logo
Australia's road toll hits 12-year high as pedestrian and cyclist fatalities rise

Australia's road toll hits 12-year high as pedestrian and cyclist fatalities rise

The Guardian27-01-2025

Australia's roads are getting deadlier, as a four-year period of surging fatalities marks a trend of increasing danger not recorded since the 1960s, before seatbelts were compulsory.
Annual road fatality data collated by the federal government's Bureau of Infrastructure and Transport Research Economics (BITRE) shows that 1,300 people died on Australian roads in 2024, up from 1,258 in 2023.
A sharp spike in fatalities towards the end of the year, with 359 people dying in the three months to the end of December, confirmed 2024 as the deadliest year for Australian roads since 2012, when the figure was also 1,300.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
Last year's road toll was 18.5% higher than 2021, when a 10-year plan to halve road deaths was introduced.
The Australian Automobile Association (AAA) has called on the Albanese government to force states to produce data about the safety scores of an individual road if they want federal funding to improve it.
The annual data also revealed that while driver and passenger deaths slightly decreased in 2024 compared to the previous year, roads became far more deadly for other users.
Pedestrian deaths rose from 156 in 2023 to 167 in 2024, a 7.1% increase, while cyclist deaths jumped from 34 in 2023 to 38 in 2024, an 11.8% increase.
Motorcyclist deaths increased from 252 in 2023 to 278 in 2024 – an increase of 10.3% – making last year the deadliest calendar year for motorbike deaths since 1989.
Deaths in Queensland grew from 277 in 2023 to 302 in 2024, while Western Australia's toll increased from 158 to 185. There were jumps in deaths in the Northern Territory, from 31 in 2023 to 58 in 2024, while the Australian Capital Territory's total rose from four to 11 in 2024.
While there has been a consistent increase nationally, some states and territories posted improvements in death tolls in 2024 compared with 2023, with Victoria recording a drop from 296 to 281, while Tasmania's total dropped from 35 to 32 and South Australia's dropped from 117 to 91. Deaths in New South Wales were 340, the same figure as in 2023.
The trajectory means no state or territory is on track to achieve the objectives of Australia's National Road Safety Strategy 2021-2030, to halve road deaths, the AAA said.
However, the AAA noted that progress on other objectives of the strategy, related to serious injuries on roads, were impossible to measure, because states and territories had not been forthcoming with data.
While the four consecutive years of increases have been in terms of total deaths, as opposed to per capita to take into account population growth, the AAA is still alarmed given the national strategy objective was to halve total deaths.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
Road safety academics have considered a range of possible factors behind the increasing road toll, including deteriorating road quality and speed limits which are too high for smaller and rural roads, as well as impatience and poor driving habits which developed on emptier streets during lockdowns.
Academics have also flagged the significant rise in SUV ownership over the past decade and their potential to lead to a sense of security which can make drivers less concerned about other road users' safety, as well as the larger vehicles being more dangerous in collisions.
With the industry still unclear about how to reverse the trend of increasing road deaths, the AAA spent much of last year campaigning the federal government for better information about fatalities and serious injuries. In November, states and territories agreed to begin providing more data, including about the causes of crashes and the effectiveness of traffic police enforcement.
Part of the data that states hold concerns the condition of individual roads, assessed using a standardised five-star scoring system known as AusRAP which uses engineering and other analysis to identify which roads need the most significant safety upgrades.
The AAA said it wanted federal funding for any road to be contingent on states and territories providing its AusRAP score, with the peak motoring body believing this requirement would be a way to ensure road funding is not misused for pork barrelling.
'The AAA believes this transparency will save lives, while also showing Australians whether politicians are spending their taxes to save lives rather than winning votes in marginal electorates,' it said in a statement.
Michael Bradley, the managing director of the AAA, said 'this critical data must be embedded into the road funding allocation process so investment can be prioritised to our most dangerous roads'.
'Australia's rising road toll underscores the importance of using road condition data to direct road funding, and to prevent the politicisation of scarce public funds,' he said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Red Bull plan if Max Verstappen gets F1 ban as Daniel Ricciardo theory emerges
Red Bull plan if Max Verstappen gets F1 ban as Daniel Ricciardo theory emerges

Daily Mirror

time3 days ago

  • Daily Mirror

Red Bull plan if Max Verstappen gets F1 ban as Daniel Ricciardo theory emerges

Max Verstappen is one penalty point away from a Formula 1 race ban and Red Bull will have to have a plan in place in the event the Dutchman has another run-in with the stewards Red Bull have a plan in place in the event they need to find a one-off replacement for Max Verstappen. The Dutchman is one penalty point away from a Formula 1 race ban after colliding with George Russell in Barcelona last Sunday and must now be on his best behaviour. Two of the 11 penalty points on his licence will expire at the end of this month. But, until then, he will be walking a tightrope at the Canadian and Austrian Grands Prix – a single penalty point gained at either of those races would trigger an automatic one-race ban under FIA rules. ‌ But in the event that does happen, Red Bull will not be turning to former drivers such as Daniel Ricciardo or Sergio Perez. Despite hopeful reports in the Australian media suggesting Ricciardo could be on for a one-off F1 return to help out his former employer, Mirror Sport can confirm that will not happen. ‌ It is understood that Red Bull believe it is unlikely that they will have to choose a temporary replacement for Verstappen. But, if they must, then it will be a current Red Bull driver who gets the nod to step up. They don't have a named reserve driver but it is understood that either Liam Lawson, who was Verstappen's team-mate for two races earlier this season before he was replaced by Yuki Tsunoda, or Isack Hadjar would be selected to step up from sister team Racing Bulls to take the Dutchman's place if required. Red Bull would then turn to one of their academy drivers to fill in at Racing Bulls. That would be either Ayumu Iwasa, the official reserve for the junior squad, or the impressive British teenager Arvid Lindblad. READ MORE: Red Bull won't rule out Yuki Tsunoda losing seat to F1 star who 'exceeded all expectation' READ MORE: Max Verstappen's Red Bull contract release, Helmut Marko clause, Ralf Schumacher theory However, the latter is not currently eligible to take part in an F1 race weekend. Because he is still only 17, Lindblad would need special dispensation from the FIA to receive his superlicence early. It is understood that Red Bull has made that request to the governing body in order to broaden their options. ‌ As for the Red Bull seat itself, Lawson is the more experienced of the two options to fill in for Verstappen, but buckled under the pressure of racing for the top team earlier this year. Team-mate Hadjar, meanwhile, has been very impressive since making the step up from Formula 2. The Frenchman has scored 21 points so far in his rookie season and Red Bull team principal Christian Horner showered Hadjar with praise when he said of Hadjar: "I think he's been the most outstanding of the rookies. "The expectation on him wasn't as high as he's delivered so far. He's exceeded all our expectations, he's been fast, he's been consistent. He's constantly delivered, and I think it's been a great start to his Formula 1 career. He just needs to keep that momentum running. His future, if he keeps performing as he is, is very bright."

Safety vs. Savings: Why Experts Can't Agree on ADAS Impact on Car Insurance Premiums
Safety vs. Savings: Why Experts Can't Agree on ADAS Impact on Car Insurance Premiums

Auto Blog

time3 days ago

  • Auto Blog

Safety vs. Savings: Why Experts Can't Agree on ADAS Impact on Car Insurance Premiums

ADAS safety comes with a costly catch Advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) like automatic emergency braking have been making roads safer for years, but their presence can be viewed as a double-edged sword given their negative impact on auto insurance claims. On the upside, in 2022, AAA reported how Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) data from 2010-2015 found that vehicles equipped with automatic emergency braking exhibited a 50% decrease in police-reported rear-end crashes relative to equivalent cars without the system. Another study found that automatic emergency braking systems reduced the U.K.'s number of claims by 25% over five years, but it discovered that claim costs increased by a whopping 60%, according to Carscoops. Previous Pause Next Unmute 0:00 / 0:09 Walmart is selling a 'heavy duty' $89 step ladder for $48, and shoppers say it's 'sturdy and secure' Walmart is selling a 'heavy duty' $89 step ladder for $48, and shoppers say it's 'sturdy and secure' Watch More On the downside, expenses for fixing ADAS require pricey components like cameras, LiDAR, and radar, and the proper equipment necessary for their calibration. Equipment for calibrating these parts can cost up to $1 million, making it difficult for the average corner garage to invest. To make matters more complicated, automakers are committed to making features like automatic emergency braking an essential part of all new cars by 2029, as outlined in the Federal Register. Volvo EX90 LiDAR — Source: Getty More expensive repairs don't always equal higher insurance premiums, some experts say Additional examples of ADAS include, but aren't limited to, lane departure warning or prevention, parking sensors, and blind-spot monitoring. Essentially, anything adding to an insurer's losses can raise your premium. ADAS components are often located outside a vehicle, increasing the chances of damage during an accident. A 2023 report by AAA discovered that ADAS repairs represented a 36% average of the total cost of repairs in four common collision scenarios. Additionally, ADAS accounted for 40.9% of total repair costs in rear collision repairs. However, Tony Cotto, Director of Auto and Underwriting policy at the National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies (NAMIC), said: 'We're seeing AEB, especially, really bring down rear-end crashes, and some of those are the lower-dollar-value claims,' according to Bankrate. Car radar and cameras — Source: Getty In other words, reducing the frequency of small claims, even if remaining claims are higher, reduces overall losses for insurers, potentially reducing premiums. Jessica Cicchino, IIHS senior vice president for research, echoed this sentiment: 'Across the board, insurers are paying out less money on claims for vehicles with [AEB] systems because the reduction in crashes is outweighing the increase in the cost.' However, this doesn't rule out the possibility of drivers with ADAS facing higher repair costs if they get into accidents, especially with how precise the repairs are. Automotive News reports that: 'Sensor[s] misaligned by a single degree—about the depth of a business card—can throw it [radar sensors] off target by 66 inches at a distance of 100 yards.' Autoblog Newsletter Autoblog brings you car news; expert reviews and exciting pictures and video. Research and compare vehicles, too. Sign up or sign in with Google Facebook Microsoft Apple By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. Final thoughts While the belief that ADAS is increasing insurance premiums through higher claims isn't universally held among experts, some drivers repairing these systems won't be able to avoid a higher bill, and this won't change until the tech gets more affordable. A Wall Street Journal article from November cited vehicle maintenance and repair costs as increasing 28% over the past three years, and during Q2 2024, the average repair cost for an insurance claim was $4,721—up about $800 from over three years ago. About the Author Cody Carlson View Profile

Why Aren't Americans Buying EVs? AAA Survey Uncovers Key Hesitations
Why Aren't Americans Buying EVs? AAA Survey Uncovers Key Hesitations

Auto Blog

time3 days ago

  • Auto Blog

Why Aren't Americans Buying EVs? AAA Survey Uncovers Key Hesitations

Supply does not always equal demand These days, it seems like every automaker and its rivals have some sort of electric car out on the market. Years ago, Elon Musk and Tesla were one of only a handful of manufacturers on the block producing electric vehicles, but today's EVs come from a smattering of brands that include familiar mainstream names like Ford, Chevrolet, and even Hyundai and Kia. However, while there are more choices in the American EV market than ever before, a new customer survey conducted by the American Automobile Association reveals that Americans may not be as interested in electric cars as they think. In an aerial view, electric cars sit parked at a charging station on May 19, 2025 in Corte Madera, California. Less than 20% of U.S. adults are 'likely' to get an EV as their next car, says AAA. According to a new survey of U.S. adults conducted by AAA, American interest in EVs is at its lowest since 2019. The study, conducted in March of this year, surveyed 1,128 American adults to measure the likelihood of purchasing an EV and the factors influencing their decisions. The Automobile Club found that only 16% of U.S. adults indicated they are 'very likely' or 'likely' to purchase an electric vehicle (EV) as their next car, marking the lowest percentage recorded in six years. Meanwhile, the proportion of adults who told AAA that they are 'unlikely' or 'very unlikely' to buy an EV for their next vehicle has increased from 51% to 63% over the past four years. The percentage of those who said they are 'neither likely nor unlikely' to purchase an EV has remained steady at 21%. 'Since we began tracking interest in fully electric vehicles, we've seen some variability,' AAA automotive engineering director Greg Brannon said in a statement. 'While the automotive industry is committed to long-term electrification and providing a diverse range of models, underlying consumer hesitation remains.' What are the reasons behind the public's lack of interest? According to AAA, the most common reasons people are not considering an EV purchase are a few specific issues that linger from the past. About 62% of drivers expressed concern about potentially high battery repair costs, while 59% of buyers were deterred by the higher upfront purchase price compared to equivalent gas-powered models. Many respondents also expressed concerns about specific activities and how EVs handle them. About 57% of Americans feel that EVs can't handle the rigors of long trips, while 56% of EV skeptics were also concerned about the lack of convenient public EV charging facilities. Furthermore, 55% of skeptics stated that they avoid EVs due to fear of being stranded with a dead battery on the side of the road, while 27% reported issues with installing a charging station at their homes. A Rivian R1T electric vehicle (EV) pickup truck, left, and R1S electric sports utility vehicle (SUV) at the company's showroom in New York, US, on Tuesday, Jan. 2, 2024. — Source: Tesla In addition, the onset of the new Presidential administration has made the future of electric vehicle incentives unclear, which has led to fewer people showing interest in buying EVs to benefit from rebates and tax credits. Despite this, 77% of respondents said that they're motivated to get an EV to save money on gas, while 59% of people said they care about the environment. However, the study showed a shift in perspectives regarding the electric vehicle (EV) market. Just 23% of respondents surveyed by AAA believe EVs will surpass gasoline cars within the next decade, which peaked at 40% in 2022. Final thoughts Right now, price anxiety and political discussions are heavily influencing how people view electric vehicles. Regardless of where you stand politically, trying to let the market alone decide the future of EV adoption when many feel everything is already too expensive will likely lead to the public rejecting the pricier option. At this point, more affordable EV options and a stronger charging network need to be built out in order for full electrification to happen, but that's a tall order. About the Author James Ochoa View Profile

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store