
Andrew Bolt demands an investigation into Brittany Higgins' $2.4million payout after she announced her return to the workforce
Andrew Bolt has called for an investigation into Brittany Higgins ' $2.4million compensation payment from the federal government after she got a new job despite being 'diagnosed as medically unfit for any form of employment'.
The former Liberal staffer made a compensation claim for damages in March 2022 after alleging she was raped in parliament by her former colleague, Bruce Lehrmann.
He has always denied the claims but was found to have raped Ms Higgins on the balance of probabilities by Justice Michael Lee in April last year - a decision Lehrmann is currently appealing.
In Ms Higgins' draft statement of claim, first reported by The Australian newspaper, she had been 'diagnosed as medically unfit for any form of employment, and has been given a very poor prognosis for future employment'.
The claim suggested she was therefore due over $2.5 million in economic loss for 40 years' of missed earnings.
These claims were untested in court given Ms Higgins was awarded the $2.4 million by payout after one day of mediation talks.
Now, Sky News host Andrew Bolt has called for a 'hearing' into the decision.
'I feel taxpayers were taken for a ride by both Higgins and by the government. Shouldn't this payout be investigated?' he asked in a column for Newscorp.
'Indeed, it's now nearly two years since Linda Reynolds (former Defence Minister and Ms Higgins' former boss) rightly referred it to Labor's new National Anti-Corruption Commission for investigation.
'It's still deciding what to do, but Reynolds isn't giving up.'
A decision in Senator Reynolds' defamation action against Ms Higgins and her husband David Sharaz is expected later this month.
The couple were forced to sell their French chateau they bought in 2023 to pay for their legal bills.
Despite once claiming not to be able to work again, Ms Higgins last week revealed she is returning to the workforce, joining the same company where her husband is employed.
The 30-year-old is now the director of public affairs at the public relations agency Third Hemisphere, the Australian Financial Review first reported.
Her appointment came soon after her husband David Sharaz announced in March he had taken on the role of director at the agency.
The pair are working from home as they juggle their roles with looking after their son Freddie who was born on March 2.
Ms Higgins shared the news of her appointment on Instagram with the caption: 'Your girl is finally back in the workforce!'
It is the first full-time job for Ms Higgins since she was a ministerial media adviser and was thrust into the limelight when she made rape claims against Lehrmann.
Following the trials, Ms Higgins became an advocate for survivors of sexual assault and has interned at the United Nations and has done work for Queensland's Human Rights Commission.
Ms Higgins explained her move to Third Hemisphere came after fostering a connection with the firm's founder and CEO Hannah Moreno.
Ms Moreno was also a rape and domestic violence survivor who campaigns for gender equality and fights against sexual harassment.
'There was this general feeling of "how long do I have to be the story for?" At what point do I get to put it to rest... and have my own identity outside this narrative of Brittany Higgins,' Ms Higgins said.
'I also have a brand reputation and I don't want to align myself in a corporate sense with someone that could be doing something untoward.
'I had to join a team that I fundamentally believe in and which believes in the same things that I do.'
Ms Higgins said the role would be her first step in following her role models, including Governor-General Samantha Mostyn, Indigenous social activist and business executive Tanya Hosch and business executive Christine Holgate.
In her new position, Ms Higgins will work with clients on reputation management and strategic advocacy.
She will also handle stakeholder engagement, media relations and public affairs initiatives which create public discussion.
Ms Higgins shared the news of her appointment to Instagram on Wednesday with the caption: 'Your girl is finally back in the workforce!'
In August 2021, Mr Lehrmann was identified as the Liberal Party staffer accused of raping Ms Higgins inside Parliament House in 2019.
Ms Higgins shared her alleged sexual assault ordeal with Channel 10 journalist Lisa Wilkinson in an interview aired on The Project.
Lehrmann has always denied the allegations.
Lehrmann faced the ACT Supreme Court in late 2022 but the case was dropped after a juror brought outside research into the deliberation room.
Another criminal trial did not happen, with prosecutors citing concern for Ms Higgins' mental health.
In 2023, Lehrmann launched legal proceedings against Wilkinson and Channel 10, claiming he'd been defamed by The Project episode.
The ruling in that lawsuit left Lehrmann's reputation in ruins with Justice Michael Lee finding that, on the balance of probabilities, he raped Ms Higgins.
He has appealed the ruling with the case to go before the Federal Court of Australia in August.
After quitting her role as Liberal Party media adviser, Ms Higgins worked on short-term contracts at the First Peoples' Assembly of Victoria and the Queensland Human Rights Commission.
She also signed a book deal with Penguin Random House in 2021 for a tell-all memoir about her time in Parliament and the moment Lehrmann allegedly raped her.
The final 90,000-word autobiography was meant to hit shelves in 2022, but publishers placed it on indefinite hold due to legal issues - namely, because the trial against Mr Lehrmann fell over and he was never convicted.
It emerged this week that Mr Lehrmann is working unpaid as a live-in nanny to the children of a close friend as he awaits further trials.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Herald Scotland
32 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
California governor accuses Trump of 'acts of a dictator'
Gavin accused Trump of "inciting and provoking violence," "creating mass chaos" and "militarizing cities." "These are the acts of a dictator, not a President," Newsom said. The two men have long been at odds. Trump said on social media June 7 that federal authorities needed to step in because of the inaction of Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass and Newsom, who Trump has nicknamed. "If Governor Gavin Newscum, of California, and Mayor Karen Bass, of Los Angeles, can't do their jobs, which everyone knows they can't, then the Federal Government will step in and solve the problem, RIOTS & LOOTERS, the way it should be solved!!!" Trump said in the post. The two have repeatedly clashed, most recently in late May, when Trump threatened to cut California's federal funding after a transgender high school athlete qualified for the state championship. "Large scale Federal Funding will be held back, maybe permanently," Trump said at the time, if California fails to follow an executive order he signed Feb. 5 seeking to bar transgender student athletes from playing women's sports. Newsom, a Democrat with presidential aspirations, has also sparred with Trump over tariffs, fighting fires and the management of water and environmental resources, though he has also criticized his own party.


Daily Mail
40 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Alleged money laundering scheme is busted as cops uncover complex network in Australia
A security company allegedly used an armoured transport service to smuggle cash around the nation as it laundered millions of dollars of criminal proceeds. Three men - aged 32, 48 and 58 - and a 35-year-old woman have been charged with multiple money laundering offences, Australian Federal Police say. Investigations continue into the scheme that allegedly transferred $190million into cryptocurrency between October 2022 and May 2024. Authorities have restrained 17 properties, bank accounts and luxury cars in NSW and Queensland worth more than $21million, allegedly purchased with tainted money. 'This investigation has unravelled a sophisticated operation that allegedly moved illicit cash around the country,' AFP Detective Superintendent Adrian Telfer told reporters on Monday. 'It was truly a national operation, laundering the profits of criminal ventures across the country, (and) these cash profits were being flown into Queensland to be washed and returned to individuals.' Investigators allege the Gold Coast-based security company used a complex network of bank accounts, businesses, couriers and cryptocurrency accounts to launder millions of dollars of illicit funds over 18 months. 'The results we are announcing today will deliver a significant blow to alleged individuals, whoever relied on this operation to turn their ill-got profits into property portfolios, luxury cars and cryptocurrency,' Mr Telfer said. AFP Detective Superintendent Adrian Telfer claimed the alleged operation was a 'sophisticated operation that allegedly moved illicit cash around the country' (pictured, a Nissan GT-R seized by police) The 48-year-old man and the woman, who were the director and general manager respectively of the security business, were each charged with a money laundering offence. The couple was granted bail to face Southport Magistrates Court on July 21. The 58-year-old man is accused of funnelling laundered money through a business account to a separate business account controlled by the 32-year-old man. He was also charged with two money laundering offences and was granted bail to face Brisbane Magistrates Court on August 1. The 32-year-old man is accused of laundering $9.5 million through the operation over 15 months. He has been charged with money laundering and failing to provide the password to a mobile phone. He has been remanded in custody and is scheduled to face Brisbane Magistrates Court on Monday.


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Shock discovery at Vinnies sparks outrage: 'I am blown away'
Aussies have been left outraged after a shopper complained about the insane price for a basket at an op-shop. Queensland op-shopper Jennifer Zervas found the simple carry basket at a north Brisbane Vinnies with an asking price of $60. She took to TikTok to share her disappointment upon finding the item. '$60 for what? Oh my God, man, are you actually serious?' she asked. 'I just am blown away.' Many Australians said the basket was a sign second hand stores were no longer what they once were. 'All the Australian charity shops are rip offs now,' one wrote. 'Thrift shops are meant to promote reusing unwanted items, and try and steer away from fast fashion and waste,' another said. 'It's meant to be a non-profit thing. It's so upsetting to see this.' 'I'm officially too poor for the op-shop,' a third said. 'Vinnies lost my respect about 11 years ago, they upped the price at the only local store my family could afford clothes at ... Scamming a***holes,' another said. Others agreed shops operated by registered charities, like Vinnies, were no longer useful for those who needed them most. 'It's criminal. the government needs to crack down on this corruption from thrift stores. the have lost the message, which is to help the poor,' one wrote. 'How is a $60 basket helping the unfortunate? They could buy that but better for $10 elsewhere,' another said. 'Op shops have forgotten that their actual role in giving back to community is making clothing and second hand goods accessible and affordable to the community, not raising money for their other 'community initiatives',' a third added. Others said they had seen cheap goods marked up past their original price at op-shops. Many claimed they had seen Kmart and Target home-brand clothes on sale for more than double their original prices. 'I'll never forget donating my clothes and finding one of my dresses there selling for double what I originally paid for it new,' a woman claimed. But others said 'scalpers' had ruined the stores for everybody. They claimed people looking for fashionable and branded items in the stores to resell at used clothes markets and online had led to stores 'following suit'. 'Blame the people who started upselling everything they could get their grubby, (little) mitts on, why wouldn't the original shop just follow suit,' one wrote. 'Especially if it's meant to be for charity this way they get the same (money) as scalpers.' 'Scalpers and well off people have ruined (it) by taking advantage of op shops,' another said.