work done in hospitals, not just in clinics. Article content The OHC has rounded up 50 patients who say they were sold lenses they didn't require, or even were charged for surgeries that OHIP covers. The coalition will lodge formal protests this week with the provincial and federal governments. Article content Perhaps there is substance to these complaints. If so, the health coalition should forward them to the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario for investigation. Mehra says some patients feel intimidated by that process. Maybe the OHC could help them. That would be doing something useful. Article content What isn't useful is attempting to undermine the cataract-surgery clinic program because the service is provided by privately owned businesses. The typical doctor's office is privately owned, as are many of the province's diagnostic clinics. Article content
CTV News
4 hours ago
- CTV News
Quebec senator introduces bill to protect Gatineau Park
A new bill has been introduced in the Senate to establish greater ecological protections of Gatineau Park. Independent Quebec Senator Rosa Galvez introduced Bill S-229, An Act to amend the National Capital Act (Gatineau Park) on Tuesday. It is currently at second reading in the Senate. The bill was drafted with input from Liberal MP for Pontiac-Kitigan Zibi Sophie Chatel. The bill was first introduced last fall but died on the order paper when the 2025 federal election was called. 'Only 7.6 per cent of the Outaouais region and less than 9 per cent of the Ottawa River watershed are currently protected,' Galvez said in a news release. 'The protection of Gatineau Park is essential for Canada to meet its goal of protecting 30 per cent of lands by 2030, as outlined in the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework.' Chatel called Gatineau Park 'one of the great natural treasures of the Outaouais' region. 'A place for hiking, running, skiing, biking, and swimming in every season. It is at the heart of our regional identity. This bill is about protecting that legacy. It is time to act, so that future generations can continue to enjoy this space and help protect the biodiversity it sustains,' she said. According to the text of the current bill, it aims to establish the boundaries of Gatineau Park, prioritize the ecological integrity of the park in its management by the National Capital Commission (NCC), prohibit the sale of public lands located within the park, with certain exceptions, and authorize the creation of regulations to oversee activities in the park and set corresponding fees. It also seeks to strengthen consultation and collaboration between the NCC, the Algonquin Anishinabeg Nation and neighbouring municipalities and promote the use of services from businesses and workers of the Algonquin Anishinabeg Nation for maintenance and conservation activities in Gatineau Park. 'It is essential to protect our green spaces for future generations,' said Chief Jean-Guy Whiteduck, of the Kitigan Zibi Anishinabeg Band Council. 'This bill not only aims to preserve the ecological integrity of the precious Gatineau Park; it also honours our connection to the land, which is located on the traditional and unceded territory of the Algonquin Anishinabeg Nation. I support MP Sophie Chatel and Senator Rosa Galvez in this initiative, which aligns with the core values of our community. This bill reflects our collective responsibility to safeguard this unique environment for ourselves and for future generations.' According to the NCC, Gatineau Park is the largest green space in the National Capital Region, covering 7.7 per cent of its total area. It receives more than 2.6 million visitors per year, making it the second-most visited park in Canada, behind Banff National Park in Alberta. The NCC says on its website that Gatineau Park used to have distinct periods of high visitor traffic and low visitor traffic, which gave wildlife and the natural ecosystem time to grow. But the park has been busier in all seasons in recent years, which has led to impacts on the soil, plants, and wildlife. 'Preserving Gatineau Park for future generations is a collective responsibility. You can support the Park's conservation mission by being a responsible user, and by getting involved,' the NCC says.
