Poll exclusive to UP: half of Ukrainians support compromise to end war
According to a December 2024 poll conducted by Ukrainska Pravda, 50% of Ukrainians favour a compromise solution involving the leaders of other countries to end the war, but with significant security guarantees for Ukraine.
Source: Ukrainska Pravda's article; a December poll by the sociological company Socis, available to Ukrainska Pravda
Quote: "According to a December poll by the sociological company Socis, which is available to Ukrainska Pravda, the number of Ukrainians who would like immediate negotiations and an end to the war has recently increased sharply."
Details: Thus, 50% of respondents support the search for a compromise solution involving the leaders of other countries to end the war.
Also, the number of those who support freezing the war and ending combat actions along the current line of contact has increased from 8% to almost 20% over the year.
One of the biggest risks of the negotiation process is whether the government's actions will be accepted by society and the servicemen.
At the start of Russia's full-scale invasion, Ukrainians were eager to defend the country and fight until the country's borders as of 1991 were restored, but the situation on the battlefield has evolved over the course of three years, as has public sentiment.
Nonetheless, no one can guarantee that Ukrainian opposition would be avoided until the negotiations result in significant security guarantees for Ukraine.
The majority of Ukrainska Pravda sources in the government team are adamant that any agreement can only be based on reliable guarantees of Ukraine's security until it enters NATO.
Thus, the president believes that the subject of a peacekeeping mission in Ukraine entails at least 200,000 soldiers stationed in the country.
Quote from one of the most influential members of the president's team: "We have two big tasks now. To try to do something big and unprecedented. Perhaps, to achieve some kind of agreement on guarantees with the United States, which would be ratified by the Congress. No one else in the world has this, and it would send a serious signal. We also must overcome Russia's main goals, such as permanent neutrality and the like."
Details: However, most of the officials interviewed by Ukrainska Pravda assume that if it comes to negotiations, the Russians will try to start with the Istanbul Treaty project, which Ukraine has rejected in 2022.
"So we'll have to fight harder to get rid of the 'treacherous' clauses about limiting the army or neutrality. But that's if it comes to such negotiations at all. We are still waiting to see what the Americans decide, and what the results of their talks with the Russians will be. Maybe our team will have to tell everyone to back off," the source said.
Support UP or become our patron!
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
China's Envoy Urges Australia to Resist US Pressure on Military Spending
(Bloomberg) -- China's envoy to Canberra urged Australia not to be 'incited' by NATO's support for US demands to sharply raise defense spending and instead cooperate with Beijing to resolve regional disputes. Philadelphia Transit System Votes to Cut Service by 45%, Hike Fares Squeezed by Crowds, the Roads of Central Park Are Being Reimagined Sprawl Is Still Not the Answer Sao Paulo Pushes Out Favela Residents, Drug Users to Revive Its City Center Mapping the Architectural History of New York's Chinatown Ambassador Xiao Qian, in an opinion article published in The Australian newspaper Monday, wrote that both Australia and China rely on the same trade routes and have a major stake in safeguarding maritime security. He emphasized their roles as key trade partners with 'highly complementary' economies. 'Dramatically increasing military spending places a heavy fiscal burden on the countries involved, undermining their efforts to boost economies and improve livelihoods, and further straining a global economy already struggling with weak recovery,' Xiao said. He added some countries at events such as the Group of Seven summit and the recent North Atlantic Treaty Organization meeting have 'hyped up the so-called China threat narrative,' to increase defense spending 'and even incited Australia to follow suit.' Australia spends a little over 2% of its gross domestic product on defense and is under pressure from the US to raise that to 3.5%. The center-left government has pushed back, pointing out it has already increased outlays. At a higher level, Canberra is trying to balance the increasingly confrontational relationship between the US and China, which are respectively Australia's historic security ally and its biggest trading partner. Australia likely wants to avoid raising defense spending excessively and antagonizing Beijing. 'As I often hear from Australian friends, 'we have hundreds of reasons to be friends, and none to be enemies',' Xiao said. NATO leaders last week agreed to increase defense spending to 5% of GDP and renewed their 'ironclad commitment' to mutual security as they aim to push back against an increasingly belligerent Russia. The US wants allies to take up more of the fiscal burden for their own defense so it can focus more heavily on China. Australia's Labor government has managed to rebuild ties with Beijing after they plunged into a deep freeze, which included punitive trade actions against some Australian goods in 2020. The fallout was triggered by the then center-right government calling for a probe into the origins of Covid-19. 'China and Australia are friends, not foes. This should never have been in question,' Xiao said. 'China has been always developing bilateral friendship and co-operation with the utmost sincerity and patience, and we hope Australia will work with us in the same direction.' America's Top Consumer-Sentiment Economist Is Worried How to Steal a House Inside Gap's Last-Ditch, Tariff-Addled Turnaround Push Luxury Counterfeiters Keep Outsmarting the Makers of $10,000 Handbags Apple Test-Drives Big-Screen Movie Strategy With F1 ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
‘Not foes': China to Aus amid nuclear build-up
Xi Jinping's envoy in Canberra says China and Australia are 'not foes', despite being embroiled in a regional rivalry and Beijing rapidly building up conventional and nuclear military capabilities. Anthony Albanese has been facing domestic and international calls to boost the defence budget, with the US warning of a potentially 'imminent' threat from China in the Indo Pacific. But the Prime Minister has resisted, making Australia an outlier in the West – a position highlighted by NATO's decision last week to dramatically hike military spending to 5 per cent of GDP. Chinese ambassador Xiao Qian on Monday urged Mr Albanese to stay the course. 'Recently, some countries hyped up the so-called China threat narrative on occasions such as the Shangri-La Dialogue, G7 summit and NATO summit, proclaiming to significantly increase defence expenditures, and even incited Australia to follow suit,' Mr Xiao wrote in The Australian. 'Such rhetoric and actions are steeped in Cold War mentality, blatantly creating division, fuelling a global arms race as well as threatening world peace and stability, which warrants our high vigilance. 'By playing up international and regional tensions and slandering China's normal military build-up, these countries are merely seeking nothing but excuses to drastically grow their military spending, even arbitrarily reaching beyond its geographical scope and mandate.' He accused 'certain countries' of trying to contain China because they 'fear fair competition' and 'cannot tolerate other countries from making progress'. Mr Xiao's piece comes as Foreign Minister Penny Wong heads to Washington for a second meeting with her Quad counterparts within six months. The Quad, made up of Australia, India, Japan and the US, is a partnership broadly seen as a check on China's economic and military might. Earlier this month, US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth warned China could invade the democratically self-governed island of Taiwan as early as 2027. Such a move would deal a major blow to global supply of semiconductors – crucial components in modern tech – and massively disrupt vital trade routes. 'Let me be clear, any attempt by Communist China to conquer Taiwan by force would result in devastating consequences for the Indo-Pacific and the world,' Mr Hegseth told the Shangri La Dialogue. 'There's no reason to sugar-coat it. The threat China poses is real and it could be imminent. 'We hope not but certainly could be.' Meeting with Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles on the sidelines of the conference, he directly asked Australia to boost the defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP. The Albanese government was quick to brush off the request, saying Australia would set its own military budget. But days later, Mr Marles, who is also defence minister, admitted China's growing nuclear arsenal was driving 'security anxiety'. 'I mean, we've made no secret of the fact that we have a security anxiety in relation to China that's principally driven by the very significant conventional military build-up that China is engaging in, and, for that matter, a nuclear build-up that China is engaging in,' he told reporters. 'We've made that clear to China itself.' As of mid-2024, China's operational nuclear warheads exceeded 600, according to the US Department of Defence. That was nearly triple what the country was estimated to have in 2020. More recently, Mr Marles refused to say whether three Chinese warships that circumnavigated Australia earlier this year targeted cities when they carried out exercises off the country's vast coastline. Appearing at New Corp's Defending Australia Summit, he said was asked point blank if the ships rehearsed strikes on Australian cities or onshore facilities. 'Look, I do know the answer to the question,' he said. 'I don't think it's appropriate or helpful for me in this situation to speculate about it for a range of reasons … and the most significant being what we did with the Chinese task group was to engage in an unprecedented level of surveillance on that task group. 'So we do know exactly what they were doing and exactly what they're rehearsing. 'For me to start talking about that obviously reveals our surveillance capabilities, which is why I'm reluctant to.'
Bloomberg
2 hours ago
- Bloomberg
China's Envoy Urges Australia to Resist US Pressure on Military Spending
China's envoy to Canberra urged Australia not to be 'incited' by NATO's support for US demands to sharply raise defense spending and instead cooperate with Beijing to resolve regional disputes. Ambassador Xiao Qian, in an opinion article published in The Australian newspaper Monday, wrote that both Australia and China rely on the same trade routes and have a major stake in safeguarding maritime security. He emphasized their roles as key trade partners with 'highly complementary' economies.
