SNP 'still in the dark on £85m international student tax'
Now, the SNP appears to be in the dark about the remit of the tax and point out Scottish universities have already been hit with a new bill of £30m because of the UK Government's increase to employer national insurance contributions.
READ MORE:
Winter fuel payments to more pensioners expected in coming weeks
Sturgeon: 'If trans lives become almost impossible to live then law has to change'
Universities facing £85m bill from UK foreign students tax
Universities will not pay £85m foreign student tax
The party says it urgently wants Labour ministers to give clarity on the matter and that the UK Government has had no engagement with the Scottish Government on the issue or provided any direct assurance that the levy will not apply in Scotland.
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer announced the new 6% tax on foreign students earlier this month as part of his crackdown on immigration, with critics accusing him of unveiling the measures in response to the success of Nigel Farage's populist right Reform UK in the local elections in England.
Education is a devolved issue while migration legislation is reserved to Westminster.
"We had the unedifying spectacle of Keir Starmer dancing to Nigel Farage's tune on immigration as he announced plans which are completely out of sync with Scotland's needs and values," SNP MSP Bill Kidd told The Herald.
SNP MSP Bill Kidd (Image: Andrew Cowan) 'Labour's damaging migration plans are a direct threat to Scotland's NHS, our economy and our universities.
'The UK Labour Government has already slapped our universities with a £30m bill with their reckless decision to hike employer national insurance contributions.
'Our universities have now been left in limbo not knowing if they are faced with a further bill of £85m directly due to Labour's political choices, whilst they also face the prospect of finding it harder to attract international students."
Mr Kidd called for the Prime Minister to "urgently provide clarity" on whether the proposed tax on international students will apply in Scotland and urged him to say if he would consider introducing "a Scottish Graduate Visa".
The Scottish Graduate Visa policy was unveiled by First Minister John Swinney in January and would allow overseas graduates at Scottish universities to live and work in Scotland for up to two years allowing employers in Scotland to benefit from their skills while generating income for public services through their taxes.
'Keir Starmer must urgently provide clarity on whether this proposed tax on international students will apply in Scotland, whether he will look again at introducing a Scottish Graduate Visa, and whether he will listen to experts from across various sectors and ditch his damaging anti-immigration agenda," he said.
Scotland faces significant population challenges, including a falling birth rate, an ageing population, and declining population in certain rural areas.
While migration has helped to offset these declines, the future impact of decreased in-migration due to factors like the ending of freedom of movement from the EU post Brexit is a key concern.
As well as allowing international students to live and work in Scotland for two years after graduation, the Scottish Graduate Visa would allow them to work towards a Skilled Worker Visa, encouraging and enabling the best international talent to remain in Scotland.
Several Scottish universities are facing acute financial challenges and major job losses.
Last week University of Edinburgh staff voted for industrial action, which could include strikes, as the institution refused to rule out compulsory redundancies. The university is looking to cut £140m from its budget, plans for which would include cutting staff, selling buildings and merging schools.
Meanwhile, around 300 jobs will be cut at Dundee University - down from an initial estimate of 700- following a £35m budget gap, while up to 70 jobs could be lost at the University of Aberdeen if the institution doesn't raise enough revenue to reduce its £5.5m financial black hole.
The crisis has led to debate over whether the Scottish Government policy of free tuition for Scottish students should continue.
On Saturday Andrew Cubie, the author of a report published in 1999, which paved the way for free tuition, said in an interview with The Times free tuition was no longer affordable in its present form and was failing to retain some of the country's best students.
'We've got to start thinking the unthinkable,' he said. 'The unthinkable is there'll be less money, not more money, so what do we do with less money? That raises the question of how many universities, how many colleges do you need? What should the private sector be contributing to this? And why, with free tuition fees, has Scotland not gained an edge in attracting students from less advantaged backgrounds?'
The former lawyer said a cap on Scottish student numbers meant some of the best qualified students were looking elsewhere for university places.
A UK government spokeswoman said: "The international student levy will not apply in Scotland unless the Scottish Government decides to introduce it.'
It is understood the UK Government has written to Universities Scotland, the organisation representing Scottish universities, to say the tax will not apply in Scotland unless the Scottish Government decides to introduce it.
Scottish universities sources have told The Herald they have been given "verbal assurances"from the UK Government the international student tax won't apply to them unless the Scottish Government bring it in.
The Scottish Government has previously said it will not introduce it.
A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'Scottish Ministers have directly raised concerns with the UK government about the lack of clarity on the proposed levy on international students and if it will apply to universities in Scotland. No formal clarification has been given.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Brexit solution to UK economy misery shunned, Nicola Sturgeon in focus
All sorts of potential moves have been floated in the media, with inheritance tax among the topics in focus last week. UK economic challenges have fuelled speculation that Labour will have to raise taxes and/or rein in spending to meet its fiscal rules, which are not that different from the strictures of the Tories. The National Institute of Economic and Social Research declared earlier this month: 'The Government is not on track to meet its 'stability rule', with our forecast suggesting a current deficit of £41.2 billion in the fiscal year 2029-30.' It remains somewhat baffling that Labour, given its lead in the polls ahead of the summer 2024 general election, felt it had to tie its hands so tightly with such fiscal rules. Surely the case could have been made for loosening the purse strings, to a sensible degree, and attempting to boost growth and thereby provide a fillip to tax revenues. Chancellor Rachel Reeves, writing in The Guardian last week, described the talk about tax increases as 'speculation'. She talked about the Labour Government's aim of boosting the productive capacity of the economy by allocating investment for infrastructure projects and reforming planning rules. Ms Reeves declared: 'If renewal is our mission and productivity is our challenge, then investment and reform are our tools.' It seems that 'productivity' is the buzzword of the moment. You hear it all over the corporate world, in myriad sectors, and on occasions it seems management of companies are trying to drive their measure of 'productivity' in ways which are counter-productive and lose sight of the bigger picture. At least the talk of infrastructure investment makes sense in the context of productivity. That said, when it comes to productivity, Labour might want to think about doing something meaningful to stop the Brexit damage if it wants to deliver a meaningful boost here. Sadly, its red lines of refusing to take the UK back into the European Union or single market mean that Ms Reeves and her Labour colleagues cannot take advantage of the huge economic benefits a return to the bloc would bring. Such a return would certainly ease the pressure on the public finances. Read more Office for Budget Responsibility chairman Richard Hughes said in spring 2023 of Brexit's effect: 'We think that in the long run it reduces our overall output by around 4% compared with had we remained in the EU.' Labour, however, continues to turn its back on the big win, for fear it seems of upsetting pro-Brexit types who polls show are diminishing in number. This becomes ever more frustrating as the UK economic misery continues, with no sign of anything that is going to provide a significant boost to growth or living standards. There was mixed news on the economy north of the Border last week in a closely watched survey. Scotland's private sector economy slipped back into reverse in July but was relatively resilient on the employment front in a UK context, according to the latest growth tracker survey from Royal Bank of Scotland. The survey showed a fall in the overall output of private sector services and manufacturing after two consecutive months of growth. Read more Scotland was placed 11th out of the 12 UK nations and regions in July in terms of the month on month change in its business activity. Seven English regions achieved rises in business activity, with London posting the strongest increase. The other five nations and regions covered by the survey saw declines. Scotland was second out of the 12 UK nations and regions in the employment league table behind Northern Ireland, which was the only one to see an overall rise in private sector staffing. The decline in employment in Scotland was slight compared with the falls recorded in the other 10 nations and regions of the UK to post drops in staffing. Meanwhile, the survey showed the first increase in outstanding business in Scotland for more than a year, something which was viewed by Royal Bank as a positive sign in terms of the employment outlook. Drops in outstanding business occurred in the other 11 nations and regions, which the bank declared was a "sign of underutilised capacity" across the rest of the UK. Nicola Sturgeon was firmly in focus last week in the wake of publication of her memoir, Frankly. There was much in the way of negativity about the former first minister in the reaction to the book, fuelled in large part by politicking and emotion it seemed. My column in The Herald on Friday observed: 'Perhaps the best overall assessment of Ms Sturgeon's time in charge is to be gleaned from examining the foreign direct investment numbers over the period in which she was first minister.' Ms Sturgeon was first minister from November 2014 to March 2023. The column noted that accountancy firm EY, publishing figures for 2024 earlier in the summer, highlighted the fact that Scotland has been second only to London in terms of the number of FDI projects won in every year since 2015. The column concluded: 'Those who would claim that Ms Sturgeon achieved nothing, or was somehow detrimental to business and the economy, should reflect on this, once the emotion subsides a bit.'
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Glasgow plans first automatic voter registration pilot
If approved, the project would use existing council data to automatically enrol those in the city eligible to vote, rather than relying on individuals to register themselves. READ MORE The scheme draws on lessons from trials in Wales, where several local authorities have tested similar systems to expand the voter roll. SNP councillor Alex Kerr, who represents Baillieston, spearheaded the initiative. His motion calling on Glasgow to volunteer as a pilot site was approved by the council in April. 'This is a big step towards making voting in Glasgow more accessible, inclusive and representative of our whole community,' said Cllr Kerr. 'Too many people fall off the electoral register simply because they did not fill in a form, even though their eligibility is already known. Automatic voter registration would help ensure every eligible Glaswegian has their voice heard in our democracy.' Supporter of AVR argue the system removes barriers that disproportionately affect certain groups. The Electoral Commission estimates around 8 million eligible voters are missing from UK electoral rolls, with renters and minority ethnic communities among those most likely to be unregistered. Cllr Kerr said: 'Scotland has a strong track record in leading the way on expanding participation in our democracy through policies like votes at 16 which are now being adopted across these islands. "Those from more deprived backgrounds, who are disabled or from ethnic minorities are likely to benefit most — but even those moving house will find it easier to get their vote. "One less bit of paperwork to think about when changing your details for bills and other bodies." If the plan moves ahead, the Glasgow pilot would use education records, council tax billing, university data, and registrars' citizenship information. It will require robust verification measures, including the use of data from the Department for Work and Pensions, the Home Office, and death notifications. 'I am delighted that Glasgow Council is moving forward with this proposal, and that we are looking at practical, data-driven solutions to strengthen participation,' Cllr Kerr added. In the paper put to councillors last week, officers warned that developing the pilot would have 'material staffing implications' and would require dedicated resources. The Electoral Registration Officer is now seeking Scottish Government funding to support the work. A further report will go before councillors later this year, outlining how the scheme would operate and how success will be measured.
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Why a plebiscite election won't deliver Scottish independence
This week, let's take a look at what is being canvassed as the principal alternative to that strategy. This is generally described as the plebiscite election strategy. This argues that we should make the vote at the election the vote about Scotland's independence. If, when we add up all the votes for pro-independence parties it comes to 50%+1, then we take that as a mandate to start negotiations with the UK. There was quite a lot wrong with this idea when Nicola Sturgeon toyed with it in 2021 and there's a lot wrong with it now. And that's even assuming it might be possible to get all the parties involved to agree. READ MORE: Rachel Reeves failed to raise Grangemouth with refinery owner days before closure To be clear, I'm not against trying to get a majority of the electorate to vote for parties that support independence. Indeed, there's no reason why that shouldn't in part be a consequence of the SNP trying to win a majority. These objectives are not contradictory. The first problem is getting acceptance from the people taking part in the election that it is a vote on deciding independence. We don't need everyone to agree, but we do need a majority to buy into the idea. This proposition will be hotly contested. Elections are about many things. Asking people to set aside concerns about everything else and focus on Scotland's constitutional future will be a big ask. We should remember that while there may be a majority telling pollsters they want Scotland to be independent, many of them are not that strongly attached to the idea. Their support is based on a belief that things couldn't be any worse. There are also not insignificant numbers who vote Labour or Liberal Democrat but who also believe in Scotland becoming independent. They would vote Yes in a referendum, but that doesn't mean they will abandon their allegiance to a party they identify with at the 2026 election. Smart Unionists will say we can come back to a decision on indy later. For now, let's fix the health service, the housing crisis, energy costs, whatever. We know the best way to fix all of these things is to have the powers that come with independence. But that is not where many of the electorate are. So, no matter how much pro-independence parties were to tell people that is what this election is about, our opponents will shout till they are blue in the face that it isn't. And then, should we fail to get more than 50% of the votes, they will shamelessly tell us that it was about precisely that. You'll have had your referendum. Again. But the main problem with the plebiscite referendum is that it works only in the minds of its believers. They claim if a majority vote for pro-indy parties in the election, independence will then happen. Why? Kenny MacAskill said in this paper last week: 'Starmer and his Cabinet have already said no to a second referendum and nothing will change that.' If that is true, a plebiscite election won't change that. The majority of the electorate will have the same problem as the majority of MSPs. They will be ignored by a Westminster Government which takes the view that Scotland's status is a matter for it, not the people who live here. Robin McAlpine offered some insight last week. He is half right when he talks about the process following the creation of a majority and not the other way round. Most countries became independent when it was the will of most of the people, referenda only formalised what had happened on the ground. He is wrong, though, to suggest the political process is unimportant and that the campaign needs to be taken out of it. In fact, there is a dynamic relationship between the two. The missing ingredient from McAlpine's analysis is the substantial chunk of people who believe in independence but see no way of it happening. For them the link between independence and voting in elections has been broken. READ MORE: For Women Scotland launches legal action against Scottish ministers on gender policy This isn't just the SNP's problem. The support for SNP, Greens and Alba combined is still 10% below support for independence. Neither a plebiscite election nor indeed a referendum proper, is going to offer a way forward until we change that. In reality, John Swinney and Kenny MacAskill have the same problem – a critical number of independence supporters don't believe that voting for them achieves it. At least one of them doesn't pretend otherwise. So, we need a strategy for what could happen with the right election result, how could that be used to advance Scotland's autonomy. And that brings us back to asserting the right of the people and getting past the Supreme Court judgment of autumn 2023. And that requires the mobilisation of the people into a force for change. That is an expressly political task. It's not just a matter of winning elections. But winning elections is a part of it.
