logo
Temerloh Fatal Crash: Car Driver Involved Charged With Drug Possession, Trafficking

Temerloh Fatal Crash: Car Driver Involved Charged With Drug Possession, Trafficking

Barnama15 hours ago

TEMERLOH, June 18 (Bernama) -- The car driver involved in a road crash that resulted in the death of two teenage girls was charged in the Magistrate's Court here today with trafficking more than 50 grammes of Methamphetamine last week.
Chun Kok Keong, 38, of Kepong, Kuala Lumpur, is charged with committing the offence in front of the lobby of the Temerloh District Police Headquarters at about 12.30 am on June 12 this year.
The charge, under Section 39B(1)(a) of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952, provides the death penalty or life imprisonment and not less than 15 strokes of the cane in the absence of the death penalty, upon conviction.
No plea was recorded from Chun, who works as a customer service officer, after the charge was read out before Magistrate Tan Chiew King, as the case is under the jurisdiction of the High Court.
Chun was also charged with possessing heroin weighing about 0.85 grammes at the same location and time under Section 12(2) of the same act.
He pleaded not guilty to the charge, which provides a maximum fine of RM100,000 or imprisonment for up to five years, or both, upon conviction.
The court allowed him bail of RM4,500 with one surety for the charge and set Sept 18 for mention.
Deputy public prosecutors Adriana Azrin and Siti Sarah Aqilah Lokman appeared for the prosecution, while Chun was represented by lawyer Siti Fatimah Mohd Shahril, from the National Legal Aid Foundation.
In the same court, Chun also pleaded not guilty to two charges of dangerous driving, which resulted in the death of Nur Erdina Shaffiya Muhammad Nazri and Aneez Irdiena Sofya Khairul Azman, both aged 18, at the traffic lights on Jalan Tengku Ismail, here at 10.50 pm, on June 11 this year.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

202 Victims Of Air India Plane Crash Identified
202 Victims Of Air India Plane Crash Identified

Barnama

time4 hours ago

  • Barnama

202 Victims Of Air India Plane Crash Identified

ISTANBUL, June 18 (Bernama-Anadolu) -- 206 of the victims of Air India Flight 171's crash into a medical college hostel in the western Indian city of Ahmedabad last week were identified via DNA tests by Wednesday, according to Gujarat government. Anadolu Ajansi (AA) reported that some 169 of the identified bodies have been handed over to their families, said the local government. The mishap occurred on Thursday, when the plane crashed into the hostel complex shortly after takeoff.

No whistleblower protection for Sabah case informant– MACC
No whistleblower protection for Sabah case informant– MACC

New Straits Times

time5 hours ago

  • New Straits Times

No whistleblower protection for Sabah case informant– MACC

KUALA LUMPUR: The Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) has confirmed that the person set to be charged alongside two Sabah assemblymen in connection with a corruption case involving mineral mining licences is not protected under the Whistleblower Protection Act 2010. Its Legal and Prosecution senior director, Datuk Wan Shaharuddin Wan Ladin, said Section 11(1) of the Act clearly states that anyone involved in the offence they report is not eligible for protection. "If a person is involved in the wrongdoing, they are not protected under the Act and therefore cannot be considered a whistleblower," he told Bernama today. He said to qualify for protection, a report must be made in good faith to a recognised enforcement agency such as the MACC, the police, or other authorised government bodies. "Reports made with malicious intent, such as to seek revenge or defame others, do not meet the criteria for protection," he added. Wan Shaharuddin also stressed that a key requirement under Section 11(1) is that the whistleblower must not be complicit in the wrongdoing being reported. If found otherwise, any protection granted may be revoked. "This is to preserve the integrity of the whistleblower framework and prevent it from being misused as a 'shield' by those trying to escape accountability," he said. Earlier, the individual's lawyer claimed his client was a whistleblower who had cooperated with authorities, but was later informed he would be charged in court on June 30. Recently, several video clips allegedly featuring conversations involving certain individuals and Sabah elected representatives discussing corrupt practices linked to mineral mining activities went viral on social media. Previously, MACC chief commissioner Tan Sri Azam Baki confirmed that two Sabah assemblymen and another individual are expected to be charged in court this month in connection with the scandal. – BERNAMA

Individual In Sabah Mineral Licence Case Not Protected Under Whistleblower Act
Individual In Sabah Mineral Licence Case Not Protected Under Whistleblower Act

Barnama

time5 hours ago

  • Barnama

Individual In Sabah Mineral Licence Case Not Protected Under Whistleblower Act

KUALA LUMPUR, June 18 (Bernama) -- The Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) has confirmed that the individual set to be charged alongside two Sabah assemblymen in connection with a corruption case involving mineral mining licences is not protected under the Whistleblower Protection Act 2010. Its Legal and Prosecution senior director, Datuk Wan Shaharuddin Wan Ladin, said Section 11(1) of the Act clearly states that anyone involved in the offence they report is not eligible for protection. 'If a person is involved in the wrongdoing, they are not protected under the Act and therefore cannot be considered a whistleblower,' he told Bernama today. He said to qualify for protection, a report must be made in good faith to a recognised enforcement agency such as the MACC, the Royal Malaysia Police (PDRM), or other authorised government bodies. 'Reports made with malicious intent, such as to seek revenge or defame others, do not meet the criteria for protection,' he added. Wan Shaharuddin also stressed that a key requirement under Section 11(1) is that the whistleblower must not be complicit in the wrongdoing being reported. If found otherwise, any protection granted may be revoked. 'This is to preserve the integrity of the whistleblower framework and prevent it from being misused as a 'shield' by those trying to escape accountability,' he said. Earlier, the individual's lawyer claimed his client was a whistleblower who had cooperated with authorities, but was later informed he would be charged in court on June 30. Recently, several video clips allegedly featuring conversations involving certain individuals and Sabah elected representatives discussing corrupt practices linked to mineral mining activities went viral on social media.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store