&w=3840&q=100)
IPO-bound Allchem in legal tussle with Alkem over trademark infringement
Sanket Koul New Delhi
Listen to This Article
Vadodara-based Allchem Lifesciences on Friday issued an addendum to its draft red herring prospectus (DRHP) with the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi), highlighting a suit filed by Alkem Laboratories against it in the Delhi High Court.
The suit, filed on 23 April, alleges infringement of Alkem Labs' trademark with respect to the use of the name Allchem by the initial public offering (IPO)-bound company.
In its submission to the Delhi HC, Alkem has sought a permanent injunction on the use of the name 'Allchem' and the offer under this name, along with damages of ₹2 crore for the
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
33 minutes ago
- Mint
Lure of ‘Free Money' in Secondaries Nears a Mania
(Bloomberg) -- Demand for secondary funds focused on private markets is soaring, in part because some investors are seizing on an accounting quirk that allows them to buy assets at a discount and then revalue them at par. It's 'creating this sense that people are just picking up free money, and almost a mania,' Blue Owl Capital Co-Chief Executive Officer Marc Lipschultz said on a call with analysts recently. He said his firm avoids the practice, adding there is still a 'great business to be had being a really thoughtful buyer of secondary interest when you have more sellers today than you've ever had in the past.' The secondary market allows investors to buy or sell stakes in private-asset funds, often at a discount. It's become an increasingly popular solution to the problem that many managers faced at the end of the easy-money era, when higher interest rates made some valuations more difficult to justify — and left them unable to exit investments. Credit is expected to be the fastest-growing part of secondaries for years to come, according to Jefferies Financial Group Inc., which forecasts the number of transactions in the space to grow to more than $17 billion this year from $10 billion last year. The marketplace for fund stakes is drawing more sellers than ever before, pushing up prices, which is tempting more investors to look at disposals. Investors in private credit funds looking for liquidity are now able to shift their positions into the secondary market, clearing a bottleneck in the financing chain. The deadlock started when dealmaking stalled, forcing private company owners to hold on to assets for longer. That meant direct lenders had to extend loans for longer too and wait to cash out, crimping returns for some. One benefit for some buyers is the accounting treatment which allows them to mark up the acquisitions, bolstering the value of the assets. 'It's true that secondary transactions are often completed at a discount to NAV, and yes, that can create an initial unrealized gain for the buyer,' private capital investor Hamilton Lane wrote on its website last month. 'But this isn't artificial. It represents real value and can enhance returns for the fund.' More broadly, the wider secondaries trend has proven fruitful recently. The strategy was the best performing for Blackstone Inc. in the second quarter, the alternative asset manager said in a presentation last month. The firm is considering a standalone pool of capital to buy second-hand private credit funds through its Strategic Partners unit, Bloomberg News reported last month. London-based Coller Capital Ltd. closed a deal for a $3 billion continuation fund with direct lender TPG Twin Brook Capital Partners this past week that will transfer a portfolio of loans from the US firm's previous vintages into a new fund. It's the largest such vehicle in private credit secondaries to date. Other signs of appetite for the strategy include Pantheon, a manager of more than $70 billion, raising three times its original target of $750 million for its third credit secondaries fund. Ares Management Corp., meanwhile, has so far raised more than $3.5 billion for its debut credit secondaries fund and related vehicles, Chief Executive Officer Michael Arougheti said on an earnings call last month. The secondaries group 'remains one of our strongest growth vectors for the foreseeable future,' he said. More stories like this are available on
Indian Express
35 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Trump tariffs: Why gem & jewellery sector fears rivals could undercut Indian exports
Facing a sharp blow from the US' steep tariff hike, India's gem and jewellery export industry has sought government intervention to cushion the impact and sustain its competitiveness in global markets. The sector finds itself at a crossroads, as rivals like Turkey, Vietnam and Thailand continue to enjoy significantly lower tariffs, making Indian products less attractive in the lucrative American market. The US accounts for nearly 30 per cent — or close to $10 billion — of the total gem and jewellery exports. Kirit Bhansali, chairman of the Gem & Jewellery Export Promotion Council (GJEPC), warned that unless corrective action is taken, India risks losing its hard-won position as a key supplier to the US. The threat isn't just financial — it's strategic. Bhansali expressed concern that international trade may start rerouting via low-tariff countries like Mexico, Canada, UAE, Oman and Turkey, undermining transparency and sidelining legitimate Indian players. This is particularly alarming since 85 per cent of exports from the SEEPZ Special Economic Zone — that employs over 50,000 people — are to the US. For cut and polished diamonds, the US remains the market for nearly half of India's total exports. A prolonged tariff standoff, Bhansali warned, could bring the industry to a grinding halt. The industry has asked the government to roll out a targeted scheme — similar to the Duty Drawback — that would reimburse 25–50 per cent of the new US-bound tariff burden between August and December 2025. GJEPC believes this is vital to prevent disruption across the value chain, stretching from artisanal karigars to large-scale manufacturers. In addition to tariff relief, exporters are calling for temporary financial breathing space. They've requested a six-month deferment on interest payments, a measure that echoes the pandemic-era support extended by lending institutions. With cancelled orders threatening to lock up working capital and push units towards non-performing asset (NPA) status, the Council has urged the government to allow SEZ units to release unsold stock into the domestic market. The sector is also grappling with shipment delays triggered by global uncertainty. To address this, banks are being asked to extend pre-shipment loan due dates by 90 days without penalties. The GJEPC has also called for the reintroduction of the interest subvention scheme, which could offer much-needed liquidity during a period of heightened risk. It has asked both the Centre and the RBI to consider short-term relief packages tailored to the sector's needs. Ironically, while the threat looms large, recent data points to a short-term spike in trade. Gross exports of gems and jewellery rose by nearly 16 per cent in July 2025, reaching $2.18 billion (Rs 18,756 crore), up from $1.88 billion (Rs 15,700 crore) a year ago. Imports too surged 26.5 per cent, as traders rushed to complete orders before the tariff hike took effect in August. A similar surge was seen in cut and polished diamond exports, which jumped nearly 18 per cent to $1.07 billion (Rs 9,230 crore), largely due to pre-emptive stocking by global buyers. This uptick, however, may be short-lived. Colin Shah, MD of Kama Jewelry, termed July's performance as a 'cautionary uptick' — a final flourish before the sector feels the full weight of tariff-induced drag. While new trade agreements like the India-UAE CEPA have unlocked opportunities, the broader landscape remains volatile. High gold prices, geopolitical uncertainty, and unstable metal markets continue to cloud the outlook, he said. The festive and wedding seasons in India may help absorb some of the shock by boosting domestic demand. But for the export-reliant segment, all eyes are now on the trajectory of India-US trade negotiations. With the current 50 per cent tariffs in place, sustaining recent growth could prove difficult, and industry leaders are hoping that policymakers will step in before the sparkle fades.
News18
an hour ago
- News18
Gilgit-Baltistan: A New Uprising In Pakistan's ‘Last Colony' Against Oppressive Rule
Last Updated: For decades, GB has sought autonomy, political representation, and development aligned with local needs and ambitions, but has faced growing neglect and exploitation from Pakistan A fresh wave of resistance against the Pakistani state's illegal occupation of the region is being witnessed in Gilgit-Baltistan (GB). The local traders and business community of GB have launched a movement to oppose trade and travel between Pakistan and China via the Khunjerab Pass. This latest protest is the outcome of the relentlessly exploitative economic and political conditions imposed on GB by the Pakistani state. The protest by the traders has come close on the heels of a mass movement by the local residents of GB against the controversial Land Reforms Act, 2025, passed on May 21. For the last four weeks, traders have been continuing with a sit-in at the Karakoram Highway, bringing the region to a standstill. They are demanding recognition of local interests by Islamabad as well as its accountability. To understand GB's tumultuous relationship with Islamabad, it is important to look at the history of this asymmetric and oppressive power dynamic, which continues to disenfranchise, marginalise, and politically erase the identity, aspirations, and future of the people of this region. According to the US-based Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI), Pakistan has treated GB more as a colony rather than as part of the federation. 'The region has long been regarded by Pakistan not as a cherished part of the federation, but as a distant and burdensome periphery. Successive governments have turned a blind eye to the fundamental needs of the humble inhabitants of Gilgit-Baltistan, relegating the region to an ad hoc governance framework administered from afar—governed not by participatory laws, but by decrees handed down from Islamabad," says a recent MEMRI report. The origins of this injustice lie in the 1949 Karachi Agreement. Under this 'agreement", the control of GB (then called Northern Areas) was transferred from Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir (PoJK) to Islamabad without any representative from the region. Since then, Islamabad has directly ruled GB through the Ministry of Kashmir Affairs, using the draconian colonial-era Frontier Crimes Regulation. Its constitutional status remains in limbo as Pakistan has tried to use it to build another false narrative by linking it to the resolution of the Kashmir issue with India. But to deal with growing frustration among the local residents, it introduced limited self-governance reforms to the region, renaming it 'Gilgit and Baltistan' in 2009. However, this move was exposed as hollow; right from the beginning, the GB assembly was systematically populated by 'compliant figureheads or puppets, rather than leaders who dared to interpret their roles with independence and purpose," as emphasised in the MEMRI analysis. For decades, GB has sought autonomy, political representation, and development aligned with local needs and aspirations, but instead has faced growing neglect and exploitative policies from Pakistan. The Pakistani magazine Herald once described Gilgit-Baltistan as Pakistan's 'last colony", a phrase that aptly reflects Islamabad's governing attitude toward the region. Very recently, GB was engulfed in massive demonstrations against the forcibly passed Land Reforms Act, 2025. This legislation was opposed by the people, as it would enable land grabs by Punjabi landlords and the Pakistani military, displace the local population, and exploit natural resources. This law would also intensify military control. As GB is the only region under Pakistan's occupation that has a Shia and Ismaili majority, Islamabad has also undertaken a systematic campaign of altering the demography by opening up the region to outsiders. Now, fed up with increasing federal taxes and deliberate obstacles to local trade, GB traders—backed by a host of local political parties and religious groups—have sustained a resilient sit-in at Sost. This powerful show of solidarity and demand for justice compelled Chief Minister Haji Gulbar Khan and Governor Mehdi Shah to seek federal intervention, leading to the formation of a federal committee to make recommendations for the issue's resolution. The protestors' demands are simple: exemption from income, sales, and other federal taxes on commodities imported from China through the Khunjerab Pass—deemed illegal by traders considering GB's lack of constitutional status—and urgent customs clearance for 280 consignments stuck at Sost Dry Port under a one-time amnesty scheme. Ironically, while Gilgit-Baltistan is considered to be geographically very significant for the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor, Islamabad's treatment of local traders sends a clear message that it is least bothered about the interests of the local population and is only interested in exploiting the strategic position and resources of the region. All routes connecting Pakistan to China, including the critical Karakoram Highway, pass through GB, which should ideally have brought more economic opportunities for the local population. However, in contrast, it has resulted in increased Chinese military presence. This reinforces the fact that Pakistan follows the template of exploiting the region while keeping the people underdeveloped. If the locals dare to express their aspirations, they are handled brutally by the Pakistani military and its death squads. Therefore, the traders' blockade in GB represents more than an economic conflict—it is the roar of a voice silenced for decades from a region long suffering under the thumb of Islamabad's colonial and oppressive policies. The writer is an author and columnist. His X handle is @ArunAnandLive. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect News18's views. Click here to add News18 as your preferred news source on Google. tags : China Kashmir pakistan view comments Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: August 16, 2025, 22:02 IST News opinion Global Watch | Gilgit-Baltistan: A New Uprising In Pakistan's 'Last Colony' Against Oppressive Rule Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
