
Drugs developed decades ago reduced Canadian mortality rates 49 percent - saving 847,000 life-years by 2022, and reduced hospital utilization by 55 percent - avoiding potential healthcare costs of $78.7 billion in 2022 alone
TORONTO, Aug. 11, 2025 /CNW/ - New research from the world's leading pharmaceutical economist affirms that Canadians continue to receive significant windfall gains from global pharmaceutical innovation that occurred decades ago.
Columbia University Professor and affiliate of the U.S. National Bureau of Economic Research, Frank R Lichtenberg, PhD, examined whether the new drugs that were approved by government regulators in earlier years had any impact on Canadian mortality rates or use of hospital services in later years.
Using publicly available data spanning from 1970 to 2022, Lichtenberg estimated that if those innovative medicines had not been available in Canada, the number of life-years lost before age 75 would have been 49 percent higher by 2022. Pharmaceutical innovation that occurred in the earlier years saved 847 thousand Canadian life-years.
In a separate analysis of hospital utilization, he estimated that without access to the new drugs that were released during 1970-1991, the total number of hospital days used by Canadians would have been 55 percent higher in 2022. Total national spending on hospitals in 2022 was CA$143 billion – almost all of it paid by governments, so lower utilization avoided significant costs for taxpayers.
Lichtenberg explained the cost implications, "Pharmaceutical innovation occurring in earlier years saved 14.2 million hospital days that otherwise would have been used. The estimated reduction in 2022 hospital expenditure attributable to drug innovation during 1970-1991 was CA$78.7 billion – twice as large as 2022 national expenditure on all prescribed medicines and related supply chain costs totaling CA$37.4 billion."
The data also revealed that new classes of drugs had a more immediate effect on mortality than new drugs, but the former effect was smaller and less statistically significant than the latter effect. For example, new classes of drugs authorized during 1990-2011 were estimated to have reduced the growth in the number of years of life lost before age 65 – 29 percent by 2022, while the corresponding estimate for new drugs authorized during 1978-1999 was 39 percent.
The study further found that the age-adjusted mortality rate from a disease in a province and year was statistically significantly inversely related to the number of drugs used to treat the disease that were covered on public drug program formularies in that province 4-12 years earlier.
The study was funded by Innovative Medicines Canada, the national industry association of research based pharmaceutical companies. It was published in Canadian Health Policy, the free access journal of the Canadian Health Policy Institute (CHPI) a non-governmental think tank.
Brett J Skinner, founder and CEO of the Institute and Editor of the journal said, "Lichtenberg's study is empirical evidence of a virtuous legacy from past investments in the research and development of new medicines."
The study is available at www.canadianhealthpolicy.com – Lichtenberg, F. R. (2025). The impact of pharmaceutical innovation on mortality and hospital utilization in Canada, 2000–2022. Canadian Health Policy, AUG 2025.
Media Contact: Frank R Lichtenberg, PhD, Columbia University, National Bureau of Economic Research, and CESifo. [email protected]. Columbia University, Kravis Hall 522, 665 West 130th Street, New York, NY 10027.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Vancouver Sun
3 hours ago
- Vancouver Sun
Canadians overwhelmingly in favour of mandatory national service, poll finds
Canadians are overwhelmingly in favour of mandatory national service for young adults but are less united about what form that service should take, a new survey has found. The survey, produced by the non-profit Angus Reid Institute , asked a group of Canadians if they supported the idea of mandatory national service – that is, one year of time donated for those younger than 30 years of age – across a number of fields. Many nations including Germany, France and Norway have instituted this practice in recent years. Respondents were overwhelmingly in favour of Canada adopting the practice across a range of disciplines. For instance, 74 per cent favoured a year of public health support service, with only 18 per cent against and 8 per cent undecided. When asked about other options for service, the numbers remained high. For environmental support service, 73 per cent were in favour. Youth service garnered 72 per cent support, and civil protection had 70 per cent in favour. The numbers dropped, however, when respondents were asked about compulsory military service. In this category, only 43 per cent were in favour, while 44 per cent opposed the idea, and 12 per cent weren't sure. The breakdown between the sexes was even more stark on the question on military service. When the pollsters calculated the percentage in favour minus the percentage opposed, they found that males generated positive numbers, meaning there were more respondents for the idea than against it. (Although notably the 18-to-29 cohort who would be most affected by such a measure still created a negative number, meaning more were against the idea than for it.) Across the female respondents, however, the same calculation resulted in a negative number for every age group, except for a slight positive in the 60-and-older respondents. When asked: 'If Canada were to introduce one form of mandatory national service for young adults, which would you prefer?' respondents overwhelmingly chose civilian (i.e., non-military) service, with 59 per cent picking that option versus 19 per cent who chose military, and 13 per cent who said neither. Asked about the potential benefits of mandatory non-military service, most respondents said the personal development of young adults would be improved by the practice, with 40 per cent saying it would be greatly improved, and another 42 per cent saying it would be somewhat improved, for a total of 82 per cent. Quality of public service was also seen as a potential benefit, with 71 per cent saying it would be improved or greatly improved. And social cohesion in Canada was viewed as a beneficiary by 69 per cent. Asked about the potential benefits of military service, were it to happen, more than half (64 per cent) still thought it would help personal development of young adults, while 51 per cent said it would improve the quality of public service, and 52 per cent said it would help social cohesion. Between 21 and 26 per cent felt these areas would be worsened by compulsory military service, however. The survey was conducted online among a sample of 1,619 Canadians who are members of the Angus Reid Forum. The results are considered to have a margin of error of plus or minus 2 per cent, 19 times out of 20. Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here .


Edmonton Journal
3 hours ago
- Edmonton Journal
Canadians overwhelmingly in favour of mandatory national service, poll finds
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Support drops off when respondents were asked about military service, with roughly equal numbers for and against the idea Data from Angus Reid shows the percentage of respondents in favour of each form of service. Photo by Angus Reid Institute Canadians are overwhelmingly in favour of mandatory national service for young adults but are less united about what form that service should take, a new survey has found. The survey, produced by the non-profit Angus Reid Institute, asked a group of Canadians if they supported the idea of mandatory national service – that is, one year of time donated for those younger than 30 years of age – across a number of fields. Many nations including Germany, France and Norway have instituted this practice in recent years. Respondents were overwhelmingly in favour of Canada adopting the practice across a range of disciplines. For instance, 74 per cent favoured a year of public health support service, with only 18 per cent against and 8 per cent undecided. When asked about other options for service, the numbers remained high. For environmental support service, 73 per cent were in favour. Youth service garnered 72 per cent support, and civil protection had 70 per cent in favour. The numbers dropped, however, when respondents were asked about compulsory military service. In this category, only 43 per cent were in favour, while 44 per cent opposed the idea, and 12 per cent weren't sure. The breakdown between the sexes was even more stark on the question on military service. When the pollsters calculated support minus opposition (the percentage in favour minus the percentage opposed), they found that males generated positive numbers, meaning there were more respondents for the idea than against it. (Although notably the 18-to-29 cohort who would be most affected by such a measure still created a negative number, meaning more were against the idea than for it. Across the female respondents, however, support minus opposition was a negative number for every age group, except for a slight positive in the 60-and-older respondents. When asked: 'If Canada were to introduce one form of mandatory national service for young adults, which would you prefer?' respondents overwhelmingly chose civilian (i.e., non-military) service, with 59 per cent picking that option versus 19 per cent who chose military, and 13 per cent who said neither. Asked about the potential benefits of mandatory non-military service, most respondents said the personal development of young adults would be improved by the practice, with 40 per cent saying it would be greatly improved, and another 42 per cent saying it would be somewhat improved, for a total of 82 per cent. Quality of public service was also seen as a potential benefit, with 71 per cent saying it would be improved or greatly improved. And social cohesion in Canada was viewed as a beneficiary by 69 per cent. Asked about the potential benefits of military service, were it to happen, more than half (64 per cent) still thought it would help personal development of young adults, while 51 per cent said it would improve the quality of public service, and 52 per cent said it would help social cohesion. Between 21 and 26 per cent felt these areas would be worsened by compulsory military service, however. The survey was conducted online among a sample of 1,619 Canadians who are members of the Angus Reid Forum. The results are considered to have a margin of error of plus or minus 2 per cent, 19 times out of 20. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Exclusive articles by David Staples, Keith Gerein and others, Oilers news from Cult of Hockey, Ask EJ Anything features, the Noon News Roundup and Under the Dome newsletters. Unlimited online access to Edmonton Journal and 15 news sites with one account. Edmonton Journal ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on. Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword. Support local journalism. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Exclusive articles by David Staples, Keith Gerein and others, Oilers news from Cult of Hockey, Ask EJ Anything features, the Noon News Roundup and Under the Dome newsletters. Unlimited online access to Edmonton Journal and 15 news sites with one account. Edmonton Journal ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on. Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword. Support local journalism. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here. This advertisement has not loaded yet.


National Post
3 hours ago
- National Post
Canadians overwhelmingly in favour of mandatory national service, poll finds
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Support drops off when respondents were asked about military service, with roughly equal numbers for and against the idea Data from Angus Reid shows the percentage of respondents in favour of each form of service. Photo by Angus Reid Institute Canadians are overwhelmingly in favour of mandatory national service for young adults but are less united about what form that service should take, a new survey has found. The survey, produced by the non-profit Angus Reid Institute, asked a group of Canadians if they supported the idea of mandatory national service – that is, one year of time donated for those younger than 30 years of age – across a number of fields. Many nations including Germany, France and Norway have instituted this practice in recent years. Respondents were overwhelmingly in favour of Canada adopting the practice across a range of disciplines. For instance, 74 per cent favoured a year of public health support service, with only 18 per cent against and 8 per cent undecided. When asked about other options for service, the numbers remained high. For environmental support service, 73 per cent were in favour. Youth service garnered 72 per cent support, and civil protection had 70 per cent in favour. The numbers dropped, however, when respondents were asked about compulsory military service. In this category, only 43 per cent were in favour, while 44 per cent opposed the idea, and 12 per cent weren't sure. The breakdown between the sexes was even more stark on the question on military service. When the pollsters calculated support minus opposition (the percentage in favour minus the percentage opposed), they found that males generated positive numbers, meaning there were more respondents for the idea than against it. (Although notably the 18-to-29 cohort who would be most affected by such a measure still created a negative number, meaning more were against the idea than for it. Across the female respondents, however, support minus opposition was a negative number for every age group, except for a slight positive in the 60-and-older respondents. When asked: 'If Canada were to introduce one form of mandatory national service for young adults, which would you prefer?' respondents overwhelmingly chose civilian (i.e., non-military) service, with 59 per cent picking that option versus 19 per cent who chose military, and 13 per cent who said neither. Asked about the potential benefits of mandatory non-military service, most respondents said the personal development of young adults would be improved by the practice, with 40 per cent saying it would be greatly improved, and another 42 per cent saying it would be somewhat improved, for a total of 82 per cent. Quality of public service was also seen as a potential benefit, with 71 per cent saying it would be improved or greatly improved. And social cohesion in Canada was viewed as a beneficiary by 69 per cent. Asked about the potential benefits of military service, were it to happen, more than half (64 per cent) still thought it would help personal development of young adults, while 51 per cent said it would improve the quality of public service, and 52 per cent said it would help social cohesion. Between 21 and 26 per cent felt these areas would be worsened by compulsory military service, however. The survey was conducted online among a sample of 1,619 Canadians who are members of the Angus Reid Forum. The results are considered to have a margin of error of plus or minus 2 per cent, 19 times out of 20. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS Enjoy the latest local, national and international news. Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events. Unlimited online access to National Post. National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. Support local journalism. SUBSCRIBE FOR MORE ARTICLES Enjoy the latest local, national and international news. Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events. Unlimited online access to National Post. National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. Support local journalism. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here. This advertisement has not loaded yet.