DEI law cosponsor calls Ohio State's Juneteenth guidelines an ‘intentional overreaction'
COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — Just days before Pride Month, Ohio State University disabled its LGBTQ+ webpages and issued limiting guidelines for how university groups can celebrate 'cultural and awareness recognitions and events' like Pride and Juneteenth.
University spokesperson Ben Johnson said the changes fell under compliance efforts for Senate Bill 1, which opponents say is a sweeping anti-diversity, equity and inclusion bill that goes into effect for Ohio universities on June 27. The bill's cosponsor, Rep. Gary Click (R-Vickery), said Ohio State is wildly misinterpreting the bill in its cultural event guidelines, which only allow recognition of events without advocacy or voicing opinions.
Ohio Senators work to ensure groups like LifeWise can send items back with students
'As is typical, this is an intentional overreaction and misrepresentation designed to misinform the public on what the legislation actually says and does,' Click told NBC4.
Senate Bill 1 prohibits public universities from endorsing or taking a position on any 'controversial belief or policy,' which includes any politically controversial topic, including climate change, foreign policy, elections, immigration, abortion, marriage and DEI. Senate Bill 1 does not define DEI or what it encompasses.
'We are in the process of implementing the law, and there is an ongoing review of DEI programming,' Johnson said.
Ohio State said university organizations are allowed to acknowledge 'cultural and awareness celebrations and events,' but they cannot do anything further. OSU said anything beyond recognizing an event, including taking a position, engaging in advocacy or further expanding on the celebration, is not permitted in university spaces. This includes speaking in a university capacity and using school email or social media.
Events celebrating Pride or other celebrations also cannot be 'for' or 'primarily benefit' any underrepresented group. The university used Women's History Month, Black History Month, Pride Month and Juneteenth as examples.
Ohio State announces every student will use AI in class
Juneteenth stands out among the list because it is a state and federal holiday, and the university will close on June 19 in honor of the occasion. Juneteenth recognizes when the last enslaved Americans learned about the Emancipation Proclamation.
Although Senate Bill 1 said universities cannot endorse controversial topics, it does clarify that the law does not apply to state and federal holidays. Click alleged Ohio State was purposefully misunderstanding the law by issuing those guidelines for Juneteenth and Black History Month.
As the bill originated in the state Senate, NBC4 also reached out to Senate Republicans but did not immediately receive a response. Ohio State also did not respond to Click's allegation by publication.
Ohio State referred to its guidelines as a 'pause' on further commentary as the university examines the extent of Senate Bill 1's limits on controversial topics.
'It's too soon to say what exact programs and services will be available in the fall,' Johnson said.
Ohio State athletics department launches new NIL group after NCAA House ruling
The university is complying with Senate Bill 1, but the law does not go into effect until June 27. NBC4 asked why these changes were implemented ahead of the law going into effect, and the university responded that it is part of Senate Bill 1 implementation.
Despite the new guidelines, the College of Social Work is marching in this weekend's Columbus Pride parade. Ohio State still includes Columbus Pride in its suggestions to explore Columbus. Ohio State University Marching Band alumni and current members will perform together at Pride.
Before discontinuing Ohio State's LGBTQ+ webpages, the website offered support for LGBTQ+ students and allies. An archived version of the webpage shows it offered educational materials, support services and resources for LGBTQ+ students. It is not the only discontinued support page; although Ohio State still links to its Inclusion and Student Engagement and Support pages, both are no longer available.
Ohio State's new guidelines do not apply to Ohio State faculty, staff or students expressing their individual beliefs separately from university channels or programming.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
25 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Israeli strikes on Iran lead to new test of Trump's ability to deliver on ‘America first' agenda
Advertisement 'Israel advised us that they believe this action was necessary for its self-defense,' Rubio said in a statement. 'President Trump and the Administration have taken all necessary steps to protect our forces and remain in close contact with our regional partners. Let me be clear: Iran should not target U.S. interests or personnel.' Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up As Israel stepped up planning for strikes in recent weeks, however, Iran, had signaled that the United States would be held responsible in the event of an Israeli attack. The warning was issued by Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi even as he engaged in talks with Trump special envoy Steve Witkoff over Tehran's rapidly advancing nuclear program. On Thursday, just hours before the strikes, Trump made the case that there was still time for diplomacy — but it was running out. The White House had even planned to dispatch Witkoff to Oman on Sunday for the next round of talks with Araghchi. It wasn't immediately clear how the strikes would affect plans for those discussions. Advertisement Trump is set to meet with his National Security Council in the Situation Room on Friday to discuss the tricky path ahead. Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., offered rare words of Democratic praise for the Trump administration after the attack 'for prioritizing diplomacy' and 'refraining from participating in tonight's actions.' But he also expressed deep concern about what the Israeli strikes could mean for U.S. personnel in the region. Iranian officials made clear that they intended to retaliate with decisive action after the Israeli strikes targeted Iran's main enrichment facility in Natanz and the country's ballistic missile program, as well as top nuclear scientists and officials. 'I cannot understand why Israel would launch a preemptive strike at this juncture, knowing high level diplomatic discussions between the United States and Iran are scheduled for this weekend,' Kaine said. Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., said the U.S. Senate 'stands ready to work with President Trump and with our allies in Israel to restore peace in the region and, first and foremost, to defend the American people from Iranian aggression, especially our troops and civilians serving overseas.' Trump in the hours before the attack still appeared hopeful that there would be more time for diplomacy. The president, in an exchange with reporters, again urged Iran to negotiate a deal. He warned that a 'massive conflict' could occur in the Middle East without it. He later took to social media to emphasize that his 'entire Administration has been directed to negotiate with Iran.' Advertisement As long as there was a chance for an agreement, Trump said of Israel, 'I don't want them going in because I think it would blow it.' But it was clear to the administration that Israel was edging toward taking military action against Iran. The State Department on Wednesday directed a voluntary evacuation of nonessential personnel and their families from some U.S. diplomatic outposts in the Middle East. 'I don't want to be the one that didn't give any warning, and missiles are flying into their buildings. It's possible. So I had to do it,' Trump explained. Before Israel launched the strikes, some of Trump's strongest supporters were raising concerns about what another expansive conflict in the Mideast could mean for the Republican president who ran on a promise to quickly end the brutal wars in Gaza and Ukraine. Trump has struggled to find an endgame to either of those conflicts and to make good on two of his biggest foreign policy campaign promises. And after criticizing President Joe Biden during last year's campaign for preventing Israel from carrying out strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, Trump found himself making the case to the Israelis to give diplomacy a chance. The push by the Trump administration to persuade Tehran to give up its nuclear program came after the U.S. and other world powers in 2015 reached a long-term, comprehensive nuclear agreement that limited Tehran's enrichment of uranium in exchange for the lifting of economic sanctions. But Trump unilaterally withdrew the U.S. from the Obama-administration brokered agreement in 2018, calling it the 'worst deal ever.' The way forward is even more clouded now. Advertisement 'No issue currently divides the right as much as foreign policy,' Charlie Kirk, the founder of Turning Point USA and an ally of the Trump White House, posted on X Thursday. 'I'm very concerned based on (everything) I've seen in the grassroots the last few months that this will cause a massive schism in MAGA and potentially disrupt our momentum and our insanely successful Presidency.' Jack Posobiec, another prominent Trump supporter, warned a 'direct strike on Iran right now would disastrously split the Trump coalition.' 'Trump smartly ran against starting new wars, this is what the swing states voted for — the midterms are not far and Congress' majority is already razor-thin,' Posobiec added in a posting on X. Rosemary Kelanic, director of the Middle East program at Defense Priorities, said the job ahead for Trump and his team is to protect U.S. forces who are highly vulnerable to Iranian retaliation. 'Israel's strike on Iran must not become the United States' war,' Kelanic said. 'The U.S. public overwhelmingly opposes another military engagement in the Middle East for good reason — an open-ended military campaign in Iran would risk repeating the catastrophic mistakes of the 2003 war in Iraq, which inadvertently strengthened Tehran's influence there.' ___ AP Congressional Correspondent Lisa Mascaro contributed reporting.
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Bicyclists upset at removal of Arizona Avenue protected bike lanes
WASHINGTON () — There's controversy in the District after the D.C. Department of Transportation (DDOT) removed barriers from a bike lane in the Northwest neighborhood because it looked ugly. Bikers in the Palisades said it will make using Arizona Avenue more dangerous. DDOT said it's because neighbors don't like the way it looks, and it's not used much. Tariffs prompt uncertainty for many Vietnamese businesses owners in Northern Virginia The top half of Arizona Avenue was just repaved about two weeks ago, from Loughboro Road to Hawthorne Place. Orange cones now replace the bike lane's protected barriers. The bottom half to MacArthur Boulevard hasn't been repaved yet, so the protected bike lanes will remain until that construction starts. Protected bike lanes are a big reason Nathan Barbour ditched his car and bought a cargo bike. 'I was like, great. I take my son to school and back every day using the lane,' Barbour said. 'I do grocery shopping for our family of five up the lane every single — I'm on it daily.' But in testimony Tuesday, DDOT Director Sharon Kershbaum said the protected bike lanes on Arizona Avenue from Loughboro Road to MacArthur Boulevard are going away. 'Today, it has very little usage because it doesn't take you anywhere. It takes you to a trailhead that is not bike accessible,' Kershbaum said. Neighbors disagree with that assessment. 'I use this every day, for exercise and for commuting with these awesome scooters,' said Willie Maiden. Immigrants and allies unite in DC to protest ICE raids and violence As Arizona Avenue gets resurfaced, the barriers aren't going to be replaced. 'The concrete blocks and flex posts are–I think there's very few people that are a fan of how those look aesthetically,' Kershbaum said. DDOT plans on painting five-foot-wide standard bike lanes in both directions. One will be along the curb on the north side and one adjacent to parked cars on the south side. Barbour isn't happy about the decision. 'You think I'm going to have my son ride up this bike lane with just paint? Paint isn't infrastructure. It doesn't protect anyone,' Barbour said. 'Aesthetics. There's no other reason given because there's no other impact of the lanes.' Tenants say church took down Pride decorations at DC apartment building Kershbaum said once the Capital Crescent Trail is done, which is more than a year off, they can revisit protected lanes on Arizona Avenue. Public comment can be filed in writing or by email by July 25 with the District Department of Transportation, Capital Planning Division, 250 M Street, S.E., Washington, D.C. 20003, or by email to Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Home solar panel systems could cost 43% more for most consumers under Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill'
HARRISBURG, Pa. (WHTM) — They first existed in a different form in 1978 — and have existed in essentially their current form since 2008 — and 30% tax credits for new home solar system installations were scheduled to last another eight years. Instead, they could end just 60 days after President Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' becomes law, warn solar advocates, unless the plan changes in the U.S. Senate, where it is under consideration now after passing the U.S. House late last month. 'Companies have built infrastructure. They have created pipelines. They have employed people. We've had billions of dollars spent on factories to supply solar panels, solar inverters, solar modules,' Abigail Ross Hopper, president and CEO of the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA), an industry lobby, said in an interview. Two months, she said, are 'obviously not enough time to change your business model, find new markets — kind of evolve your structure.' 'And so we are asking the United States Senate to restore some of those cuts,' Ross Hopper said. Might Sen. Dave McCormick (R-Pennsylvania), a member of the chamber's energy and national resources committee, consider supporting such a restoration? 'The full reconciliation text has not been released from Senate committees, particularly the finance committee,' a spokesperson for McCormick said in a statement. 'We expect there will be changes from the House approved language, but we do not know those details yet. We cannot comment on hypotheticals at this time. Senator McCormick is committed to ensuring Pennsylvania families benefit from this bill, and he will review the legislation carefully when the text is released.' President Trump has said he hopes to sign the bill by July 4. The tax credits amount to a 30% refund. A real-world example: A reporter paid $15,366 for a 2-panel solar system to power a home (the systems can be paid for in cash or financed, similar to buying a car), resulting in an extra tax refund of $4,610 — that's 30% of $15,366 — bringing the total cost down to $10,756 for a system that has eliminated electric bills (in a house that does still rely on natural gas for heat). In fact, the system generates more electricity than the home needs. That electricity is automatically sold back to the power company at a small profit. Without the credit, the system cost would have risen from that after-credit price of $10,756 to the original price of $15,366, which is a 43% increase. Steve Bodley, a retired science teacher who has a (solar-powered) home-based business selling solar power systems for a company called Lifestyle Solar, said 93% of his clients since 2021 have gotten the credits. And although this is harder to know for sure, Bodley estimates 75% of his customers wouldn't have bought their systems if not for the credits. Customers are happy to rely on clean energy generated on their own rooftops, but the motivation is not primarily altruistic, Bodley said. 'The majority is economics,' he said, acknowledging the credits are a subsidy — but saying that only serves to help level the playing field against other forms of energy. 'We subsidize every other source of power,' Bodley said. For example, some analysts and critics say tax credits and loan guarantees could save Constellation Energy as much as $200 million if it wins approval to restart one Three Mile Island nuclear reactor as the Crane Clean Energy Center in order to supply power to Microsoft. Download the abc27 News+ app on your Roku, Amazon Fire TV Stick, and Apple TV devices On a larger scale, Ross Hopper cited the Aspen Road Solar farm in Fannett Township, Franklin County — whose owners say it can power 18,000 homes and will contribute $23 million in state and local taxes during its existence — as an example of a project that might not have existed if not for solar tax credits. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
