Gov. Kevin Stitt wants sole power to appoint Oklahoma Supreme Court justices
The governor said he believes the federal government's model of selecting U.S. Supreme Court justices is the best, adding that he'd prefer to appoint justices to the state's highest court directly.
"To get the very best and brightest, and to be able to get the best pool of people into these different positions, sometimes you have to go recruit them," Stitt said Wednesday during his weekly news conference. "You have to go make some phone calls. You have to say, 'Hey, I really need you to apply.' And when you have all these restrictions around, it's difficult."
Stitt's comments come after he named Travis Jett, a conservative lawyer with no judicial experience, to fill the open seat on the Oklahoma Supreme Court Monday. The seat became vacant after Stitt and the Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs, a right-wing think tank in Oklahoma City, pushed to oust three justices from the state's highest civil court. Jett previously served as a lawyer for OCPA.
Two measures authored by House Speaker Pro Tem Anthony Moore, R-Clinton, seek to reform the nomination process for judges. House Joint Resolution 1024 would send to a vote of the people a state question asking whether to amend the Oklahoma Constitution to establish that at least one member of the Judicial Nominating Commission be from each of the state's five congressional districts at the time of their appointment.
More: Travis Jett named to Oklahoma Supreme Court by Gov. Kevin Stitt
House Bill 2103 would prohibit any Judicial Nominating Commission member from participating in the decision-making process if the member is related to a nominee to the third degree either through ancestry or by marriage.
The governor also addressed several other topics at his news briefing:
Stitt commented on his decision earlier this week to appoint a special investigator to look into the Oklahoma Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services. He said he believed the recently appointed Commissioner Allie Friesen offers a fresh set of eyes on the agency, but that its contract spending still needed to be examined.
"As soon as you start questioning things, you start saying, 'Hey, this contract doesn't sound right. I want to give the money over here to this vendor. This nonprofit is doing a better job.' These guys start spending," Stitt said. "They can afford to hire lobbyists."
More: Gov. Stitt wants special investigator to look into Oklahoma's mental health agency
Stitt's comments coincide with an announcement earlier this week from House Speaker Kyle Hilbert, R-Bristow, who formed a select committee to examine the mental health department's operations and budget. The committee will meet Thursday afternoon. Stitt said he welcomed lawmakers' review.
"I tell people, 'Let's shine a light on some of these dollars,'" Stitt said. "Let's see where all the mice scatter. That's what you're seeing right now. The rats are running, and they're screaming as we thought before."
Stitt also expressed his support for a Senate bill that would prohibit the governor from closing businesses during a pandemic unless they have evidence that the nature of a particular business would contribute to spreading the disease.
Authored by Sen. Julie McIntosh, R-Porter, SB 672 would require the governor to send a notice to each affected business and allow time for a hearing before mandatory shutdowns could occur.
"President Trump, during that initial time, I think the whole country, learned a lot from COVID, and every leader had a difficult decision," Stitt said. "There were leaders of businesses, and there were leaders in athletics and the NFL and NBA. Everybody was dealing with uncertainty during that time."
The governor said in the case of another pandemic, the state would take guidance from health care professionals in Oklahoma. He touted his decision not to enact a mask mandate during the COVID-19 pandemic.
"Most people agree that you don't put our U.S. Constitution in the attic just because somebody in Washington, D.C. tells us to," Stitt said.
This article originally appeared on Oklahoman: Gov. Stitt wants sole power to appoint Oklahoma Supreme Court justices
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Who will win the White House in 2028? JD Vance favorite, but Dems have better odds
Donald Trump is a little more than halfway through his first year in office, and already people are jockeying for position for the 2028 presidential election. It was about a year ago when Trump overtook Democratic nominee Kamala Harris as the favorite to win the election and he cruised from that point on. The tides have turned once again, and now democrats are favored to win back the White House in 2028. But last July, Harris was the overwhelming favorite to defeat Trump, so things can change in a hurry. According to a Democrat is -110 to win the 2028 Presidential Election. Republicans come in at +100. So while the lead is ever so slight, it is noteworthy that for the first time in about a year, Democrats are favored to win the next presidential election. If you think an independent can win, that's where the real money is. Independents are +2000 to win. 2028 presidential betting odds When it comes to individuals, nobody has really been able to pull away from the pack. Vice President JD Vance remains the top choice on the betting market. He comes in at +250. Trump himself comes in at No. 2 in betting odds at +900. Right now he can't run again, but Vegas believes that could change. On the Democratic side, California Gov. Gavin Newsom and U.S. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez are the top two favorites, both coming in at +900. Bettinglectionodds also has their odds. That site has Vance as the favorite to be the next president with a 23.9 percent chance of winning. He's followed by Newsom (8.2 percent), Ocasio-Cortez (6.6 percent), Pete Buttigieg (4.9 percent), Josh Shapiro (3.7 percent), Ron DeSantis (2.5 percent) and Ivanka Trump (2.4 percent) as the favorites. This article originally appeared on Asbury Park Press: 2028 presidential betting odds: Vance, Trump, Newsom, AOC favorites
The Hill
21 minutes ago
- The Hill
Thune: Deal on nominees up to Democrats and White House
Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) said Friday afternoon that whether a deal is reached on 160 stalled nominees hinges on talks between the White House and Senate Democrats, and didn't sound confident that an agreement could be reached before the weekend. Thune said 'a number of people involved' from the White House are in discussions with Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), who is under heavy pressure from the Democratic base to draw out the floor proceedings on Trump's nominees as long as possible. 'That will be up to the discussions between White House and Schumer and the Democrats,' Thune said when asked about the prospect of getting a deal on nominees to allow senators to begin the four-week August recess, which is scheduled to begin Saturday. Republican senators are growing increasingly pessimistic about reaching a deal to avoid working over the weekend. They spent Friday churning through lower-level nominees who would ordinarily get confirmed by unanimous consent or voice vote. The Senate voted earlier in the day to end debate on Brian Nesvik to serve as director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and to confirm Casey Mulligan to serve as chief counsel for advocacy for the Small Business Administration. Senate Republican Whip John Barrasso (Wyo.) blasted Democrats on the floor for 'unprecedented obstruction of the Senate nomination process.' 'President Trump is the only president in modern history not to have a single nominee confirmed by voice vote or unanimous consent. Not a single one. Even the most routine nominees are being filibustered,' he said. 'Positions that used to fly through by voice vote or unanimous consent are now treated and taken as political hostages. This isn't normal. This is petty partisan politics at its worst,' he said.
22 minutes ago
Senate delays August recess for now as Trump presses for more confirmations
WASHINGTON -- A stalemate over the pace of confirmations has delayed the Senate's yearly August recess, for now, as President Donald Trump declares that his nominees 'should NOT BE FORCED TO WAIT' and as Democrats slow the process by forcing procedural votes on almost all of Trump's picks. Caught in the middle, Senate Majority Leader John Thune says he will keep the Senate in session over the weekend, at least, to hold confirmation votes while also negotiating with Democrats to speed up consideration of dozens of nominees. The two sides haven't come to agreement yet, and it's still unclear if Trump, who has been publicly calling on Republicans to cancel their break, would be onboard with any bipartisan deal. Thune said Friday he was leaving some of the negotiations to Trump and Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y. 'That's how this is going to get resolved,' Thune said. 'We'll see where that leads.' Senators in both parties are eager to leave Washington for their annual break, when many of them tour their states to talk to constituents. Republicans in particular are eager to return home and sell the massive tax and spending cuts package they passed in July as Democrats vow to use it against them in the 2026 midterm elections. The House, which has no role in the confirmation process, fled Washington a week ago. But Trump has other plans. 'The Senate must stay in Session, taking no recess, until the entire Executive Calendar is CLEAR!!!' Trump posted on social media Thursday night, after a meeting with Thune at the White House. 'We have to save our Country from the Lunatic Left. Republicans, for the health and safety of the USA, DO YOUR JOB, and confirm All Nominees.' Thune said this week that Republicans are considering changing the Senate's rules when they get back in September to make it easier to quickly approve a president's nominations — and to try and avoid a similar stalemate in the future. Democrats have blocked more nominees than usual this year, denying any quick unanimous consent votes and forcing roll calls on each one, a lengthy process that takes several days per nominee and allows for debate time. Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., said Friday that Senate GOP leadership was 'going back, drafting a specific rule for us to react to" as they try to plot a path forward. It's the first time in recent history that the minority party hasn't allowed at least some quick confirmations. Thune has already kept the Senate in session for more days, and with longer hours, this year to try and confirm as many of Trump's nominees as possible. Democrats have little desire to give in, even though they too are eager to skip town after several long months of work and bitter partisan fights over legislation. Schumer has said Democrats have blocked quick votes because, 'historically bad nominees deserved historic levels of scrutiny.' There are more than 150 nominations on the Senate calendar, and confirming them all would take more than a month even if the Senate does stay in session, if Democrats draw out the process. The standoff is just the latest chapter in an ever-escalating Senate fight over nominations in the last two decades. Both parties have increasingly used stalling tactics to delay confirmations that were once quick, bipartisan and routine. In 2013, Democrats changed Senate rules for lower court judicial nominees to remove the 60-vote threshold for confirmations as Republicans blocked President Barack Obama's judicial nominations. In 2017, Republicans did the same for Supreme Court nominees as Democrats tried to block Trump's nomination of Justice Neil Gorsuch. Still, Thune says, the Democrats' current delays are a 'historic level of obstruction.' In his first year as leader, Thune has worked with Trump to quickly confirm his Cabinet and navigated complicated internal party dynamics to pass the tax and spending cuts package, which Trump sees as his signature policy achievement. Yet the president is applying increasing pressure on Thune and his conference, trying to control the Senate's schedule and calling out three Republican senators in social media posts this week — including Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, the senior-most Senate Republican who worked closely with Trump to confirm his picks for Supreme Court in his first term. Trump criticized Grassley for keeping with Senate tradition and working with home state Democrats on some judicial confirmations, saying that he got Grassley re-elected 'when he was down, by a lot.' Opening a committee hearing on Thursday, Grassley defended the practice and added that he was 'offended by what the president said, and I'm disappointed that it would result in personal insults.' Trump also criticized Missouri Sen. Josh Hawley for working with Democrats on a stock trading ban for lawmakers. And in a post late Thursday, he counseled Republicans to 'vote the exact opposite' of Senate Appropriations Committee Chairwoman Susan Collins, a moderate who has worked with Democrats on spending bills this year and frequently opposes Trump.
