logo
Is private equity's pushback on the CPA credential a regulatory issue?

Is private equity's pushback on the CPA credential a regulatory issue?

Yahoo2 days ago

This story was originally published on CFO.com. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily CFO.com newsletter.
Amid the growing influence of private equity across business — particularly in public accounting — a quiet but consequential trend is beginning to ripple through the profession. Licensed CPAs who don't work in audit or attest roles are being told to remove CPA from their email signatures, business cards and LinkedIn profiles.
In some cases, the directive is not coming from private equity owners, but from state boards of accountancy. It's the regulators who are pressing firms to limit the use of the CPA title among licensed professionals in non-attest roles. State boards have expressed concern that CPAs in advisory or consulting positions may inadvertently mislead clients by signaling regulatory oversight where none applies.
Regulators worry the public may assume anyone using the CPA title is providing services under the oversight and standards of a licensed audit practice, even when that's not the case. These interventions are often prompting firms, particularly those with private equity structures, to adopt dual-entity models that separate audit and non-audit functions, thus stripping CPA titles from certain professionals accordingly.
Firm leaders often cite regulatory caution and legal risk as justification, concerned that clients may assume all services are being performed by professionals working under the CPA license. But the move is sparking backlash among some accounting leaders and raising broader questions about the long-term value of the CPA designation itself.
Many CFOs already feel the CPA has been devalued, whether due to burdensome licensure requirements, changes to the exam structure or the limited appeal of public accounting careers for young talent. Now, the rise of private equity ownership and intensifying regulatory scrutiny is introducing a new layer of complexity for CPAs inside firms and for the finance leaders who rely on them.
The practice of splitting CPA firms into the dual entity model — one that performs audit work and another that handles advisory or consulting services — is not new, especially among firms with private equity backing. This structure allows firms to navigate ownership rules that prohibit non-CPAs from owning audit practices.
However, according to commentary shared on an Accounting Podcast episode from early last month, at least one state board of accountancy has begun pressuring firms to prevent licensed CPAs on the non-attest side from using the 'CPA' title publicly. Blake Oliver, co-host of the podcast, said a listener of the podcast who works at a private equity-backed firm confirmed the decision to restrict CPA usage came in response to this regulatory scrutiny.
State boards, the listener told Oliver, are concerned the public could be misled if credentialed staff appear to be offering services under the CPA umbrella when they are technically working outside the regulated audit entity. Oliver also included a statement from AICPA CEO Mark Koziel, who defended the value of the credential and expressed concern over firms limiting its use.
'We support the use of CPA to everyone who has gone through the process of becoming licensed. As I've heard in my listening tour, the passion behind CPA is evident,' said Koziel. 'The CPA and what goes with it — integrity, accountability, objectivity, competence — is the value that we bring to the market, to our clients and to communities. It's what creates trust in firms of all business models, including alternative practice structures.' Oliver said the decision to have non-audit CPAs drop the title may be a countermove from firms against regulation. 'Private equity is calling [the regulators'] bluff,' he said on the episode. 'Private equity is saying, 'well fine, you give us a hassle, we're just not going to call ourselves CPAs period'.'
The implications of this challenge have the potential to go beyond firm branding or regulatory semantics. In a recent op-ed in the Journal of Accountancy, AICPA public accounting CEO Susan Coffey warned that the move could undercut recruiting efforts and damage the pipeline. She delivered a message to private equity-backed accounting firms who are limiting the use of "CPA" saying it sends the wrong message to the next generation of accountants.
'This isn't just an issue for current CPAs,' wrote Coffey. 'There could be unintended consequences for our future talent.'
Coffey cited a 2023 study by the Center for Audit Quality that found 82% of accounting majors view the CPA license as extremely or very valuable to their career goals. 'Why would a young professional work hard to acquire the CPA, only to have their employer tell them they can't use it?' she wrote.
That disconnect between what firms expect of their staff and how they represent them risks weakening one of the profession's fundamentally vital recruitment and skill-building tools. Not only do many CFOs credit their time in public accounting to learning the intangibles of the job, but for many students and early-career accountants, the license is more than a regulatory hurdle. It can be a symbol of credibility, achievement and long-term opportunity. If firms appear to undervalue the credential, some, like Coffey, worry that fewer students will choose accounting in the first place.
And while private equity backers may be focused on risk mitigation and compliance, the oversight leaders say the shift could inadvertently damage the profession's public standing. 'We work with market permission,' Coffey wrote. 'CPA licensure helped build that market permission. And that permission equates to tremendous value for us as individuals, for the businesses we work in and serve clients in and for the CPA profession.'
This story is ongoing, and we will publish additional findings as we continue to reach out to CPA society leaders for their input.
Recommended Reading
How CPA licensure changes are affecting CFOs and accounting talent
Connectez-vous pour accéder à votre portefeuille

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Caraway has HR, 4 RBIs to help Oregon St. beat USC 14-1, stay alive at Corvallis Regional
Caraway has HR, 4 RBIs to help Oregon St. beat USC 14-1, stay alive at Corvallis Regional

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Caraway has HR, 4 RBIs to help Oregon St. beat USC 14-1, stay alive at Corvallis Regional

CORVALLIS, Ore. (AP) — Trent Caraway had a double, a home run, and four RBIs, Gavin Turley also hit a homer and Oregon State beat Southern California 14-1 at the Corvallis Regional on Sunday night. Oregon State (44-13-1) can win its second consecutive regional title with another win over the Trojans on Monday. Advertisement The Beavers — who lost 6-4 to Saint Mary's Friday, then won games Saturday against TCU and earlier Sunday against Saint Mary's, avenging their opening-round loss by beating the Gaels 20-3 — have won three consecutive elimination games. Oregon State starter Wyatt Queen gave up back-to-back singles to lead off the fifth, walked Ethan Hedges to load the bases and struck out Bryce Grudzielanek before Kellan Oakes came on and struck out Adrian Lopez looking and then got Abbrie Covarrubias swinging to end the threat. Oakes (3-0) had four strikeouts in 1 2/3 innings before before Zach Kmatz struck out seven across three scoreless innings for his first save of the season. Wilson Weber and Caraway led off the second with back-to-back singles before a sacrifice bunt by AJ Singer moved both runners into scoring position. Weber scored on a bunt single by Canon Reeder, who was thrown out at second on a bunt by Dallas Macias, who reached on a fielder's choice to drive in Caraway. Tyce Peteron — who finished with four hits — had an RBI single up the middle Macias scored on a sacrifice bunt by Easton Talt to make it 4-0. Maximo Martinez had an RBI single in the second for USC (37-22). Advertisement Brayden Dowd led off the first with a single but was thrown out at home when Hedges followed with a double. Dowd appeared to be shaken up after a collision at the plate and left the game in the second inning. ___ AP college sports:

Royals Turn Heads With Decision on No. 1 Prospect
Royals Turn Heads With Decision on No. 1 Prospect

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Royals Turn Heads With Decision on No. 1 Prospect

Royals Turn Heads With Decision on No. 1 Prospect originally appeared on Athlon Sports. In a move that has electrified Kansas City, the Royals are calling up their top prospect, Jac Caglianone, as reported by ESPN's Jeff Passan on Sunday night. Advertisement The 22-year-old slugger, drafted sixth overall in 2024, has been tearing through the minors, boasting a .322/.389/.593 slash line with 15 home runs and 56 RBIs across 50 games between Double-A and Triple-A. Caglianone, a former two-way star at the University of Florida, has transitioned into a full-time hitter, splitting time between first base and right field. Royals fans, desperate for outfield power after a lackluster season, are buzzing with excitement as Caglianone prepares to make his MLB debut against the Cardinals and Yankees. Kansas City Royals first round draft pick Jac Caglianone poses with his mother Johanne Caglianone for photos on the fieldDenny Medley-Imagn Images "The kid has all the potential in the world," wrote one fan. Advertisement "Dude is a stud and is going to be a major asset to the Royals for years to come," wrote another. "Born superstar," said one user. "That's exciting news! Jac Caglianone is going to bring some serious power to the Royals lineup," said another user. "Damn Jac gonna rake for the Royals," chimed in another. Despite concerns over his high two-strike chase rate, the Royals believe his raw power and improved plate discipline—evidenced by more walks than strikeouts in spring training—make him ready for the big leagues. The 6-foot-5, 250-pound phenom's arrival signals a new era for Kansas City, a team looking to build on its 2024 postseason appearance. With Caglianone's bat in the lineup, the Royals are poised to make a serious statement in the AL Central. Related: Florida Beats Out Three SEC Rivals For Elite OL Recruit This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jun 2, 2025, where it first appeared.

Taylor Swift got what she wanted. So what do 'Taylor's Versions' mean now?
Taylor Swift got what she wanted. So what do 'Taylor's Versions' mean now?

Yahoo

time24 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Taylor Swift got what she wanted. So what do 'Taylor's Versions' mean now?

I have been to some very loud concerts. Nothing compares to what I witnessed at SoFi Stadium in Los Angeles on Aug. 9, 2023, when I attended Taylor Swift's Eras Tour. 'Here we are on the last night of the U.S. leg of the Eras Tour, in the eighth month of the year on the ninth day of the month,' Swift told the 70,000-plus people in the audience near the end of the 3½-hour show. '... There's something that I've been planning for a really, really, really, ridiculously, embarrassingly long time. And I think instead of just telling you about it, I think I'll just sort of show you.' The screaming during Swift's speech — her emphasis on the numbers eight and nine could only mean one thing — was just a warmup for the deafening roar when the enormous screen behind her transformed into the cover art for '1989 (Taylor's Version).' The surprise reveal of Swift's fourth rerecorded album, an effort she started in 2019 after her devastation that her master recordings of her first six albums were sold to music manager Scooter Braun, sent the crowd into such a frenzy that my ears still hurt when I think about it. That was the last rerecording announcement that Swift made until Friday morning, when the superstar dropped the bombshell that after the years-long battle, she finally was able to buy back her masters and now owns her entire music catalogue. The purchase, which Swift called her 'greatest dream come true,' immediately made global headlines, from every corner of social media to midday cable news. ('Now it's all going to be Taylor's version,' said CNBC reporter Bertha Coombs, to which anchor Kelly Evans replied, 'All is well with the world.') The most ecstatic people were in her fandom, the famously loyal Swifties who ensured that all of the 'Taylor's Version' albums ('Fearless' and 'Red' in 2021, 'Speak Now' and '1989' in 2023) debuted at No. 1 on the Billboard 200 chart. Swift embarked on this project to gain control of her music and as a way to devalue her original recordings so they wouldn't be worth as much to Braun, who Swift claimed bullied her for years. (In 2020, he sold her masters to private equity firm Shamrock Capital.) Until Friday, the most die-hard fans called those songs the 'stolen versions' and refused to listen to them, even if they preferred the originals to the updated tracks. Swift's announcement, however, also prompted some criticism on social media and beyond from people who looked back on the 'Taylor's Version' endeavor and called it a 'scam,' or mocked fans who spent money on the rerecords when Swift — whose net worth reached a reported $1.6 billion last year — turned around and bought back the masters anyway. Swift's statement implied that she won't be releasing the highly anticipated 'Reputation (Taylor's Version)' and that there's no timeline for her rerecorded self-titled debut album. There's no doubt that Swifties have had an extreme reaction to this project: the internet-consuming countdown to every rerelease day; the intense speculation about when Swift was dropping 'Rep TV,' including the widespread theory that she would reveal the date at last week's American Music Awards (nope); the literal tears of joy after Friday's announcement. But as I thought about it, I went back to that eardrum-piercing night in Los Angeles and what Swift said during her speech before she revealed the album, as she talked about how she was 'pleasantly surprised' by how much fans had supported her rerecording quest. 'That was something that I expected to be just a 'me' thing, just a personal thing,' Swift said. '... The way that you have embraced that, the way that you have celebrated that — you really decided that it was your fight too, and that you were 100 percent behind me. And if I cared about it, you cared about it. I will never stop thanking you for that.' Setting aside the idea that Swift could actually be surprised that her listeners cared about her actions (in 2014, iTunes Canada accidentally uploaded eight seconds of static labeled as a Taylor Swift song and it immediately rocketed to No. 1), her speech got to the core of why Swifties connected so deeply to the rerecords. The foundation of Swift's legacy as a once-in-a-generation pop star is the inimitable relationship she has with her fan base, building on the personal nature of her music that has enthralled listeners for nearly 20 years. Swift's back-and-forth with her fans dates back to her country music days as a teenager in Nashville, when she spent hours chatting on MySpace and stayed at venues until every autograph was signed. She bought listeners Christmas presents and showed up at their houses and left comments on their Instagram photos, and she jumped out of the car to meet them if she saw them wearing one of her tour T-shirts on the street. Swift has never charged for meet-and-greets at her concerts. She hosted backstage after-parties and had 'secret sessions' for early album previews at her home. She referred to her fans as friends, and emphasized that they are all equally important participants in her musical journey. But as Swift has become a global celebrity, the relationship with her fans had to change. Her fan base has grown at an astonishing and unmanageable rate, and for both logistical and safety reasons, Swift hasn't hosted meet-and-greets since 2018. Although she posts the occasional reaction on TikTok, she's rarely active on social media. When I interview Swifties, they often say that they understand why she had to pull back on letting everyday people into her life, but that they still wish they could talk to Taylor like they did in the old days. In a way, the rerecords allowed the less accessible Swift to communicate with her fans once again. She incentivized the purchase by including 'from the vault' songs that she left off the albums the first time, which provided new details for the Swifties who meticulously track her life story, and shed insight into how she thought about her career and legacy. On the rerecorded 'Fearless,' she paid homage to her country music roots as she tapped Keith Urban and Maren Morris to sing with her on two vault tracks. The new 'Red' included the 10-minute version of 'All Too Well,' with unreleased lyrics that fans had been clamoring for for almost a decade. With the 'Speak Now' rerelease looming, she assured one concert crowd that she didn't need anyone defending her online — presumably a preventative measure for people to leave John Mayer alone about 'Dear John,' the album's scathing ballad. The updated '1989' included vault songs with even more vulnerable lyrics about a breakup. All of her actions surrounding the rereleases, including the letters she included with each album that explained her choices in making the record, proved the most important thing for Swifties: that she was still listening to them. A few years ago, I wrote about how the hunt for hints and Easter eggs in Swift's work (something she has always encouraged) had exploded over time. One fan told me, 'She's aware of the game, so if we play the game, it feels like we're all doing something together.' That sums up why the practice only increased through the rerecords. During the Los Angeles announcement, for example, people in the stadium also lost their minds when Swift appeared onstage in a blue costume. Because '1989' is associated with the color blue, they (correctly) assumed a 'Taylor's Version' announcement was coming that night. This doesn't make sense to anyone outside the fan base, but that's the point. In her letter about her masters on Friday, Swift noted that the success of the Eras Tour (which grossed more than $2 billion) allowed her to make this purchase — but so did the support from her fans. And that underscores what Swift has told them all along and what the Swifties believe: that Taylor and the fans always have been, and always will be, in this together.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store