Taylor Swift to testify in court? Here's what the Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni lawsuit is all about
Pop superstar
Taylor Swift
has been subpoenaed to testify in an ongoing legal case involving her close friend Blake Lively and actor-director Justin
Baldoni
. The case is about a dispute over a failed business venture, and Swift's involvement has added a new layer of media attention to the proceedings.
What is the dispute
The legal battle began when Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni reportedly disagreed over the management and direction of a wellness company they worked on together. According to court documents, the project was meant to focus on mental health and lifestyle content, but things fell apart over creative and financial differences.
#Operation Sindoor
India-Pakistan Clash Live Updates| Pak moving troops to border areas? All that's happening
Why India chose to abstain instead of 'No Vote' against IMF billion-dollar funding to Pakistan
How Pak's jihadi general Munir became trapped in his own vice
Also Read:
'Intoxicated, trapped': Woman testifies against ex-junior Canada hockey players in 2018 sexual assault case
Continue to video
5
5
Next
Stay
Playback speed
1x Normal
Back
0.25x
0.5x
1x Normal
1.5x
2x
5
5
/
Why is Swift involved
Taylor Swift has been asked to testify because of her close friendship with Lively and her alleged informal role in early discussions about the project. Legal documents show that Swift attended meetings and exchanged messages with both Lively and Baldoni during the early phases of the business idea.
Lawyers believe her testimony could shed light on what was said during those informal conversations, including any promises or verbal agreements that may have been made.
Swift's legal team responds
Swift's legal representatives have not confirmed whether she will appear in court but acknowledged the subpoena. In a brief statement, they said Swift "has no direct involvement in the business dealings" and is being brought in only as a witness. They added that she respects the legal process and will cooperate as required.
Live Events
Media and public reaction
The news of Swift's possible court appearance has sparked a wave of online buzz. Fans of the pop icon are expressing concern and support for her. Meanwhile, the entertainment industry is watching closely, as the case could highlight celebrities' risks when mixing personal friendships with business ventures.
Blake Lively and Taylor Swift have been close friends for years, often seen vacationing together and publicly supporting each other's work. Justin Baldoni is best known for starring in the TV show Jane the Virgin and directing films such as Five Feet Apart.
Also Read:
Kosmos 482 falls to Earth: lost Soviet Venus probe finally comes home
What's next
The case is ongoing, and court proceedings will continue over the coming months. Whether Taylor Swift will take the stand remains uncertain, but her name, now being officially tied to the case, has already drawn considerable attention.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Pink Villa
12 minutes ago
- Pink Villa
Blake Lively Lands Big Win Against Justin Baldoni as ‘Sham' 400 Million USD Counter Lawsuit Gets Tossed Out
Justin Baldoni has lost a major footing in his claims against It Ends With Us co-star Blake Lively, amid their ongoing feud about the happenings on the film set. On June 9 local time, a judge dismissed the director's 400 million USD defamation case against the actress. The original counter lawsuit stood against the leading lady of the film and her famous husband, Ryan Reynolds, who can now breathe a sigh of relief. According to Variety, it was a judge named Lewis J. Liman who stopped the defamation lawsuit from taking root by dismissing it, earning Blake Lively a long-awaited win. Justin Baldoni 's other claims included extortion from him, but those have all gone down the drain. It's not all negative, however, as he has been allowed to refile a couple of other claims and make changes to some of his allegations. Blake Lively's side reacts to dismissal of defamation case filed by Justin Baldoni The lawyers for the actress were in a celebratory mood, counting it as a 'total victory' in their fight against the 41-year-old star. They say that it's a release from the 'abusive litigation', and look forward to receiving attorneys' fees, treble damages and punitive damages, the next time around. 'As we have said from day one, this '$400 million' lawsuit was a sham, and the Court saw right through it', they added. What does the judge's new ruling mean? The dismissal not only benefits Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds, but also Leslie Sloane and The New York Times, who were previously implicated in the filing of the lawsuit. Initially, the Jane the Virgin actor meant to shove away Blake Lively, her husband and her publicist, by claiming that the allegations of s*xual harassment and trying to ruin her career with a smear campaign were all false. It has now been ruled that Blake Lively's accusations were legally protected.
Mint
22 minutes ago
- Mint
Sharmishta Panoli row: Wajahat Khan Qadri, man who filed case against influencer, arrested in Kolkata
The Kolkata Police on Monday arrested Wajahat Khan Qadri, the man who filed a case against social media influencer and law student Sharmistha Panoli, reported India Today. According to the Kolkata Police, Khan's police complaint led to the arrest of the social media influencer. Khan was allegedly on the run since 1 June after a series of raids. Earlier, a case was registered against Wajahat Khan at the Golf Green Police Station in Kolkata for allegedly spreading hate speech and hurting religious sentiments via his social media activity. Despite the police serving Khan three notices at his Garden Reach residence and directing him to appear for questioning, he remained on the run until his arrest. Khan's arrest comes amid mounting controversy over Panoli's arrest, who was held from Gurugram on 30 May by Kolkata Police, following a controversial video she posted on social media which drew strong reactions. In the video, she allegedly criticised Bollywood celebrities for staying silent on Operation Sindoor. After intense trolling and threats in the comments, Panoli removed the video and issued a public apology on 15 May. Earlier on 3 June, the Calcutta High Court had rejected the interim bail plea of Panoli. On 2 June, Shree Ram Swabhiman Parishad filed a formal complaint against Wajahat Khan with the Kolkata Police, accusing him of using derogatory, inflammatory, and sexually explicit language targeting Hindu deities, religious traditions, and the community at large. In the letter to the Officer-in-Charge of the Garden Reach Police Station, Shree Ram Swabhiman Parishad alleged that Khan in his social media posts referred Hindus by using terms including "rapist cultures" and "urine drinkers". The Hindu body requested the police to take action against Khan under sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Information Technology Act.
Time of India
33 minutes ago
- Time of India
Centre approves additional amount of Rs 25 cr as compensation for houses damaged by Pakistan's shelling
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel The Centre on Monday approved an additional amount of Rs 25 crore as compensation for houses damaged in the border areas of Jammu and Kashmir due to Pakistani shelling during Operation Sindoor Prime Minister Narendra Modi recently announced the additional compensation amount for the houses damaged by Pakistani a special case, Modi said an additional compensation amount of Rs 2 lakh will be given for each fully-damaged house and Rs 1 lakh for each partially-damaged the prime minister's announcement, Union Home Minister Amit Shah ensured swift action by facilitating an additional provision of Rs 25 crore from the Ministry of Home Affairs for 2,060 houses, an official statement said.A similar compensation amount will also be provided in the border areas of Punjab, it home minister visited the border district of Poonch in Jammu and Kashmir on May the visit, he handed over appointment letters on compassionate grounds to the family members of those who lost their lives due to the cross-border to norms, compensation for the damage caused by the cross-border shelling was provided Operation Sindoor, several incidents of cross-border shelling were reported from the border districts of the Union Territory of Jammu and of families suffered due to the shelling on residential areas, schools, religious structures, including gurdwaras, temples and mosques, and commercial administration took proactive measures to anticipate possible events and ensure an effective response.A total of 3.25 lakh people were evacuated from the border districts, of whom about 15,000 were accommodated in 397 shelter sheds and accommodation centres, equipped with facilities like food, water, healthcare services, electricity etc.A total of 394 ambulances were deployed in the border districts to ferry patients to hospitals, including 62 ambulances in Poonch alone, the statement said.A total of 2,818 civil-defence volunteers were also deployed for services related to health, fire and emergency, livestock, essential supplies etc., it added. PTI
