My friend won the lottery. She then made it a point to give back to the people who had been kind to her.
A close friend from college messages me on Facebook to hang out.
She took me out for dinner and paid for everything, and gave me a gift card.
She had won the lottery and wanted to give back to people who had been kind to her.
It started with a Facebook message.
"Hey," it said. "I'm going to be in your area soon, and I'd love to see you and your family. Pick your favorite restaurant. Price doesn't matter."
It was from an old friend. We'd been close in college. Then life happened. We moved, changed, and grew up. The connection faded gradually, like a song fading out. Every now and then, I'd see her name in a comment or a like on a photo. A flicker of recognition, then silence again.
When her message arrived, it felt like opening a letter from another lifetime. I read it twice, and then I chose a restaurant.
I gave her the address of a local restaurant — the kind of place we reserve for birthdays or anniversaries. Cloth napkins, candlelight, and a wine list as thick as a novel.
My friend arrived with her wife and child. She hugged me like we'd just seen each other last week, and then she started ordering. Appetizers, entrees, desserts. A round of martinis. Then more appetizers, more laughter. She waved off the prices like they were a nuisance, a background hum.
The table filled, and so did the space between us. We passed plates, clinked glasses, and talked like old friends who had finally pressed play on a paused story.
When the check came, she didn't flinch. She simply handed over her credit card. Then she passed me a generous gift card for the same restaurant. I held it in my hand for a second; the gesture was so unexpected and so generous that I didn't quite know what to do with it.
I looked at her. "OK, what's going on? Why are you doing all this?"
For half a second, doubt tried to creep in. That little inner voice that questions kindness too freely — What's the catch? I wondered if this was leading up to a multi-level marketing pitch.
She just smiled. "I won the lottery," she said.
She didn't mean metaphorically. She meant the literal lottery. It wasn't private island money, she said, but it was enough that her family would never have to worry. Enough to redraw the shape of their future.
But instead of disappearing into luxury, my friend had done something quieter and, to me, more extraordinary: she made a list of people who had been kind to her, people who'd made her life feel a little less heavy.
"I just wanted to do something good for the people who were good to me," she said. "And you were good to me."
That was the part that undid me. Not the meal, not the gift card, not even the wild, dazzling fact that she'd won the kind of money that would change her life. It was the remembering.
The fact that, when she looked back on her life and traced the outlines of kindness, my name surfaced. Until then, I didn't know I'd been a light, even a small one, in someone else's sky.
We're often told that kindness should be given without expecting anything in return, trusting that it will matter in some way. But what a gift it is to know that it truly did — to be remembered not for your accomplishments, possessions, or status but simply for being kind.
I wrote about the experience on Threads, thinking it might touch a few people. Instead, it bloomed. Stories poured in from strangers, sharing what they'd do if they ever came into money. The responses weren't about big, flashy purchases. They were about generosity: paying off a friend's student loans, surprising a single mom with a year of groceries, sending a teacher on vacation.
It was affirming that people still believe in taking care of one another, and even just the fantasy of it was enough to bring people together. The thread warmed something in me I hadn't realized had grown cold. In a world where the gap between the ultrawealthy and the rest of us seems like a canyon, this felt like a bridge.
That night with her has stayed with me, not because of how extravagant it was, but because it was intimate and thoughtful. It's my reminder that kindness lingers.
When we left the restaurant, the evening air felt warmer. My family walked a little lighter. We talked about the food, but mostly we talked about my friend and about what it means to tell people they matter.
That moment planted something in me. A quiet vow: to remember the people who've held me up, even in fleeting ways. To reach out before the moment passes. To let others know they were significant.
Because sometimes the most extraordinary thing isn't winning the lottery. It's realizing you were someone worth remembering.
Read the original article on Business Insider

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


News24
an hour ago
- News24
Eastern Cape woman turns herself in after allegedly killing police officer boyfriend
Be among those who shape the future with knowledge. Uncover exclusive stories that captivate your mind and heart with our FREE 14-day subscription trial. Dive into a world of inspiration, learning, and empowerment. You can only trial once. Start your FREE trial now Show Comments ()


Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Is Working From Home Benefiting Moms — Or Adding To Their Workload?
Work from home mom getty For many, working from home began as a response to a crisis. Now, while many can't imagine their lives without it, for some mothers, it has created a new kind of crisis – one in which they juggle work and family in a never-ending double shift. Scandalous stories of remote workers multitasking two full-time jobs simultaneously don't shock me – I'm a WFM mom. Long before the Covid-19 pandemic, working remotely with a flexible schedule was one of my top priorities. As a twenty-something in the 2010s, I enjoyed the freedom to travel and work at hours when I felt most productive. Then, after I gave birth to my daughter in 2022 as a single mom, working from home was essential for me to be able to thrive in both my career and as a parent, especially as a sole caregiver. I know that I could make a higher income in a more traditional role, but for my situation, the flexibility is well worth the trade-off. Many moms agree. But, I have to wonder – although working from home allows us to 'have it all,' do we end up instead 'doing it all' and taking on even more responsibilities? During the pandemic, moms in heterosexual two-parent families more often shouldered the child care and helped with virtual schooling, even when both parents were working from home. 64 percent of mothers said they were responsible for the majority of child care and only 35 percent of fathers, according to a May 2020 poll. Even when children are physically in the classroom, most work schedules do not match up with school calendars, creating gaps during school breaks as well as afternoons and sick days. Post-pandemic, moms are still taking on more of that care, according to a 2022 Pew Research Center survey, which reported that 78 percent of mothers in two-parent households say they do more when it comes to managing their children's schedules and activities. Another study researching those family dynamics found that both men and women did more housework and child care when they worked from home, but women did proportionally more, even when they had similar work situations. And women who worked from home felt more guilt about conflicting work-family priorities than women who worked in a traditional environment. Likely, you don't need statistics or data from research studies to understand these perspectives. Being a working mom isn't easy, whether you're in an office or working from home. But the inclination to take on ever-increasing responsibilities at home can perpetuate a cycle in which WFM mom are handling so many family and household tasks that they couldn't go back to the office even if they wanted to – at least not without a dramatic redistribution of the work of the home. That's because working from home does free up a substantial amount of time. According to a 2023 study, American workers saved an average of 72 minutes a day by removing the commute to an office. Post-pandemic remote work policies are also credited with keeping more moms in the workforce. On the surface, the advantages of WFH for mothers are undeniable. In addition to saving time commuting, remote work typically with additional flexibility, such as the ability to attend school events. But, just because we can now 'do it all' – is it taking its toll? In addition to the hours of household responsibilities that women take on, it's important to also consider the mental load of balancing home and work priorities simultaneously. As Dr. Regina Lark, author of 'Emotional Labor: Why A Woman's Work is Never Done and What To Do About It,' writes in her book, it is the remembering, reminding, planning, noticing and anticipating that is the invisible work of mental and emotional labor. Dr. Lark gives an example during a phone interview. 'It's not just about making dinner; it's about planning family meals, checking the fridge and pantry to see what you already have and should use, creating a shopping list, purchasing groceries, coordinating family schedules to determine the right time to serve dinner that evening and planning backwards to create a timeline for preparation, cooking and then noticing how each member of the family seems to like the meal to adjust for next time. 'Making dinner' might just sound like one simple task, but it's really an entire project to be overseen.' While individual household tasks may seem small when looked at in silo, additional workload at home leads to decreased productivity at work. A Pew study on working parents showed that 23 percent of working moms (versus 15 percent of working dads) report having turned down a promotion due to juggling work and parenting responsibilities. Wage gaps and career advancement have long-term consequences, as well as furthering the sentiment that there just isn't enough time to do everything that needs to be done. Dr. Lark remarks, "The blurring of boundaries between professional and personal spaces has led to many women working longer hours and still not complete their 'to do' list.' So, what is the solution? Every family has different needs and priorities, there is no one-size-fits-all solution. For myself, a solo parent, it may mean preemptively setting boundaries on where I'll spend my time. I take care of my daughter when she's home sick, but find alternative child care during planned breaks to make sure my work isn't disrupted. I intentionally save my household chores for when my daughter is with me and let her 'help' with the laundry and dishes, so I'm not as distracted by these tasks while I'm working. For WFM mothers with opposite sex partners, Dr. Lark suggests having intentional conversations about sharing all the work of the household. 'Modern households have transformed dramatically, yet the work of running a home still falls disproportionately to women. Women and men need deliberate dialogues to make visible the invisible work of the home by discussing what needs to happen on a daily, weekly, monthly, yearly and occasional basis. Often, one partner thinks they've shared their overwhelm in those moments of frustration, but by having a calm conversation through the course of the relationship -- without blame or resentment -- and simply talk about the work, you can much more effectively create a plan for change." It isn't all on men to step up. Dr. Lark shares that women often struggle with the transition as well. "For women, sometimes the hardest part of letting go of some of this work is the worry that their partner won't do the task as well as they are. And that is likely true. Radical delegation is difficult, but it's the only way to achieve true parity in the home."


New York Times
2 hours ago
- New York Times
William Langewiesche, the ‘Steve McQueen of Journalism,' Dies at 70
William Langewiesche, a magazine writer and author who forged complex narratives with precision-tooled prose that shed fresh light on national security, the occupation of Iraq and, especially, aviation disasters — he was a professional pilot — died on Sunday in East Lyme, Conn. He was 70. Cullen Murphy, his longtime editor at The Atlantic and Vanity Fair, confirmed the death, at the home of a friend, saying the cause was prostate cancer. Mr. Langewiesche (pronounced long-gah-vee-shuh) was one of the most prominent long-form nonfiction writers of recent decades. He was an international correspondent for Vanity Fair, a writer-at-large for The New York Times Magazine and a national correspondent for The Atlantic. For 10 years running, from 1999 to 2008, his pieces were finalists for the National Magazine Award, and he won it twice: in 2007 for 'Rules of Engagement,' about the killing of 24 unarmed civilians by U.S. Marines in 2005 in Haditha, Iraq; and in 2002 for 'The Crash of EgyptAir 990,' about a flight that went down in the Atlantic Ocean in 1999 with the loss of all 217 people aboard. He chose to write often about calamitous events, piecing together a meticulous explanation for what went wrong while portraying the human subjects under his microscope with sympathy. 'At his best there's a sort of cinematic omniscience in the way he writes,' Mr. Murphy said in an interview. 'And so you feel almost as he feels, with your face pressed up against the window watching something unfold, often very rapidly, and often wishing that things would unfold very differently but knowing there's nothing that can be done.' Want all of The Times? Subscribe.