French Ex-PM Fillon Given Suspended Sentence Over Wife's Fake Job
Former French prime minister Francois Fillon was on Tuesday given a four-year suspended prison sentence over a fake jobs scandal that wrecked his 2017 presidential bid.
Fillon, 71, had been found guilty in 2022 on appeal of embezzlement for providing a fake parliamentary assistant job to his wife, Penelope Fillon, that saw her being paid from public funds although the court found that she never did any work in the National Assembly.
The Paris appeals court also ordered him to pay a fine of 375,000 euros ($433,000) and barred him from seeking elected office for five years.
The sentence was milder than the one handed down in 2022, when he had been ordered to spend one year behind bars without any suspension.
But France's highest appeals court, the Court of Cassation, overruled that decision and ordered a new sentencing trial.
No change was made to the punishment for Penelope Fillon, who is British, and who was handed a two-year suspended sentence and ordered to pay the same fine as her husband.
The couple has always insisted that Penelope Fillon had done genuine constituency work.
Neither was present in court for the sentencing.
Fillon, a conservative, earlier this year called the ban on seeking public office a "moral wound".
The scandal, dubbed "PenelopeGate" by the French press, hurt Fillon's popularity and contributed to his first-round elimination in France's 2017 presidential election that was won by current President Emmanuel Macron.
"The treatment I received was somewhat unusual and nobody will convince me otherwise," Fillon said. "Perhaps there was a link with me being a candidate in the presidential election."
Fillon claimed that fake parliamentary jobs were common between 1981 and 2021, saying that "a large majority" of lawmakers had been in a "perfectly similar situation" to his during that time.
His wife's fake contract ran from 2012 to 2013.
"It is the appreciation of the court that there is no proof of any salaried work in the case," the court said in its ruling.
Fillon's lawyer, Antonin Levy, welcomed the decision to spare his client time in prison.
"Francois Fillon is a free man," he said.
In another recent high-profile case involving French politicians, former president Nicolas Sarkozy, also a conservative, was stripped of his Legion d'Honneur distinction following his conviction for graft.
Sarkozy, 70, had been wearing an electronic ankle tag until last month after France's highest appeals court upheld his conviction last December of trying to illegally secure favours from a judge.
Sarkozy is currently on trial in a separate case on charges of accepting illegal campaign financing in an alleged pact with late Libyan dictator Moamer Kadhafi.
Another case involves far-right leader Marine Le Pen, who was convicted in an embezzlement trial over fake European Parliament jobs, and is appealing the verdict.
As well as being given a partly suspended jail term and a fine, she was banned from taking part in elections for five years, which would -- if confirmed -- scupper her ambition of standing for the presidency in 2027. The court found no evidence that Penelope Fillon ever did the parliamentary work she was paid for AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Int'l Business Times
16 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
French Ex-PM Fillon Given Suspended Sentence Over Wife's Fake Job
Former French prime minister Francois Fillon was on Tuesday given a four-year suspended prison sentence over a fake jobs scandal that wrecked his 2017 presidential bid. Fillon, 71, had been found guilty in 2022 on appeal of embezzlement for providing a fake parliamentary assistant job to his wife, Penelope Fillon, that saw her being paid from public funds although the court found that she never did any work in the National Assembly. The Paris appeals court also ordered him to pay a fine of 375,000 euros ($433,000) and barred him from seeking elected office for five years. The sentence was milder than the one handed down in 2022, when he had been ordered to spend one year behind bars without any suspension. But France's highest appeals court, the Court of Cassation, overruled that decision and ordered a new sentencing trial. No change was made to the punishment for Penelope Fillon, who is British, and who was handed a two-year suspended sentence and ordered to pay the same fine as her husband. The couple has always insisted that Penelope Fillon had done genuine constituency work. Neither was present in court for the sentencing. Fillon, a conservative, earlier this year called the ban on seeking public office a "moral wound". The scandal, dubbed "PenelopeGate" by the French press, hurt Fillon's popularity and contributed to his first-round elimination in France's 2017 presidential election that was won by current President Emmanuel Macron. "The treatment I received was somewhat unusual and nobody will convince me otherwise," Fillon said. "Perhaps there was a link with me being a candidate in the presidential election." Fillon claimed that fake parliamentary jobs were common between 1981 and 2021, saying that "a large majority" of lawmakers had been in a "perfectly similar situation" to his during that time. His wife's fake contract ran from 2012 to 2013. "It is the appreciation of the court that there is no proof of any salaried work in the case," the court said in its ruling. Fillon's lawyer, Antonin Levy, welcomed the decision to spare his client time in prison. "Francois Fillon is a free man," he said. In another recent high-profile case involving French politicians, former president Nicolas Sarkozy, also a conservative, was stripped of his Legion d'Honneur distinction following his conviction for graft. Sarkozy, 70, had been wearing an electronic ankle tag until last month after France's highest appeals court upheld his conviction last December of trying to illegally secure favours from a judge. Sarkozy is currently on trial in a separate case on charges of accepting illegal campaign financing in an alleged pact with late Libyan dictator Moamer Kadhafi. Another case involves far-right leader Marine Le Pen, who was convicted in an embezzlement trial over fake European Parliament jobs, and is appealing the verdict. As well as being given a partly suspended jail term and a fine, she was banned from taking part in elections for five years, which would -- if confirmed -- scupper her ambition of standing for the presidency in 2027. The court found no evidence that Penelope Fillon ever did the parliamentary work she was paid for AFP
Local Germany
17 hours ago
- Local Germany
'Scarier things to come': How foreigners view Germany's immigration crackdown
One of the major election campaign promises made by Chancellor Friedrich Merz's conservative Christian Union (CDU/CSU) parties was a "migration turnaround" in Germany. We asked our readers if the recent developments are a source of concern to them, and whether they have worries about their future rights as foreigners in the country. Respondents from across Germany revealed a range of reactions – from deep concern to a degree of sympathy for the current government's predicament. Concerns around political rhetoric and the social climate it enables Many respondents drew a sharp distinction between the actions of the government and the harsh tone heard when politicians talk about foreigners in Germany. While the government's hardening stance on migration garnered a wide variety of responses, the tone with which leaders address immigration issues elicited a much more consistent negative response. 'I'm not worried about [the government's hardening stance towards immigration] per se, but rather about the narrative,' wrote Ahmed Maher, who lives in Berlin. 'Ugly statements like 'we imported antisemitism…' are a sign of scarier things to come!' Saleem S. agrees: 'What concerns me more is the rhetoric in the streets against all immigrants, good and bad. If people in the street continue rejecting all immigrants, the government will eventually follow – most probably by empowering far right parties and policies.' READ ALSO: Why a quarter of Germany's immigrants are thinking of leaving Advertisement Some respondents expressed concerns about being scapegoated or treated as 'less German' as a result of the rhetoric. 'I'm worried that Germans view highly skill migrants as 'people we bring in to pay high taxes' and want to kick out the poor/artists/etc. who don't boast such flashy and high paid skills but nonetheless have a positive impact on society,' said Elliott Rarden in Berlin. Elliot, who is a dual national, added: 'I worry that Germany views me as 'less German' and will strip my citizenship away.' READ ALSO: Germany's government could make it easier to strip citizenship from dual nationals For some, the prospect of a tougher stance on immigration is tied to fears of increased discrimination. "Discrimination Stop" is written on the sign of a participant in a Women's Day demonstration. Photo: picture alliance/dpa | Hannes P Albert Youva Aoun, who lives in Darmstadt, wrote, 'Even if as a French citizen I'm not directly affected, I have an immigration background from northern Africa. I fear that I will end up being targeted by controls and institutional racism even more than is already the case.' Support for the 'migration turnaround' While respondents were broadly unanimous in their condemnation of the rhetoric which has sprung up around the question of immigration in Germany, opinions were more evenly split on the government's efforts to reduce migration to the country. Advertisement Many respondents welcomed the government's tougher approach, seeing it either as a political necessity, or as an important measure for stability and fairness in Germany. 'The government has to answer constituents' concerns,' said a respondent from Mainz, adding that he suspected the actual policies would be less dramatic than the rhetoric. 'These are the right moves by the government,' said Manoj, from Frankfurt am Main. 'Germany should not be treated as a place to use free social security...' Javier Torres agreed: 'As a brown Latino immigrant who has followed the immigration process and adapted to German culture, I welcome the new policies. German citizenship shouldn't be cheapened!' Others echoed this sentiment. 'Those of us who have played by the rules and integrated have nothing to worry about,' said Eric in Oberfranken. Space for a nuanced debate? Even when there was support for the new government's policies, however, it was tempered by concerns that their presentation left little room for a nuanced view of the pros and cons of immigration. Shankar Kumar in Berlin sees the current moves as 'acceptable and healthy for everyone,' but warns they must be properly thought through. 'If they're just based on targeting a group,' he points out, 'they will be chaotic and meaningless.' Some respondents went further, expressing anger that the important contribution made by immigrants is being overlooked and undervalued. 'I am worried I will be treated a second-class citizen even with a German passport. I don't hear anything from politicians about how they are going to retain me as someone who pays a lot of taxes," wrote Vitya in Berlin. READ ALSO: How German ministers want to boost skilled migration and integration 'Foreigners will work when and where most citizens will not,' agreed William Trimmer, based in Großburgwedel, adding that 'work is the key to integration.' Government hypocrisy, or stupidity? A number of respondents felt that immigrants in the country were being unfairly scapegoated, partly to cover up the failures of integration policies in the country. 'It's not a great idea to be harsher on immigration when the state has utterly failed integration processes,' wrote Vitya. 'As a highly skilled worker, I couldn't even understand how to apply for the integration courses. "It is ridiculous for politicians to gaslight the population like this without looking at their own processes first.' Advertisement Youva Aoun agrees, calling policies that target immigrants "populism" and "stupid". He added that "'illegal' migrants are actually the backbone of German society," noting that they fill important roles as nurses, construction workers, cashiers, and farm labourers. The Estrel Tower in Neukölln celebrates its topping-out ceremony. About two-thirds of construction workers in Germany come from an immigration background. Photo: picture alliance/dpa | Jens Kalaene The fear of worse to come Some respondents, including Myles in Berlin, are worried that they could be directly affected by current government plans. 'I am concerned about some of the hostility toward the 5-year citizenship path," he wrote. "That's a big reason I came to Germany, and I would feel like it was an outrageous bait and switch if they revoke it.' READ ALSO: 'Slap in the face' - Applicants blast Germany's plan to scrap citizenship reform Others, including people who disagree completely on whether or not the government is acting wisely, share fears there may be worse to come for foreigners in Germany. Advertisement In response to the question, 'Are you worried about your future rights in Germany as a foreigner?' Maksym in Berlin said he was more worried about German people voting for the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD). 'As a German citizen with a migration background, I'm worried about being classified as a second-class citizen if the 2029 elections go south!' wrote Ahmed. 'I feel like what's being done right now is not being communicated seems populist," wrote Andrija in Berlin, summing up the overarching mood of the survey respondents. "That might make us less safe indirectly – via the behaviour of ordinary citizens,' she added. Thank you to everyone who completed our survey. Although we weren't able to use all the responses, we read them all and they helped inform our article. Please feel free to leave a comment below if you would like to add another opinion to the conversation.
Int'l Business Times
a day ago
- Int'l Business Times
AFP Photographer Shot In Face With Rubber Bullet At LA Protest
An Agence France-Presse photographer was recovering Monday after he was shot in the face with a rubber bullet by law enforcement during their standoff with protesters in downtown Los Angeles. The photographer was covering demonstrations on Saturday -- part of the many rallies across the country against US President Donald Trump. He was struck twice by rubber bullets fired by authorities when they abruptly moved in to disperse protesters, and had to be treated in hospital for his injuries. "I was covering the protest ... approximately 90 feet away from the police when I received the impact of a rubber bullet in my face and another one in my right arm," he recalled. The photographer, who asked to remain anonymous, said he was clearly identified as a journalist. "I was working with two cameras, a helmet with AFP stickers on it and also, I had a big patch on my chest that said 'Press,'" he added. Los Angeles Police Department did not acknowledge firing at the photographer but said it had sought to clear protesters after declaring an unlawful assembly. "Following the dispersal order, less-lethal munitions were used to clear the area of those who refused to comply and leave the area," it told AFP in a statement. Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, which also policed the protest, said it was reviewing footage of the incident but added it was "not clear whether our personnel were involved." "The LASD does not condone any actions that intentionally target members of the press," it said. Saturday's rally was the largest of the protests that began in Los Angeles on June 6 and have continued daily ever since. They first erupted in anger at raids by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), which has been ordered by the Trump administration to target undocumented migrants across the sprawling, heavily Latino city. The demonstrations have been mostly peaceful and confined to a small section of downtown Los Angeles. But at times they have spiraled into violence that Trump has pounced on to send 4,000 National Guard and 700 Marines into the city -- a move loudly protested by local officials. Other journalists have also been injured during the protests. The Guardian newspaper reported that a British photographer had to undergo emergency surgery after he was shot in the leg by a non-lethal round on June 7. Meanwhile, an Australian reporter was hit in the leg by a rubber bullet while she was reporting on live television on June 8, an incident slammed by the country's prime minister as "horrific." And the New York Post said its photographer was shot in the head with a rubber bullet, also during the June 8 clashes.
