Residents file lawsuit challenging Louisiana constitutional amendments
BATON ROUGE, La. (KTAL/KMSS) – A Louisiana attorney representing three residents seeking to challenge HB7 said his clients are challenging the bill that seeks to alter the state's constitution.
Two teachers and a pastor filed a lawsuit on Monday that challenges the constitutionality of the proposed changes to the Louisiana State Constitution in the form of House Bill 7, which is slated for the March 29, 2025, ballot.
Amending Louisiana's lengthy constitution was at the top of Governor Landry's agenda, and during a Legislative Special Tax Session in November 2024, HB 7 was passed. At the time, many in the legislature and others familiar with Louisiana politics decried what they believed was a rushed attempt by the governor and business entities to rewrite the state's governing document without a Constitutional Convention. The current version of the Louisiana Constitution was drafted over a three-year period during the 1970s.
Teen's medical abortion puts Louisiana, New York leaders at odds as Landry signs doctor's extradition order
According to the complaint, the governor's attempt at a constitutional convention was blocked by Republicans in the legislature. However, the governor used a special tax session in the fall to push HB7, which the three plaintiffs say will 'dramatically alter the constitution' with a wide range of disjointed alterations.
The lawsuit highlights several issues with the amendment which is more than 100 pages including:
Narrowing constitutional protections for church and union property
Limiting local control over sale taxes
Liquidating several education trust funds
Deleting a fund supporting infant mortality programs
Changing gendered pronouns in the constitution
Potentially increasing taxes on take-out food
Removing constitutional authorization for farmers and fishermen's programs
According to the lawsuit, these changes are condensed into a one-sentence question that will appear on the March 29 ballot.
The plaintiffs also point out that the ballot language contradicts the true meaning of the language in the amendment. They cite claims verbiage within the amendment would 'provide a permanent teacher salary increase,' however, the plaintiffs said, 'no teacher will be paid any more than they currently are due to this potential amendment, and some teachers may be paid less.'
The plaintiffs are represented by Attorney William Most of Most & Associates a New Orleans-based law firm.
'Democracy only works if state officials are transparent with voters about what they are being asked to vote on. This proposed amendment flunks the basic honesty test,' Most said in a news release announcing the suit.
Read the full lawsuit below:
2025-2-17-Petition-for-Injunctive-ReliefDownload
The belief of the three residents bringing the lawsuit is that the ballot language fails to communicate the range of changes to the constitution that voters may find unappealing including eliminating constitutional protection for early childcare, STEM initiatives, and dyslexia training, programs that would impact more than 26K Louisiana students if the amendment passes.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Gov. Landry vetoes Senate oversight for his Port of New Orleans board choices
Barges and ships navigate the Mississippi River near Gramercy, Louisiana, on May 1, 2025. (Wes Muller/Louisiana Illuminator) A bill that attempted to add a layer of legislative oversight to the governor's picks for the Port of New Orleans board was officially sunk Monday with Gov. Landry's veto pen. Senate Bill 89 by Sen. Joseph Bouie, D-New Orleans, would have required the Senate to approve the governor's picks for members of the Board of Commissioners of the Port of New Orleans. The measure received unanimous approval from both chambers of the legislature. Currently, the governor has sole authority to choose port board members nominated by a coalition of organizations from Orleans, Jefferson and St. Bernard Parish. The nominating organizations are made up of university leaders, trade associations and local chambers of commerce. Members of the board serve for five-year terms. Landry cited 'an unnecessary layer of bureaucracy' as grounds for nixing the bill in his veto message, saying the port board selection process was sufficiently rigorous. 'Appointments are locally driven, carefully vetted, and rooted in industry expertise and community representation,' reads Landry's veto message. 'Adding a Senate confirmation requirement would complicate a system that already includes substantial input, oversight, and structure.' The Port Board of Commissioners is made up of four members from New Orleans, three from Jefferson Parish and one from St. Bernard Parish. As the sixth-largest port in the United States, the Port of New Orleans handles shipments of hundreds of cargo types, from consumer goods such as coffee, clothes and food to industrial materials including metals, wood and rubber. A major hub of global commerce, the Port of New Orleans ships more than 74 million tons of goods a year, according to a 2025 U.S. Bureau of Transportation Statistics report.
American Press
a day ago
- American Press
Landry aims to address 'legacy lawsuits' against oil and gas companies
State Representative Brett F. Geymann, a Republican for District 35. (Special to the American Press) Last week, lawmakers passed legislation to address 'legacy lawsuits' against oil and gas companies over alleged environmental damage. Those attempts on Sunday came in the form of amendments to a 200-page bill that was originally only meant as a restructuring of the Louisiana Department of Energy and Natural Resources. Not every amendment on Senate Bill 244 survived, but those that did were enough to have Gov. Jeff Landry celebrating on X. 'Closing the book on legacy lawsuits means real progress and predictability for Louisiana's energy future,' Landry wrote in his post, thanking Sen. Bob Hensgens, R-Abbeville, and Rep. Jacob Landry, R-Erath. The surviving amendments will require currently pending lawsuits that seek to force oil and gas companies to pay for environmental damage to properties from their activities be adjudicated by September 2027. The Senate did not consider the bill on Monday. When Rep. Bett Geymann, R-Lake Charles, was speaking on the bill on the House floor, he admitted that he hadn't spoken with industry representatives, but understood that 'they would prefer these lawsuits be over immediately.' Geymann didn't know how right he was. 'Delaying the implementation of the SB244 amendment by 26 months only extends the opportunity for plaintiffs' attorneys to exploit the current system,' Mike Phillips, Chevron's lead trial attorney, told The Center Square. 'This extended timeline incentivizes a last-minute rush of questionable legacy lawsuits…before the new reforms take effect on September 1, 2027.' A previous bill by Landry would have made the deadline a year earlier. The amendments that didn't survive, authored by Landry himself, would have drastically changed a process known as indemnification, where one company promises to cover the costs if another company gets sued or faces damages because of something that goes wrong, like an accident or spill. Landry's amendments would have prohibited shifting the cost of cleanup to the new landowners, instead leaving it with the original owner. In April, a jury ruled Chevron to pay over $700 million in coastal damages that occurred prior to Chevron owning the land that was damaged. 'The amendments, written personally by Gov. Landry, would retroactively and prospectively prohibit indemnification in oil and gas transactions – a move that threatens to further fuel Louisiana's lawsuit abuse crisis,' the American Tort Reform Association wrote. Though Landry has been a strong supporter of the oil and gas industry, he has not hidden his support for the lawsuits. The Landry administration joined Plaquemines parish as an appellant in the ruling against Chevron. In 2021, Landry, then the state's attorney general, authorized a settlement for $100 million against Freeport-McMoRan. Last week, Landry testified that the oil and gas industry was being 'hypocritical', referring to the oil and gas industry's support of carbon capture and sequestration. 'You can't say that litigation is so bad in this state that you will not conduct activity on one side of the equation and yet in the very next moment say, 'Guess what? I need some help from you all to do the same types of activities on this side in the same litigation environment,'' Landry said. 'That is the definition of hypocrisy.'
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Speaker Johnson sounds off on unrest in California over ICE raids
WASHINGTON, D.C. (KTAL/KMSS) – Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, of Louisiana's 4th congressional district, on Monday sounded off regarding the protests happening in California, and Los Angeles specifically, over federal ICE raids. 'The number one job of the government is to protect the people. Protect their safety and their property,' said Speaker Johnson. 'And if that's not being done by local and state authorities, then the feds have to step in. I think it's appropriate.' His comment came shortly after President Donald Trump ordered 700 United States Marines to Los Angeles as new rallies are set to take to the streets. According to NBC News, 56 people were arrested over the weekend as protesters were ordered to leave downtown Los Angeles. The Marines will be tasked with defending federal property and personnel, according to NBC News. They will join 2,000 California National Guard troops that began arriving on Sunday. 'I think it's an important message that's being sent. Hopefully, it has a deterrent effect,' said Johnson. 'But [the president] has federalized the National Guard. I think that's an appropriate step. They are bringing an end to that chaos.' Democratic House leader Representative Hakeem Jeffries, of New York's 8th Congressional District, say protestors have a right to assemble and voice their opinions on issues directly affecting their lives. He says those breaking the law should be held accountable. 'No one is actually defending any unlawful behavior,' said Representative Jeffries. 'I am defending the right for the American people to peacefully assemble. And will continue to encourage people to exercise that right peacefully. And if anyone crosses that line they should be held accountable.' Jeffries went on to praise leadership in California and Los Angeles for their handling of the tense situation. 'I'm thankful for the leadership of Governor Newsom and Mayor Bass in terms of managing a fragile situation that Donald Trump and the extreme MAGA Republicans are intentionally trying to inflame,' said Jeffries. 'They should be ashamed of themselves. And these people have zero credibility.' Speaker Johnson disagreed, saying Newson has failed to perform his duties as governor. 'I'm not sure what Gavin Newsom has done or said, but I can tell you what I know that he's done is a complete dereliction of duty. As usual,' said Johnson. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
