IL Republican lawmakers file batch of bills to boost relief for families
Springfield, Ill. (WCIA) – House Republicans filed several bills that aim to reduce the financial burden on middle-class small business owners and increase the state's economy.
The introduced bills include reducing registration and license fees for businesses and removing taxes on tips, increasing education tax credits and allowing people skilled in the trades to teach without degrees. In a news conference Thursday, Rep. Brad Stephens (R-Norridge) said their focus is to grow the economy of all businesses, particularly small shops, without increasing taxes.
Illinois senator introduces legislation to make textbooks more affordable
Under the current law, any workers who receive tips have to pay taxes on the tips they receive.
Rep. Ryan Spain (R-Peoria) filed a bill that would change that by removing state income tax on tips. This means service workers in Illinois, from waiters to bartenders, won't have to pay state income tax. If passed this legislation will only be applied to state tax, not federal tax.
One of the introduced bills, by Rep. CD Davidsmeyer (R-Jacksonville), will waive the fees for any business looking to renew their license. To qualify for the fee waiver you must show proof with either a W-2 form or any other tax document that shows you made less than $ 50,000 in the previous year. This applies to business owners who require state licenses to operate.
Similar bills filed by Rep. Kyle Moore (R-Quincy) and backed by House Minority Leader Tony McCombie (R-Savanna) would eliminate fees for all first-year business license fees for any new business and home-based business in Illinois. Currently, business license prices depend on the municipality and the type of business.
'There are many incentives to encourage large employers to set up shop in Illinois and that's certainly important to have in our toolbox. But your neighbor, who is a banker who wants to go from their kitchen to a storefront, also deserves to have similar incentives,' Moore said. 'Small businesses support families. They provide vital local tax revenue for our communities. Eliminating startup fees will help working families achieve their dreams and further boost small business growth in Illinois.'
Illinois Secretary of State urges Illinoisans to double check if they need a REAL ID before heading to the DMV
Additional bills aimed to increase the state trade program and ease the pathway for people interested in plumbing, and construction. The following legislation by Rep. Jed Davis (R-Yorkville) will allow people who are skilled and experienced in their respective work fields to teach manufacturing, engineering and trade without a bachelor's degree.
'I've gone across the district meeting with different businesses. And one common theme that comes up every single time is we don't have enough workforce, we need more help, particularly in the construction industry where we've mandated hiring practices,' Rep. Mike Coffey (R- Springfield) said.
Coffey filed a similar bill of his own that will create scholarships for students attending vocational schools. Another part of the bill proposes the Department of Revenue give tax credits to people who donate to organizations that award scholarships for vocational schools.
Coffey said this will open opportunities to students and tackle the staff shortage.
'They say, Mike, here's the problem. We don't have the technical support to fill these positions,' he said. 'We've got the work. We've got a year's worth of work, two years, three years worth of work, but we don't have the manpower. So the purpose of this bill is to help. And, you know, one of the things that we need more people trained.'
Advocates, Central Illinois lawmakers call for more protections for Mahomet Aquifer
Another bill would increase tax credits on education expenses. The bill, filed by Spain, will increase tax credits from $750 to $1,500 for families who pay for their kids' school expenses from kindergarten through high school in public and private schools.
The credits and fee waivers proposed come during a difficult year for budgeting, Governor JB Pritzker said. During his budget address, he told the General Assembly if they want to spend, he will ask them where they want to cut.
Stephens said that creating these financial incentives will create more jobs and make people invest back in the state.
'It's about putting more money in folks' pockets and then they will have more disposable dollars to be able to spend and purchase goods and services around the state,' Stephens said.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
26 minutes ago
- Newsweek
22-Year-Old Reduced to "Borderline Begging" to Access Own Money Sparks Fury
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A 22-year-old woman says her parents are refusing to give her access to approximately $40,000 she has earned since 2021. The woman and original poster (OP), user DreamSweetMyLove, sought advice on Reddit, explaining that most of her money is in a bank account owned by her father. "I cannot see it, I cannot touch it, and I have zero way of getting money from it without borderline begging and telling them exactly what I'll use it for," she wrote. Stock image of an adult woman arguing with her parents. Stock image of an adult woman arguing with her parents. JackF/iStock/Getty Images Plus She continued, "I do have some mental disabilities, but not severe enough to impair my main decision-making abilities. "I have never given them Power of Attorney. I am not in a conservatorship arrangement. There were no signed contracts. I do live at home with them. "Is it illegal for them to not allow me access to my own earned income?" Reddit Reacts More than 300 Redditors flocked to the comments to weigh in, with many offering support and advice. One wrote, "If you are on the account, you should be able to go to the bank and see your account. They will help you access their app so you can see what's happening with it. "You can't take your father off the account. You both have to agree to that. But you can take the money out and open up an account in your name only." When the OP clarified that she wasn't on the account at all, another user replied, "That's a problem. As far as the bank is concerned, you have zero right to that money. "Your only recourse would be to sue and bring pay stubs showing the direct deposit into that account." "The only reason for these types of restrictions is that your money is gone," one Redditor noted. "Your parents used that money long ago. That's my guess." The OP is now gathering pay stubs and W-2s and is planning to speak with a financial or family lawyer. "I sincerely appreciate everything that everyone has said, and I'll be doing more learning about the bank system," she wrote in her update. 'Missing pieces' Speaking to Newsweek via email, Chinwe' Foster, Esq., owner and managing attorney of Foster Law Firm, explained, "I don't see that anything criminal has taken place as she would have had to provide her banking information to any employer when she became an adult and it appears that she did. "However, she may have civil claims against her father (or the bank if her name is on the account and they won't give her access to it) if he is withholding money from her that she earned as an adult, absent of no other legal right given to him to withhold her money (i.e. conservatorship)." "However, there are a lot of missing pieces to this story," she cautioned. Financial Abuse According to Hopeful Panda, controlling access to someone else's income is a common sign of financial abuse. This may involve "demanding control over your income, savings, or accounts" or "restricting your access to financial information or your own earnings". The same article notes that using money to manipulate behavior or to punish non-compliance, such as requiring a child to explain and justify every expense, is often rooted in control rather than concern. Toxic Parental Behavior In a Newsweek interview, psychologist Wendy O'Neill said toxic behavior often comes from parents who are "manipulative and controlling, don't take responsibility for their actions... or their emotions dictate the home environment". Becca Bland, CEO of Stand Alone, a U.K. charity for estranged families, noted that parents who exhibit these patterns often "haven't done the work" to establish balanced, respectful relationships with their adult children. She added, "Being repetitively told you don't have a voice and you don't matter can very easily spin you out into a mental health crisis." Newsweek has contacted DreamSweetMyLove for comment via Reddit. Newsweek's "What Should I Do?" offers expert advice to readers. If you have a personal dilemma, let us know via life@ We can ask experts for advice on relationships, family, friends, money and work, and your story could be featured on WSID at Newsweek. To read how Newsweek uses AI as a newsroom tool, click here.
an hour ago
A teenager with a job making burritos became a powerful Minnesota lawmaker who trained service dogs
MINNEAPOLIS -- MINNEAPOLIS (AP) — Melissa Hortman' s influence at the Minnesota Capitol and her power as a Democratic leader to shape the course of a deeply divided Legislature were a far cry from her job as a teenager making chili-cheese burritos and overshadowed her volunteer work training service dogs for veterans. She was a lifelong Minneapolis-area resident who went to college in Boston and then returned home for law school and, with degree fresh in hand, worked as a volunteer lawyer for a group fighting housing discrimination. Elected to the Minnesota House in 2004, she helped pass liberal initiatives like free lunches for public school students in 2023 as the chamber's speaker. With the House split 67-67 between Democrats and Republicans this year, she helped break a budget impasse threatening to shut down state government. Tributes from friends and colleagues in both parties poured in after Hortman and her husband were shot to death early Saturday in their suburban Brooklyn Park home in what authorities called an act of targeted political violence. Helping Paws, which trains service dogs, posted a message on its Facebook page, along with a 2022 photo of a smiling Hortman with her arm around Gilbert, a friendly-looking golden retriever trained to be a service dog and adopted by her family. 'Melissa Hortman was a woman that I wish everyone around the country knew,' U.S. Sen. Amy Klobuchar, a longtime friend and Democratic ally, said Sunday on ABC's 'This Week.' Klobuchar added: 'She was a true leader and loved her work, but was always so grounded and such a decent person. I think that's probably the best word to describe her. You look at her pictures and you know what she was about.' The killings of Hortman and her husband early Saturday followed the shootings and wounding of another prominent Minnesota lawmaker, state Sen. John Hoffman, and his wife, at their home in Champlin, another Minneapolis suburb. Hoffman is chair of the Senate committee overseeing human resources spending. A nephew posted Sunday on Facebook that the Hoffmans were out of surgery and recovering from multiple gunshot wounds. The Hortmans, the Hoffmans and other top Democrats had gathered at a downtown Minneapolis hotel Friday night for their party's annual Humphrey-Mondale dinner. It's named for two Minnesota liberal icons who served both as U.S. senators and vice presidents, Hubert Humphrey and Walter Mondale. Minnesota Democrat and U.S. Sen. Tina Smith said she saw both lawmakers at the dinner. 'So it feels so personal, because we're all very good friends, of course, to have that have happened so shortly after we were all together,' Smith said on CNN's 'Inside Politics Sunday.' Outside the state Capitol in St. Paul, a memorial to Hortman and her husband included flowers, candles, small American flags and a photo of the couple. Visitors left messages on Post-It notes commending Hortman's legislative work, including, 'You changed countless lives." Legislative colleagues described Hortman as funny, savvy and fiercely committed to liberal causes. When lawmakers convened in January with a vacancy in a Democratic seat in the House giving the GOP a temporary advantage, Hortman led a boycott of daily sessions for more than three weeks to force Republicans into a power-sharing arrangement. Republicans were intent this year on ending state health coverage for adult immigrants who entered the U.S. illegally, authorized in 2023 as part of a sweeping liberal program. Democrats wanted to keep it, and lawmakers began June — the last month of the 2025 budget year — without having passed a 2026-27 spending blueprint. Hortman helped negotiate a package that included a bill ending the state health coverage for adult immigrants on Jan. 1, 2026. She was the only House Democrat to vote for it last week— the 68th vote it needed to pass the chamber. She told reporters afterward that Republicans insisted on the bill, and Minnesota voters who gave the House an even partisan split expect the parties to compromise. But she acknowledged she worries about people who will lose their health insurance. 'I know that people will be hurt by that vote,' she said, choking up briefly before regaining her composure. 'We worked very hard to try to get a budget deal that wouldn't include that provision.' Hortman's earliest jobs didn't suggest that she'd become a power in Minnesota politics. The earliest job listed on her profile, when she was 16, was as a cook and cashier at a restaurant, where she made tacos and, 'most importantly, chili cheese burritos.' She also worked for caterers and was a runner at an auto parts store, putting inventory away and retrieving items for customers. Her husband, Mark, earned a physics degree from the University of North Carolina and later, a master's of business administration. He was the chief operating officer of an auto parts company for 10 years before co-founding a business consulting firm. He was active in Helping Paws and worked with homebuilding nonprofit Habitat for Humanity. They have an adult son and an adult daughter. Melissa Hortman earned a degree in philosophy and political science from Boston University, where she also worked as a residence assistant in one of its dormitories. She earned her law degree from the University of Minnesota, but also a master's of public administration from Harvard University. She served a decade on the board of a local nonprofit providing transportation and car repairs for low-income residents. She also was part of a committee in 2005 considering whether Minneapolis should submit a bid to host the Summer Olympics. 'We remember Melissa for her kindness, compassion, and unwavering commitment to making the world better,' Helping Paws said in its Facebook message.
an hour ago
North Carolina redistricting trial begins over racial gerrymandering claims
RALEIGH, N.C. -- North Carolina congressional and legislative districts drawn by Republicans that helped them retain majorities in Raleigh and Washington are in court, as federal lawsuits accuse mapmakers of illegally eroding Black voting power in the process. A trial scheduled by a three-judge panel will start Monday in Winston-Salem over allegations that GOP legislative leaders violated federal law and the U.S. Constitution when they enacted new electoral maps in the ninth-largest state in October 2023. Republican leaders counter that lawfully partisan — and not racial — considerations helped inform their decision-making. The lines were used in the 2024 elections, after which Republicans kept General Assembly majorities and flipped three U.S. House seats held by Democratic incumbents who didn't seek reelection because they decided the recast district made winning impossible. Those seat flips, which turned a 7-7 delegation into one with a 10-4 Republican advantage, helped the GOP keep narrow control of the House, which has helped advance President Donald Trump's agenda. Favorable rulings for the plaintiffs could force Republicans to redraw maps for the 2026 elections, making it harder to retain their partisan advantage. Otherwise, the districts could be used through the 2030 elections. The trial involves two lawsuits filed in late 2023. In one lawsuit, the North Carolina NAACP, Common Cause and several Black residents originally sued over redrawn state House and Senate maps and U.S. House districts. The other lawsuit filed by nearly 20 Black and Latino voters focused on the new congressional districts, four of which they argue are illegal racial gerrymanders. Pretrial rulings this spring and amended litigation dismissed challenges to the state House map and narrowed state Senate arguments to a handful of districts. Still, both lawsuits claim that lines are so skewed for GOP candidates that many Black voters cannot elect their preferred candidates, violating the Voting Rights Act. They allege the mapmakers submerged or spread out Black voting blocs, which historically have favored Democrats, into surrounding districts with white majorities — benefiting Republicans. They point to a region where the cities of Greensboro, High Point and Winston-Salem are located. They said Republicans split the region's concentrated Black voting population within multiple U.S. House districts. Then-Rep. Kathy Manning, a Greensboro Democrat, decided not to run again because her district shifted to the right. The plaintiffs also allege Republican mapmakers intentionally discriminated against Black and Latino voters. In a pretrial brief, lawyers for Republican leaders say the lawmakers used mapmaking rules that prohibited using data identifying the race of voters, in keeping with rulings on previous North Carolina redistricting maps in which judges chided them for emphasizing race. Instead, Republicans were able to lawfully use partisan data — like statewide election results — in drawing the new maps, the lawyers said. They cite a 2019 U.S. Supreme Court decision and an April 2023 state Supreme Court decision that neutered legal claims of illegal partisan gerrymandering. The plaintiffs counter that the 'racial sorting' within the challenged districts can't be explained by politics alone. The three judges were all nominated to the bench by Republican presidents: 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Allison Rushing (Donald Trump) and District Judges Thomas Schroeder (George W. Bush) and Richard Myers (Trump). The panel has set aside several days for a trial that won't end until July 9. Likely witnesses include individual plaintiffs, state legislators, redistricting experts and historians. No immediate decision is expected — the legal sides have until early August to file additional briefs. The court's ruling can be appealed. With candidate filing for the 2026 election starting Dec. 1, any required remapping would have to be completed by late fall to avoid election disruptions. North Carolina has a long history of redistricting litigation in federal courts. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in landmark cases in the 1980s, 1990s and 2000s involving racial bias and the extent to which racial considerations could be used in forming districts that favored the election of Black candidates. The court's 2019 decision on partisan gerrymandering stemmed from a North Carolina case. The current maps were drawn after the state Supreme Court, with a Republican seat majority, essentially struck down rulings the court made in 2022 when it had a Democratic majority. Two other lawsuits challenging the 2023 district boundaries are pending. Statewide races in North Carolina are close, and Democrats have held the governor's mansion for most of the past 30 years. But Republicans have controlled the General Assembly — and thus redistricting — since 2011. Redistricting maps can't be blocked by a governor's veto.
