Palau's President Says New Index Should Be Used To Classify Economic Position
Surangel Whipps Jr delivered an address at the Global Platform for Disaster Risk Reduction in Geneva, Switzerland, last week.
Whipps said this classification ignored a "deeper truth".
"Many of our people live in income poverty," he said.
And climate disasters pushed them deeper into that, Whipps said.
"We face profound socioeconomic vulnerability and we cannot let GDP alone determine our eligibility for support."
He said the UN's multidimensional vulnerability index (MVI) should be used to "ensure a more just and accurate measure of our economic reality".
The United Nations is working with small island developing states (SIDS) on the development and implementation of an MVI.
The UN said most SIDS are not the poorest nations, but their costs are so much greater - and accessing financing is more difficult.
"A multidimensional vulnerability index has the potential to ensure truly inclusive sustainable development," it said.
"These small island nations have repeatedly said that traditional measures of development insufficiently capture their vulnerabilities.
"When it comes to financing, debt relief and aid, the use of unsuitable, outdated, simplistic [gross national income] measurements unfairly lock out SIDS from accessing the help they need."
Whipps also spoke on climate impacts in his nation, and said the dialogue's theme - 'Everyday counts - act for resilience today' - "resonates deeply with us in Palau".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
3 hours ago
- RNZ News
Pacific SIDs meet as UN plastics meeting continues in Geneva
Photo: artisteer / Getty Images/ iStockphoto Finance has been debated at a UN meeting on formulating a plastics treaty. Multiple meetings are continuing at the second part of the fifth session of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee , which aims to develop an international legally binding instrument on plastic pollution, including in the marine environment. The session will run until 14 August. Pacific Small Island Developing States (SIDS) are scheduled for a regional meeting on Tuesday in Geneva. The Secretariat of Pacific Regional Environment Programme (SPREP) reported that decisions over finance, to support the goals of the treaty and its implementation, have made minimal progress. It said the debate over who pays and who receives still remains unresolved. Fiji's permanent secretary for environment and climate change Dr Sivendra Michael said the financial mechanism is the heartbeat of the entire treaty. "In negotiating this, it is very important to make sure it is pumping the right amount of blood to all parts of the treaty so we have enough resources to be able to tackle plastic pollution at every stage of its life cycle, and that those resources are appropriate to our special circumstances," he said. "We don't produce plastic, we import it. So it's vital that we address the source." Dr Michael said without accessible and predictable financial support, even a strong treaty would consist of empty promises. "While we are talking about new and additional finance, climate change and biodiversity loss already have their own dedicated funding streams; and the underlying question is really - where will this money come from? "We need countries that are most responsible for the plastics crisis and those with the capabilities to do so to contribute towards addressing it." The Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee process was initiated following the adoption of UNEP Resolution 5/14 in March 2022, which called for the development of an international legally binding instrument to end plastic pollution. A study on plastic consumption published in 2024 warned that business as usual will result in nearly double the amount of plastic pollution .
NZ Herald
4 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Trump sets a low bar for high-stakes summit and avoids key issues for Kyiv
He added, 'I may leave and say good luck, and that'll be the end.' Trump's own description of his goals for the negotiation, the most high-stakes international meeting yet in his second term, were telling — as much for what he omitted as for what he included. And that is what worries both the Ukrainians and Washington's European allies, who have committed to keep arming Ukraine no matter the outcome in Anchorage. What wasn't mentioned Ceasefire Zelenskyy, who has not been invited to join the talks in Alaska, has said that any agreement must start with a some kind of truce or ceasefire so that negotiations were not being conducted amid continued air attacks and territorial grabs. Trump has not stipulated that a truce must come first. Guarantees During his hour-long news conference, he never once mentioned security guarantees for Ukraine, intended to assure that Putin does not exploit a break in the fighting or new territorial gains as his moment to regroup, rearm and resume his effort to seize the whole country. Support Nor did Trump commit to making sure that Ukraine has the arms, intelligence and co-operation it needs to defend its territory and deter Russia from future attacks. His Vice-President, JD Vance, a longtime critic of American aid to Ukraine, was quite explicit during an appearance on Fox News. 'We're done with the funding of the Ukraine war business,' he said, insisting that the only way American arms would make it into Ukrainian hands would be if European allies bought and transferred them. A sense of haste Trump's comments came as the White House scrambled to make arrangements for one of the most hastily assembled summits of recent times. Usually, such sessions are preceded by detailed advance negotiations, with prearranged agreements and communiqués. Trump seemed to suggest that he was walking into this discussion with none of those, though European officials say they have seen evidence that, at lower levels, Russian and American officials are talking. Adding to the sense of haste, the White House has still not said where, exactly, the meeting will be held, how long it is expected to last or whether at the end Trump will preside over a meeting between Putin and Zelenskyy, two avowed enemies. Influencing Trump The risk now, as even some of Trump's Republican allies have conceded, is that Putin will see an opportunity to flatter Trump, play for time, and perhaps win him over to the Russian leader's own interpretation of events. Recent history suggests that Trump is inclined to accept Putin's version of reality. This year he suggested that Ukraine was responsible for the invasion of its own territory, and he refused to join America's traditional Western allies in voting for a United Nations resolution condemning Russia's aggression. Earlier this week, Zelenskyy worried aloud that Trump could be easily 'deceived'. For that reason, European and Nato officials — who mollified Trump at the alliance's summit in the Netherlands in June by pledging to spend 3.5% of their gross domestic product on defence over the next decade — are now carefully trying to hedge him in. They arranged a video call for tomorrow with Trump, aware that they will not be in the room in Alaska, so their power is limited to persuading him beforehand and risking his wrath by dissenting later. One of the most explicit warnings to Trump came from the Secretary-General of Nato, Mark Rutte, a former Netherlands Prime Minister who has invested heavily in developing a relationship with the President and devised the Nato summit to minimise the chances he would disrupt it. His bet paid off, and Trump sang the alliance's praises, rather than declare that it was 'obsolete', as he did in his first term. Rutte's guardrails But this week, Rutte was clearly drawing some guardrails for the coming negotiation. 'Next Friday will be important because it will be about testing Putin, how serious he is on bringing this terrible war to an end,' Rutte said on ABC. 'When it comes to full-scale negotiations, and let's hope that Friday will be an important step in that process', territory will be only one issue, he said. 'It will be, of course, about security guarantees, but also about the absolute need to acknowledge that Ukraine decides on its own future, that Ukraine has to be a sovereign nation, deciding on its own geopolitical future — of course having no limitations to its own military troop levels,' Rutte said. 'And for Nato, to have no limitations on our presence on the eastern flank.' The dealmaker Trump said none of that in his comments in the White House briefing room yesterday. But he made it clear that striking an agreement was the key. 'I make deals,' he said. Trump has made no secret of his desire to win a Nobel Peace Prize, and has claimed that he was the driving force in recent ceasefires or peace accords in disputes between India and Pakistan, Azerbaijan and Armenia, and other regional conflicts. 'What's the definition of a good deal?' Trump asked reporters. 'I'll tell you after I hear what the deal is, because there could be many definitions.' This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Written by: David E. Sanger Photograph by: David Guttenfelder ©2025 THE NEW YORK TIMES
RNZ News
14 hours ago
- RNZ News
Myanmar security forces involved in systematic torture, UN report says
By Emma Farge , Reuters Smoke rises over Tamwe township in Yangon on March 27, 2021, as security forces continue their crackdown on protests against the military coup. Photo: AFP United Nations investigators said on Tuesday they have found evidence of systematic torture by Myanmar security forces and identified some of the senior perpetrators. The Independent Investigative Mechanism for Myanmar (IIMM), formed in 2018 to analyse evidence of serious violations of international law, said victims were subject to beatings, electric shocks, strangulations and other forms of torture like the removal of fingernails with pliers. "We have uncovered significant evidence, including eyewitness testimony, showing systematic torture in Myanmar detention facilities," Nicholas Koumjian, Head of the Mechanism said in a statement accompanying the 16-page report. The torture sometimes resulted in death, the report said. Children, who are often unlawfully detained as proxies for their missing parents, were among those tortured, it said. A spokesperson for Myanmar's military-backed government did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The military-backed government has not responded to over two dozen requests by the U.N. team for information about the alleged crimes and requests to access the country, the UN report said. The military says it has a duty to ensure peace and security. It has denied atrocities have taken place and has blamed "terrorists" for causing unrest. The findings in the report covering a one-year period through to June 30 were based on information from more than 1300 sources, including hundreds of eyewitness testimonies as well as forensic evidence, documents and photographs. The list of perpetrators identified so far includes high-level commanders, the report said. An IIMM spokesperson declined to name them, saying investigations are ongoing and it wanted to avoid alerting the individuals. The report also said that both Myanmar security forces and opposition armed groups had carried out summary executions in the conflict, and it had identified those responsible. A government spokesperson and an opposition spokesperson were not immediately available for comment. Myanmar has been in chaos since a 2021 military coup against an elected civilian government plunged the country into civil war. Tens of thousands of people have been detained since then in an attempt to silence opponents and recruit soldiers, the United Nations says. Junta chief Min Aung Hlaing ended a four-year state of emergency last month and announced the formation of a new government, with himself as acting president, ahead of a planned election. The IIMM is investigating abuses in Myanmar since 2011, including both crimes committed against the mainly Muslim Rohingya minority in 2017 when hundreds of thousands were forced to flee a military crackdown and violations affecting all groups since the coup. The IIMM said that it is supporting several jurisdictions investigating the alleged crimes, such as Britain. However, the IIMM said in its report that UN budget cuts are threatening its work. "These financial pressures threaten the Mechanism's ability to sustain its critical work and to continue supporting international and national justice efforts," it said. - Reuters
