As Trump Moves to Tax Small Parcels, Some Retailers Give Up on US
As the United States ends a tariff exemption for small parcels on Friday, some retailers have stopped selling to US customers while others are seeking temporary workarounds in the hope the tariff rate may be reduced.
The removal of 'de minimis' - duty-free treatment of ecommerce packages worth less than $800 - for products originating from China and Hong Kong exposes those goods to tariffs of 145 percent on most Chinese goods following U.S. President Donald Trump's decision last month, a move that upended global trade and triggered retaliation from Beijing.
British beauty products retailer Space NK has paused e-commerce orders and shipping to the US 'to avoid incorrect or additional costs being applied to our customers' orders', the company said in a notice on Wednesday.
It is not alone. Understance, a Vancouver-based company that sells bras and underwear manufactured in China, told customers in an Instagram post that it would no longer ship to the United States due to the tariffs, saying it will resume once there is clarity.
'We're going from zero to 145 percent, which is really untenable for companies and untenable for customers,' said Cindy Allen, CEO of Trade Force Multiplier, a global trade consultancy.
'I've seen a lot of small to medium-sized businesses just choose to exit the market altogether,' she added.
Import charges can vary depending on shipment methods. For goods handled by the US Postal Service the tariff will be 120 percent of their value, or $100 per package. The amount is due to increase to $200 in June, according to implementation guidance from US Customs and Border Protection. Price Hikes Underway
Players willing to continue to access the US market are forced to hike their price tags.
Oh Polly, a British clothing retailer, has increased prices in the US by 20 percent compared to its other markets, and may have to consider further price increases because of the higher tariffs, said managing director Mike Branney.
Singapore-based fast-fashion giant Shein sought to reassure customers in a post on its US Instagram account on Thursday, saying: 'Some products may be priced differently than before, but the majority of our collections remain as affordable as ever.' Shein sells clothes mostly manufactured in China, and the US is its biggest market.
Temu, the international arm of Chinese e-commerce giant PDD Holdings, prominently featured products already in US warehouses on its website, labelled 'Local', and a pop-up informed customers there would be no import charges for local warehouse items.
But items imported before the May 2 change will eventually run out. Both Shein and Temu have slashed their US digital advertising spending in the past weeks as they prepared for the change that is likely to hit their sales.
Shein did not immediately reply to a request for comment. Temu did not immediately reply to a request for comment.
De minimis was initially introduced to smooth online shopping and boost international trade, but became the target of bipartisan criticism due to its role in facilitating smuggling of fentanyl ingredients from China and fuelling a surge in imports of cheap clothes, toys, and furniture made in China through online platforms like Temu, Shein, and Amazon Haul.
De minimis has also been a channel for counterfeit goods. In 2024, de minimis shipments accounted for 97 percent of the intellectual property infringement-related cargo seizures made by Customs and Border Protection.
Without de minimis, sellers of goods made in China have to provide US customs with more detailed information about where each component of their product is made, an increased administrative burden that, along with the huge tariff cost, is dissuading small retailers.
UPS CEO Carol Tome said on Tuesday that many of the delivery firm's small to medium-sized business customers source 100 percent of their goods from China.
US online marketplace Etsy said in a notice to sellers earlier this month that it was making it easier for them to clarify the country of origin of their products, as tariffs are applied based on where a good is made rather than where it is dispatched from.
While disruptive to e-commerce, the end of de minimis treatment of Chinese goods could give a boost to retailers less reliant on e-commerce or on Chinese manufacturing.
British fast-fashion retailer Primark, which sells clothes to US customers only through its stores across the country, not online, said it could benefit from the change.
'With prices going up from this part of the trade, I wonder if some Americans might start going back to shopping centres to find value there,' George Weston, CEO of Primark owner Associated British Foods, told Reuters on Tuesday.
By Helen Reid, Amy Tennery, Lisa Baertlein and James Davey; Editors: Lisa Jucca and Anna Driver
Learn more:
Temu Ditches Chinese Imports Model to Avoid Trump's Tariffs
Temu is abandoning their model centred around cheap Chinese imports, aiming to sell only goods from local merchants to American consumers.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
7 minutes ago
- Newsweek
China Moves Forward on Next-Generation High-Speed Rail
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. China has moved to the testing stage for its next-generation high-speed train, the CR450. Engineers launched a test model from Yichang North Station along the Shanghai-Chongqing-Chengdu high-speed railway, with the train heading toward Wuhan. Newsweek reached out to China's Ministry of Transport via email for comment. Why It Matters China operates the world's most extensive high-speed rail network, with more than 24,855 miles of operational lines, according to a 2023 report from the International Union of Railways. The arrival of the CR450 could further enhance the country's reputation as the world leader in high-speed rail technology, promising faster, safer, and more energy-efficient transportation options. China alone accounts for nearly double the combined length of the rest of the world's high-speed rail systems. What To Know Tests on the CR450 model will continue for around two weeks to validate performance and collect data for system optimization. The CR450 prototype is designed to reach test speeds of up to 450 kilometers per hour (279.6 mph), with an intended operational speed of 400 km/h. Once launched commercially, it will become the world's fastest high-speed train, surpassing China's current CR400 model, which operates at 350 km/h. According to the China State Railway Group, the CR450 will feature a 22 percent reduction in overall operational resistance and a 10 percent decrease in weight compared to its predecessors. The CR450AF bullet train in Beijing on December 29, 2024. The CR450AF bullet train in Beijing on December 29, 2024. Xinhua The prototypes, which were first unveiled last year, are designed with an eight-car formation comprising four powered and four non-powered carriages, according to train manufacturer CRRC. China's high-speed rail network exceeded 46,000 kilometers by the end of last year. The country added over 3,100 kilometers of new railway in 2024 alone, including 2,457 kilometers of high-speed track, and its overall network now reaches more than 160,000 kilometers. Although it reached test speeds of 450 km/h, authorities stated that the train's operating speed was 400 km/h. According to China Daily, the CR450 has a braking response time of about 1.7 seconds. What People Are Saying Lin Jian, a spokesperson for the Chinese Foreign Ministry, on X, formerly Twitter, in December: "With a test speed of 450 km/h and an operational speed of 400 km/h, it's set to be the fastest high-speed train in the world! Faster, safer, more energy-efficient, more comfortable, and smarter!" What Happens Next The CR450 test phase is expected to last approximately two weeks, with commercial operations of the upgraded rail section scheduled to commence in the second half of 2025.
Boston Globe
11 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Fenway Park, MGM Music Hall workers poised to go on strike as they seek better wages, controls on automation
'We work very hard there, all of us, and we just feel undervalued,' said Keanu Austin, the lead cook for the seats in Fenway's Aura Pavilion. 'Because we love working there, you know? We wouldn't be doing this if we didn't.' Advertisement The strike vote, set against a backdrop of three consecutive Red Sox home games against the Yankees, has the potential to disrupt business for the 37,000-plus-seat ballpark at the height of summer baseball season. If a majority of workers vote in favor of authorization, 'a strike could occur at any time,' the union said in a media release. The union said it would ask fans to refrain from buying ballpark concessions if a strike were to happen. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up 'We intend to keep working with the union toward a settlement that works for everyone,' an spokesperson for Philadelphia-based Aramark said in a statement to the Globe. 'In the event of a strike, we have contingency plans in place to ensure that services are not interrupted.' Advertisement People flood Jersey Street during the Boston Red Sox opening day at Fenway Park in April. Erin Clark/Globe Staff A representative for Fenway Sports Group, which operates Fenway Park and MGM, declined to comment on the vote, referring questions to Aramark. (John Henry, the principal owner of Fenway Sports Group, also owns the Boston Globe.) Fenway is not your typical union gig. Work there is broadly seasonal, with often-unpredictable hours, and many employees hold other jobs. But many say they stick around for years, or even decades, because of the camaraderie — with each other, but also with stalwart fans whose smiling faces they remember, season after season. 'At this point, it's just like, you just don't appreciate our work that we do, like to do, and we contribute to their fans at Fenway,' said Ramon Suarez, a warehouse attendant at Fenway who also works part-time at a gas station. Workers say that guaranteed wages — less than $20 per hour — no longer come close to meeting the area's sky-high cost-of-living. Local 26 spokesperson Lynette Ng declined to disclose the wage increases Aramark has proposed since negotiations began early this year, but said they are 'a long way away from where we want to be.' There are also concerns beyond pay. Amanda Savage, a Fenway cashier who floats between various food and beer stands, started working there when she was a senior at the nearby Boston Latin School. Now 35, Savage has seen her earnings from the park plummet in recent years since the introduction of new, AI-powered self-checkout machines for concessions, which reduce her interactions with fans and eat into her tips. 'The number of times that we've heard out loud, 'Who am I even tipping?' You know, people laugh about it,' said Savage, who also works as a fourth-grade teacher. Advertisement A Mashgin self-checkout machine at Fenway Park. Handout Austin, the Aura Pavilion cook, says he is currently paid around $22 an hour, but that scheduling can often be feast or famine depending on the cadence of away games and catering events. 'I just want to make this place better for the people that'll come after me,' said Austin, 30, who has worked at the park since 2016 but is now applying to other jobs. 'I've just seen so many people come and go because of the pay Savage is still holding out hope that a strike can be averted. But Aramark, she said, needs to step up to the plate. 'We deserve to be respected and valued by management,' said Savage, 'and if going on strike is what we need to do to accomplish that, then that's what we have to do.' Dana Gerber can be reached at
Forbes
21 minutes ago
- Forbes
The Power Algorithm - How Will Tech Shape Politics?
As the 'end of globalization' thesis plays out in dramatic form, some of the more speculative views I had laid out in the 'The Levelling' book are coming into focus. One of these is that we would see the emergence of new political parties to meet, and in some cases to exacerbate, the challenges of the 21st century, especially in the US and UK, and even in China. Unlike say, France, where political entrepreneurship is relatively easy (in the sense of forming a new party), two party systems dominate the two large Anglophone countries – the dominance of fundraising in the US makes it difficult to break the Republican-Democrat nexus, whilst the first past the post electoral system in the UK has made it hard for new parties to gather the mass and momentum to dent the influence of Labour and the Tories (Duverger's Law). That 'wall' now seems to have been broken by the rise of the Reform party in the UK, and a renaissance of sorts for the Liberal Democrats. Both parties still have relatively few seats in parliament but have won recent by-elections and if opinion polls are to be believed, the British political system is about to be fragmented into four parties. In the context of a world where only 6% of the population live in 'full' democracies, according to the Economist Intelligence Unit, it should be a worry that the tendency in Washington is towards a contest between autocracy and oligarchy, as witnessed by the spat between President Trump and Elon Musk. What struck me as an interesting, though tenuous development was the threat by Musk to set up a new political party the 'American party' and such a move, if it occurs, is part and parcel of the transition to a new world order. In the UK, there has already been an attempt by an entrepreneur to set up a new party. Back in 2018 Simon Franks started a new party called 'United for Change'. He had reportedly raised GBP 50M to support the launch and having attended some of their early meetings I can attest that a decent roster of candidates was being lined up. The project soon fizzled out, a sign that political life requires a certain set of skills, and that there was little appetite in the UK for a centrist party – the battles have been taking place at the margins of public life, and even Keir Starmer now regards Reform as the party to beat. This is a mistake in my view and the centre should not be evacuated but populated by parties willing to tackle difficult issues head on. In the US, it looks like difficult issues are inspiring difficult people to enter politics, Musk being an example. In the Levelling I had speculated that several new parties might be spawned by the end of globalization – a right wing 'Heimat' party, pan-global environmental party with a large Chinese membership called the 'Diggers', and a traditionalist 'Pilgrim' party to give a few examples. One idea that might materialise soon is what I had called the 'Governance Party', whose core philosophy is that technology should be put at the centre of public, social and economic life and that it can be used to shape human behaviour. Governance ID cards and governance scores will become part of life in this vision, and artificial intelligence will penetrate our everyday activities. When I wrote this description, it was a throw-away, speculative idea, but in an age of big data, fast AI and the rise of exceptionally powerful entrepreneurs it is a distinct possibility. The infusion of social media into our social and political lives has shaed and also muddied perceptions of reality, and social media is, in many political systems, the best way to quickly reach voters and understand their preferences. In this sense, social media helps to 'soften' voters up (the Reform Party has mastered TikTok for instance). Whether this means that electorates would accept a 'Governance' style form of government is not at all clear. In a way, China with its social scoring system is a precursor, and a good number of the China hawks (geopolitically) in the US are thought to be admirers of China's approach to governance. DOGE and some of the prospective projects in the department of Defence give an inkling as to the vision for technology within the state. If the idea of a 'Governance' Party is to become a reality then the signs to watch out for are a further digitisation of the official economy (such as a digital central bank currency), the digitisation of identification and democracy (to the point where voter ID is an iris scan), and the use of the digital in law enforcement. On the other, pro-democracy side, the struggle to protect open democracy will increasingly have the equal and opposite aim – the curbing of the effect of social media on political debate, the restriction of social media use for young people and the encouragement of active participation in public life.
