
3 Reasons Why Every Parent Needs To Watch Netflix's ‘Adolescence' — By A Psychologist
Netflix's "Adolescence" has become an overnight sensation. Here are three invaluable lessons that ... [+] parents can learn from the harrowing story of Jamie Miller.
Ask any parent in the world what their worst nightmare is, and they'd all give you a similar answer: losing a child. But there's another fate—much rarer, and arguably just as horrific—that you likely wouldn't even consider: your child taking another's life.
This is the terrifying premise of Netflix's current most popular limited series, Adolescence.
The series follows 13 year-old Jamie Miller and his family after he's accused of brutally murdering a fellow female classmate—a crime which he eventually pleads guilty to. The series has been revered in countless ways: for its brilliant scripting, actors and cinematography, but mostly for its gut-wrenching and eye-opening storyline.
Although the series isn't based on a singular 'true story,' the creators of Adolescence note that it draws influence from several real-life reports from the UK. According to the House of Commons Library, in March of 2023 alone, there were 18,500 convictions and cautions made for possession of a knife; 17.3% of these offenders were between 10- and 17-years old.
Touching on themes such as incel culture, gender-based violence and the dangerous radicalization of young men, Adolescence sheds light on various terrifying realities — ones that are becoming increasingly threatening in today's age.
If you are a parent, these are just three of many reasons why you need to watch Adolescence, based on the sobering truths it confronts us with.
Society has made powerful strides in recent years towards progression. Social issues that were once rife amongst the youth—such as bullying, sexism, racism and homophobia—have started to become less prominent than they were just a few decades ago, thanks to education, prevention programs and increasing overall levels of tolerance. That said, there have been unfortunate regressions over the recent years.
In 2015, survey results on bullying were incredibly hopeful; statistics indicated that it had reached an all-time low since 2005. Unfortunately, just five years later, the COVID-19 pandemic stopped the world in its tracks. According to 2022 research from Scientific Reports, the pandemic marked a disappointing turning-point that resulted in a significant increase in cyber-bullying.
Children today are more dependent on technology than ever before; they use their phones not just as tools but as lifelines to their social worlds. While parents once feared technology because their kids seemed savvier with it, many have since become more permissive upon recognizing how ingrained it is in their children's lives, as well as their own.
However, this shift in attitude has opened up new avenues for bullying—ones that are increasingly hard to monitor and regulate. Balancing the respect for a child's privacy with the growing complexity of online interactions is challenging, and many parents are left feeling helpless when it comes to protecting their kids from harm or even realizing that their child might be the perpetrator.
Adolescence exemplifies this issue. Even the detectives investigating the crime—who had full, unrestricted access to Jamie's social media—couldn't tell the difference between friendliness and bullying in his Instagram comments. The insidiously subtle form that bullying has taken on, paired with the incredibly cryptic, backhanded use of language and Emojis, has made it almost invisible to the untrained eye.
Not only has bullying resurged amongst the youth, but so has sexism. A February 2025 study conducted in the UK, from PLOS One, highlights the increasing worry amongst school teachers about the impact of online misogyny on young boys. Out of 200 teachers in total, 76% of highschool teachers and 60% of elementary school teachers expressed this deep concern.
Andrew Tate—a social media influencer who is shockingly popular amongst young boys, whose content is blatantly bigoted and sexist—was mentioned frequently by the teachers within the study.
One teacher within the study noted that a male student of theirs had publicly verbalized that it's 'ok to hurt women because Andrew Tate does it,' while another noted they'd heard a male student tell a fellow female student that she 'belonged in the kitchen.' Appallingly, one teacher even noted that their male pupils 'touch girls non-consensually' and 'do not understand why this is inappropriate.'
Of course, these comments and behaviors affect more than just the school staff who witness it. As one teacher in the study explains, 'The majority of the girls in my class have been worried about coming to school due to what the boys may say or do to them.'
Adolescence also captures this grim, growing norm with unsettling accuracy. Teenage boys in the series—some only 12- and 13-years old—are well-versed in misogynistic rhetoric, including concepts like the '80-20 rule,' 'red pill' content and incel culture. These aren't fictionalized aspects of the show; they are very real, very dangerous principles that are spread widely on the internet.
For instance, claims are made that only 20% of men are deemed attractive enough to date the most desirable women, while the remaining 80% are left bitter and rejected. These kinds of warped perspectives incite resentment toward women, and are known to lead to violent fantasies or actions—according to 2020 research from Studies in Conflict & Terrorism.
In the second and third episodes of the series, it becomes apparent that Jamie was influenced by these ideologies, to the point that his feelings about rejection by a female classmate were likely the trigger for his heinous crime against her. Disturbingly, Jamie had vocal supporters from the 'manosphere'—one of which even provided him with the murder weapon.
When we hear of children who commit heinous acts and crimes, fingers are usually pointed at parents. 'Who raised them?' or 'What was going on at home?' are often the first thoughts to come to mind.
While reports from the Office of Justice Programs do suggest that children of criminals and abusers are more likely to exhibit deviant behavior, there are always exceptions. Some of the world's most infamous criminals—like Richard Cottingham, Dennis Rader and Randy Kraft—had reportedly happy and healthy childhoods.
Jamie, in Adolescence, had a normal childhood too. His parents, Eddie and Manda, were never abusive, nor did they have marital problems that may have affected their children; they were highschool sweethearts who were still madly in love decades later. Naturally, they were devastated by Jamie's crime, asking themselves, 'How did we make him?'
Throughout his childhood, both Eddie and Manda ensured that Jamie wasn't doing the same things that they'd gotten up to as teenagers — like underaged drinking, smoking, drug use or sex. When he was out with his friends, they knew where he was and what he was doing at all times; when he wasn't with his friends, he was home.
But when he was home, he was always locked in his room—quietly browsing the internet until the early hours of the morning.
Eddie makes a devastating observation in the final episode of the series. He explains that since Jamie was almost always at home—under his roof, and not out and about being mischievous—he thought that he'd been protecting him. He assumed that close proximity would make it impossible for Jamie to turn out as anything other than a happy, healthy young boy.
Eddie even noted that he'd made a concerted effort to be a better father than his was, and Manda poignantly stood by the fact that both Jamie and his sister were 'made' in the same way: 'through love.' Regretfully, Jamie's normal upbringing couldn't prevent his eventual horrific crime.
Parents today must understand that hatred, bigotry and violence aren't just things that children can learn directly from their upbringing. The internet is saturated with dangerous, hateful rhetoric, and research suggests that it's only becoming more prevalent. It only takes one video, one comment, one Google search or one conversation to plant the seed.
If these messages are reinforced by peers or online communities, an otherwise well-adjusted and intelligent child can become radicalized shockingly fast. It's easy to forget that keeping a child physically safe is only one half of parenting; their minds also need to be guarded from dangerous ideologies. That's why parents today need to be more vigilant than ever about the content their children consume and, more importantly, the ideas that take root.
Curious what beliefs about gender roles you may be passing on to your children? Take this science-backed test to find out: Gender Role Beliefs Scale
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Julianne Moore has praised Milly Alcock as a 'dream' co-star
Julianne Moore has praised Milly Alcock as a 'dream' co-star after working with her on new Netflix dark comedy series Sirens.


Tom's Guide
5 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
5 shows like 'Big Mouth' on Netflix to stream now that the animated show is over
Netflix recently released the final season of the hit animated show 'Big Mouth," serving up one last crudely hilarious deluge of puberty jokes and high school drama. Nick, Andrew, Jessi, Missy, Jay, and Matthew are all growing up — both inside and out — and the series continues to embrace the messy, awkward and deeply weird process of adolescence. And now that the last episode has dropped, 'Big Mouth' fans might find themselves itching to fill the hormone-fueled void with another favorite adult animated binge. Here are five shows like "Big Mouth," all of which you can stream on Netflix. The creators of 'Big Mouth' (comedian Nick Kroll and showrunner Andrew Goldberg) saw how successful their first series had become and launched a spin-off in 2022 featuring a new cast of emotional 'monsters.' This time, the setting is an HR department, which brings some refreshing office humour to what could've been a staid backdrop. SNL alum Aidy Bryant personifies Emmy the Lovebug, the key character driving the story of 'Human Resources." She struggles to identify with her first client, Becca, a pregnant lawyer with various shades of depression. Randall Park voices Pete the Logic Rock, who is as stoic as his name and often acts awkward in any interaction, but he begins to open up as the seasons progress. And comedian Maria Bamford brings her unique voice to Tito the Anxiety Mosquito, who often chills with Depression Kitties, as you would expect. Segueing from 'Big Mouth' to 'Human Resources' is as easy as diving into 'Better Call Saul' after 'Breaking Bad,' and the tight writing and complex themes around self-actualization will be familiar ground for B'ig Mouth' veterans — especially those who would love a cameo or two from Maury the Hormone Monster. Watch on Netflix Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. The five-season show, which ended in 2021, is the brainchild of stand-up star Bill Burr, and it's one of the more realistic animated shows on the list. Set in the 1970s and inspired by Burr's own family experiences, the show gives viewers a raw portrayal of a dysfunctional family navigating generational clashes and financial quagmires. With the father being a perpetually angry guy, Bill Burr afficionados will see many themes cropping up from the comedian's popular stand-up bits. But 'F is for Family' allows Burr to explore deeper probes into the, say, father-son dynamic that he rarely discusses on stage. You'll also notice an A-list cast of actors lending their voices to the series, from Laura Dern to Sam Rockwell to Justin Long. Watch on Netflix The biggest criticism this show gets is that Coach Ben (voiced by Jack Johnson, also the creator) is an unlikable character, but to each their own, right? If you can get past this issue, you'll likely enjoy this fun show about a high school basketball coach overwhelmed by his own ego. Believing he's destined for coaching greatness, Ben is obsessed with recruiting a seven-foot student with no interest in basketball, which is the main arc of the show, except for bits about his thorny relationship with his wife and battling Principal Opal. 'Hoops' only lasted one season (did the vulgarity turn off Netflix in the end?), but it's still an engaging watch whether or not you've come across a disillusioned coach like Ben. Watch on Netflix Lasting five seasons before Netflix axed it, 'Disenchantment' has the same animation style as 'Futurama' and 'The Simpsons' thanks to creator Matt Groening, who brought us Homer, Marge and Bart eons ago. Set in a fictional Medieval country, the series stars Princess Tiabeanie (Abbi Jacobson) revolting against her parents' plans to marry Prince Merkime (Matt Berry), but she only has eyes for Elfo (Nat Faxon), a naïve and lovesick elf. It doesn't always hit the same comedic notes as Groening's other popular shows, but it's fair to call 'Disenchantment' charming and digestible. It's also a great watch for family viewing if your children are pre-teens or older, as this series doesn't boast the same crude jokes as 'Human Resources' and 'Hoops.' Another strong anchor of the show is Luci (Eric Andre) who is a demon acting as the princess's lovable but scheming companion. He also often has the best lines: 'Being evil is a lot of work. You gotta tempt, you gotta corrupt, you gotta convince people to do bad stuff. It's exhausting.' Watch on Netflix Without a doubt, 'BoJack Horseman' is one of the more popular animated shows on Netflix for being a mature and smart look at mental health, intergenerational trauma and addiction. All this from a cast of characters with names like Mr. Peanutbutter and Pinky Penguin. As the titular character falls into a depression after realizing his career as a professor is a far cry from his early days as an actor on the show "Horsin' Around," we see a range of storylines about BoJack finding validation in one-night stands, recovering from his traumatic upbringing, and reconnecting with someone from his past he never thought was alive (don't worry, we won't spoil it here). Starring Will Arnett, Paul F. Tompkins, Amy Sedaris and Aaron Paul, the show is punchy and confident, and the writing is tight and at turns beautiful. It truly should've won more Emmy Awards. Rest assured, you won't look at how we view fame and self-worth the same when 'BoJack' is done with you. Watch on Netflix

5 hours ago
South Dakota is on track to spend $2 billion on prisons in the next decade
SIOUX FALLS, S.D. -- Two years after approving a tough-on-crime sentencing law, South Dakota is scrambling to deal with the price tag for that legislation: Housing thousands of additional inmates could require up to $2 billion to build new prisons in the next decade. That's a lot of money for a state with one of the lowest populations in the U.S., but a consultant said it's needed to keep pace with an anticipated 34% surge of new inmates in the next decade as a result of South Dakota's tough criminal justice laws. And while officials are grumbling about the cost, they don't seem concerned with the laws that are driving the need even as national crime rates are dropping. 'Crime has been falling everywhere in the country, with historic drops in crime in the last year or two,' said Bob Libal, senior campaign strategist at the criminal justice nonprofit The Sentencing Project. 'It's a particularly unusual time to be investing $2 billion in prisons.' Some Democratic-led states have worked to close prisons and enact changes to lower inmate populations, but that's a tough sell in Republican-majority states such as South Dakota that believe in a tough-on-crime approach, even if that leads to more inmates. For now, state lawmakers have set aside a $600 million fund to replace the overcrowded 144-year-old South Dakota State Penitentiary in Sioux Falls, making it one of the most expensive taxpayer-funded projects in South Dakota history. But South Dakota will likely need more prisons. Phoenix-based Arrington Watkins Architects, which the state hired as a consultant, has said South Dakota will need 3,300 additional beds in coming years, bringing the cost to $2 billion. Driving up costs is the need for facilities with different security levels to accommodate the inmate population. Concerns about South Dakota's prisons first arose four years ago, when the state was flush with COVID-19 relief funds. Lawmakers wanted to replace the penitentiary, but they couldn't agree on where to put the prison and how big it should be. A task force of state lawmakers assembled by Republican Gov. Larry Rhoden is expected to decide that in a plan for prison facilities this July. Many lawmakers have questioned the proposed cost, but few have called for criminal justice changes that would make such a large prison unnecessary. 'One thing I'm trying to do as the chairman of this task force is keep us very focused on our mission,' said Lieutenant Gov. Tony Venhuizen. 'There are people who want to talk about policies in the prisons or the administration or the criminal justice system more broadly, and that would be a much larger project than the fairly narrow scope that we have.' South Dakota's incarceration rate of 370 per 100,000 people is an outlier in the Upper Midwest. Neighbors Minnesota and North Dakota have rates of under 250 per 100,000 people, according to the Sentencing Project, a criminal justice advocacy nonprofit. Nearly half of South Dakota's projected inmate population growth can be attributed to a law approved in 2023 that requires some violent offenders to serve the full-length of their sentences before parole, according to a report by Arrington Watkins. When South Dakota inmates are paroled, about 40% are ordered to return to prison, the majority of those due to technical violations such as failing a drug test or missing a meeting with a parole officer. Those returning inmates made up nearly half of prison admissions in 2024. Sioux Falls criminal justice attorney Ryan Kolbeck blamed the high number of parolees returning in part on the lack of services in prison for people with drug addictions. 'People are being sent to the penitentiary but there's no programs there for them. There's no way it's going to help them become better people,' he said. 'Essentially we're going to put them out there and house them for a little bit, leave them on parole and expect them to do well.' South Dakota also has the second-greatest disparity of Native Americans in its prisons. While Native Americans make up one-tenth of South Dakota's population, they make up 35% of those in state prisons, according to Prison Policy Initiative, a nonprofit public policy group. Though legislators in the state capital, Pierre, have been talking about prison overcrowding for years, they're reluctant to dial back on tough-on-crime laws. For example, it took repeated efforts over six years before South Dakota reduced a controlled substance ingestion law to a misdemeanor from a felony for the first offense, aligning with all other states. 'It was a huge, Herculean task to get ingestion to be a misdemeanor,' Kolbeck said. Former penitentiary warden Darin Young said the state needs to upgrade its prisons, but he also thinks it should spend up to $300 million on addiction and mental illness treatment. 'Until we fix the reasons why people come to prison and address that issue, the numbers are not going to stop,' he said. Without policy changes, the new prisons are sure to fill up, criminal justice experts agreed. 'We might be good for a few years, now that we've got more capacity, but in a couple years it'll be full again,' Kolbeck said. 'Under our policies, you're going to reach capacity again soon.'